Banner
Current IssueEditorial BoardOnline First ArticlesArchive
Current IssueEditorial BoardOnline First ArticlesArchive

Research Article

volume 42 issue 4 (august 2019) : 533-537,   Doi: 10.18805/LR-3910

Production potential and economic returns of pigeonpea (Cajanus cajan L.) based intercropping system as influenced by planting pattern and nutrients levels

F
Fatehjeet Singh Sekhon
T
Thakar Singh
K
K.S. Saini
1Department of Agronomy, Punjab Agricultural University, Ludhiana-141 004, Punjab, India.

  • Submitted04-07-2017|

  • Accepted05-12-2017|

  • First Online 25-04-2018|

  • doi 10.18805/LR-3910

Cite article:- Sekhon Singh Fatehjeet, Singh Thakar, Saini K.S. (2018). Production potential and economic returns of pigeonpea (Cajanus cajan L.) based intercropping system as influenced by planting pattern and nutrients levels. Legume Research. 42(4): 533-537. doi: 10.18805/LR-3910.

ABSTRACT

A field experiment was carried out during the kharif season of 2015 and 2016 to find out the best pigeonpea based intercropping system and planting pattern along with optimum dose of nutrients to intercrops. Present study revealed that yield attributes and yield of pigeonpea were not adversely affected by different planting patterns and nutrient levels applied to intercrop during both the years. Pigeonpea planted at 50 × 25 cm with maize fodder as intercrop recorded highest pigeonpea equivalent yield of 1840 and 1895 kg/ha during 2015 and 2016, respectively. Application of 100% recommended dose of nutrient to intercrop also significantly increased the pigeonpea equivalent yield (1629 and 1732 kg/ha) over 50% of recommended dose and control during both years. Pigeonpea (50 × 25 cm) + maize fodder fetched significantly higher net returns (Rs. 61191 and 68764/ha), B: C (1.7 and 2.0) and per day income (Rs. 453 and 509/ha/day) than other intercropping systems during both the years. Higher net returns (Rs. 50694 and 59568/ha) were recorded with 100%  recommended dose of nutrient applied to intercrops as compared to net return  with 50% of recommended dose (Rs. 43752 and 53344/ha) and control (Rs. 39163 and 46535/ha)  during both the years. B: C and per day income were also recorded maximum with 100% of nutrients applied to intercrops during both the years.

REFERENCES

  1. Anonymous (2016). Area, production of pigeonpea in India. http//www.indiastat.com.
  2. Anonymous (2017). Package of Prcatices for Kharif Crops of Punjab. Punjab Agricultural University, Ludhiana.
  3. Cheema, H. S. and Singh, B. (1991). Software Statistical Package CPCS-I. Department of Statistics, Punjab Agricultural University, Ludhiana, India.
  4. Cochran, W. G. and Cox, G. M. (1967). Experimental Designs. Asia Publishing House, Bombay.
  5. Kumawat, N., Singh, R. P., Kumar, R. and Om, H. (2013). Effect of integrated nutrient management on the performance of sole and intercropped pigeonpea (Cajanus cajan) under rainfed conditions. Indian Journal of Agronomy, 58: 309-15.
  6. Malik, J. K., Singh, R., Thenua, O. V. S. and Kumar, A. (2013). Response of pigeonpea (Cajanus cajan) + mungbean (Phaseolus radiata) intercropping system to phosphorus and biofertilizers. Legume Research, 36: 323-30. 
  7. Patel, S. U., Maheriya, V. D. and Patel, H. F. (2013). Intercropping in rabi pigeonpea ((Cajanus cajan L.) millsp.) in south Gujarat. Bioinfolet, 10: 317-19.
  8. Pawar, S. B., Patil, V. O. K. and Pawar, H. D. (2013). Integrated nutrient management in pigonpea based intercropping system. Bioinfolet, 10: 345-46.
  9. Rao, S. C., Phillips, W. A., Mayeux, H. S. and Phatak, S. C. (2003). Potential grain and forage production of early maturing pigeonpea in the southern Great Plains. Crop Science, 43: 2212-17.
  10. Sharma, A., Rathod, P. S. and Chavan, M. (2010). Integrated nutrient management in pigeonpea (Cajanus cajana) based intercropping systems under rainfed conditions. Karnataka Journal of Agriculture Science, 23: 584-89.
  11. Sharma, A., Rathod, P. S., Dharmaraj, P. S. and Chavan, M. (2012). Response of pigeonpea to biofertilizers in pigeonpea based intercropping systems under rainfed conditions Karnataka Journal of Agriculture Science, 25: 322-25.
  12. Wilson, C., Nwaneri, E., Duseja, D. and Tegegne, F. (2012). Effects of planting dates, densities and varieties on ecophysiology of pigeonpea in the South Eastern United States. Agriculture Science, 3:147-52. 
Published In
Legume Research
Article Metrics
Metrics Icon
0
Views
0
Citations
Reviewed By
Share Article
Download Article
In this Article
    Contact us
    Follow us

    Research Article

    volume 42 issue 4 (august 2019) : 533-537,   Doi: 10.18805/LR-3910

    Production potential and economic returns of pigeonpea (Cajanus cajan L.) based intercropping system as influenced by planting pattern and nutrients levels

    F
    Fatehjeet Singh Sekhon
    T
    Thakar Singh
    K
    K.S. Saini
    1Department of Agronomy, Punjab Agricultural University, Ludhiana-141 004, Punjab, India.

    • Submitted04-07-2017|

    • Accepted05-12-2017|

    • First Online 25-04-2018|

    • doi 10.18805/LR-3910

    Cite article:- Sekhon Singh Fatehjeet, Singh Thakar, Saini K.S. (2018). Production potential and economic returns of pigeonpea (Cajanus cajan L.) based intercropping system as influenced by planting pattern and nutrients levels. Legume Research. 42(4): 533-537. doi: 10.18805/LR-3910.

    ABSTRACT

    A field experiment was carried out during the kharif season of 2015 and 2016 to find out the best pigeonpea based intercropping system and planting pattern along with optimum dose of nutrients to intercrops. Present study revealed that yield attributes and yield of pigeonpea were not adversely affected by different planting patterns and nutrient levels applied to intercrop during both the years. Pigeonpea planted at 50 × 25 cm with maize fodder as intercrop recorded highest pigeonpea equivalent yield of 1840 and 1895 kg/ha during 2015 and 2016, respectively. Application of 100% recommended dose of nutrient to intercrop also significantly increased the pigeonpea equivalent yield (1629 and 1732 kg/ha) over 50% of recommended dose and control during both years. Pigeonpea (50 × 25 cm) + maize fodder fetched significantly higher net returns (Rs. 61191 and 68764/ha), B: C (1.7 and 2.0) and per day income (Rs. 453 and 509/ha/day) than other intercropping systems during both the years. Higher net returns (Rs. 50694 and 59568/ha) were recorded with 100%  recommended dose of nutrient applied to intercrops as compared to net return  with 50% of recommended dose (Rs. 43752 and 53344/ha) and control (Rs. 39163 and 46535/ha)  during both the years. B: C and per day income were also recorded maximum with 100% of nutrients applied to intercrops during both the years.

    REFERENCES

    1. Anonymous (2016). Area, production of pigeonpea in India. http//www.indiastat.com.
    2. Anonymous (2017). Package of Prcatices for Kharif Crops of Punjab. Punjab Agricultural University, Ludhiana.
    3. Cheema, H. S. and Singh, B. (1991). Software Statistical Package CPCS-I. Department of Statistics, Punjab Agricultural University, Ludhiana, India.
    4. Cochran, W. G. and Cox, G. M. (1967). Experimental Designs. Asia Publishing House, Bombay.
    5. Kumawat, N., Singh, R. P., Kumar, R. and Om, H. (2013). Effect of integrated nutrient management on the performance of sole and intercropped pigeonpea (Cajanus cajan) under rainfed conditions. Indian Journal of Agronomy, 58: 309-15.
    6. Malik, J. K., Singh, R., Thenua, O. V. S. and Kumar, A. (2013). Response of pigeonpea (Cajanus cajan) + mungbean (Phaseolus radiata) intercropping system to phosphorus and biofertilizers. Legume Research, 36: 323-30. 
    7. Patel, S. U., Maheriya, V. D. and Patel, H. F. (2013). Intercropping in rabi pigeonpea ((Cajanus cajan L.) millsp.) in south Gujarat. Bioinfolet, 10: 317-19.
    8. Pawar, S. B., Patil, V. O. K. and Pawar, H. D. (2013). Integrated nutrient management in pigonpea based intercropping system. Bioinfolet, 10: 345-46.
    9. Rao, S. C., Phillips, W. A., Mayeux, H. S. and Phatak, S. C. (2003). Potential grain and forage production of early maturing pigeonpea in the southern Great Plains. Crop Science, 43: 2212-17.
    10. Sharma, A., Rathod, P. S. and Chavan, M. (2010). Integrated nutrient management in pigeonpea (Cajanus cajana) based intercropping systems under rainfed conditions. Karnataka Journal of Agriculture Science, 23: 584-89.
    11. Sharma, A., Rathod, P. S., Dharmaraj, P. S. and Chavan, M. (2012). Response of pigeonpea to biofertilizers in pigeonpea based intercropping systems under rainfed conditions Karnataka Journal of Agriculture Science, 25: 322-25.
    12. Wilson, C., Nwaneri, E., Duseja, D. and Tegegne, F. (2012). Effects of planting dates, densities and varieties on ecophysiology of pigeonpea in the South Eastern United States. Agriculture Science, 3:147-52. 
    In this Article
      Contact us
      Follow us
      Published In
      Legume Research

      Editorial Board

      View all (0)