Banner
Current IssueEditorial BoardOnline First ArticlesArchive
Current IssueEditorial BoardOnline First ArticlesArchive

volume 28 issue 2 (june 2005) : 115 - 118

COMPARISON OF MORPHOGENIC ABIUfY OF CALLUS TYPES INDUCED FROM DIFFERENT EXPLANTS OF SOYBEAN (GLYCINE MAXL. MERRILL)

S
S. Tiwari
M
M.K. Tripathi
1Plant Biotechnology Laboratory, Department of Plant Breeding and Genetics, J. N. Agricultural University Jabal;'Ur - 482 004, India

  • Submitted|

  • First Online |

  • doi

Cite article:- Tiwari S., Tripathi M.K. (2025). COMPARISON OF MORPHOGENIC ABIUfY OF CALLUS TYPES INDUCED FROM DIFFERENT EXPLANTS OF SOYBEAN (GLYCINE MAXL. MERRILL). Legume Research. 28(2): 115 - 118. doi: .

ABSTRACT

The separate experments were conducted for immature embryonic axes, inunature cotyledon, mature cotyledon, hypocotyl and leaf disc cultures with eleven soybean genotypes. For each explant culture, at least three different fortifications of basal MS medium were used. Various cultured explants initiated mainly four types of calli: a Undifferentiated callus cultures which were cream in colour and soft friable in texture; b. Compact dark green in colour with few or many bead like structures; c. Compact dark green with few or many dark green bead like structures and some times partially covered with a thin layer of white loose callus, and d. Mixture of creamy white and light green calli which was dense and glossy in texture. Culture media played an imperative role in the formation of embryogenic calli. Hypocotyl followed by mature cotyledon proved to be the superior explants for somatic embryogenesis and rpature cotyledons for plantlet regeneration.

KEYWORDS

    REFERENCES

    1. Ancelet, M. et a/. (1988). Plant Physiol. Biochem. France, 22: 212.
    2. Gai, J. and Guo, Z. (1996). Soybean. Genet. News/., 23: 58-61.
    3. Henshaw, G.C. et a/. (1982). In: Differentiation in vitro. (Yeoman, M.M. and Truman, D.E.S. eds.). University Press, Cambridge. pp. 231-251.
    4. Murashige, T. and Skoog, F. (1962). Physiol. Plant, 15: 473-497.
    5. Nawracala J. and Konieczny C. (1996). Regeneration of Soybean Plants via Somatic EmbFyogenesis Biuletyn Instytutu Hodowlii Aklimatyzaciji, Roslin. No.19B: 21-29.
    6. Yeh, M.S. (1989). J. Agric. For., 38: 139-149.
    Published In
    Legume Research
    Article Metrics
    Metrics Icon
    0
    Views
    0
    Citations
    Reviewed By
    Share Article
    Download Article
    In this Article
      Contact us
      Follow us

      volume 28 issue 2 (june 2005) : 115 - 118

      COMPARISON OF MORPHOGENIC ABIUfY OF CALLUS TYPES INDUCED FROM DIFFERENT EXPLANTS OF SOYBEAN (GLYCINE MAXL. MERRILL)

      S
      S. Tiwari
      M
      M.K. Tripathi
      1Plant Biotechnology Laboratory, Department of Plant Breeding and Genetics, J. N. Agricultural University Jabal;'Ur - 482 004, India

      • Submitted|

      • First Online |

      • doi

      Cite article:- Tiwari S., Tripathi M.K. (2025). COMPARISON OF MORPHOGENIC ABIUfY OF CALLUS TYPES INDUCED FROM DIFFERENT EXPLANTS OF SOYBEAN (GLYCINE MAXL. MERRILL). Legume Research. 28(2): 115 - 118. doi: .

      ABSTRACT

      The separate experments were conducted for immature embryonic axes, inunature cotyledon, mature cotyledon, hypocotyl and leaf disc cultures with eleven soybean genotypes. For each explant culture, at least three different fortifications of basal MS medium were used. Various cultured explants initiated mainly four types of calli: a Undifferentiated callus cultures which were cream in colour and soft friable in texture; b. Compact dark green in colour with few or many bead like structures; c. Compact dark green with few or many dark green bead like structures and some times partially covered with a thin layer of white loose callus, and d. Mixture of creamy white and light green calli which was dense and glossy in texture. Culture media played an imperative role in the formation of embryogenic calli. Hypocotyl followed by mature cotyledon proved to be the superior explants for somatic embryogenesis and rpature cotyledons for plantlet regeneration.

      KEYWORDS

        REFERENCES

        1. Ancelet, M. et a/. (1988). Plant Physiol. Biochem. France, 22: 212.
        2. Gai, J. and Guo, Z. (1996). Soybean. Genet. News/., 23: 58-61.
        3. Henshaw, G.C. et a/. (1982). In: Differentiation in vitro. (Yeoman, M.M. and Truman, D.E.S. eds.). University Press, Cambridge. pp. 231-251.
        4. Murashige, T. and Skoog, F. (1962). Physiol. Plant, 15: 473-497.
        5. Nawracala J. and Konieczny C. (1996). Regeneration of Soybean Plants via Somatic EmbFyogenesis Biuletyn Instytutu Hodowlii Aklimatyzaciji, Roslin. No.19B: 21-29.
        6. Yeh, M.S. (1989). J. Agric. For., 38: 139-149.
        In this Article
          Contact us
          Follow us
          Published In
          Legume Research

          Editorial Board

          View all (0)