Banner
Current IssueEditorial BoardOnline First ArticlesArchive
Current IssueEditorial BoardOnline First ArticlesArchive

volume 36 issue 6 (december 2013) : 535-544

EFFECTS OF SOWING SEASON ON HERBAGE AND SEED PRODUCTION OF GRASSPEA UNDER RAINFED CONDITION OF KHORAMABAD, IRAN

Z
Zahra Azadi 1
A
Ali Ashraf Jafari 2*
S
Shahram Nakhjavan3
B
Bahman Yousefvand3
K
Karim Khademi 4
11Young Researchers Club, Borujerd Branch, Islamic Azad University, Borujerd, Iran

  • Submitted|

  • First Online |

  • doi

Cite article:- 1 Azadi Zahra, 2* Jafari Ashraf Ali, Nakhjavan3 Shahram, Yousefvand3 Bahman, 4 Khademi Karim (2025). EFFECTS OF SOWING SEASON ON HERBAGE AND SEED PRODUCTION OF GRASSPEA UNDER RAINFED CONDITION OF KHORAMABAD, IRAN. Legume Research. 36(6): 535-544. doi: .

ABSTRACT

In order to study seed and dry matter (DM) yield and relationships among yield and agronomic traits, 11 lines of grasspea (Lathyrus sativus L.) obtained from the International Center for Agricultural Research in the Dry Areas (ICCADA) were sown in two growing seasons using randomized block design with three replications in autumn 2011 and spring 2012 in rainfed area of Khoramabad, Iran. Significant variation in all of traits except harvest index were observed due to sowing season. On an average, 9763 and 4708 kg ha-1 for DM yield and 3206 and 1423 kg ha-1 for seed yield were produced in autumn and spring sowing seasons, respectively. The lines of 449 and 387 gave good DM and seed yield, and they were introduced as improved varieties for cultivation. DM yield was positively correlated with straw yield and seed yield in both the sowing seasons and correlated with pods per plant, seeds per pod and pod length in spring season. Similarly, seed yield was positively correlated with straw yield, harvest index and pod number per plant for both the sowing seasons and with seeds number per pods in spring season. The results of principle component analysis (PCA) showed that the first four components (PC1 to PC4) accounted for 37, 28, 10 and 8 of the total variation, respectively. DM, straw and seed yield in the PC1, seeds per pod, pod length, pods per plant, flowering date and 100 seeds weight in the PC2, the pod height and stem length in the PC3 and finally the stem density in the PC4 components were identified as the important traits. Using Ward cluster method the 11 lines were grouped into 4 clusters. The lines in Cluster 1 coupled with late maturity had higher productivity for both DM and straw yield. The lines in Cluster 2 coupled with early maturity had higher productivity for both DM and seed yield. Clusters 3 and 4 had low and moderate productivity, respectively.

REFERENCES

  1. Badripour, H., Eskandari, N. and Rezaei, S. A. (2006). “Rangelands of Iran, an Overview”. Published by Ministry of Jihad-e-Agriculture, Forest Range and Watershed Management Organization, Technical Office of Rangeland, Tehran, Iran, Pooneh (http://www.fao.org/ag/AGP/AGPC/doc/Counprof/Iran/Iran.htm).
  2. Benkova, M. and Zakova, M. (2001). Evaluation of selected traits in grasspea (lathyrus sativus L.) genetic resources. Lathyrus lathyrism Newsletter 2: 27-30.
  3. Campbell, C.G. (1997). Grass Pea. Lathyrus sativus L. Promoting the conservation and use of underutilized and neglected crops. 18. Institute of Plant Genetics and Crop Plant Research, Gatersleben/International Plant Genetic Resources Institute, Rome
  4. Hanbury, C. D., Sarker, A., Siddique, K. H. M. and Perry, M. W. (1995). Evaluation of Lathyrus germplasm in a Mediterranean type environment in south-western Australia. Occasional Paper No. 8. Co-operative Research Centre for Legumes in Mediterranean Agriculture.
  5. ICARDA, (2000). Forage Legume Germplasm Improvement for Increased Feed and Food Production and System Productivity in Dry Areas. Germplasm Program Annual Report. International Center for Agricultural Research in the Dry Area (ICARDA), Aleppo, Syria, pp. 255–283.
  6. Karadag, Y., Iptas, S., Yavuz, M., (2004). Agronomic potential of grasspea (Lathyrus sativus) under rainfed conditions in semi-arid regions of Turkey. Asian J. Plant Sci. 3: 151–155.
  7. Kenicer, G.J., Kajita, T., Pennington, R.T., Murata J. (2005). Systematics and biogeography of Lathyrus (Leguminosae) based on internal transcribed spacer and cpDNA sequence data, Amer. J. Botany, 92: 1199–1209
  8. Kumar S, and Dubey, D.K. (2001).Variability, heritability and correlation studies in grasspea. (Lathyrus sativus L.) Lathyrus Lathyrism Newsletter 2: 79-81.
  9. Larbi, A., Hssan, S., Kattash, G., Abd El-Moneim, A.M., Jammal, B., Nabil, H. and Nakkul, H., (2010). Annual feed legume yield and quality in dryland environments in north-west Syria: 1. Herbage yield and quality. Anim. Feed Sci. Technol. 160: 81–89
  10. Mehra, R.B., Raju, D.B. and Himabindu, K. (1995). Evaluation and utilization of Lathyrus sativus collection in India. Pp. 37-43. Proceedings of a Regional Workshop, Lathyrus Genetic Resources in Asia 27-29 December 1995, Indira Gandhi Agricultural University, Raipur, India (R.K. Arora, P.N. Mathur, K.W. Riley and Y. Adham, eds.). IPGRI Office for South Asia, New Delhi, India.
  11. Palmer V.S., Kaul A.K. and Spencer, P.S. (1989). International Network for the Improvement of Lathyrus sativus and the Eradication of Lathyrism INILSEL: A TWMRF initiative. In: Spencer P. (Ed.), The Grasspea: Threat and Promise Proc of the International Network for the Improvement of Lathyrus sativus and the Eradication of Lathyrism. Third World Medical Research Foundation, New York. pp. 219-223.
  12. Robertson, L. D. and Abd el Moneim, A. M. (1995). Lathyrus germplasm collection, conservation and utilization for crop improvement at ICARDA. Proceedings of Lathyrus genetic resources in Asia, 27-29 December 1995, Indira Gandhi Agricultural University, Raipur, India.
  13. Somaroo, B. H. (1988). Relationship between dry matter yield, seed yield, and flowering time in annual forage legumes under dry conditions. J. Appl. Seed Prod. 6: 31-35.
  14. Yadov, C.R. (1995). Genetic evaluation and varietal improvement of grasspea in Nepal. pp. 21-27. Proceedings of a Regional Workshop, Lathyrus Genetic Resources in Asia 27-29 December 1995, Indira Gandhi Agricultural University, Raipur, India (R.K. Arora, P.N. Mathur, K.W. Riley and Y. Adham, eds.). IPGRI Office for South Asia, New Delhi, India.
  15. Zeven, A.C. and Zhukovsky, P. M. (1975). Dictionary of cultivated plants and their centers of diversity. Centre for Agricultural publication and Documentation, Wageningen, The Netherlands.
  16. Zohary D and Hopf, M. (1988). Domestication of Plants in the Old World. Oxford Science Publications. Clarendon Press,
Published In
Legume Research
Article Metrics
Metrics Icon
0
Views
0
Citations
Reviewed By
Share Article
Download Article
In this Article
    Contact us
    Follow us

    volume 36 issue 6 (december 2013) : 535-544

    EFFECTS OF SOWING SEASON ON HERBAGE AND SEED PRODUCTION OF GRASSPEA UNDER RAINFED CONDITION OF KHORAMABAD, IRAN

    Z
    Zahra Azadi 1
    A
    Ali Ashraf Jafari 2*
    S
    Shahram Nakhjavan3
    B
    Bahman Yousefvand3
    K
    Karim Khademi 4
    11Young Researchers Club, Borujerd Branch, Islamic Azad University, Borujerd, Iran

    • Submitted|

    • First Online |

    • doi

    Cite article:- 1 Azadi Zahra, 2* Jafari Ashraf Ali, Nakhjavan3 Shahram, Yousefvand3 Bahman, 4 Khademi Karim (2025). EFFECTS OF SOWING SEASON ON HERBAGE AND SEED PRODUCTION OF GRASSPEA UNDER RAINFED CONDITION OF KHORAMABAD, IRAN. Legume Research. 36(6): 535-544. doi: .

    ABSTRACT

    In order to study seed and dry matter (DM) yield and relationships among yield and agronomic traits, 11 lines of grasspea (Lathyrus sativus L.) obtained from the International Center for Agricultural Research in the Dry Areas (ICCADA) were sown in two growing seasons using randomized block design with three replications in autumn 2011 and spring 2012 in rainfed area of Khoramabad, Iran. Significant variation in all of traits except harvest index were observed due to sowing season. On an average, 9763 and 4708 kg ha-1 for DM yield and 3206 and 1423 kg ha-1 for seed yield were produced in autumn and spring sowing seasons, respectively. The lines of 449 and 387 gave good DM and seed yield, and they were introduced as improved varieties for cultivation. DM yield was positively correlated with straw yield and seed yield in both the sowing seasons and correlated with pods per plant, seeds per pod and pod length in spring season. Similarly, seed yield was positively correlated with straw yield, harvest index and pod number per plant for both the sowing seasons and with seeds number per pods in spring season. The results of principle component analysis (PCA) showed that the first four components (PC1 to PC4) accounted for 37, 28, 10 and 8 of the total variation, respectively. DM, straw and seed yield in the PC1, seeds per pod, pod length, pods per plant, flowering date and 100 seeds weight in the PC2, the pod height and stem length in the PC3 and finally the stem density in the PC4 components were identified as the important traits. Using Ward cluster method the 11 lines were grouped into 4 clusters. The lines in Cluster 1 coupled with late maturity had higher productivity for both DM and straw yield. The lines in Cluster 2 coupled with early maturity had higher productivity for both DM and seed yield. Clusters 3 and 4 had low and moderate productivity, respectively.

    REFERENCES

    1. Badripour, H., Eskandari, N. and Rezaei, S. A. (2006). “Rangelands of Iran, an Overview”. Published by Ministry of Jihad-e-Agriculture, Forest Range and Watershed Management Organization, Technical Office of Rangeland, Tehran, Iran, Pooneh (http://www.fao.org/ag/AGP/AGPC/doc/Counprof/Iran/Iran.htm).
    2. Benkova, M. and Zakova, M. (2001). Evaluation of selected traits in grasspea (lathyrus sativus L.) genetic resources. Lathyrus lathyrism Newsletter 2: 27-30.
    3. Campbell, C.G. (1997). Grass Pea. Lathyrus sativus L. Promoting the conservation and use of underutilized and neglected crops. 18. Institute of Plant Genetics and Crop Plant Research, Gatersleben/International Plant Genetic Resources Institute, Rome
    4. Hanbury, C. D., Sarker, A., Siddique, K. H. M. and Perry, M. W. (1995). Evaluation of Lathyrus germplasm in a Mediterranean type environment in south-western Australia. Occasional Paper No. 8. Co-operative Research Centre for Legumes in Mediterranean Agriculture.
    5. ICARDA, (2000). Forage Legume Germplasm Improvement for Increased Feed and Food Production and System Productivity in Dry Areas. Germplasm Program Annual Report. International Center for Agricultural Research in the Dry Area (ICARDA), Aleppo, Syria, pp. 255–283.
    6. Karadag, Y., Iptas, S., Yavuz, M., (2004). Agronomic potential of grasspea (Lathyrus sativus) under rainfed conditions in semi-arid regions of Turkey. Asian J. Plant Sci. 3: 151–155.
    7. Kenicer, G.J., Kajita, T., Pennington, R.T., Murata J. (2005). Systematics and biogeography of Lathyrus (Leguminosae) based on internal transcribed spacer and cpDNA sequence data, Amer. J. Botany, 92: 1199–1209
    8. Kumar S, and Dubey, D.K. (2001).Variability, heritability and correlation studies in grasspea. (Lathyrus sativus L.) Lathyrus Lathyrism Newsletter 2: 79-81.
    9. Larbi, A., Hssan, S., Kattash, G., Abd El-Moneim, A.M., Jammal, B., Nabil, H. and Nakkul, H., (2010). Annual feed legume yield and quality in dryland environments in north-west Syria: 1. Herbage yield and quality. Anim. Feed Sci. Technol. 160: 81–89
    10. Mehra, R.B., Raju, D.B. and Himabindu, K. (1995). Evaluation and utilization of Lathyrus sativus collection in India. Pp. 37-43. Proceedings of a Regional Workshop, Lathyrus Genetic Resources in Asia 27-29 December 1995, Indira Gandhi Agricultural University, Raipur, India (R.K. Arora, P.N. Mathur, K.W. Riley and Y. Adham, eds.). IPGRI Office for South Asia, New Delhi, India.
    11. Palmer V.S., Kaul A.K. and Spencer, P.S. (1989). International Network for the Improvement of Lathyrus sativus and the Eradication of Lathyrism INILSEL: A TWMRF initiative. In: Spencer P. (Ed.), The Grasspea: Threat and Promise Proc of the International Network for the Improvement of Lathyrus sativus and the Eradication of Lathyrism. Third World Medical Research Foundation, New York. pp. 219-223.
    12. Robertson, L. D. and Abd el Moneim, A. M. (1995). Lathyrus germplasm collection, conservation and utilization for crop improvement at ICARDA. Proceedings of Lathyrus genetic resources in Asia, 27-29 December 1995, Indira Gandhi Agricultural University, Raipur, India.
    13. Somaroo, B. H. (1988). Relationship between dry matter yield, seed yield, and flowering time in annual forage legumes under dry conditions. J. Appl. Seed Prod. 6: 31-35.
    14. Yadov, C.R. (1995). Genetic evaluation and varietal improvement of grasspea in Nepal. pp. 21-27. Proceedings of a Regional Workshop, Lathyrus Genetic Resources in Asia 27-29 December 1995, Indira Gandhi Agricultural University, Raipur, India (R.K. Arora, P.N. Mathur, K.W. Riley and Y. Adham, eds.). IPGRI Office for South Asia, New Delhi, India.
    15. Zeven, A.C. and Zhukovsky, P. M. (1975). Dictionary of cultivated plants and their centers of diversity. Centre for Agricultural publication and Documentation, Wageningen, The Netherlands.
    16. Zohary D and Hopf, M. (1988). Domestication of Plants in the Old World. Oxford Science Publications. Clarendon Press,
    In this Article
      Contact us
      Follow us
      Published In
      Legume Research

      Editorial Board

      View all (0)