Banner
Current IssueEditorial BoardOnline First ArticlesArchive
Current IssueEditorial BoardOnline First ArticlesArchive

volume 36 issue 4 (august 2013) : 338-343

EVALUATION OF RICEBEAN AND FRENCHBEAN AS INTERCROPS WITH MAIZE UNDER DIFFERENT ROW PROPORTIONS IN THE PENINSULAR REGION

H
H.M. Mohan
B
B.M. Chittapur*
S
S.M. Hiremath
1Department of Agronomy, College of Agriculture, University of Agricultural Sciences, Dharwad 580 005, India

  • Submitted|

  • First Online |

  • doi

Cite article:- Mohan H.M., Chittapur* B.M., Hiremath S.M. (2025). EVALUATION OF RICEBEAN AND FRENCHBEAN AS INTERCROPS WITH MAIZE UNDER DIFFERENT ROW PROPORTIONS IN THE PENINSULAR REGION. Legume Research. 36(4): 338-343. doi: .

ABSTRACT

Ricebean and Frenchbean being non-conventional crops in the peninsular region an experiment was conducted to evaluate the possibility of growing these legumes and their suitability for intercropping with predominant cereal, maize in 1:1 and 1: 2 row proportions alongwith recommended check maize + soybean at Main Agricultural Research Station, Dharwad representing Northern transitional zone of Karnataka. Intercropping of maize + frenchbean grown in 1:2 row proportion produced higher maize equivalent yield (8068 kg ha-1) and assured more income (Rs. 29 054/- ha-1) while, ricebean was comparable to maize + soybean in productivity. Maize + soybean had significantly higher protein output (851 kg ha-1) than other systems.  Intercropping of grain legumes also ensured better utilization of resources viz., land, soil moisture, nutrients and light.

REFERENCES

  1. Arora, R.K., Chandel, K.P.S., Pant, K.C. and Joshi, B.S. (1980). Ricebean – a tribal pulse of eastern India. Econ. Bot., 34:260-263.
  2. Kanakeri, V.V. (1991). Studies on intercropping of legumes in kharif maize and their residual effects on succeeding wheat. M. SC. (Agri.) Thesis, University of Agricultural Sciences, Dharwad, India.
  3. Padhi, A.K. (2001).Effect of vegetable intercropping on productivity, economics and energitics of maize (Zea mays). Indian J. Agron., 46:204-210.
  4. Sankara Reddi, G.H. and Yellamanda Reddy, Y. (2000). Efficient use of Irrigation Water. Kalyani Publishers. Pp 55-56.
  5. Trenbath, B.R. (1979). Light use efficiency of crops and the potential for improvement through intercropping. In:Proceedings of International Workshop on Intercropping, ICRISAT, Hyderabad Pp 141-154
  6. Willey, R.W. (1979). Intercropping its importance and research needs, Part 1. Competition and yield advantages. Field Crops Abstr., 32:1-10.
  7. Yoshida, S., Forno, D.D., Cock, J.H. and Gomez., K.A., (1972). Laboratory Manual for Physiological Studies of Rice. International Rice Research Institute, Manila, Philippines Pp 67-68.
Published In
Legume Research
Article Metrics
Metrics Icon
0
Views
0
Citations
Reviewed By
Share Article
Download Article
In this Article
    Contact us
    Follow us

    volume 36 issue 4 (august 2013) : 338-343

    EVALUATION OF RICEBEAN AND FRENCHBEAN AS INTERCROPS WITH MAIZE UNDER DIFFERENT ROW PROPORTIONS IN THE PENINSULAR REGION

    H
    H.M. Mohan
    B
    B.M. Chittapur*
    S
    S.M. Hiremath
    1Department of Agronomy, College of Agriculture, University of Agricultural Sciences, Dharwad 580 005, India

    • Submitted|

    • First Online |

    • doi

    Cite article:- Mohan H.M., Chittapur* B.M., Hiremath S.M. (2025). EVALUATION OF RICEBEAN AND FRENCHBEAN AS INTERCROPS WITH MAIZE UNDER DIFFERENT ROW PROPORTIONS IN THE PENINSULAR REGION. Legume Research. 36(4): 338-343. doi: .

    ABSTRACT

    Ricebean and Frenchbean being non-conventional crops in the peninsular region an experiment was conducted to evaluate the possibility of growing these legumes and their suitability for intercropping with predominant cereal, maize in 1:1 and 1: 2 row proportions alongwith recommended check maize + soybean at Main Agricultural Research Station, Dharwad representing Northern transitional zone of Karnataka. Intercropping of maize + frenchbean grown in 1:2 row proportion produced higher maize equivalent yield (8068 kg ha-1) and assured more income (Rs. 29 054/- ha-1) while, ricebean was comparable to maize + soybean in productivity. Maize + soybean had significantly higher protein output (851 kg ha-1) than other systems.  Intercropping of grain legumes also ensured better utilization of resources viz., land, soil moisture, nutrients and light.

    REFERENCES

    1. Arora, R.K., Chandel, K.P.S., Pant, K.C. and Joshi, B.S. (1980). Ricebean – a tribal pulse of eastern India. Econ. Bot., 34:260-263.
    2. Kanakeri, V.V. (1991). Studies on intercropping of legumes in kharif maize and their residual effects on succeeding wheat. M. SC. (Agri.) Thesis, University of Agricultural Sciences, Dharwad, India.
    3. Padhi, A.K. (2001).Effect of vegetable intercropping on productivity, economics and energitics of maize (Zea mays). Indian J. Agron., 46:204-210.
    4. Sankara Reddi, G.H. and Yellamanda Reddy, Y. (2000). Efficient use of Irrigation Water. Kalyani Publishers. Pp 55-56.
    5. Trenbath, B.R. (1979). Light use efficiency of crops and the potential for improvement through intercropping. In:Proceedings of International Workshop on Intercropping, ICRISAT, Hyderabad Pp 141-154
    6. Willey, R.W. (1979). Intercropping its importance and research needs, Part 1. Competition and yield advantages. Field Crops Abstr., 32:1-10.
    7. Yoshida, S., Forno, D.D., Cock, J.H. and Gomez., K.A., (1972). Laboratory Manual for Physiological Studies of Rice. International Rice Research Institute, Manila, Philippines Pp 67-68.
    In this Article
      Contact us
      Follow us
      Published In
      Legume Research

      Editorial Board

      View all (0)