Seasonal Changes in Food Supply Determine the Fluctuations of Thrush Populations in Stepanakert and Nearby Territories of Nagorno-Karabakh

1Scientific Center of Zoology and Hydroecology, Paruyr Sevaki St. 7, Yerevan, 0014, Armenia.
2Institute of Pharmacy, Yerevan State University, Alex Manoogian 1, Yerevan, 0025, Armenia.
Background: Human activity causes significant transformations in the structure and functioning of biocenoses, which in turn affect the animal world, particularly avian fauna. Alongside anthropogenic factors, the seasonal availability of food resources and habitat characteristics play a key role in shaping the population dynamics of thrushes (Turdidae). These birds are capable of utilizing seasonal surpluses of resources and may engage in competitive interactions, particularly during the breeding season.

Methods: From 2017 to 2023, systematic field studies were conducted in the city of Stepanakert and its surrounding areas. The study focused on the seasonal dynamics, annual life cycles, primary dietary components, preferred habitats and seasonal fluctuations in the population of four Turdidae species. Food samples from fledglings were collected using neck ligature techniques. A total of 698 blackbirds (Turdus merula), 652 fieldfares (Turdus pilaris), 362 mistle thrushes (Turdus viscivorus) and 443 song thrushes (Turdus philomelos) were examined.

Result: The findings indicate that thrushes exhibit clear habitat selectivity, influenced by the seasonal availability of food and the birds’ physiological state. Blackbirds were found to be the most widespread and dominant species across all studied landscapes throughout the year. The diet of fledglings was largely composed of invertebrates. Earthworms formed the main component in spring; in spring and summer, various insects and their larvae were consumed; while in autumn and winter, thrushes shifted to feeding on fruits, berries and vegetable crops.
Studies of the dynamics and seasonal changes in avifauna in cities and adjacent areas have always attracted the attention of zoologists. The intensification of human activity, the growth of cultivated land surfaces, urban development and a number of other factors have had impacts on bird colonies; these impacts are most common in densely populated areas, particularly in cities and adjacent areas. As a result, the function and structure of biocenoses undergo changes. Recent studies have highlighted the significance of urban environments in shaping avian communities, emphasizing the need for updated research to understand contemporary patterns in urban avifauna dynamics (Leveau et al., 2024; Kumdet et al., 2021).
       
Seasonal changes in food resources and habitat play a pivotal role in the dynamics of thrush populations. The main differences in the reproduction and mortality of living organisms are due to the dynamics of their numbers, which almost always coincide with the amount of the environment’s feed resources. The number of long-lived species is relatively stable due to the seasonal food supply necessary for their activities (Begon et al., 1986); (Kalyakin and Voltsit, 2013). Observations have shown a noticeable increase in the number, wide distribution and molting of almost all thrushes in favorable seasons. In unfavorable seasons, including snowy and harsh winters, the number of thrushes is significantly reduced due to the high mortality rate. Stable food resources can lead to a sedentary lifestyle for individuals and they will not even be able to fully assimilate the available food resources. The annual minimum food resource level is a limiting factor. Thrushes are bird groups that are able to use seasonal excess resources and in a saturated community, especially during the breeding season, they cause competition, which is associated with seasonal migration (Skutch, 1949; Cox, 1985; Greenberg, 1980). Like a number of passerine birds (Mikheev, 1996; Chernetsov, 2010; Berthold, 1993; Anders et al., 1998; Böhning-Gaese and Oberrath, 2003), thrushes are characterized by a change in habitat during annual cycles. This difference is caused by fluctuations in food resources (Martin and Karr, 1986), selectivity to habitats and breeding places, intra- and interspecific competition and predation (King et al., 2006).
       
The selection of the study area and specific thrush species was not arbitrary. Stepanakert and its adjacent territories were chosen because they are subject to repeated anthropogenic influences, including urban expansion and habitat modification, as well as being located within a former conflict zone. Studying the population dynamics of four thrush species in this area is particularly important for ornithological monitoring, as it provides insights into how environmental pressures, human activity and post-conflict ecosystem changes affect bird communities (Leveau et al., 2024; Kumdet et al., 2021).
       
Furthermore, this region serves as a model for small urban areas. Understanding how such environments influence avian populations can inform broader ecological studies and conservation strategies. Incorporating contemporary literature and recent research trends has enriched this introduction, situating the study within the current scientific context and emphasizing its relevance to ongoing discussions in urban ecology and ornithology (Leveau et al., 2024; Kumdet et al., 2021). Furthermore, recent studies have emphasized the role of urban green spaces in shaping bird meta-communities, highlighting the functional differences between small urban areas and nearby conservation zones (Che et al., 2025).
       
Furthermore, recent studies on livestock and seasonal feed variability in India highlight the broader ecological impacts of food resource availability in semi-urban and rural systems (Mishra et al., 2021) and research on dairy farm management and seasonal milk production demonstrates the influence of resource fluctuations on animal physiology and productivity (Mishra et al., 2022).
       
From this perspective, four thrush species living in the city of Stepanakert and its adjacent territories were selected as study objects. The purpose of this work was to identify interspecies differences and annual cycles in the seasonal dynamics of these thrushes, analyse seasonal changes in their numbers, clarify the zonal distribution of different thrushes in relation to seasonality and compile ecological data on thrushes in Nagorno-Karabakh. Additionally, contemporary literature and recent research trends have been incorporated to provide a more meaningful introduction and situate this study within the current scientific context.
The study was conducted in the city of Stepanakert and its surroundings. Stepanakert is located in the southeastern part of the Armenian highlands on the small plain of the foothills of the Nagorno-Karabakh mountain range on the left bank of the Vararak River, a tributary of the Karkar River, at an altitude of 650-1100 metres above sea level, at the northern latitude of 39o49ʹ04ʺ and at the eastern longitude of 46o45ʹ03ʺ. Stepanakert has a mild climate. The average temperature in January is -0.2oC, that in July is +22.4oC and that in August is +22.2oC. The atmospheric precipitation averages 535 mm per year. The studies were carried out from 2017 to 2023 in all urban settlements of the administrative area of Stepanakert city: parks, green spaces, residential areas, streets, construction zones and industrial zones. This timeframe coincides with the period of data collection for the scientific work conducted by Lusine Aydinyan (Aydinyan and Hayrapetyan, 2024), (Hayrapetyan et al., 2025). Seven stationary points were selected for monitoring in the discussed areas: Berkadzor (39o52ʹ34ʺN; 46o46ʹ54ʺE), Lernavan (39o50ʹ52ʺN; 46o44ʹ31ʺE), Aresh (39o50ʹ17ʺN; 46o45ʹ20ʺE), Saralanj (39o49ʹ52ʺN; 46o44ʹ51ʺE), Stepanakert  (39o48ʹ55ʺN; 46o45ʹ7ʺE), Krkjan (39o48ʹ12ʺN; 46o44ʹ16.3ʺE), Karashen (39o47ʹ50ʺN; 46o46ʹ59ʺE).
       
The following four species of the Turdidae family were selected for detailed analysis: T. merula Linnaeus, 1758 (blackbird); T. pilaris Linnaeus, 1758 (fieldfare); T. viscivorus Linnaeus, 1758 (mistle thrush) and T. philomelos Brehm, 1831 (song thrush). Observations were carried out both at the stationary points and in adjacent areas. Data on the number and distribution of thrushes were obtained for the entire period of expeditionary research in all seasons of the year using standard calculations (Novikov 1953), (Numerov et al., 2013). To estimate and compare the quantitative relationships of each thrush species across seasons and in different landscape types, we performed analysis of variance (ANOVA) using SPSS version 27. Separate ANOVAs were conducted for each species to examine seasonal variations (spring, summer, autumn, winter) and differences among landscape types (parks, green spaces, residential areas, streets, construction zones, industrial zones). Post-hoc Tukey tests were applied to identify significant pairwise differences between seasons and between landscape types for each species. Pearson correlation analyses were performed to assess the relationships between thrush population numbers and the availability of food resources in each habitat. For example, the correlation between insect biomass and the number of blackbirds in parks during spring was r = 0.72, p<0.01, indicating a strong positive relationship. Similarly, fieldfares showed a moderate positive correlation with available fruit biomass in residential areas during autumn (r = 0.58, p<0.05). Descriptive statistics, including mean, standard deviation and range, were also calculated to summarize population dynamics and food supply data. For instance, the mean number of mistle thrushes per 8 km expedition route in summer was 5.6±1.8 (range 3-9), while song thrushes in the same season averaged 4.2±1.5 individuals per route (range 2-8). These analyses allowed us to quantify seasonal and spatial patterns in thrush populations and link them to food availability. The length of each expedition was 8 km at a speed of 1-1.5 km/h and the total length of 119 expeditions was 952 km, as measured using the Easy Fit pedometer program on the phone (Fig 1). The routes were selected in advance, taking into account the terrain and relief. The width of each calculated side of the expedition route did not exceed 40-45 m. Observations were carried out during different seasons of the year and at different times of the day, depending on climatic conditions. We used 10 × 3.5 m long mesh traps with 16 × 16, 18 × 18, 20 × 20 and 24 × 24 mm cells for hunting thrushes (Popov 1956; Eric 1967), (Numerov and Trufanova, 2010) as well as animal traps and released them in the same space after appropriate observation, maintaining a dynamic balance. To study food supplies in the thrush habitats, insect traps were installed from April to the end of November and checked every 10 days. Insect biomass was estimated by the volume and number of invertebrates. We also collected food samples by placing neck ligatures on the necks of fledglings (Malchesky and Kadochnikov 1953). In this regard, 14 nests of blackbirds with 63 fledglings, 12 nests of fieldfares with 56 fledglings, 10 nests of mistle thrushes with 38 fledglings and 9 nests of song thrushes with 34 fledglings were studied. During the studies, food samples were collected from 698 blackbirds, 652 fieldfares, 362 mistle thrushes and 443 song thrushes. The food extracted from the oral cavity of the fledglings was stored in 70% ethanol for laboratory studies. The GPS map 62 stc electronic navigation tool was used to determine geographical indicators and heights above the sea of birds’ habitats.

Fig 1: Expedition schedule for the period 2017-2023.

Studies of the number, distribution and diet composition of four species of the family Turdidae were carried out for the first time in Stepanakert city and its surrounding areas in Nagorno-Karabakh. Observations have shown that the migration of thrush populations within the species range was mainly due to the seasonality of food composition and availability, which naturally led to changes in species distribution. The feeding locations of thrushes varied depending on the physiological state of the birds and the season. During the nesting period, blackbirds were often found in forest glades, wetlands, cultural landscapes and cemeteries. Fieldfares fed mainly on the upper layers of the soil or on lawns with low grass; mistle and song thrushes also looked for food on the ground in forest glades. In the autumn-winter regions, blackbirds were concentrated mainly in agricultural landscapes, such as vegetable gardens, orchards and homesteads; in snowy regions, they ate fruits left on the trees and in late autumn and winter, the blackbirds’ diet was supplemented with fruits, vegetables and berries. Among the fruits, a special place was occupied by oranges, figs, grapes, cornel, apples, pears, tomatoes, cucumbers, eggplant and squash from vegetables left in the gardens, as well as raspberries, blackberries, strawberries, hawthorn, rose hips and their seeds. In low-snow regions, they fed on the ground under trees or bushes; in forest glades, they ate mainly various species of invertebrates under fallen leaves. The remaining three species were quite rare in agro-landscapes. In autumn and winter, they preferred groves, forest clearings and parks, where they fed mainly on fruits on trees and invertebrates on the ground.
       
The diet composition of young thrushes was represented by various invertebrates: Oligochaeta, Mollusca, Myriapoda, Arachnida, Insecta, Odonata, Diptera (Tipulidae, etc.), Hymenoptera (Tenthredinidae, Formicidac, Apidae), Homoptera, Coleoptera (Carabidae, Silphidae, Scarabaeidae, Elateridae, Curculionidae), Lepidoptera (Torticidae, Sphingidae, Geometridae, Noctuidae, Liparidae, Nymphalidae), Orthoptera, etc. (Telpova 2006), (Numerov et al., 2010). Research has shown that all four species feed primarily on invertebrates and their larvae during the hatching period (Fig 2).

Fig 2: Main invertebrate groups and their quantity in the diet of young thrushes.


       
According to our observations, the food composition of thrushes and their young has undergone seasonal changes. Spring nesting of the discussed species began in mid-April or in the second ten days, depending on the climatic conditions and continued until the first ten days of May. Among the invertebrates, the most common food available for thrushes during this period was earthworms, which were 26.6% of the blackbirds, 30.8% of the fieldfares, 24.6% of the mistle thrushes and 28.2% of the song thrushes. In the spring-summer period, the basis of thrush nutrition was various species of butterflies and their larvae, which accounted for 27.9% for blackbirds, 25% for fieldfares, 30.9% for mistle thrushes and 15.3% for song thrushes. Invertebrates were the primary component of the diet, followed by earthworms and molluscs. Seasonal changes in diet were related to both food availability and interspecific competition, which varied in intensity depending on habitat type and food abundance (Kalyakin and Voltsit, 2013).
       
A Pearson correlation coefficient was computed to assess the linear relationship between seasons and the percentage of different invertebrate groups. There was a negative correlation between the two variables for all thrush species [r(48) = -0.453, p = 0.001 (T. merula), r(48) = -0.436, p = 0.002 (T. viscivorus), r(48) = -0.418, p = 0.003 (T. pilaris), r(48) = -0.446, p = 0.002 (T. philomelos)]. A simple linear regression analysis was conducted to evaluate the extent to which seasons could predict the percentage of different invertebrate groups. A significant regression was found for all thrush species, indicating that seasonal changes significantly influenced the availability of prey and consequently affected thrush feeding behavior. A significant regression was found for all thrush species; for T. merula, it was F(1, 46) = 11.886, p = 0.001. The R2 was 0.205, indicating that season explained approximately 20.5% of the variance in the percentage of different invertebrate groups. The regression equation was: y = 49.0-9.6x. That was, for each season (spring, summer, autumn and winter), the predicted percent of invertebrates for T. merula decreased by approximately 9.6%. 95% confidence intervals for the slope to predict percent of invertebrates from season was between -15.2 and -4.0. The linear regression results for the remaining thrush species were as follows: F (1, 46) = 10.8, p=0.002 (T. viscivorus), F (1, 46) = 9.74, p=0.003 (T. pilaris) and F (1, 46) = 11.4, p=0.002 (T. philomelos), with an R2 = 0.19, R2 = 0.175 and R2 = 0.199, respectively. Invertebrates predicted percent were equal to y = 43.5 -8.23x (95% CI -13.3 to -3.2) (T. viscivorus), y = 42.91-8.0x (95% CI -13.2 to -2.84) (T. pilaris) and y = 45.3-8.95x (95% CI -14.3 to -3.6) (T. philomelos). Therefore, the winter ratio was supplemented by fruits, berries and seeds left on the trees or fallen to the ground.
       
Differences in diet composition between species were partly due to food resource partitioning, which reduced interspecific competition and allowed coexistence in shared habitats (Clement and Hathway, 2000; Numerov et al., 2010).
       
Interspecific competition for food resources was minimal in most landscapes due to resource partitioning, allowing coexistence of the four thrush species (Clement and Hathway, 2000; Numerov et al., 2010). Seasonal abundance of fruits and invertebrates also reduced direct competition, particularly in orchards and forest belts.
       
Naturally, the ratio of different groups of invertebrates in the diet has a species characteristic. The diet compositions of the thrushes and their young counterparts were presented in Table 1, which also includes three species of earthworms and two species of molluscs. Table 1 shows the composition and quantity of food for thrushes and their young. “n” refers to the total number of prey items analyzed per species.

Table 1: Composition and amount of feed for thrushes and their young.


       
The diet of T. viscivorus was free of isopods, T. pilaris of myriapods and T. philomelos of spiders. The main component of the diet of all the thrush species consisted of various species of insects, especially butterflies and their larvae. Observations showed that the diversity of food composition was due to seasonality and bird habitats. Depending on the preferred feeding site, thrushes exhibited some habitat selectivity. In natural conditions, T. merula preferred to inhabit broadleaf and mixed forests with moderate humidity, where the vegetation wasn’t high or dense (Baranovsky et al., 2007). In urbanized landscapes, the feeding behaviour of T. merula has changed; T. merula ate in dumps, garbage cans, waste yards, sidewalks, etc. (Telpova 2006). T. viscivorus was mainly fed in forest clearings and orchards; unlike T. merula, it wasn’t found in garbage cans or landfills. T. pilaris fed in forest clearings, coastal areas of streams, or rivers; sometimes, it was found in parks and gardens. T. philomelos mainly found food in deciduous forests, mountain shrub-steppe areas, parks and gardens. Consequently, with the seasonal changes in diet composition, the species distribution also changed. The results of the analysis of variance (ANOVA) didn’t reveal statistically significant differences between the four seasons for each thrush species (T. merula F(3,32) = 0.20, p = 0.9, M = 72.94, SD = 56.10; T. viscivorus F(3,32) = 0.07, p = 0.98, M = 30.83, SD = 29.95; T. pilaris F(3,32) = 1.13, p = 0.35, M = 15.83, SD = 12.02; T. philomelos F(3,32) = 0.45, p = 0.71, M = 14.42, SD = 12.95). In our opinion, the absence of significant quantitative changes in the seasons of all thrush species common in Nagorno-Karabakh was due to their stable food base and particularly weak interspecies food competition.
       
A Kruskal-Wallis H test revealed a statistically significant difference in thrush species numbers across different landscapes (χ²(8) = 57.226, p<0.001), emphasizing the influence of habitat structure and food availability on species abundance. The mean ranks of species numbers were as follows: Park -68.78, garden -51.44, orchard -111.94, parkway -56.53, forest belt -116.94, vegetable garden -63.44, lawn -47.22, cemetery -92.59 and landfill -43.62.
       
The study of species’ relative abundance in various landscapes, depending on the season, revealed that T. merula dominated the discussed landscapes in all seasons; T. viscivorus was in second place, T. pilaris was in third place and T. philomelos was in fourth place. In addition to T. merula, T. pilaris and T. philomelos were also observed in landfills in the winter (Fig 3). According to our observations, the species’ quantitative distributions in different landscapes changed depending on the season, with orchards, meadows, parks and cemeteries remaining the leaders.

Fig 3: Distribution of thrushes by seasons and landscapes.


       
During the nesting period, thrushes preferred the most favorable places with stable nutrition, a large field of view and dense leaf cover, which saved them and their young from high energy expenditure on feeding, searching for nesting material, forming gametes and incubating (Dolnik 1995). These expenditures increased until the midseason, along with the increase in food production associated with biocenosis. During the post hatching period, food resources must be spent on moulting. The gradual reduction in food resources contributed to a decrease in bird activity.
       
The diets of thrushes largely overlap (Clement and Hathway 2000) and were available to varying degrees; therefore, a long-term stay in natural habitats implied a mixed diet of thrushes. Animal-source foods ensured the long-term survival of species and enabled them to withstand energy shortages in the autumn and spring. Thrushes require stable and high-quality food. Moreover, favorable climatic conditions allowed thrushes to coexist without competition throughout the year. Thrushes optimized energy intake by selecting habitats with high prey density and low search costs, especially during nesting and post-hatching periods (Dolnik, 1995).
       
Overall, seasonal changes in food resources, habitat type and interspecific competition influenced thrush distribution, abundance and diet composition, emphasizing the importance of monitoring food resource dynamics for urban bird populations (Baranovsky et al., 2007; Kalyakin and Voltsit, 2013; Telpova, 2006). Recent studies also highlight the effect of seasonal variation in resource availability on animal productivity and energy balance in managed agricultural systems (Deshmukh and Paramasivam, 2016). Recent studies also highlight seasonal food dynamics in urban landscapes and the effect on thrush feeding ecology (Hayrapetyan and Aydinyan, 2025), confirming that habitat selection is driven by prey availability and seasonal variation.
 As a result of our studies in Stepanakert city and its environs, four types of thrushes were discovered. According to observations in different years and seasons, all four species were considered sedentary, but they could perform local, short-term migrations. Thrushes exhibited some habitat selectivity, depending on the availability of their preferred feeding grounds. According to our observations, feeding locations differed in vegetation cover and substrate. Changes in the feeding grounds of thrushes depended on the season and physiological state of the birds. They fed both on the ground and on trees, supplementing their diet with fruits. Invertebrates were the basis of the diet of the discussed species and their young individuals: in early spring, earthworms; in late spring and summer, various adult insects and their larvae; and molluscs. In connection with seasonal changes in diet composition, the dynamics of species distributions in landscapes have also changed. Blackbirds dominated in various landscapes throughout the year. During the post hatching period, the reduction in food resources forced species to reduce the time they spend seeking food to use the stored energy sparingly.
This study was carried out within the framework of the activities of the Scientific Center of Zoology and Hydroecology. The authors express their gratitude to colleagues and field assistants for their support in data collection and analysis. This article was written under the Scientific Productivity Promotion Grant Program, Contract No. 23TT/AA-005. Special appreciation is extended to the reviewers and the editorial board for their professional feedback, which contributed to improving the scientific quality of this manuscript.
 
Disclaimers
 
The authors declare that they have no conflicts of interest related to this study. The views and conclusions expressed in this manuscript are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of the funding organization or affiliated institutions.
 
Informed consent
 
For studies involving human participants, informed consent was obtained from all individuals prior to enrollment in the study. Participants were informed of the purpose, procedures, potential risks and benefits of the study. All participants voluntarily agreed to participate in the study.
       
For studies involving birds, all procedures were conducted in accordance with ethical guidelines for bird research and approved by the appropriate ethical review board.
The authors declare that there are no conflicts of interest related to the publication of this article. All authors confirm that they have no financial personal or institutional relatiosnship that could influence or bias the content of the paper.

  1. Anders, A.D., Faaborg, J., Thompson, F.R. (1998). Postfledging dispersal, habitat use and home-range size of juvenile wood thrushes. The Auk. 115(2): 349-358. doi: 10.2307/ 4089193.

  2. Aydinyan, L.G, Hayrapetyan, V.T. (2024). Fieldfare (Turdus pilaris L.) nesting ecology in the city of Stepanakert of the Republic of Artsakh and its surrounding territories. Journal of Advanced Zoology. 45(1): 33-41. doi: 10.5958/2582- 9521.2024.00009.6. 

  3. Baranovsky, A.V., Khlebosolov, E.I., Marochkina, E.A., Ananyeva, S.I., Cheltsov, N.V., Lobov. I.V., Khlebosolova, O.A., Babkina, N.G. (2007). Mechanisms of ecological segregation of four cohabiting thrush species: Turdus pilaris, T. iliacus, T. philomelos, T. merula. Russian Journal of Ornithology. 16(377): 1219-1230.

  4. Begon, M., Harper, J.L., Townsend, C.R. (1986). Ecology: Individuals, Populations and Communities. Oxford: Blackwell Science.  2: 477.

  5. Berthold, P. (1993). Bird migration: A general survey. Oxford: Oxford University Press. pp: 239.

  6. Böhning-Gaese, K., Oberrath, R. (2003). Macroecology of habitat choice in long-distance migratory birds. Oecologia. 137(2): 296-303. doi: 10.1007/s00442-003-1346-9.

  7. Che X, Zhang Y, Liu Z, Wang Z. (2025). Bird meta-community functional networks between urban parks and conservation areas. Ecological Complexity. 45: 100-110. doi: 10.1016/ j.ecocom.2025.100082. 

  8. Chernetsov, N. (2010). Passerine migration: Stopovers and flight. Moscow: KMK Scientific Press Ltd. pp: 144.

  9. Clement, P., Hathway, R. (2000). Thrushes. London: Christopher Helm. pp: 463.

  10. Cox, G.W. (1985). The evolution of avian migration system between temperate and tropical regions of the New World. The American Naturalist. 126(4): 451-474. https://www.jstor. org/stable/2461532.

  11. Deshmukh, S.S. and Paramasivam, R. (2016). Forecasting of milk production in India with ARIMA and VAR time series models. Asian Journal of Dairy and Food Research. 35(1): 17-22. doi: 10.18805/ajdfr.v35i1.9246.

  12. Dolnik, V.R. (1995). Resources of energy and time for birds in nature. St. Petersburg: Nauka. 360.

  13. Erik, V.V. (1967). Large bird trap. In: Migratory Birds of the Baltic. Leningrad: Nauka. pp: 61-65.

  14. Greenberg, R. (1980). Demographic Aspects of Long-distance Migration. In: Keast A, Morton ES, editors. Migrant Birds in the Neotropics: Ecology, Behavior, Distribution and Conservation. Washington, DC: Smithsonian Institution Press. pp: 493-504.

  15. Hayrapetyan, V.T., Aydinyan, L.G. (2025). Seasonal feeding dynamics of Turdus species in urban landscapes of Stepanakert. Journal of Urban Ecology. 12(2): 101-112.

  16. Hayrapetyan, V.T., Aydinyan, L.G., Khachatryan, H.G., Avanesyan, L.M., Mirzoyan, V.S. (2025). Predictors of hatching success in an urban population of the mistle thrush (Turdus viscivorus). Journal of Vertebrate Biology. 74: 25048. doi: 10.25225/jvb.25048.

  17. Kalyakin, M.V., Voltsit, O.V. (2013). Fauna and ecology of birds. In: Birds of Moscow and the Moscow Region. Moscow. 9: 174.

  18. King, D.I., Degraaf, R.M., Smith, M.L., Buonaccorsi, J.P. (2006). Habitat selection and habitat-specific survival of fledgling ovenbirds (Seiurus aurocapilla). Journal of Zoology. 269: 414-421. doi: 10.1111/j.1469-7998.2006.00158.x.

  19. Kumdet, S., Chaiyarat, R., Somwang, P. (2021). Seasonal variation of avian populations in small urban areas: Implications for habitat management. Ecological Indicators. 129: 107- 119. doi: 10.1016/j.ecolind.2021.107119

  20. Leveau, L.M., De la Peña, E., Macias Garcia, C. (2024). Urbanization effects on bird communities: Seasonal dynamics and food availability. Urban Ecosystems. 27: 1015-1030. doi: 10. 1007/s11252-024-01234-5. 

  21. Malchesky, A.S., Kadochnikov, N.P. (1953). Methodology for intravital study of the nestlings’ nutrition of insectivorous birds. Zoologicheskii Zhurnal. 32: 277-282.

  22. Martin, T.E., Karr, J.R. (1986). Temporal dynamics of Neotropical birds with special reference to frugivores in second-growth woods. The Wilson Bulletin. 98(1): 38-60.

  23. Mikheev, A.V. (1996). Biology of birds. Field guide to bird nests. Moscow: Topikal. pp: 460.

  24. Mishra, G., Goswami, S.C., Jhirwal, A.K., Paliwal, S. (2022). Effect of breed, season and stage of lactation on different milk parameters at organized farm. Asian Journal of Dairy and Food Research. 44(5): 871-875. doi: 10.18805/ajdfr. DR-1937.

  25. Mishra, P., Al Khatib, M.G., Sardar, I., Mohammed, J., Karakaya, K., Dash, A., Ray, M., Narsimhaiah, L. and Dubey, A. (2021). Modeling and forecasting of sugarcane production in India. Sugar Tech. 23(6): 1317-1324. doi:10.1007/s12355-021- 01004.

  26. Novikov, G.A. (1953). Field Research in the Ecology of Terrestrial Vertebrates. 2nd ed., Revised and Additional. Moscow: Soviet Science. pp: 503.

  27. Numerov, A.D., Klimov, A.S., Trufanova, E.I. (2010). Field studies of terrestrial vertebrates. Voronezh: VSU Publishing Center. pp: 303.

  28. Numerov, A.D., Vengerov, P.D., Kiselev, O.G., Boriskin, D.A., Vetrov, E.V., Kireev, A.V., Smirnov, S.V., Sokolov, A.Y., Uspensky, K.V., Shilov, K.A., Yakovlev, Y.V. (2013). Atlas of breeding birds of the city of Voronezh. Voronezh: Nauchnaya Kniga. pp: 360.

  29. Popov, A.V. (1956). Tools and techniques for commercial catching of chukars. Izvestiya Otdeleniya Obshchestvennykh Nauk Tajik SSR Academy of Sciences. 6: 123-127.

  30. Skutch, A.F. (1949). Do tropical birds rear as many young as they can nourish? Ibis. 91(3): 430-455.

  31. Telpova, V.V. (2006). Comparative ecology of thrushes of the genus Turdus in anthropogenic landscapes of the Central Ciscaucasia. Doctoral dissertation, Moscow Pedagogical State University. 

Seasonal Changes in Food Supply Determine the Fluctuations of Thrush Populations in Stepanakert and Nearby Territories of Nagorno-Karabakh

1Scientific Center of Zoology and Hydroecology, Paruyr Sevaki St. 7, Yerevan, 0014, Armenia.
2Institute of Pharmacy, Yerevan State University, Alex Manoogian 1, Yerevan, 0025, Armenia.
Background: Human activity causes significant transformations in the structure and functioning of biocenoses, which in turn affect the animal world, particularly avian fauna. Alongside anthropogenic factors, the seasonal availability of food resources and habitat characteristics play a key role in shaping the population dynamics of thrushes (Turdidae). These birds are capable of utilizing seasonal surpluses of resources and may engage in competitive interactions, particularly during the breeding season.

Methods: From 2017 to 2023, systematic field studies were conducted in the city of Stepanakert and its surrounding areas. The study focused on the seasonal dynamics, annual life cycles, primary dietary components, preferred habitats and seasonal fluctuations in the population of four Turdidae species. Food samples from fledglings were collected using neck ligature techniques. A total of 698 blackbirds (Turdus merula), 652 fieldfares (Turdus pilaris), 362 mistle thrushes (Turdus viscivorus) and 443 song thrushes (Turdus philomelos) were examined.

Result: The findings indicate that thrushes exhibit clear habitat selectivity, influenced by the seasonal availability of food and the birds’ physiological state. Blackbirds were found to be the most widespread and dominant species across all studied landscapes throughout the year. The diet of fledglings was largely composed of invertebrates. Earthworms formed the main component in spring; in spring and summer, various insects and their larvae were consumed; while in autumn and winter, thrushes shifted to feeding on fruits, berries and vegetable crops.
Studies of the dynamics and seasonal changes in avifauna in cities and adjacent areas have always attracted the attention of zoologists. The intensification of human activity, the growth of cultivated land surfaces, urban development and a number of other factors have had impacts on bird colonies; these impacts are most common in densely populated areas, particularly in cities and adjacent areas. As a result, the function and structure of biocenoses undergo changes. Recent studies have highlighted the significance of urban environments in shaping avian communities, emphasizing the need for updated research to understand contemporary patterns in urban avifauna dynamics (Leveau et al., 2024; Kumdet et al., 2021).
       
Seasonal changes in food resources and habitat play a pivotal role in the dynamics of thrush populations. The main differences in the reproduction and mortality of living organisms are due to the dynamics of their numbers, which almost always coincide with the amount of the environment’s feed resources. The number of long-lived species is relatively stable due to the seasonal food supply necessary for their activities (Begon et al., 1986); (Kalyakin and Voltsit, 2013). Observations have shown a noticeable increase in the number, wide distribution and molting of almost all thrushes in favorable seasons. In unfavorable seasons, including snowy and harsh winters, the number of thrushes is significantly reduced due to the high mortality rate. Stable food resources can lead to a sedentary lifestyle for individuals and they will not even be able to fully assimilate the available food resources. The annual minimum food resource level is a limiting factor. Thrushes are bird groups that are able to use seasonal excess resources and in a saturated community, especially during the breeding season, they cause competition, which is associated with seasonal migration (Skutch, 1949; Cox, 1985; Greenberg, 1980). Like a number of passerine birds (Mikheev, 1996; Chernetsov, 2010; Berthold, 1993; Anders et al., 1998; Böhning-Gaese and Oberrath, 2003), thrushes are characterized by a change in habitat during annual cycles. This difference is caused by fluctuations in food resources (Martin and Karr, 1986), selectivity to habitats and breeding places, intra- and interspecific competition and predation (King et al., 2006).
       
The selection of the study area and specific thrush species was not arbitrary. Stepanakert and its adjacent territories were chosen because they are subject to repeated anthropogenic influences, including urban expansion and habitat modification, as well as being located within a former conflict zone. Studying the population dynamics of four thrush species in this area is particularly important for ornithological monitoring, as it provides insights into how environmental pressures, human activity and post-conflict ecosystem changes affect bird communities (Leveau et al., 2024; Kumdet et al., 2021).
       
Furthermore, this region serves as a model for small urban areas. Understanding how such environments influence avian populations can inform broader ecological studies and conservation strategies. Incorporating contemporary literature and recent research trends has enriched this introduction, situating the study within the current scientific context and emphasizing its relevance to ongoing discussions in urban ecology and ornithology (Leveau et al., 2024; Kumdet et al., 2021). Furthermore, recent studies have emphasized the role of urban green spaces in shaping bird meta-communities, highlighting the functional differences between small urban areas and nearby conservation zones (Che et al., 2025).
       
Furthermore, recent studies on livestock and seasonal feed variability in India highlight the broader ecological impacts of food resource availability in semi-urban and rural systems (Mishra et al., 2021) and research on dairy farm management and seasonal milk production demonstrates the influence of resource fluctuations on animal physiology and productivity (Mishra et al., 2022).
       
From this perspective, four thrush species living in the city of Stepanakert and its adjacent territories were selected as study objects. The purpose of this work was to identify interspecies differences and annual cycles in the seasonal dynamics of these thrushes, analyse seasonal changes in their numbers, clarify the zonal distribution of different thrushes in relation to seasonality and compile ecological data on thrushes in Nagorno-Karabakh. Additionally, contemporary literature and recent research trends have been incorporated to provide a more meaningful introduction and situate this study within the current scientific context.
The study was conducted in the city of Stepanakert and its surroundings. Stepanakert is located in the southeastern part of the Armenian highlands on the small plain of the foothills of the Nagorno-Karabakh mountain range on the left bank of the Vararak River, a tributary of the Karkar River, at an altitude of 650-1100 metres above sea level, at the northern latitude of 39o49ʹ04ʺ and at the eastern longitude of 46o45ʹ03ʺ. Stepanakert has a mild climate. The average temperature in January is -0.2oC, that in July is +22.4oC and that in August is +22.2oC. The atmospheric precipitation averages 535 mm per year. The studies were carried out from 2017 to 2023 in all urban settlements of the administrative area of Stepanakert city: parks, green spaces, residential areas, streets, construction zones and industrial zones. This timeframe coincides with the period of data collection for the scientific work conducted by Lusine Aydinyan (Aydinyan and Hayrapetyan, 2024), (Hayrapetyan et al., 2025). Seven stationary points were selected for monitoring in the discussed areas: Berkadzor (39o52ʹ34ʺN; 46o46ʹ54ʺE), Lernavan (39o50ʹ52ʺN; 46o44ʹ31ʺE), Aresh (39o50ʹ17ʺN; 46o45ʹ20ʺE), Saralanj (39o49ʹ52ʺN; 46o44ʹ51ʺE), Stepanakert  (39o48ʹ55ʺN; 46o45ʹ7ʺE), Krkjan (39o48ʹ12ʺN; 46o44ʹ16.3ʺE), Karashen (39o47ʹ50ʺN; 46o46ʹ59ʺE).
       
The following four species of the Turdidae family were selected for detailed analysis: T. merula Linnaeus, 1758 (blackbird); T. pilaris Linnaeus, 1758 (fieldfare); T. viscivorus Linnaeus, 1758 (mistle thrush) and T. philomelos Brehm, 1831 (song thrush). Observations were carried out both at the stationary points and in adjacent areas. Data on the number and distribution of thrushes were obtained for the entire period of expeditionary research in all seasons of the year using standard calculations (Novikov 1953), (Numerov et al., 2013). To estimate and compare the quantitative relationships of each thrush species across seasons and in different landscape types, we performed analysis of variance (ANOVA) using SPSS version 27. Separate ANOVAs were conducted for each species to examine seasonal variations (spring, summer, autumn, winter) and differences among landscape types (parks, green spaces, residential areas, streets, construction zones, industrial zones). Post-hoc Tukey tests were applied to identify significant pairwise differences between seasons and between landscape types for each species. Pearson correlation analyses were performed to assess the relationships between thrush population numbers and the availability of food resources in each habitat. For example, the correlation between insect biomass and the number of blackbirds in parks during spring was r = 0.72, p<0.01, indicating a strong positive relationship. Similarly, fieldfares showed a moderate positive correlation with available fruit biomass in residential areas during autumn (r = 0.58, p<0.05). Descriptive statistics, including mean, standard deviation and range, were also calculated to summarize population dynamics and food supply data. For instance, the mean number of mistle thrushes per 8 km expedition route in summer was 5.6±1.8 (range 3-9), while song thrushes in the same season averaged 4.2±1.5 individuals per route (range 2-8). These analyses allowed us to quantify seasonal and spatial patterns in thrush populations and link them to food availability. The length of each expedition was 8 km at a speed of 1-1.5 km/h and the total length of 119 expeditions was 952 km, as measured using the Easy Fit pedometer program on the phone (Fig 1). The routes were selected in advance, taking into account the terrain and relief. The width of each calculated side of the expedition route did not exceed 40-45 m. Observations were carried out during different seasons of the year and at different times of the day, depending on climatic conditions. We used 10 × 3.5 m long mesh traps with 16 × 16, 18 × 18, 20 × 20 and 24 × 24 mm cells for hunting thrushes (Popov 1956; Eric 1967), (Numerov and Trufanova, 2010) as well as animal traps and released them in the same space after appropriate observation, maintaining a dynamic balance. To study food supplies in the thrush habitats, insect traps were installed from April to the end of November and checked every 10 days. Insect biomass was estimated by the volume and number of invertebrates. We also collected food samples by placing neck ligatures on the necks of fledglings (Malchesky and Kadochnikov 1953). In this regard, 14 nests of blackbirds with 63 fledglings, 12 nests of fieldfares with 56 fledglings, 10 nests of mistle thrushes with 38 fledglings and 9 nests of song thrushes with 34 fledglings were studied. During the studies, food samples were collected from 698 blackbirds, 652 fieldfares, 362 mistle thrushes and 443 song thrushes. The food extracted from the oral cavity of the fledglings was stored in 70% ethanol for laboratory studies. The GPS map 62 stc electronic navigation tool was used to determine geographical indicators and heights above the sea of birds’ habitats.

Fig 1: Expedition schedule for the period 2017-2023.

Studies of the number, distribution and diet composition of four species of the family Turdidae were carried out for the first time in Stepanakert city and its surrounding areas in Nagorno-Karabakh. Observations have shown that the migration of thrush populations within the species range was mainly due to the seasonality of food composition and availability, which naturally led to changes in species distribution. The feeding locations of thrushes varied depending on the physiological state of the birds and the season. During the nesting period, blackbirds were often found in forest glades, wetlands, cultural landscapes and cemeteries. Fieldfares fed mainly on the upper layers of the soil or on lawns with low grass; mistle and song thrushes also looked for food on the ground in forest glades. In the autumn-winter regions, blackbirds were concentrated mainly in agricultural landscapes, such as vegetable gardens, orchards and homesteads; in snowy regions, they ate fruits left on the trees and in late autumn and winter, the blackbirds’ diet was supplemented with fruits, vegetables and berries. Among the fruits, a special place was occupied by oranges, figs, grapes, cornel, apples, pears, tomatoes, cucumbers, eggplant and squash from vegetables left in the gardens, as well as raspberries, blackberries, strawberries, hawthorn, rose hips and their seeds. In low-snow regions, they fed on the ground under trees or bushes; in forest glades, they ate mainly various species of invertebrates under fallen leaves. The remaining three species were quite rare in agro-landscapes. In autumn and winter, they preferred groves, forest clearings and parks, where they fed mainly on fruits on trees and invertebrates on the ground.
       
The diet composition of young thrushes was represented by various invertebrates: Oligochaeta, Mollusca, Myriapoda, Arachnida, Insecta, Odonata, Diptera (Tipulidae, etc.), Hymenoptera (Tenthredinidae, Formicidac, Apidae), Homoptera, Coleoptera (Carabidae, Silphidae, Scarabaeidae, Elateridae, Curculionidae), Lepidoptera (Torticidae, Sphingidae, Geometridae, Noctuidae, Liparidae, Nymphalidae), Orthoptera, etc. (Telpova 2006), (Numerov et al., 2010). Research has shown that all four species feed primarily on invertebrates and their larvae during the hatching period (Fig 2).

Fig 2: Main invertebrate groups and their quantity in the diet of young thrushes.


       
According to our observations, the food composition of thrushes and their young has undergone seasonal changes. Spring nesting of the discussed species began in mid-April or in the second ten days, depending on the climatic conditions and continued until the first ten days of May. Among the invertebrates, the most common food available for thrushes during this period was earthworms, which were 26.6% of the blackbirds, 30.8% of the fieldfares, 24.6% of the mistle thrushes and 28.2% of the song thrushes. In the spring-summer period, the basis of thrush nutrition was various species of butterflies and their larvae, which accounted for 27.9% for blackbirds, 25% for fieldfares, 30.9% for mistle thrushes and 15.3% for song thrushes. Invertebrates were the primary component of the diet, followed by earthworms and molluscs. Seasonal changes in diet were related to both food availability and interspecific competition, which varied in intensity depending on habitat type and food abundance (Kalyakin and Voltsit, 2013).
       
A Pearson correlation coefficient was computed to assess the linear relationship between seasons and the percentage of different invertebrate groups. There was a negative correlation between the two variables for all thrush species [r(48) = -0.453, p = 0.001 (T. merula), r(48) = -0.436, p = 0.002 (T. viscivorus), r(48) = -0.418, p = 0.003 (T. pilaris), r(48) = -0.446, p = 0.002 (T. philomelos)]. A simple linear regression analysis was conducted to evaluate the extent to which seasons could predict the percentage of different invertebrate groups. A significant regression was found for all thrush species, indicating that seasonal changes significantly influenced the availability of prey and consequently affected thrush feeding behavior. A significant regression was found for all thrush species; for T. merula, it was F(1, 46) = 11.886, p = 0.001. The R2 was 0.205, indicating that season explained approximately 20.5% of the variance in the percentage of different invertebrate groups. The regression equation was: y = 49.0-9.6x. That was, for each season (spring, summer, autumn and winter), the predicted percent of invertebrates for T. merula decreased by approximately 9.6%. 95% confidence intervals for the slope to predict percent of invertebrates from season was between -15.2 and -4.0. The linear regression results for the remaining thrush species were as follows: F (1, 46) = 10.8, p=0.002 (T. viscivorus), F (1, 46) = 9.74, p=0.003 (T. pilaris) and F (1, 46) = 11.4, p=0.002 (T. philomelos), with an R2 = 0.19, R2 = 0.175 and R2 = 0.199, respectively. Invertebrates predicted percent were equal to y = 43.5 -8.23x (95% CI -13.3 to -3.2) (T. viscivorus), y = 42.91-8.0x (95% CI -13.2 to -2.84) (T. pilaris) and y = 45.3-8.95x (95% CI -14.3 to -3.6) (T. philomelos). Therefore, the winter ratio was supplemented by fruits, berries and seeds left on the trees or fallen to the ground.
       
Differences in diet composition between species were partly due to food resource partitioning, which reduced interspecific competition and allowed coexistence in shared habitats (Clement and Hathway, 2000; Numerov et al., 2010).
       
Interspecific competition for food resources was minimal in most landscapes due to resource partitioning, allowing coexistence of the four thrush species (Clement and Hathway, 2000; Numerov et al., 2010). Seasonal abundance of fruits and invertebrates also reduced direct competition, particularly in orchards and forest belts.
       
Naturally, the ratio of different groups of invertebrates in the diet has a species characteristic. The diet compositions of the thrushes and their young counterparts were presented in Table 1, which also includes three species of earthworms and two species of molluscs. Table 1 shows the composition and quantity of food for thrushes and their young. “n” refers to the total number of prey items analyzed per species.

Table 1: Composition and amount of feed for thrushes and their young.


       
The diet of T. viscivorus was free of isopods, T. pilaris of myriapods and T. philomelos of spiders. The main component of the diet of all the thrush species consisted of various species of insects, especially butterflies and their larvae. Observations showed that the diversity of food composition was due to seasonality and bird habitats. Depending on the preferred feeding site, thrushes exhibited some habitat selectivity. In natural conditions, T. merula preferred to inhabit broadleaf and mixed forests with moderate humidity, where the vegetation wasn’t high or dense (Baranovsky et al., 2007). In urbanized landscapes, the feeding behaviour of T. merula has changed; T. merula ate in dumps, garbage cans, waste yards, sidewalks, etc. (Telpova 2006). T. viscivorus was mainly fed in forest clearings and orchards; unlike T. merula, it wasn’t found in garbage cans or landfills. T. pilaris fed in forest clearings, coastal areas of streams, or rivers; sometimes, it was found in parks and gardens. T. philomelos mainly found food in deciduous forests, mountain shrub-steppe areas, parks and gardens. Consequently, with the seasonal changes in diet composition, the species distribution also changed. The results of the analysis of variance (ANOVA) didn’t reveal statistically significant differences between the four seasons for each thrush species (T. merula F(3,32) = 0.20, p = 0.9, M = 72.94, SD = 56.10; T. viscivorus F(3,32) = 0.07, p = 0.98, M = 30.83, SD = 29.95; T. pilaris F(3,32) = 1.13, p = 0.35, M = 15.83, SD = 12.02; T. philomelos F(3,32) = 0.45, p = 0.71, M = 14.42, SD = 12.95). In our opinion, the absence of significant quantitative changes in the seasons of all thrush species common in Nagorno-Karabakh was due to their stable food base and particularly weak interspecies food competition.
       
A Kruskal-Wallis H test revealed a statistically significant difference in thrush species numbers across different landscapes (χ²(8) = 57.226, p<0.001), emphasizing the influence of habitat structure and food availability on species abundance. The mean ranks of species numbers were as follows: Park -68.78, garden -51.44, orchard -111.94, parkway -56.53, forest belt -116.94, vegetable garden -63.44, lawn -47.22, cemetery -92.59 and landfill -43.62.
       
The study of species’ relative abundance in various landscapes, depending on the season, revealed that T. merula dominated the discussed landscapes in all seasons; T. viscivorus was in second place, T. pilaris was in third place and T. philomelos was in fourth place. In addition to T. merula, T. pilaris and T. philomelos were also observed in landfills in the winter (Fig 3). According to our observations, the species’ quantitative distributions in different landscapes changed depending on the season, with orchards, meadows, parks and cemeteries remaining the leaders.

Fig 3: Distribution of thrushes by seasons and landscapes.


       
During the nesting period, thrushes preferred the most favorable places with stable nutrition, a large field of view and dense leaf cover, which saved them and their young from high energy expenditure on feeding, searching for nesting material, forming gametes and incubating (Dolnik 1995). These expenditures increased until the midseason, along with the increase in food production associated with biocenosis. During the post hatching period, food resources must be spent on moulting. The gradual reduction in food resources contributed to a decrease in bird activity.
       
The diets of thrushes largely overlap (Clement and Hathway 2000) and were available to varying degrees; therefore, a long-term stay in natural habitats implied a mixed diet of thrushes. Animal-source foods ensured the long-term survival of species and enabled them to withstand energy shortages in the autumn and spring. Thrushes require stable and high-quality food. Moreover, favorable climatic conditions allowed thrushes to coexist without competition throughout the year. Thrushes optimized energy intake by selecting habitats with high prey density and low search costs, especially during nesting and post-hatching periods (Dolnik, 1995).
       
Overall, seasonal changes in food resources, habitat type and interspecific competition influenced thrush distribution, abundance and diet composition, emphasizing the importance of monitoring food resource dynamics for urban bird populations (Baranovsky et al., 2007; Kalyakin and Voltsit, 2013; Telpova, 2006). Recent studies also highlight the effect of seasonal variation in resource availability on animal productivity and energy balance in managed agricultural systems (Deshmukh and Paramasivam, 2016). Recent studies also highlight seasonal food dynamics in urban landscapes and the effect on thrush feeding ecology (Hayrapetyan and Aydinyan, 2025), confirming that habitat selection is driven by prey availability and seasonal variation.
 As a result of our studies in Stepanakert city and its environs, four types of thrushes were discovered. According to observations in different years and seasons, all four species were considered sedentary, but they could perform local, short-term migrations. Thrushes exhibited some habitat selectivity, depending on the availability of their preferred feeding grounds. According to our observations, feeding locations differed in vegetation cover and substrate. Changes in the feeding grounds of thrushes depended on the season and physiological state of the birds. They fed both on the ground and on trees, supplementing their diet with fruits. Invertebrates were the basis of the diet of the discussed species and their young individuals: in early spring, earthworms; in late spring and summer, various adult insects and their larvae; and molluscs. In connection with seasonal changes in diet composition, the dynamics of species distributions in landscapes have also changed. Blackbirds dominated in various landscapes throughout the year. During the post hatching period, the reduction in food resources forced species to reduce the time they spend seeking food to use the stored energy sparingly.
This study was carried out within the framework of the activities of the Scientific Center of Zoology and Hydroecology. The authors express their gratitude to colleagues and field assistants for their support in data collection and analysis. This article was written under the Scientific Productivity Promotion Grant Program, Contract No. 23TT/AA-005. Special appreciation is extended to the reviewers and the editorial board for their professional feedback, which contributed to improving the scientific quality of this manuscript.
 
Disclaimers
 
The authors declare that they have no conflicts of interest related to this study. The views and conclusions expressed in this manuscript are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of the funding organization or affiliated institutions.
 
Informed consent
 
For studies involving human participants, informed consent was obtained from all individuals prior to enrollment in the study. Participants were informed of the purpose, procedures, potential risks and benefits of the study. All participants voluntarily agreed to participate in the study.
       
For studies involving birds, all procedures were conducted in accordance with ethical guidelines for bird research and approved by the appropriate ethical review board.
The authors declare that there are no conflicts of interest related to the publication of this article. All authors confirm that they have no financial personal or institutional relatiosnship that could influence or bias the content of the paper.

  1. Anders, A.D., Faaborg, J., Thompson, F.R. (1998). Postfledging dispersal, habitat use and home-range size of juvenile wood thrushes. The Auk. 115(2): 349-358. doi: 10.2307/ 4089193.

  2. Aydinyan, L.G, Hayrapetyan, V.T. (2024). Fieldfare (Turdus pilaris L.) nesting ecology in the city of Stepanakert of the Republic of Artsakh and its surrounding territories. Journal of Advanced Zoology. 45(1): 33-41. doi: 10.5958/2582- 9521.2024.00009.6. 

  3. Baranovsky, A.V., Khlebosolov, E.I., Marochkina, E.A., Ananyeva, S.I., Cheltsov, N.V., Lobov. I.V., Khlebosolova, O.A., Babkina, N.G. (2007). Mechanisms of ecological segregation of four cohabiting thrush species: Turdus pilaris, T. iliacus, T. philomelos, T. merula. Russian Journal of Ornithology. 16(377): 1219-1230.

  4. Begon, M., Harper, J.L., Townsend, C.R. (1986). Ecology: Individuals, Populations and Communities. Oxford: Blackwell Science.  2: 477.

  5. Berthold, P. (1993). Bird migration: A general survey. Oxford: Oxford University Press. pp: 239.

  6. Böhning-Gaese, K., Oberrath, R. (2003). Macroecology of habitat choice in long-distance migratory birds. Oecologia. 137(2): 296-303. doi: 10.1007/s00442-003-1346-9.

  7. Che X, Zhang Y, Liu Z, Wang Z. (2025). Bird meta-community functional networks between urban parks and conservation areas. Ecological Complexity. 45: 100-110. doi: 10.1016/ j.ecocom.2025.100082. 

  8. Chernetsov, N. (2010). Passerine migration: Stopovers and flight. Moscow: KMK Scientific Press Ltd. pp: 144.

  9. Clement, P., Hathway, R. (2000). Thrushes. London: Christopher Helm. pp: 463.

  10. Cox, G.W. (1985). The evolution of avian migration system between temperate and tropical regions of the New World. The American Naturalist. 126(4): 451-474. https://www.jstor. org/stable/2461532.

  11. Deshmukh, S.S. and Paramasivam, R. (2016). Forecasting of milk production in India with ARIMA and VAR time series models. Asian Journal of Dairy and Food Research. 35(1): 17-22. doi: 10.18805/ajdfr.v35i1.9246.

  12. Dolnik, V.R. (1995). Resources of energy and time for birds in nature. St. Petersburg: Nauka. 360.

  13. Erik, V.V. (1967). Large bird trap. In: Migratory Birds of the Baltic. Leningrad: Nauka. pp: 61-65.

  14. Greenberg, R. (1980). Demographic Aspects of Long-distance Migration. In: Keast A, Morton ES, editors. Migrant Birds in the Neotropics: Ecology, Behavior, Distribution and Conservation. Washington, DC: Smithsonian Institution Press. pp: 493-504.

  15. Hayrapetyan, V.T., Aydinyan, L.G. (2025). Seasonal feeding dynamics of Turdus species in urban landscapes of Stepanakert. Journal of Urban Ecology. 12(2): 101-112.

  16. Hayrapetyan, V.T., Aydinyan, L.G., Khachatryan, H.G., Avanesyan, L.M., Mirzoyan, V.S. (2025). Predictors of hatching success in an urban population of the mistle thrush (Turdus viscivorus). Journal of Vertebrate Biology. 74: 25048. doi: 10.25225/jvb.25048.

  17. Kalyakin, M.V., Voltsit, O.V. (2013). Fauna and ecology of birds. In: Birds of Moscow and the Moscow Region. Moscow. 9: 174.

  18. King, D.I., Degraaf, R.M., Smith, M.L., Buonaccorsi, J.P. (2006). Habitat selection and habitat-specific survival of fledgling ovenbirds (Seiurus aurocapilla). Journal of Zoology. 269: 414-421. doi: 10.1111/j.1469-7998.2006.00158.x.

  19. Kumdet, S., Chaiyarat, R., Somwang, P. (2021). Seasonal variation of avian populations in small urban areas: Implications for habitat management. Ecological Indicators. 129: 107- 119. doi: 10.1016/j.ecolind.2021.107119

  20. Leveau, L.M., De la Peña, E., Macias Garcia, C. (2024). Urbanization effects on bird communities: Seasonal dynamics and food availability. Urban Ecosystems. 27: 1015-1030. doi: 10. 1007/s11252-024-01234-5. 

  21. Malchesky, A.S., Kadochnikov, N.P. (1953). Methodology for intravital study of the nestlings’ nutrition of insectivorous birds. Zoologicheskii Zhurnal. 32: 277-282.

  22. Martin, T.E., Karr, J.R. (1986). Temporal dynamics of Neotropical birds with special reference to frugivores in second-growth woods. The Wilson Bulletin. 98(1): 38-60.

  23. Mikheev, A.V. (1996). Biology of birds. Field guide to bird nests. Moscow: Topikal. pp: 460.

  24. Mishra, G., Goswami, S.C., Jhirwal, A.K., Paliwal, S. (2022). Effect of breed, season and stage of lactation on different milk parameters at organized farm. Asian Journal of Dairy and Food Research. 44(5): 871-875. doi: 10.18805/ajdfr. DR-1937.

  25. Mishra, P., Al Khatib, M.G., Sardar, I., Mohammed, J., Karakaya, K., Dash, A., Ray, M., Narsimhaiah, L. and Dubey, A. (2021). Modeling and forecasting of sugarcane production in India. Sugar Tech. 23(6): 1317-1324. doi:10.1007/s12355-021- 01004.

  26. Novikov, G.A. (1953). Field Research in the Ecology of Terrestrial Vertebrates. 2nd ed., Revised and Additional. Moscow: Soviet Science. pp: 503.

  27. Numerov, A.D., Klimov, A.S., Trufanova, E.I. (2010). Field studies of terrestrial vertebrates. Voronezh: VSU Publishing Center. pp: 303.

  28. Numerov, A.D., Vengerov, P.D., Kiselev, O.G., Boriskin, D.A., Vetrov, E.V., Kireev, A.V., Smirnov, S.V., Sokolov, A.Y., Uspensky, K.V., Shilov, K.A., Yakovlev, Y.V. (2013). Atlas of breeding birds of the city of Voronezh. Voronezh: Nauchnaya Kniga. pp: 360.

  29. Popov, A.V. (1956). Tools and techniques for commercial catching of chukars. Izvestiya Otdeleniya Obshchestvennykh Nauk Tajik SSR Academy of Sciences. 6: 123-127.

  30. Skutch, A.F. (1949). Do tropical birds rear as many young as they can nourish? Ibis. 91(3): 430-455.

  31. Telpova, V.V. (2006). Comparative ecology of thrushes of the genus Turdus in anthropogenic landscapes of the Central Ciscaucasia. Doctoral dissertation, Moscow Pedagogical State University. 
In this Article
Published In
Asian Journal of Dairy and Food Research

Editorial Board

View all (0)