Physico-chemical analysis of papaya, pineapple and aloe vera mixed fruit jam during storage
Titrable acidity
Over the storage period, mixed fruit jam titratable acidity increased (p<0.05) significantly (Table 2). This might be due to oxidation of sugar and polysaccharide hydrolysis and the addition of citric acid to the mixed fruit jam as well. These findings were similar to the results of pineapple juice blend with carrot and orange juice (
Jan and Masih, 2012).
pH
The pH of all treatments was declined significantly by means of rise of storing duration as indicated in Table 2. Raise of acidity for the period of storage may be the reason for this (
Hirdyani, 2015). In ready to serve (RTS) cabbage and key lime blended drinks through storage, similar results were perceived
(Inthuja et al., 2019).
Ascorbic acid
The ascorbic acid content of the mixed fruit jam in Table 2 was decreased as the storage time increased. According to DMRT, the amount of ascorbic acid in all treatments revealed an important decreasing trend in storage (p<0.05). Due to the oxidation of ascorbic acid by oxygen in the containers into dehydro-ascorbic acid and non-enzymatic browning reactions, the cause for ascorbic acid reduction during storage is probable
(Patel et al., 2015). These kind of results were recorded in RTS from medicinal plants (
Hirdyani, 2015) and mulberry squash (
Thakur and Hamid, 2017).
Moisture content
An indication of the shelf life of the any food is moisture. In Table 3, the moisture content of all treatments decreased significantly (p<0.05) over the storage period. The observed variations in moisture content could be attributed to the heating process used in processing. The removal of water during jam processing resulted in a change in the concentration of food nutrients
(Rana et al., 2021).
Total soluble solid
Per the DMRT, there were significant (p<0.005) increasing in total soluble solids among treatments. This may be because of the degradation during storage of complex polysaccharides into simple sugars and also increase in concentration of jam due to dehydration (
Bhardwaj and Mukherjee, 2011). These results were consistent with the previous RTS from orange juice and
Aloe vera gel (
Kausar, 2020) and in seabuckthorn squash
(Ali et al., 2011).
Total sugar
The total sugar content of mixed fruit jam during storage has increased as in Table 3. Any of the reasons for increasing the sugar content during storage may be the hydrolysis of polysaccharides such as pectin and starch and the distortion of non-reducing sugars into reducing sugars, leading to an increase in total sugars in the jam (
Hariharan and Mahendran, 2016). In papaya and pineapple mixed RTS (
Sindhumathi and Premalatha, 2013) and sapota squash
(Relekar et al., 2013) the same increase in total sugars was reported.
Sensory analysis
The results in terms of sensory qualities are shown in Table 4. The color, aroma, taste, texture and overall acceptability scores of jams steadily decreased as the storage period advanced, according to the sensory evaluation results. The most important parameters used during consumption are the color of the food product. The highest mean value (5.5) observed in the T2 formulation is based on the mean value of sensory scores. The formation of off-color compounds is the result of carotenoid breakdown, which could be accelerated by reduced oxygen in the headspace via oxidation
(Gliemmo et al., 2009). The highest mean value score for taste was 5.4 for the T4 formulation and the lowest mean value score was 3.9 for the T5 formulation at the end of storage. The decrease of jam’s sugar-acid combination during storage could explain the product’s drop in taste ratings
(Chauhan et al., 2019). The T
4 treatment had the highest mean value score of 5.5 and the lowest mean value score of 3.2 for the T
2 treatment in the potential explanation for a drop in the texture score may be owing to the presence of galacturonic acids, the adverse effect of humidity and ambient temperature. In sapota squash, comparable results were perceived
(Relekar et al., 2013). T
4 had a maximum mean aroma score (5.7) and T
2 had a minimum mean aroma score of 3.5 at the end. Mean aroma scores showed a significant decrease in the aroma of mixed fruit jam after a storage period of 10 weeks. The loss of volatile aromatic components is most likely to blame for the reduction of aroma scores after storage (
Thakur and Hamid, 2017). The overall acceptability score was found to be the highest in T
4 (5.8) and the lowest mean value score in T
5 (2.1) considering the texture, color, aroma and taste of mixed fruit jam. Because of changes in texture, flavor components and processing variables such as temperature and storage duration, jam’s overall acceptance scores may deteriorate over time
(Ullah et al., 2015).