Variability for harvest index and biomass in lentil (Lens culinaris Medik) varieties

DOI: 10.18805/LR-3705    | Article Id: LR-3705 | Page : 1093-1096
Citation :- Variability for harvest index and biomass in lentil (Lens culinaris Medik) varieties.Legume Research-An International Journal.2017.(40):1093-1096
G.P. Dixit, A. Kumar and A.K. Parihar ashoka.parihar@gmail.com
Address : ICAR- Indian Institute of Pulses Research, Kanpur- 208024, Uttar Pradesh, India
Submitted Date : 19-03-2016
Accepted Date : 9-03-2017

Abstract

Lentil is an important cool season food legume of our nation and positions next just to chickpea. Pulses are generally known to produce higher vegetative part and less grain yield, consequently poor harvest index. Lentil is no exception to this, and produces excess vegetative growth and support lesser grains. Therefore, in present investigation attempt has been made to screen 36 lentil varieties for biomass and harvest index in macro-sperma and micro-sperma types. Ample amount of variability were recorded for both harvest index and biomass. 37.78-62.96 per cent and 3.38 g to 40.94 gm range was noticed for harvest index and biomass, respectively. At the end of present investigation, three lentil varieties viz. L 4147, IPL 406 and PL 234 were identified as high biomass and high harvest index varieties. These varieties may be used as an agronomic base in the future lentil improvement programme for evolving high yielding varieties. 

Keywords

Biomass Harvest Index (HI) Lentil.

References

  1. Donald, C. M.(1962) . In search of yield. J . Aust . Inst . agric. Sci . 28: 171-178. 
  2. Erskine, W. and Goodrich, W. J. (1991). Variability in lentil growth habit. Crop Sci. 31: 1040–1044.
  3. Hanlan, T. G., Ball, R. A. and Vandenberg, A.(2006) Canopy growth and biomass partitioning to yield in short-season lentil.Can. J. Plant Sci. 86: 109–119.
  4. Jain, H.K. (1975). Breeding for yield and other attributes in grain legumes. Indian J. Genet. 35:169–187.
  5. Jain, H.K. (1986). Eighty years of post-Mendelian breeding for crop yield: nature of selection pressures and future potential. Indian J. Genet. 46[Supplement]:30–53.
  6. Jeswani, L.M. (1986). Breeding strategies for the improvement of pulse crops. Indian J. Genet .46 [Suppl]: 267–280.
  7. Kumar, J. and Srivatava, E. (2015). Impact of reproductive duration on yield and its component traits in lentil. Legume Research: An International Journal, 38 (2)139-148.
  8. Mondal, M.M.A., Adam B. Puteh, Mohd Abdul Malek, S. Roy and Yusop, M.R.(2013). Contribution of morpho-physiological traits on yield of lentil (Lens culinaris Medik) Aust. J. Crop Sci. 7(8):1167-1172. 
  9. PC Report (2015). Project Coordinators Report (Rabi crops) 2014-15, All India Coordinated Research Project on MULLaR. ICAR-    Indian Institute of Pulses Research, Kanpur-208024, p-38.
  10. Rahman, M,A. and Ali, M.O. (2011). The causes of decrement in pulse production and its possible remedy. Proceedings of the International Conference on ‘Pulses in South Asia’ held at the Bangladesh Agricultural Research Institute, Gazipur-1701, Bangladesh during 17 -19 February 2011. pp. 91-94
  11. Rasheed, M., Jilani, G., Shah, I.A., Najeeb, U. and Iqbal, T. (2010). Improved lentil production by utilizing genetic variability in response to phosphorus fertilization. Acta Agriculturae Scandinavica Section B- Soil and Plant Science, 60: 485-493.
  12. Singh, K.B. (1987). Chickpea breeding. In: Saxena MC, Singh KB (eds) The chickpea. CAB Int, Wallingford, pp 127–158.
  13. Wallace, D.H. and Munger, H.M. (1966). Studies on the physiological basis for yield differences. II .Variation in dry matter distribution among aerial organs for several dry beans varieties. Crop Sci . 6: 503-507.

Global Footprints