Banner
Current IssueEditorial BoardOnline First ArticlesArchive
Current IssueEditorial BoardOnline First ArticlesArchive

volume 36 issue 6 (december 2013) : 557-562

INFLUENCE OF IRRIGATION METHODS AND MULCHES ON PEA (PISUM SATIVUM L.) IN BER (ZIZIPHUS MAURITIANA) BASED VEGETABLE PRODUCTION SYSTEM UNDER TROPICAL CLIMATE OF RAJASTHAN

B
Birbal*
V
V.S. Rathore
N
N.S. Nathawat
S
S. Bhardwaj
N
N.D. Yadava
1Central Arid Zone Research Institute, Regional Research Station, Bikaner – 334 004, India

  • Submitted|

  • First Online |

  • doi

Cite article:- Birbal*, Rathore V.S., Nathawat N.S., Bhardwaj S., Yadava N.D. (2025). INFLUENCE OF IRRIGATION METHODS AND MULCHES ON PEA (PISUM SATIVUM L.) IN BER (ZIZIPHUS MAURITIANA) BASED VEGETABLE PRODUCTION SYSTEM UNDER TROPICAL CLIMATE OF RAJASTHAN. Legume Research. 36(6): 557-562. doi: .

ABSTRACT

A field experiment was conducted during the rabi season of 2009-10 and 2010-11.  The experiment consisted of two methods of irrigation viz. drip and furrow methods and four type of mulching material treatments viz. plastic mulch (black polyethylene-25micron), hessian cloth mulch (50% shade jute cloth), indigenous plant material (laptodoniaspps.@ 10t/ha) mulch and no mulch (control). Method of irrigation, mulching and their interaction had significant effects on growth, yield attributes and yield. Mean yield averaged across the mulching treatments was 18.3 % higher under drip irrigation than furrow method. Mulching improved the yield from 40 to 71.8 % over no mulch treatment. Among the tested mulching materials, the plastic mulch had the highest improvement in yield (71.8 %) followed by hessian cloth (54.1 %) and indigenous plant material mulch (40 %) over no mulch. Interaction effect between drip irrigation with plastic mulch resulted in significant response in growth, yield attributes and yield of pea as compared to all other treatment combinations.  Number of branches per plant, canopy cover and survival percentage of ber was higher in ber + pea cropping system than sole ber.

REFERENCES

  1. Bhella, H.S. (1988). Tomato response to drip irrigation and black polythene. J. Am. Soc. Hort. Sci., 113: 543-546.
  2. Birbal, Rathore,V.S., Nathawath, N.S, Bhardwaj, S. and Yadava,N.D. (2012). Effect of irrigation methods and mulching on yield attributes and yield of pea under arid environment. In: [Sandhu S.K. et al. (Eds)] Proc. International conference on sustainable agriculture for food and livelihood security. November,27-29, 2012, Ludhiana, India. Crop Imp. 39 (Spl.Issue): 555-556.
  3. Bogle, C.R., Hartz, T.K. and Nunez, C. (1989). Comparison of subsurface trickle and furrow irrigation on plastic mulch and bare soil for tomato production. J.Am.Soc. hort.. Sci.114: 40-43.
  4. Cai, X. and Rosegrant M W. (2003). World water productivity: current situation and future options. In: [Kijne, J.W., Barker, R., Molden, D. (Eds.)], Water Productivity in Agriculture: Limits and Opportunities for Improvement. International Water Management Institute, Colombo, Sri Lanka, pp. 163–178.
  5. Debaeke P and Aboudrare A. (2004). Adaptation of crop management to water-limited environments. Eur. J. Agron. 21: 433–446.
  6. Gomez K A and Gomez A. (1983). Statistical Procedures for Agricultural Research. Willy, New York. pp. 680.
  7. Goyal, M.R., Gonzailez, E.A., Rivera, L.E. and Baez, C.C.(1987). Sweet pepper response to drip, micro-sprinkler and furrow irrigation. Am. Soc. Agri. Eng. 87: 12
  8. Liu, L.C., Padilla, M.A., Goyal, M.R. and Ibanez, J.G. (1987). Integrated weed management in Transplanted tomatoes and peppers under drip irrigation. J. Agri. Uni. Puerto Rico.71:349-358.
  9. Liu, Q.Z. and Hu Z.Z., (2000). Study of plastic mulching on Brassica rapa in Alpine area. 1: Effects of plastic film mulching on micro-environment of brassica in alpine area. Practuc. Sci., 17: 19-22.
  10. More,T.A., Singh,R.S., Bhargava,R. and Sharma B.D. (2012). Arid horticulture for Nutrition and livelihood. 376
  11. Malik, R.S., Kumar, K. (1996). Effect of drip irrigation on yield and water use efficiency of pea. J. Indian Soc. Soil Sci. 44: 508-509.
  12. Narayanamoorthy, A. (2008). Drip irrigation in India: can it solve water scarcity? Water Policy 6: 117-130.
  13. Shrivastava, P.K., Parikh, M.M. Sawani, N.G. and Raman, S. (1994). Effect of drip irrigation and mulching on tomato yield. Agri. Water Mngt. 25: 179-184.
Published In
Legume Research
Article Metrics
Metrics Icon
0
Views
0
Citations
Reviewed By
Share Article
Download Article
In this Article
    Contact us
    Follow us

    volume 36 issue 6 (december 2013) : 557-562

    INFLUENCE OF IRRIGATION METHODS AND MULCHES ON PEA (PISUM SATIVUM L.) IN BER (ZIZIPHUS MAURITIANA) BASED VEGETABLE PRODUCTION SYSTEM UNDER TROPICAL CLIMATE OF RAJASTHAN

    B
    Birbal*
    V
    V.S. Rathore
    N
    N.S. Nathawat
    S
    S. Bhardwaj
    N
    N.D. Yadava
    1Central Arid Zone Research Institute, Regional Research Station, Bikaner – 334 004, India

    • Submitted|

    • First Online |

    • doi

    Cite article:- Birbal*, Rathore V.S., Nathawat N.S., Bhardwaj S., Yadava N.D. (2025). INFLUENCE OF IRRIGATION METHODS AND MULCHES ON PEA (PISUM SATIVUM L.) IN BER (ZIZIPHUS MAURITIANA) BASED VEGETABLE PRODUCTION SYSTEM UNDER TROPICAL CLIMATE OF RAJASTHAN. Legume Research. 36(6): 557-562. doi: .

    ABSTRACT

    A field experiment was conducted during the rabi season of 2009-10 and 2010-11.  The experiment consisted of two methods of irrigation viz. drip and furrow methods and four type of mulching material treatments viz. plastic mulch (black polyethylene-25micron), hessian cloth mulch (50% shade jute cloth), indigenous plant material (laptodoniaspps.@ 10t/ha) mulch and no mulch (control). Method of irrigation, mulching and their interaction had significant effects on growth, yield attributes and yield. Mean yield averaged across the mulching treatments was 18.3 % higher under drip irrigation than furrow method. Mulching improved the yield from 40 to 71.8 % over no mulch treatment. Among the tested mulching materials, the plastic mulch had the highest improvement in yield (71.8 %) followed by hessian cloth (54.1 %) and indigenous plant material mulch (40 %) over no mulch. Interaction effect between drip irrigation with plastic mulch resulted in significant response in growth, yield attributes and yield of pea as compared to all other treatment combinations.  Number of branches per plant, canopy cover and survival percentage of ber was higher in ber + pea cropping system than sole ber.

    REFERENCES

    1. Bhella, H.S. (1988). Tomato response to drip irrigation and black polythene. J. Am. Soc. Hort. Sci., 113: 543-546.
    2. Birbal, Rathore,V.S., Nathawath, N.S, Bhardwaj, S. and Yadava,N.D. (2012). Effect of irrigation methods and mulching on yield attributes and yield of pea under arid environment. In: [Sandhu S.K. et al. (Eds)] Proc. International conference on sustainable agriculture for food and livelihood security. November,27-29, 2012, Ludhiana, India. Crop Imp. 39 (Spl.Issue): 555-556.
    3. Bogle, C.R., Hartz, T.K. and Nunez, C. (1989). Comparison of subsurface trickle and furrow irrigation on plastic mulch and bare soil for tomato production. J.Am.Soc. hort.. Sci.114: 40-43.
    4. Cai, X. and Rosegrant M W. (2003). World water productivity: current situation and future options. In: [Kijne, J.W., Barker, R., Molden, D. (Eds.)], Water Productivity in Agriculture: Limits and Opportunities for Improvement. International Water Management Institute, Colombo, Sri Lanka, pp. 163–178.
    5. Debaeke P and Aboudrare A. (2004). Adaptation of crop management to water-limited environments. Eur. J. Agron. 21: 433–446.
    6. Gomez K A and Gomez A. (1983). Statistical Procedures for Agricultural Research. Willy, New York. pp. 680.
    7. Goyal, M.R., Gonzailez, E.A., Rivera, L.E. and Baez, C.C.(1987). Sweet pepper response to drip, micro-sprinkler and furrow irrigation. Am. Soc. Agri. Eng. 87: 12
    8. Liu, L.C., Padilla, M.A., Goyal, M.R. and Ibanez, J.G. (1987). Integrated weed management in Transplanted tomatoes and peppers under drip irrigation. J. Agri. Uni. Puerto Rico.71:349-358.
    9. Liu, Q.Z. and Hu Z.Z., (2000). Study of plastic mulching on Brassica rapa in Alpine area. 1: Effects of plastic film mulching on micro-environment of brassica in alpine area. Practuc. Sci., 17: 19-22.
    10. More,T.A., Singh,R.S., Bhargava,R. and Sharma B.D. (2012). Arid horticulture for Nutrition and livelihood. 376
    11. Malik, R.S., Kumar, K. (1996). Effect of drip irrigation on yield and water use efficiency of pea. J. Indian Soc. Soil Sci. 44: 508-509.
    12. Narayanamoorthy, A. (2008). Drip irrigation in India: can it solve water scarcity? Water Policy 6: 117-130.
    13. Shrivastava, P.K., Parikh, M.M. Sawani, N.G. and Raman, S. (1994). Effect of drip irrigation and mulching on tomato yield. Agri. Water Mngt. 25: 179-184.
    In this Article
      Contact us
      Follow us
      Published In
      Legume Research

      Editorial Board

      View all (0)