Banner
Current IssueEditorial BoardOnline First ArticlesArchive
Current IssueEditorial BoardOnline First ArticlesArchive

volume 35 issue 4 (december 2012) : 345 - 349

EVALUATION OF GROUNDNUT GENOTYPES FOR INTRINSIC THERMO TOLERANCE UNDER IMPOSED TEMPERATURE STRESS CONDITIONS

P
Pranusha1
R
Raja Rajeswari1
P
P. Sudhakar*
P
P. Latha
M
Mohan Reddy1
1Institute of Frontier Technology, RARS, Acharya N.G. Ranga Agricultural University, Tirupati-500 030, India

  • Submitted|

  • First Online |

  • doi

Cite article:- Pranusha1, Rajeswari1 Raja, Sudhakar* P., Latha P., Reddy1 Mohan (2025). EVALUATION OF GROUNDNUT GENOTYPES FOR INTRINSIC THERMO TOLERANCE UNDER IMPOSED TEMPERATURE STRESS CONDITIONS. Legume Research. 35(4): 345 - 349. doi: .

ABSTRACT

A field experiment was conducted at Regional agricultural research Station, Tirupati during kharif 2010 with15 groundnut prerelease and released groundnut genotypes. Thermo tolerance of these genotypes across the important growth phenophases were measured using reliable traits viz., Relative injury to the cell membranes and Chlorophyll fluorescence ratio (Fv/Fm) of  photosystem II. The results clearly indicate that groundnut is susceptible to high cellular damage due to high temperature stress at pod maturity stage compared to the flowering and pegging stages. The genotypes TCGS-991 recorded low mean membrane injury (10.08%), high chloroplast activity (0.540) with highest pod yield of 2037.8 Kg/ha followed by TCGS 969, TCGS 1043.  These entries possess high potential to maintain themostabilty under high temperature conditions and also produced higher pod yield. Among the other entries, Greeshma and TCGS-894 recorded highest thermo stability of cellular membranes and chloroplast activity with moderate yields. These genotypes can be recommended to high temperature conditions or may be used as potential donor source in resistance breeding programs for developing varieties in pursuit of global warming.

REFERENCES

  1. Babitha, M. et al. (2006). Indian J. Plant Physio. 11: pp. 63-74.
  2. Havaux, M. (1993). Plant Cell Environ. 16: 461-467.
  3. Leopold, A.C. (1981). Plant Physiology. 68; 1222-1225.
  4. Martineau, J. R. et al. (1979). Crop Science 19: 75-78.
  5. Mc William, J. R. (1980). Adaptation to high temperature stress in Adaptation of plants to water and high temperature stress. pp 444-447. Eds N. C. Turner and P. J. Kumar. New York, USA, John Wiley and Sons.
  6. Raison, J. K et al. (1980). Adaptation of plants to water and high temperature stress. pp. 261-273. Eds. New York, USA: John Wiley and Sons.
  7. Schneider, S. H. (1989). Sci. Am. 261: 70-79.
  8. Smillie, R. M., and Hetherington, S. E. (1990) Measurement Techniques in Plant Science pp. 229-261. Academic Press, San Diego.
  9. Sudhakar, P. et al. (2006). Journal of Arid Legumes 3 (2): 11-16.
  10. Sullivan, C. Y., and Ross, W. M. (1979). Stress Physiology in Crop Plants, pp. 263- 281. Des. H Mussell and R Staples. New York. USA John Willey and Sons.
  11. Talwar, H.S. et al. (1999). Crop Sci. 39: 460-466.
  12. Weis, E. (1981). Z. Pflanaenphysiol. 101:169-178.
Published In
Legume Research
Article Metrics
Metrics Icon
0
Views
0
Citations
Reviewed By
Share Article
Download Article
In this Article
    Contact us
    Follow us

    volume 35 issue 4 (december 2012) : 345 - 349

    EVALUATION OF GROUNDNUT GENOTYPES FOR INTRINSIC THERMO TOLERANCE UNDER IMPOSED TEMPERATURE STRESS CONDITIONS

    P
    Pranusha1
    R
    Raja Rajeswari1
    P
    P. Sudhakar*
    P
    P. Latha
    M
    Mohan Reddy1
    1Institute of Frontier Technology, RARS, Acharya N.G. Ranga Agricultural University, Tirupati-500 030, India

    • Submitted|

    • First Online |

    • doi

    Cite article:- Pranusha1, Rajeswari1 Raja, Sudhakar* P., Latha P., Reddy1 Mohan (2025). EVALUATION OF GROUNDNUT GENOTYPES FOR INTRINSIC THERMO TOLERANCE UNDER IMPOSED TEMPERATURE STRESS CONDITIONS. Legume Research. 35(4): 345 - 349. doi: .

    ABSTRACT

    A field experiment was conducted at Regional agricultural research Station, Tirupati during kharif 2010 with15 groundnut prerelease and released groundnut genotypes. Thermo tolerance of these genotypes across the important growth phenophases were measured using reliable traits viz., Relative injury to the cell membranes and Chlorophyll fluorescence ratio (Fv/Fm) of  photosystem II. The results clearly indicate that groundnut is susceptible to high cellular damage due to high temperature stress at pod maturity stage compared to the flowering and pegging stages. The genotypes TCGS-991 recorded low mean membrane injury (10.08%), high chloroplast activity (0.540) with highest pod yield of 2037.8 Kg/ha followed by TCGS 969, TCGS 1043.  These entries possess high potential to maintain themostabilty under high temperature conditions and also produced higher pod yield. Among the other entries, Greeshma and TCGS-894 recorded highest thermo stability of cellular membranes and chloroplast activity with moderate yields. These genotypes can be recommended to high temperature conditions or may be used as potential donor source in resistance breeding programs for developing varieties in pursuit of global warming.

    REFERENCES

    1. Babitha, M. et al. (2006). Indian J. Plant Physio. 11: pp. 63-74.
    2. Havaux, M. (1993). Plant Cell Environ. 16: 461-467.
    3. Leopold, A.C. (1981). Plant Physiology. 68; 1222-1225.
    4. Martineau, J. R. et al. (1979). Crop Science 19: 75-78.
    5. Mc William, J. R. (1980). Adaptation to high temperature stress in Adaptation of plants to water and high temperature stress. pp 444-447. Eds N. C. Turner and P. J. Kumar. New York, USA, John Wiley and Sons.
    6. Raison, J. K et al. (1980). Adaptation of plants to water and high temperature stress. pp. 261-273. Eds. New York, USA: John Wiley and Sons.
    7. Schneider, S. H. (1989). Sci. Am. 261: 70-79.
    8. Smillie, R. M., and Hetherington, S. E. (1990) Measurement Techniques in Plant Science pp. 229-261. Academic Press, San Diego.
    9. Sudhakar, P. et al. (2006). Journal of Arid Legumes 3 (2): 11-16.
    10. Sullivan, C. Y., and Ross, W. M. (1979). Stress Physiology in Crop Plants, pp. 263- 281. Des. H Mussell and R Staples. New York. USA John Willey and Sons.
    11. Talwar, H.S. et al. (1999). Crop Sci. 39: 460-466.
    12. Weis, E. (1981). Z. Pflanaenphysiol. 101:169-178.
    In this Article
      Contact us
      Follow us
      Published In
      Legume Research

      Editorial Board

      View all (0)