Initially, the stage of ashwagandha addition was optimized and it was determined that adding the powder before heating of milk was satisfactory (Table 1). Ashwagandha powder was incorporated and subjected to sensory evaluation in various concentrations of 0.2%, 0.4%, 0.6%, 0.8% and 1.5%.
Sensory analysis
On analysis of paneer samples, it was observed that the highest and lowest scores for different parameters were found for different samples (Table 2). For color and appearances,the maximum value was observed in T
2 and the minimum in T
5 .A similar result was found in turmeric-fortified paneer (
Chandrakant, 2021). For body and texture, T
0, T
1 and T
2 had the same score and minimum for T
5 because of its hard body and texture. For flavor, T
2‚ had a higher score as compared to other samples. As a result, an increase in the concentration of ashwagandha powder in the paneer can result in a decrease in the acceptability of the paneer.T
2‚ had the highest score for mouthfeel whereas T
5 had the least. It is also mentioned that ashwagandha powder has a potent flavor; as a result, a higher concentration can have a negative impact on mouthfeel.
From the overall analysis, T
2 (8.37±0.25) received a higher overall acceptability rating. The body and texture of T
2 were found to be similar to that of the control sample and with 0.4% addition, ashwagandha’s mildly bitter flavor did not overpower the paneer sample.The optimized product was studied in three milk variants, full cream, toned and cow milk.
Physico-chemical analysis of paneer
Moisture
According to BIS standards, the moisture of the paneer should be a maximum of 60% and the above samples meet the requirement. The highest content was observed for the control sample (51.42±0.20%) and the lowest was observed for FCMP (47.53±0.22%) (p<0.05) (Table 3). The incorporation of ashwagandha powder has reduced the moisture content of paneer significantly.
Modi et al., (2023) studied the effect of ashwagandha incorporation on physico-chemical traits of basundi. Moisture content decreases from 54.7 to 52.62% with decreasing quantity of ashwagandha powder.
Total solid content
The total solid content was found to be highest in FCMP (52.47±0.22) and lowest in the control sample (48.58±0.20%) (p<0.05). The total solid increased with the increase in the addition of ashwagandha powder (Table 3).
Veer et al., (2019a) observed an increased total solid content from 34.60 to 35.80 % with an ashwagandha powder from 0 to 4 %, resp. in shrikhand.
Fat
Paneer samples supplemented with ashwagandha differed significantly in terms of fat content due to the use of milk variants with different fat content. The control had the highest fat content of 24.49±0.20% followed by FCMP, CMP and TMP (p<0.05) (Table 3). According to
Kumari and Gupta, (2016), ashwagandha root powder has a fat content of 0.3 g per 100 g, hence the addition of 0.4% ashwagandha powder does not affect the paneer’s fat content.
Baliram, (2018) observed a negligible variation in fat content (8.25 to 8.23%) upon increasing ashwagandha powder content from 0 to 1%.
Protein
FCMP had a protein content of 20.57±0.05% followed by control, TMP and CMP (p<0.05) (Table 3).
Karadbhajne and Bhoyarkar, (2010) reported that the protein content of ashwagandha powder was 3.45%. It can be inferred from the analysis that the addition of ashwagandha had no significant effect on the protein content of paneer.
Baliram, (2018) also observed a negligible increase in the protein content of shrikhand. 9.11% of protein content in shrikhand was increased to 9.13% on addition of 1% ashwagandha powder.
Ash content
The highest value of ash content value was observed in FCMP 2.24±0.03% followed by control, CMP and TMP (p<0.05) (Table 3), which contains several constituents including alkaloids and phenolic compounds and is also high in iron content.
Oraon, (2014) observed a rise in mineral composition (1.85 to 2.14%) with a respective increasing ashwagandha content (0 to 0.3%)
Titratable acidity (TA) (% Lactic acid)
The highest TA was observed in the control sample (0.17±0.01%). The FCMP, TMP and CMP had 0.15±0.02%, 0.13±0.02% and 0.16±0.01%, resp. (p<0.05). As per BIS regulations, TA (max.) of paneer is 0.50% but no any analyzed samples had TA up to it. This could be due to the lower initial acidity of milk and the concentration of coagulant used (Table 3).
Jayasinghe et al., (2023) also observed 0.15% acidity in paneer sample coagulated with citric acid.
Free fatty acid (FFA) (% Oleic acid)
FFA analysis provides a measure of the hydrolytic rancidity of paneer. FFA content in the control sample (0.55±0.02%), followed by TMP, FCMP and CMP(p<0.05) (Table 3). Withan addition of ashwagandha the FFA content was constant and so increased stability against lipolytic changes during storage. Similar findings were noted by
Oraon, (2014) in ashwagandha fortified basundi.
Antioxidant activity
An antioxidative activity of paneer samples was determined by DPPH inhibiting capacity and TPC (Table 4).
Kumari and Gupta, (2016) studied about the polyphenols content (19.0 mg) and % DPPH inhibition (67.16%) of dehydrated ashwagandha root powder. This present study showed a significant increase in antioxidative properties of paneer than the control sample. FCMP (46.08±0.03%) showed the highest activity followed by CMP (42.75±0.06%), TMP (34.49±0.09%) and control (26.47±0.11%).
Kumar et al., (2024) compared a TPC and % DPPH inhibition of control (negligible and 75.67±0.02%, resp.) and ashwagandha added ghee (62.85±0.02 and 83.9±0.02, resp.). As per
Vijayakumar, (2011), the antioxidant activity of ashwagandha ethanolic extract (67.70%) is higher than its aqueous equivalent (49.93%).
Total phenolic content (µg GAE/g)
Ashwagandha contains phyto-steroid withanolides and withaferins, which help to increase the phenolic content on fortification. The FCMP 22.42±0.44 µgGAE/g had the highest phenol concentration. Whereas control had 18.55±0.26µgGAE/g, TMPhad 18.28±0.13 µgGAE/g and CMP had 19.55±0.39 µgGAE/g.
Vijayakumar, (2011) evaluated that the ethanolic extract of ashwagandha had a phenolic value of 23.95 µg GAE/gm while aqueous extract had 20.88 µgGAE/gm.
Texture analysis
Primary textural properties are hardness, cohesiveness and springiness while secondary properties are gumminess, chewiness and adhesiveness. The evaluated data over a period of 7 days for these properties has been depicted in (Table 5) and all are significantly differed (p<0.05).
The hardness (g) value of all the prepared and control sample was found to be increased. On 0
th and 7
th days of study, TMP (145.29±2.84 and 148.63±0.08, resp.) showed the highest value for it followed by control (128.57±3.25 and 134.37±1.25, resp.), FCMP (125.41±2.65 and132.42±0.23, resp.) and CMP (120.42±3.03 and 124.62±0.20, resp.) There was a significant increase from 8.331 to 14.223 kg. in the hardness of paneer samples in storage (7 days) under refrigerated conditions which showed agreement with findings of
Dongare et al., (2019).
The highest and lowest values for cohesiveness were found in control (0.54±0.02) and TMP (0.37±0.01), resp. Obtained results showed decreased cohesiveness in control sample (0.54±0.12 to 0.43±0.07) while increased in treated samples [FCM (0.43±0.09 to 0.57±0.02), TMP (0.37±0.08 to 0.45±0.01) and CMP (0.64±0.11 to 0.75± 0.01) over a period of 7 days. The variation in cohesiveness value can be due to different milk compositions used for paneer manufacturing.
Uprit and Mishra, (2004) stated that the nature of the protein matrix and the extent of fat dispersion in paneer contribute to cohesiveness.
The springiness (mm) of the control sample was found to decrease at highest extent from 1.24±0.32 to 0.87±0.03 during study. All other treated samples also showed decreasing trend for springiness at low extent.
Husain, (2016) in ashwagandha-fortified Sandesh found decreasing trend from 0.664 (control) to 0.570 (treated).
The gumminess (N) of the control (0.68±0.03) sample was observed to decrease (0.67±0.07), whereas,all treated samples
viz. CMP, TMP and FCMP found to increase from 0.75±0.04 to 0.91±0.01, 0.53±0.04 to 0.66±0.02 and FCMP 0.53±0.09 to 0.73±0.02, resp. during storage period. Similar results were reported by
Sharath and Divya, (2020) in paneer samples prepared using citric acid as a coagulant.
Over a storage period, chewiness (g) of Control was found to be decreased from 83.80±2.76 to 80.56±1.03, TMP 36.11±2.17 to 30.72±0.67, CMP 56.04±3.85 to 54.47 ±1.31, whereas increased from 56.90±3.21 to 72.94±2.63 in FCMP sample. Chewiness depends on characteristics like the composition of milk, moisture and fat contents. According to
Sindhu et al., (2000), paneer tends to be chewier when it has more protein and calcium content.
Husain, (2016) found that the addition of ashwagandhain Sandesh reduced the chewiness from 68.8 kg to 60.91 kg.
An adhesiveness (Nm) of the all the analysed sample was found to bedecreases like, in control from -2.26±-0.04 to -2.03±0.11, in CMP -3.36±-0.21 to -2.83±-0.02, in TMP -3.24±-0.15 to-2.83±-0.02 and in FCMP -2.56±-0.12 to -1.95±-0.03.
Prakashrao, (2013) reported that the adhesiveness of paneer decreases from -3.983±0.616 to -0.606±0.061 upon storage of 21 days under refrigeration conditions for a long period.
Microbial analysis
Microbial analysis was carried out within the permitted range during 7 days storage (Table 6). BIS standards for microbial content of paneer are <5×10
5/g total plate count, <250 g yeast and mold and <50/g coliform count. From the analyzed data, it can be inferred that all the samples had TPC under BIS standards over a period of 0
th to 7
th daysfrom 3.63±0.37 to 6.39±0.53 (cfu/g × 10
3) in control, 2.43±0.20 to 3.53±0.23(cfu/g × 10
3) in FCMP, 2.53±0.37 to 10.33±0.15 (cfu/g × 10
3) in TMP and 2.6±0.10 to 20.5±0.10 (cfu/g × 10
3) in CMP, resp. The results observed for the Standard plate count of samples were below the range of FSSAI standards
i.e. 1.5 × 10
5 to 3.5 × 10
5 cfu/g. A similar trend was reported in ashwagandha fortified ice cream (
Veer et al., 2019b). The yeast andmold count was not detected in the control sample and FCMP. While TMP and CMP had 1.30±0.26 cfu/g × 10
1 and 2.46±0.25 cfu/g × 10
1, resp on day 0. Whereas on 7
th day, control, FCMP, TMP and CMP showed 2.6±0.34 cfu/g × 10
1, 2.23±0.25 cfu/g × 10
1, 2.60±0.26 cfu/g × 10
1 and 3.43±0.30, resp.
Husain, (2016) reported similar findings in ashwagandha-fortified Sandesh.
Oraon, (2014) observed similar findings in ashwagandha-fortified Basundi. There was no coliform count in the samples over a storage. The results were in agreement with the findings of
Janardan, (2019).
Babayi et al., (2004) reported that the methanolic extract of ashwagandha has inhibitory action against
Staphylococcus aureus and
E. coli. The main variables affecting the paneer’s microbiological quality are its moisture content, milk quality, manufacturing process and storage conditions.