Drought stress significantly reduced SPAD-chlorophyll value. Data showed that maximum SPAD-chlorophyll (47.17) was observed where drought applied at the vegetative stage while minimum SPAD-chlorophyll value was observed under DS conditions (Table 1). Regarding the foliar application of SNP maximum SPAD-chlorophyll value was observed where 200µM SNP was applied. However, the minimum value was recorded with water spray (control). The interaction effect of SNP doses and drought growth stage was found to be non-significant in both years of study (Table 1).
Likewise, the maximum relative water content (RWC) value was found where drought applied at the vegetative stage which was at par with all other drought treatments except control where no irrigation was applied. However, a minimum RWC value was observed with control (Table 1). Regarding the foliar application of SNP, the maximum RWC was recorded when 200 µm was sprayed while; the minimum RWC was found with water spray. The interaction effect was observed non-significant in both years of study (Table 1). The membrane stability index (MSI) is an important indicator of drought stress. Higher MSI was noted in plots where drought was applied at the vegetative stage and was at par with other drought treatments except control (Table 1). However, considerably lesser MSI was observed where no irrigation was applied. Regarding SNP application, maximum MSI value was observed in all SNP treatments except with water spray while, the interaction effect was found to be non-significant in both years of study (Table 1). The number of pods per plant (NPP) was found more where drought was applied at the vegetative and flowering stages while NPP was minimal where drought was applied at grain formation and pod formation stages and controlled treatment where no irrigation was applied throughout the season (Table 1). Foliar application of SNP had a significant effect in improving NPP under drought stress and maximum NPP was recorded in treatment where 200 µM of SNP was applied while minimum NPP was recorded in treatment with water spray. The interaction effect remained non-significant for both years of study (Table 1).
Drought stress significantly reduced hundred seed weight (HSW) and minimum HSW was recorded in plots where groundnut was grown as rainfed while, maximum HSW was recorded where drought was imposed at the vegetative stage (Table 2). Foliar application of SNP has improved the adverse effect of drought and maximum HSW was recorded with foliar application of 200 µM SNP which was at par with all other SNP treatments while minimum HSW was recorded in treatments where water was sprayed (Table 2). Their interaction was recorded to be non-significant for both years of the study. Maximum pod yield (PY) was observed when DS was applied at the vegetative stage while minimum PY was observed in plots where no irrigation was applied (Table 2). Foliar application of SNP improved PY and maximum PY was obtained from plots treated with 200 µM SNP while, minimum PY was observed with water spray during 2
nd year of study.
The DS and exogenous application of SNP had a significant effect on kernel yield (KY) and biological yield (BY) during both years of investigation. Data showed that maximum KY and BY were recorded when drought was imposed at vegetative stages in groundnut which was at par with all treatments of drought imposition at various growth stages. However, minimum KY and BY were recorded in controlled treatment where groundnut was grown under rainfed conditions (Table 2). Foliar application of SNP improved both KY and BY in all drought-treated plots. However, foliar application of 200 µM SNP significantly produced higher KY and BY which was at par with other levels of SNP compared with controlled treatments which produced minimum KY and BY in both years of study. The interaction effect for these traits was found to be non-significant during both years (Table 2).
The DS and foliar application of SNP had a significant effect on shelling percentage (SP) and harvest index (HI) during both years of experimentation. More SP and HI were found in plots where drought was applied at the vegetative stage while less SP and HI were found in control plots where no irrigation was applied to groundnut. Foliar application of SNP significantly improved both SP and HI and maximum SP and HI were recorded with foliar application of 200 µM SNP while, minimum SP and HI were recorded with water spray during both years. Statistically non-significant interaction was recorded for SP and HI during both years (Table 3).
The results depicted that DS imposed at different growth stages of peanut and varying doses of SNP had statistically significant impact on yield contributing traits and kernel yield, whereas their interaction showed a non-significant effect for oil contents (OC) and protein contents (PC) (Table 3). The results also indicated that the highest and most significant OC were recorded in plots where DS was imposed at the grain formation stage followed by DS employed at the grain formation stage. However, the highest PC were recorded in plots where DS was imposed at the vegetative stage. Contrastingly, the minimum OC and PC were recorded in plots where crops were grown under drought conditions. Foliar application of SNP improved the quality of groundnut; however, foliar application of 300 µm SNP produced more OC and PC compared with other SNP levels while less OC and PC were recorded with water was sprayed during years of investigation (Table 3).
Groundnut is an important oil seed crop grown throughout the world in tropical and subtropical regions for human consumption due to its high nutritive value with 25% protein and 50% oil contents
(Banka et al., 2024). The DS at various growth stages adversely affects peanut yield by interrupting different morphological, physiological, biochemical and anatomical processes. Likewise, DS at various growth stages in peanuts significantly affected SPAD-chlorophyll value, relative water contents and MSI in the current investigation and peanuts grown with no irrigation significantly reduced all these traits however, foliar application of SNP significantly improved relative water contents, SPAD-chlorophyll value and MSI. The DS reduces turgor pressure in phloem vessels, thereby increasing the sucrose viscosity to limit its flow through the conducting cells toward the sinks
(Yasir et al., 2023). Regarding the foliar application of SNP, a maximum SPAD-chlorophyll value was observed where 200µM SNP was applied. The increase in chlorophyll contents by foliar application might be due to the ROS inhibition or maintain the photosynthetic mechanism stability
(Tian et al., 2015). The SNP plays a significant role in protecting membrane damage, sequestering Na+ ions in the vacuole and improving cell wall repair and all these are related to improving antioxidant defense systems (
Pokhrel and Dubey, 2013). Foliar application of SNP also improves plant tolerance to osmotic stress in many plants. SNP increases the chlorophyll content in plant leaves, hence playing an important role in the greening of seedlings
(Zhang et al., 2007). It also regulates stomatal opening and closing through ABA signaling
(Laxalt et al., 2016). Membrane stability is an important drought indicator and is adversely affected by DS and in the current study, MSI was significantly reduced which might be due to increased variation in protein contents of the cell membrane, which had increased the permeability of the cell membrane
(Pooja et al., 2020). However, foliar application of SNP improved the MSI under DS which might be due to lesser leakage of electrolytes
(Ahmad et al., 2022). The DS caused a significant reduction in RWC in the current study which is in line with the previous study conducted by
Wasaya et al. (2021). Foliar application of SNP improved RWC in peanut crops and a significantly 16% higher RWC was recorded with 200 µM application of SNP compared with control in the current investigation which might be because of more proline content which coincides with improvements in RWC under DS and maintained water balance in plants (
dos Santos et al., 2022).
Hundred seed weight was increased when 200 µM SNP was applied while less HSW was recorded with control in this study. More HSW was observed when DS was applied at the vegetative stage while less HSW was found when drought was applied at the reproductive stages. The reduced HSW at pod and grain development stages might be owing to stress-induced reduced ability of kernel to serve as a sink which led to a serious decline in seed weight
(Ahmad et al., 2024). Likewise, the incidence of DS at the seed-filling stage promoted senescence and reduced the duration of seed-filling along with disrupting the source-sink relationship
(Hossain et al., 2024). Application of 200 µM SNP increased kernel yield compared with other treatments. Similar to our findings, it has been reported that DSboosted the endogenous ABA levels which adversely affected the potential of reproductive parts to acquire the assimilates. Additionally, DS-induced increment in the biosynthesis and accumulation of non-reducing sugars resulted in ovary abortion, suboptimal grain weight set and reduced grain yield
(Ahmad et al., 2022). Moreover, DS has been reported to be associated with a reduction in water potential which suppressed acid invertase activity in seeds and sucrose import to the seed was inhibited
(Farooq et al., 2017). Particularly, DS suppressed the vegetative growth of cereals through a reduction in leaf water content (
El Sabagh et al., 2019), which disrupted the stomatal conductance and the rate of the photosynthesis process declined. Another disadvantage associated with reduced stomatal was elevation in leaf temperatures, which ultimately triggered the leaf wilting
(Farooq et al., 2017). Contrarily, SNP being a prime signaling molecule exhibited the potential for improving the growth and physiological function of plants under water-limited conditions, by elevating water potential under osmotic stress, which could be a possible reason for increasing grain and biomass yield
(Iqbal et al., 2025). The NO plays a pivotal role in plant developmental processes, including seed germination, plant development, photosynthesis, stomatal movement and recovery of cell membrane and increases chlorophyll synthesis and declines chlorophyll degradation of plants which ultimately improves grain yield under stress conditions
(Ahmad et al., 2024).
Similar to our findings, it was inferred that water-limited conditions restricted the accumulation of seed constituents (protein and starch) by inhibiting the biosynthesis of enzymes and proteins along with reducing seed weight and seed yield
(Ochatt et al., 2015). Akin to our findings concerning the seed quality traits, it was reported that seed protein quality was largely a genotypic trait, however, DS caused degradation and decline of seed protein content. To cope with DSconditions, SNP application remained effective in promoting the morphological traits of crop plants along with supporting the vital physiological processes which led to improved seed protein content. Moreover, our findings were in concurrence with previously reported results whereby SNP application enhanced the enzymatic activity under DS that increased the oil contents
(Farooq et al., 2017).