Banner
Current IssueEditorial BoardOnline First ArticlesArchive
Current IssueEditorial BoardOnline First ArticlesArchive

Research Article

volume 43 issue 1 (february 2020) : 105-110,   Doi: 10.18805/LR-4062

Nitrogen use efficiency, economic return and yield performance of Pigeonpea [Cajanus cajan (L.) Millsp.] as influenced by nipping and fertility levels

A
A.K. Dhaka
S
Satish Kumar
B
Bhagat Singh
K
Karmal Singh
A
Amit Kumar
N
Navish Kumar
1Department of Agronomy, CCS Haryana Agricultural University, Hisar-125 004, Haryana, India.

  • Submitted18-07-2018|

  • Accepted30-08-2018|

  • First Online 13-02-2019|

  • doi 10.18805/LR-4062

Cite article:- Dhaka A.K., Kumar Satish, Singh Bhagat, Singh Karmal, Kumar Amit, Kumar Navish (2019). Nitrogen use efficiency, economic return and yield performance of Pigeonpea [Cajanus cajan (L.) Millsp.] as influenced by nipping and fertility levels. Legume Research. 43(1): 105-110. doi: 10.18805/LR-4062.

ABSTRACT

An experiment was conducted to study nitrogen use efficiency in pigeonpea at Research farm, CCS Haryana Agricultural University, Hisar, India having three nipping treatments (no nipping, nipping at just start of branching and nipping at flower initiation) and five fertility levels (control, 20 kg N + 40 kg P2O5/ha, 30 kg N + 40 kg P2O5 /ha, 40 kg N + 40 kg P2O5/ha and 20 kg N + 40 kg P2O5/ha + foliar spray of 2% N immediately after nipping) replicated thrice in split plot design during growing seasons of 2016 and 2017. Nipping at start of branching reduced the plant height, while increased primary and secondary branches, pods/plant and yield over no nipping. Significantly higher total N uptake, protein content, net return, B: C, agronomical NUE, physiologic NUE, agro-physiologic NUE, apparent recovery efficiency, utilization efficiency of N and partial N balance were improved with nipping at start of branching. Among fertility levels, 40 kg N + 40 kg P2O5 / ha recorded significantly higher yield attributes with 39.7 per cent higher seed yield over control. Significantly higher agronomic NUE, physiologic NUE, agro-physiological NUE, apparent recovery efficiency, utilization efficiency of N, partial N balance and NER were recorded with 20 kg/ha as compared to higher nitrogen doses. 

REFERENCES

  1. Chandewar, K.B., Khawale, V.S., Jiotode, D.J., Pagar, P.C. and Upakar, A.L. (2016). Effect of fertilizer levels and mepiquat chloride on growth, yield and nutrient uptake of pigeonpea. Journal of Soils and Crops, 26 (2): 238-242.
  2. Dahatonde, B. N. and Nalamwar R.V. (1996). Effect of nitrogen and irrigation levels on yield and water use of French bean (Phaseolus vulgaris). Indian Journal of Agronomy, 4: 265-268.
  3. Imayavaramban, V., Singaravel, R., Thanunathan.K.andManickam.G. (2002).Studies on the effect of different plant densities of sesame. Crop Research, 24 (2): 314- 316
  4. Kumar, E. S., Channaveerswami, A. S., Merwade, M. N., Naik,V. R. and Krishna, A.(2018). Influence of nipping and hormonal sprays on growth and seed yield in field bean [(Lablab purpureus (L.) Sweet] Genotypes.International Journal of Economic Plants, 5 (1), 008-014.
  5. Lakshmi, J., Gowda, R., Parashivamurthy, Narayanaswamy, S. and Shivanandan, V.N., (2015). Influence of pre – flowering pinching and Maleic hydrazide spray on plant growth, seed yield and quality attributes in fenugreek. Legume Research, 38 (3): 353–357.
  6. Mishra, G. C. and Nayak, S. C. (1997).Effect of sowing date and row spacing on seed on production of Jute genotypes with and without clipping. Indian Journal of Agronomy, 42 (3): 531- 534
  7. Singh MS and S. Devi (2006). Profitability of nipping in cultivation of pea (Pisum sativum) An indigenous agro-technique in Manipur. Indian Journal of Agronomy, 51 (3):206- 208.
  8. Singh, Umesh.,Prahraj. Chandra. Shekhar.Parihaar. A. K., Singh. S. S. and Shivran. R. K. (2016). Kheti ( November, 2016) published by ICAR, p.: 28- 37.
  9. Singh. H. and Diwakar.B. (1995).Chickpea botany and production practices. ICRISAT. Skill Development Series No. 16.
  10. Sushant, R.S. Dixit and G. Singh. (1999). Effect of irrigation, nitrogen and phosphorus on seed yield and water use of rajmash (Phaseolus vulgaris). Indian Journal of Agronomy, 44: 382-388.
  11. Thompson, Helen. (2012). Food science deserves a place at the table – US agricultural research chief aims to raise the profile of farming and nutrition science. Nature, July 12.
  12. Vasudevan, S.N., Sudarshan, J.S., Kurdikeri, M.B. and Dharmatti, P.R.(2008). Influence of pinching of apical bud and chemical sprays on seed yield and quality of fenugreek. Karnataka Journal of Agricultural Sciences, 21(1), 26–29. 
Published In
Legume Research
Article Metrics
Metrics Icon
0
Views
0
Citations
Reviewed By
Share Article
Download Article
In this Article
    Contact us
    Follow us

    Research Article

    volume 43 issue 1 (february 2020) : 105-110,   Doi: 10.18805/LR-4062

    Nitrogen use efficiency, economic return and yield performance of Pigeonpea [Cajanus cajan (L.) Millsp.] as influenced by nipping and fertility levels

    A
    A.K. Dhaka
    S
    Satish Kumar
    B
    Bhagat Singh
    K
    Karmal Singh
    A
    Amit Kumar
    N
    Navish Kumar
    1Department of Agronomy, CCS Haryana Agricultural University, Hisar-125 004, Haryana, India.

    • Submitted18-07-2018|

    • Accepted30-08-2018|

    • First Online 13-02-2019|

    • doi 10.18805/LR-4062

    Cite article:- Dhaka A.K., Kumar Satish, Singh Bhagat, Singh Karmal, Kumar Amit, Kumar Navish (2019). Nitrogen use efficiency, economic return and yield performance of Pigeonpea [Cajanus cajan (L.) Millsp.] as influenced by nipping and fertility levels. Legume Research. 43(1): 105-110. doi: 10.18805/LR-4062.

    ABSTRACT

    An experiment was conducted to study nitrogen use efficiency in pigeonpea at Research farm, CCS Haryana Agricultural University, Hisar, India having three nipping treatments (no nipping, nipping at just start of branching and nipping at flower initiation) and five fertility levels (control, 20 kg N + 40 kg P2O5/ha, 30 kg N + 40 kg P2O5 /ha, 40 kg N + 40 kg P2O5/ha and 20 kg N + 40 kg P2O5/ha + foliar spray of 2% N immediately after nipping) replicated thrice in split plot design during growing seasons of 2016 and 2017. Nipping at start of branching reduced the plant height, while increased primary and secondary branches, pods/plant and yield over no nipping. Significantly higher total N uptake, protein content, net return, B: C, agronomical NUE, physiologic NUE, agro-physiologic NUE, apparent recovery efficiency, utilization efficiency of N and partial N balance were improved with nipping at start of branching. Among fertility levels, 40 kg N + 40 kg P2O5 / ha recorded significantly higher yield attributes with 39.7 per cent higher seed yield over control. Significantly higher agronomic NUE, physiologic NUE, agro-physiological NUE, apparent recovery efficiency, utilization efficiency of N, partial N balance and NER were recorded with 20 kg/ha as compared to higher nitrogen doses. 

    REFERENCES

    1. Chandewar, K.B., Khawale, V.S., Jiotode, D.J., Pagar, P.C. and Upakar, A.L. (2016). Effect of fertilizer levels and mepiquat chloride on growth, yield and nutrient uptake of pigeonpea. Journal of Soils and Crops, 26 (2): 238-242.
    2. Dahatonde, B. N. and Nalamwar R.V. (1996). Effect of nitrogen and irrigation levels on yield and water use of French bean (Phaseolus vulgaris). Indian Journal of Agronomy, 4: 265-268.
    3. Imayavaramban, V., Singaravel, R., Thanunathan.K.andManickam.G. (2002).Studies on the effect of different plant densities of sesame. Crop Research, 24 (2): 314- 316
    4. Kumar, E. S., Channaveerswami, A. S., Merwade, M. N., Naik,V. R. and Krishna, A.(2018). Influence of nipping and hormonal sprays on growth and seed yield in field bean [(Lablab purpureus (L.) Sweet] Genotypes.International Journal of Economic Plants, 5 (1), 008-014.
    5. Lakshmi, J., Gowda, R., Parashivamurthy, Narayanaswamy, S. and Shivanandan, V.N., (2015). Influence of pre – flowering pinching and Maleic hydrazide spray on plant growth, seed yield and quality attributes in fenugreek. Legume Research, 38 (3): 353–357.
    6. Mishra, G. C. and Nayak, S. C. (1997).Effect of sowing date and row spacing on seed on production of Jute genotypes with and without clipping. Indian Journal of Agronomy, 42 (3): 531- 534
    7. Singh MS and S. Devi (2006). Profitability of nipping in cultivation of pea (Pisum sativum) An indigenous agro-technique in Manipur. Indian Journal of Agronomy, 51 (3):206- 208.
    8. Singh, Umesh.,Prahraj. Chandra. Shekhar.Parihaar. A. K., Singh. S. S. and Shivran. R. K. (2016). Kheti ( November, 2016) published by ICAR, p.: 28- 37.
    9. Singh. H. and Diwakar.B. (1995).Chickpea botany and production practices. ICRISAT. Skill Development Series No. 16.
    10. Sushant, R.S. Dixit and G. Singh. (1999). Effect of irrigation, nitrogen and phosphorus on seed yield and water use of rajmash (Phaseolus vulgaris). Indian Journal of Agronomy, 44: 382-388.
    11. Thompson, Helen. (2012). Food science deserves a place at the table – US agricultural research chief aims to raise the profile of farming and nutrition science. Nature, July 12.
    12. Vasudevan, S.N., Sudarshan, J.S., Kurdikeri, M.B. and Dharmatti, P.R.(2008). Influence of pinching of apical bud and chemical sprays on seed yield and quality of fenugreek. Karnataka Journal of Agricultural Sciences, 21(1), 26–29. 
    In this Article
      Contact us
      Follow us
      Published In
      Legume Research

      Editorial Board

      View all (0)