Development of Vegan Probiotic Chocolate

P
P. Jayamma1,*
A
A.D. Srikanth Tangirala2
R
R. Aruna1
R
R. Kavya1
K
K. Visishta1
K
Kummari Sirisha1
1Department of Food Safety and Quality Assurance, College of Food Science and Technology, Acharya N.G. Ranga Agricultural University, Pulivendula-516 390, Kadapa, Andhra Pradesh, India. 
2Department of Food Process Engineering, College of Food Science and Technology, Acharya N.G. Ranga Agricultural University, Pulivendula-516 390, Kadapa, Andhra Pradesh, India. 

Background: Probiotics are live microorganisms that, when administered in adequate amounts, confer health benefits to the host. However, options for lactose-intolerant individuals are limited due to the predominant use of dairy-based carriers. The present study was undertaken to isolate and identify potential probiotic strains and develop a novel dairy-free probiotic chocolate using microencapsulated Lactobacillus spp. with fruit pulp as a natural prebiotic source.

Methods: Fifteen bacterial isolates were obtained from yogurt samples and subjected to biochemical and sugar fermentation tests, leading to the identification of five Lactobacillus isolates (LC1 to LC5). These were evaluated for probiotic potential under varied pH (2 to 7) and NaCl concentrations (2%, 4%, 6%, and 8%). Antimicrobial activity was assessed via the well diffusion method and antibiotic susceptibility was determined by the disc diffusion assay. The most promising isolate, LC1, was microencapsulated and incorporated into a dairy-free chocolate matrix using coconut pulp as a prebiotic. The encapsulated beads were added before setting the chocolate at 2-3°C and the final product was analyzed for texture properties.

Result: Optimal bacterial growth was observed at pH 6. Isolate LC1 demonstrated the highest salt tolerance and significant antimicrobial activity with a 3 mm inhibition zone. It also showed minimal susceptibility to antibiotics, indicating probiotic robustness. The incorporation of microencapsulated LC1 into chocolate slightly increased hardness compared to the control but retained desirable sensory properties. The developed product offers a functional and palatable probiotic food option for lactose-intolerant individuals.

Probiotics, whether consumed as dietary supplements or through functional food products, have emerged as key components in the realm of health-promoting nutrition. They have long been recognized as vital agents offering a range of potential health benefits and are a focal point in commercial health food development (Sanz et al., 2016; Hamad et al., 2022). The term probiotic was first introduced by Werner Kollath in 1953, derived from the Latin pro and the Greek Bio, meaning “for life.” Kollath described probiotics as active substances with essential roles in supporting various aspects of health (Gasbarrini et al., 2016). Later, the Food and Agriculture Organization (FAO) and the World Health Organization (WHO) defined probiotics as “live microorganisms which, when administered in adequate amounts, confer a health benefit on the host”. Microorganisms from several genera, including Pediococcus, Lactococcus, Enterococcus, Streptococcus, Propionibacterium and Bacillus, have been identified as promising candidates for probiotic application (De Brito Alves  et al., 2016; Hamad  et al., 2022). Probiotics not only aid the gut by increasing the number of beneficial bacteria and inhibiting harmful bacteria but also strengthen the body’s immune response. Prebiotics, act as ‘food’ for these beneficial probiotic bacteria, promoting their activity. The combinations of pre-and probiotics are called symbiotics as both work together in a synergistic manner to enhance the probiotic benefits (Sugandhi et al., 2018; Gehlot et al., 2018).
       
Probiotics can be consumed through various means, including their incorporation into dairy and non-dairy food products or as dietary supplements (Fenster et al., 2019). Many fermented foods naturally contain active microbial strains that are genetically similar to those recognized as probiotics. These fermented products not only contribute beneficial microbes but also improve the functional and nutritional profile of foods by transforming raw substrates into bioactive and bioavailable compounds (Marco et al., 2017). An effective daily dose of probiotics has been identified as approximately 10y  colony-forming units (CFU) (Hill et al., 2014). To meet this effective dosage, the food industry has introduced probiotics into a wide range of products such as beverages, yogurt, ice cream, bread and more. However, a major challenge in probiotic application is their vulnerability to harsh processing conditions and gastrointestinal (GI) stresses, which can compromise their viability. Despite these limitations, consumer interest in probiotic-enriched foods remains strong due to their associated health benefits (Konuray and Erginkaya, 2018).
       
Lactose intolerance (LI) is a condition characterized by the inability to digest lactose due to low levels of lactase enzyme activity. Symptoms of LI include bloating, nausea, abdominal cramping and diarrhoea. Lactase enzyme activity is affected by several factors such as age, race, integrity of the small intestinal membrane and small intestinal transit time. Prevalence of LI in adult populations varies from 5 per cent to 15 per cent in European and North American countries, and 50 per cent to 90 per cent in African, Asian, and South American countries, highest rates of LI are found in the Asian populations (Misselwitz et al., 2013).
       
Prebiotics are non-digestible, selectively fermented dietary fibers that promote the growth and activity of specific bacterial genera in the gastrointestinal tract, thereby offering health benefits to the host. They can feed the intestinal microbiota, and their degradation products are short-chain fatty acids that are released into blood circulation, consequently, affecting not only the gastrointestinal tracts but also other distant organs. Fructo-oligosaccharides and galacto-oligosaccharides are the two important groups of prebiotics with beneficial effects on human health (Davani-Davari  et al., 2019)
       
The most widely studied prebiotics are inulin-type fructans and galacto-oligosaccharides. The selective nature of prebiotics is driven by species-specific gene clusters found in saccharolytic bacteria, which are regulated by substrate-responsive signaling mechanisms. The beneficial effects of prebiotics are largely attributed to immune modulation and the production of bacterial metabolites. In humans, prebiotic supplementation has been shown to increase the abundance of beneficial gut microbiota, such as Bifidobacteria, enhance immune function and, depending on the microbial response, stimulate the production of short-chain fatty acids (SCFAs). Gastrointestinal disorders like irritable bowel syndrome (IBS) and Crohn’s disease are commonly associated with a decline in beneficial gut bacteria and heightened mucosal inflammation (Wilson and Whelan, 2017).
       
Encapsulation is a mechanical or physicochemical process that traps a potentially sensitive material and provide a protective barrier between it and the external conditions (Katke et al., 2022). Vegan chocolate is made of fine solid sugar and cocoa particles suspended in a continuous fat phase. Chocolate solidifies between 20 and 25°C and melts at body temperature (37°C), resulting in a smooth suspension of solid particles and a pleasant sensation in the mouth. The continuous phase affects sensory qualities like melt in the mouth or mouth feel. There are plenty of commercially accessible probiotic-infused dairy-based items on the market, including frozen treats, dairy products, baby food, chocolate and puddings (Abbasiliasi et al., 2019). The development of probiotic chocolate with fruit pulp added for prebiotic benefits is suggested by the current investigation.
       
The main objective of this study is to develop a vegan probiotic chocolate, along with fruit pulp as prebiotic source, using microencapsulated Lactobacillus strains which were isolated, identified and screened for their potential probiotic properties.
Isolation of lactobacillus
 
The lactic acid bacteria were isolated from yoghurt collected from the local market. A loop full of yogurt was inoculated into 20 ml sterile MRS broth under aseptic conditions and incubated at 37°C for 24 h in a rotary orbital shaker. A loop full of the inoculated broth was streak plated on MRS agar and incubated at 37°C up to 18 h. Bacterial colonies grown were purified by repeated streaking. The bacterial isolates were examined for their colony morphology, gram staining character, biochemical tests (Mannan et al., 2017). Identified pure cultures were stored in MRS agar slant for further study.

Screening of bacterial isolates for probiotic properties
 
Acid tolerance test
 
Test tubes containing MRS broth were adjusted to pH 2 to 7 using HCl and NaOH to decrease and increase the pH respectively. After sterilization, each test tube was inoculated with 0.1% fresh overnight grown probiotic culture, incubated at 37°C for 24 h and the growth was determined by Spectrophotometer at 600 nm absorbance (Reda et al., 2018).
 
Salt tolerance test
 
Test tubes containing MRS broth with different concentrations of NaCl (2%, 4%, 6% and 8%) were prepared. After sterilization, each test tube was inoculated with 0.1% fresh overnight culture, incubated at 37°C for 24 h and the growth was determined by Spectrophotometer at 600 nm absorbance (Reda et al., 2018).
 
Antimicrobial activity
 
The Lactobacillus isolates were examined for their antimicrobial activity against the indicator microorganism Staphylococcus aureus by well diffusion method. Antibacterial activity was estimated as the diameter of the inhibitory zone formed around the wells (Forhad et al., 2015).
 
Antibiotic susceptibility test
 
Antibiotic susceptibility test is widely performed using disc diffusion method. MRS agar plate containing 10 μL of bacterial isolate was prepared in this present study. Antibiotic discs containing Meropenem, Ciproflaxin, Tobramycin, Moxiflaxin, Ofloxacin, Sparfloxacin, Levoflaxin, Impenem were placed on MRS agar plates containing bacterial isolate and zone of inhibition were noted after incubation at 37°C for 24 hr (Hoque et al., 2010).
 
Encapsulation of probiotic bacteria
 
Procedure
 
Sodium alginate solution was prepared by dissolving 2 g (w/v) of sodium alginate powder with 100 ml distilled water in 250 ml sterilized beaker. Afterward, it was heated until boiling for proper mixing. Calcium chloride solution was prepared by dissolving 5 g (w/v) calcium chloride granules in 500 ml beaker with simultaneous gentle stirring. Both the reagents were sterilized before use. The cell biomass was added to a 2.0% (w/v) strength sodium alginate solution with gentle stirring. Under aseptic conditions, the bacterial alginate suspension was packed into the sanitized container of spray gun (make pilot spray gun P-5) having nozzle size of 1.6 mm and this was connected to a laboratory air compressor (range: 14-58 psi). The filled alginate cell biomass mix was then sprayed into prepared 1% (w/v) calcium chloride solution. This allowed the formation of microcapsules, and these beads were allowed to harden for 5 min. The probiotic ca-alginate beads were then harvested with the help of sanitized nylon sieve (size <100 µm) and were air-dried at the normal temperature (Mandal et al., 2012).
 
Preparation of probiotic chocolates
 
Preparation of chocolate
 
By double boiler method, over low heat, add 50 gm-coconut oil, 10gm-cocoa powder, 45 gm-icing sugar. Stir constantly until well combined and a pourable consistency is achieved. Add in the vanilla essence and whisk until just combined. The prepared chocolate was allowed to cool to room temperature (Fig 1).

Fig 1: Flowchart for preparation of probiotic chocolate.


 
Preparation of fruit pulp
 
Collect tender coconut flesh and shred into fine pieces. Blend the coconut shreds with equal amount of water. Strain the mixture to separate coconut milk. The coconut pulp is obtained.
 
Texture analysis
 
Chocolate samples in block shape were analysed for their textural properties using Brookfield CT3-texture analyser with TA44 type penetration probe. Hardness and fracturability were determined by penetration analysis with test speed 1mm/s, pre-test speed 1 mm/s in 2 cycle penetration. Analysis was done in ambient temperature at 30°C, where each sample was frozen in first cycle and entered melting phase in second cycle (Limbardo et al., 2017).
This chapter contains the results obtained for isolation, identification of lactobacillus bacteria and results of screening test for potential probiotic bacteria. The obtained results are represented in suitable forms and discussed.
 
Isolation of lactobacillus bacteria
 
A total of 15 lactobacillus isolates were cultured on MRS agar plate by streak plate method and initially subjected to morphological and biochemical tests.
 
Identification of lactobacillus bacteria
 
Based on the morphological characteristics of the bacteria, among 15 isolates five isolates were found to be Gram-positive, non-sporeforming, rod shaped as shown in Table 1.

Table 1: Colony morphological characteristics of lactobacillus isolates obtained from yogurt.


 
Screening of bacterial isolates for probiotic properties
 
Acid tolerance
 
The acid tolerance test helps in studying the survival of the strains under low pH gastric juice conditions.In the present studies, it was observed that as pH increased from 2 to 7, there was a gradual increase in turbidity and reached maximum at pH 6 as shown in the Fig 2. This indicates that the probiotic isolates are tolerant to acidic environment. Table 4 indicates that LC1 isolate showed maximum growth (OD580nm=0.250) at pH 2 followed by LC4 (OD580 nm=0.214) and minimum growth is seen in LC5. Pundir et al., (2013) reported that the lactobacillus isolated from fresh vegetables and curd survived in pH 3.5 to pH 7. Similar study conducted by Hoque et al., (2010) found lactobacillus growth in pH 2.5 to pH 8.5.

Fig 2: Acid tolerance of lactobacillus isolates.


       
The sodium chloride tolerance test was performed to test the organism’s ability to tolerate various osmotic conditions. As sodium chloride concentration increases from 2 to 6 percentthe growth was decreased as shown in Fig 3. Table 2 indicates the growth of bacteria at different NaCl concentrations. The LC1 showed maximum growth at 8 percent concentration (OD580nm=1.026) followed by LC3 (OD580nm=0.649) and LC5 showed minimum growth (OD580 nm=0.198). Mannan et al., (2017) stated that all the isolates were able to grow 2% and 4% of sodium chloride concentration of lactobacillus species from yoghurt and cheese samples in Dhaka Metropolitan area. Absorbance at 580 nm.

Fig 3: NaCl tolerance of lactobacillus isolates.



Table 2: Growth of lactobacillus isolates at different NaCl concentrations.


 
Antimicrobial activity
 
The results of antimicrobial activity of the probiotic culture showed that the probiotic isolate can restrain the growth of pathogenic bacteria. The zone of inhibition produced by the bacteria indicates its antimicrobial activity as shown in Table 3. The antimicrobial effect could be due to the production of acetic acid or lactic acids that lowers the overall pH. The isolate LC1 clearly exhibited the zone of inhibition (3 mm) for antimicrobial activity against S. aureusas as shown in Fig 4. The isolates LC2 and LC3 produced a inhibition zone of 1.6 and 1.2 mm respectively. Whereas LC4 and LC5 isolates did not exhibit zone of inhibition against the pathogenic bacteria.

Table 3: Antimicrobial activity of lactobacillus isolates against pathogenic bacteria.



Fig 4: Zone of inhibition produced by lactobacillus bacteria.


       
Sharma and Bisht (2017) reported the effects of lactobacillus isolates of curd against food borne and human pathogens. It was observed that none of the lactobacilli cellfree supernatant (CFS) exhibited inhibitory activity against four pathogens, namely Staphylococcus aureus, Listeria monocytogenes, Escherichia coli and Klebsiella pneumoniae. Bacillus cereus, Salmonella enterica serovar Typhi and Shigella flexneri were moderately inhibited by majority of CFSs, whereas, weak activity was observed against Pseudomonas aeruginosa and Proteus mirabilis. CFS of some of the curd isolates displayed antagonistic activity against Streptococcus mutans; however, human milk lactobacilli did not displayed any inhibitory activity against them. Kang et al., (2017) also reported that lactobacillus spp. had bactericidal effect against planktonic and biofilm S.aureus. It was observed that Cell-free supernatant that was pH neutralized and heat inactivated or proteinase K treated had significantly reduced killing of L. salivarius than with pH-neutralized supernatant alone.
 
Antibiotic susceptibility
 
The zones of inhibition observed against the eight antibiotics indicated that probiotic culture isolated in the present study is sensitive to Meropenem, Moxifloxacin and Impenem as shown in Fig 5. Among all the isolates it was observed that LC1 showed lesser zone of inhibition to antibiotics and no zone of inhibition to two antibiotics (Ofloxacin, Levoflaxin), whereas LC5 isolate was found to be more susceptible to all the antibioticsas indicated in Table 4.

Fig 5: Effects of different antibiotics on lactobacillus isolates.



Table 4: Effects of different antibiotics on lactobacillus isolates.


       
Sharma and Bisht (2017) reported LAB isolates of curdorigin showed sensitivity towards Ampicillin, Imipenem, Meropenem, Chloramphenicol and Erythromycin while investigating the antibiotic sensitivity pattern of indigenous Lactobacilli isolated from curd and human milk samples.
 
Preparation of probiotic chocolates
 
Several studies in recent years have shown the therapeutic benefits derived from the ingestion of probiotic foods. Chocolate is a more effective delivery system than capsules and tablets for probiotics and could be an attractive alternative for consumers. Chocolate has a distinct taste, flavour and texture and is also a source of biologically active substances, like polyphenols that show substantial antioxidant properties and have a positive impact on human health, principally on the cardiovascular system (Homayouni et al., 2016). An in vitro model of the human digestive tract (Simulator of the Human Intestinal Microbial Ecosystem, SHIME) shows that chocolate can indeed represent an ideal carrier for the intestinal delivery of probiotics.
       
In this context, in the present study steps are taken up to develop a probiotic chocolate with the isolated probiotic culture and test its viability and consumers satisfaction survey. Incorporation of the immobilised LAB in chocolate is an excellent solution to protect them from environmental stress conditions and for optimal delivery. In this work, chocolate has been evaluated as a potential protective carrier for oral delivery of a microencapsulated mixture of Lactobacillus sp. The Lactobacillus strains were encapsulated as micro-beads by using sodium alginate and calcium chloride and these beads were incorporated into chocolate suspension. Polysaccharides in the coconut pulp constitute an effective growth substrate for enhancement of Lactobacillus spp. proliferation. (Abbasiliasi et al., 2019) reported that the polysaccharides show stronger activity such as better resistance to human gastric juice and a-amylase as compared to that of commercial prebiotic-FOS, which ensures their reaching the colon to effectively stimulate the growth of probiotic bacteria. A chocolate with encapsulated probiotic bacteria and coconut pulp was prepared.
 
Texture analysis
 
The hardness and fracturability of probiotic chocolate determined by the texture analyzer at ambient temperature 30°C was found to be 305 g and 207 g respectively as shown in Fig 6. The hardness of the prepared chocolate was found to be slightly greater than a normal dark chocolate made with coconut oil which may be due to the presence of coconut pulp and microencapsulated beads. (Limbardo et al., 2017) reported that the substitution of coconut oil for cocoa butter reduced the hardness of chocolate bar from 152.5 to 74.75 g.

Fig 6: TPA graph for probiotic chocolate.

A total of 15 isolates were isolated from yogurt. Among these 15 isolates five were identified as lactobacillus spp. (LC1, LC2, LC3, LC4, LC5). These were screened for their probiotic properties. In the acid tolerance test, LC1 isolate showed maximum growth (OD580nm=0.250) at pH 2. In the NaCl tolerance test, at 8 per cent NaCl concentration, LC1 isolate showed maximum growth (OD580nm=1.013). Among all the isolates LC1 showeda clear zone of inhibition of 3 mm against pathogen bacteria. In antibiotic susceptibility test, LC1 isolate showed lesser zone of inhibition to antibiotics.
       
Hence, LC1 isolate was found to be efficient and have potential probiotic properties among the five isolates and was used to prepare the encapsulated probiotic beads. The probiotic chocolate was formulated using fruit pulp, probiotic beads and chocolate is a functional food since it has the beneficial effects of fruit, probiotic and dairy free chocolate. From texture analysis, the hardness of the prepared chocolate was found to be slightly greater than a normal dairy free chocolate which may be due to the presence of coconut pulp and microencapsulated beads. The idea of combining all these dairy free ingredients and making a product with the goodness of each of the ingredients gives the combined effect in the functional food and serves as a probiotic source for lactose intolerant people.
Thanks to the College of Food Science and Technology, Pulivendula, Acharya N G Ranga Agricultural University for providing necessary budget to complete the research project.
Authors declare that there is no conflict of interest.

  1. Abbasiliasi, S., Tan, J.S., Bello, B., Ibrahim, T.A.T., Tam, Y.J., Ariff, A. and Mustafa, S. (2019). Prebiotic efficacy of coconut kernel cake’s soluble crude polysaccharides on growth rates and acidifying property of probiotic lactic acid bacteria in vitro. Biotechnology and Biotechnological Equipment. 33(1): 1216-1227.

  2. Davani-Davari, D., Negahdaripour, M., Karimzadeh, I., Seifan, M., Mohkam, M., Masoumi, S.J., Berenjian, A. and Ghasemi, Y. (2019). Prebiotics: Definition, types, sources, mechanisms and clinical applications. Foods. 8(3): 92.

  3. de Brito Alves, J.L., De Sousa, V.P., Cavalcanti Neto, M.P., Magnani, M., Braga, V.D.A., Costa-Silva, J.H.D., Leandro, C.G., Vidal, H. and Pirola, L. (2016). New insights on the use of dietary polyphenols or probiotics for the management of arterial hypertension. Frontiers in Physiology. 7: 448.

  4. Fenster, K., Freeburg, B., Hollard, C., Wong, C., Laursen, R.R. and Ouwehand, A.C. (2019). The production and delivery of probiotics: A review of a practical approach. Microorganisms7(3): 83.

  5. Forhada, M.H., SM, K.R., Rahmana, S., Saikota, F.K. and Ch, K. (2015). Probiotic properties analysis of isolated lactic acid bacteria from buffalo milk. Archives of Clinical Microbiology. 7(1): 5-10.

  6. Gasbarrini, G., Bonvicini, F. and Gramenzi, A. (2016). Probiotics history. Journal of Clinical Gastroenterology. 50: S116- S119.

  7. Gehlot, R. and Arora, S. (2018). Probiotics from food and eubiosis in Gut: A commensalism-A review. Asian Journal of Dairy and Food Research. 37(1): 28-34. doi: 10.18805/ajdfr. DR-1267.

  8. Hamad, G.M., Amer, A., El-Nogoumy, B., Ibrahim, M., Hassan, S., Siddiqui, S.A., El-Gazzar, A.M., Khalifa, E., Omar, S.A., Abd-Elmohsen Abou-Alella, S. and Ibrahim, S.A. (2022). Evaluation of the effectiveness of charcoal, Lactobacillus rhamnosus, and Saccharomyces cerevisiae as aflatoxin adsorbents in chocolate. Toxins. 15: 21.

  9. Hamad, G.M., Omar, S.A., Mostafa, A.G., Cacciotti, I., Saleh, S.M., Allam, M.G., El-Nogoumy, B., Abou-Alella, S.A.E. and Mehany, T. (2022). Binding and removal of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons in cold smoked sausage and beef using probiotic strains. Food Research International. 161: 111793.

  10. Hill, C., Guarner, F., Reid, G., Gibson, G.R., Merenstein, D.J., Pot, B., Morelli, L., Canani, R.B., Flint, H.J., Salminen, S. and Calder, P.C. (2014). Activity of cecropin P1 and FA-LL-37 against urogenital microflora. Nature Reviews Gastroenterology and Hepatology. 11(8): 506.

  11. Homayouni, A. and Norouzi, S. (2016). Evaluation of physicochemical traits, sensory properties and survival of lactobacillus casei in fermented soy based ice cream. Journal of Food Processing and Preservation. 40(4): 681-687.

  12. Hoque, M.Z., Akter, F., Hossian, K.M., Rahman, M.S.M., Billah, M.M., Islam, K.M.D. (2010). Isolation, Identification and Analysis of probiotic properties of Lactobacillus Spp. from selective regional yogurts. World Journal of Dairy Food Science. 5(1): 39-46.

  13. Kang, M.S., Lim, H.S., Oh, J.S., Lim, Y.J., Wuertz-Kozak, K., Harro, J.M. and Achermann, Y. (2017). Antimicrobial activity of Lactobacillus salivarius and Lactobacillus fermentum against Staphylococcus aureus. Pathogens and Disease. 75(2). doi: 10.1093/femspd/ftx009.

  14. Katke, S.D. and Deshpande, H.W. (2022). Studies on development of fibre rich probiotic frozen yogurt. Asian Journal of Dairy and Food Research. 41(2): 142-149. doi: 10.18805/ ajdfr.DR-1753.

  15. Konuray, G. and Erginkaya, Z. (2018). Potential use of Bacillus coagulans in the food industry. Foods. 7(6): 92.

  16. Limbardo, R.P., Santoso, H. and Witono, J.R. (2017). The Effect of Coconut Oil and Palm Oil as Substituted Oils to Cocoa Butter on Chocolate Bar Texture and Melting Point. In: AIP Conference Proceedings. AIP Publishing. 1840(1). doi: 10.1063/1.4982281.

  17. Mandal, J., Acharya, N. S., Buddhapriya, D. and Parija, S.C. (2012).  Antibiotic resistance pattern among common bacterial uropathogens with a special reference to ciprofloxacin resistant Escherichia coli. The Indian Journal of Medical Research. 136(5): 842.

  18. Mannan, S.J., Rezwan, R., Rahman, M.S. and Begum, K. (2017). Isolation and biochemical characterization of Lactobacillus species from yogurt and cheese samples in Dhaka metropolitan area. Bangladesh Pharmaceutical Journal20(1): 27-33.

  19. Marco, M.L., Heeney, D., Binda, S., Cifelli, C.J., Cotter, P.D., Foligné, B., Gänzle, M., Kort, R., Pasin, G., Pihlanto, A. and Smid, E.J. (2017). Health benefits of fermented foods: Microbiota and beyond. Current Opinion in Biotechnology. 44: 94- 102.

  20. Misselwitz, B., Pohl, D., Frühauf, H., Fried, M., Vavricka, S.R. and Fox, M. (2013). Lactose malabsorption and intolerance: Pathogenesis, diagnosis and treatment. United European Gastroenterology Journal. 1(3): 151-159.

  21. Pundir, R.K., Kashyap, S.R.N. and Kaur, A. (2013). Probiotic potential of lactic acid bacteria isolated from food samples: An in vitro study. Journal of Applied Pharmaceutical Science. 3(3): 85-93.

  22. Reda, F.M., Hussein, B.M. and Enan, G. (2018). Selection and Characterization of two probiotic lactic acid bacteria strains to be used as starter and protective cultures for food fermentations. Journal of Pure and Applied Microbiology. 12(3): 1499-1513.

  23. Sanz, Y., Portune, K., Del Pulgar, E.G. and Benítez-Páez, A. (2016). Targeting the Microbiota: Considerations for Developing Probiotics as Functional Foods. In: The Gut-brain Axis. Academic Press. (pp. 17-30).

  24. Sharma, D. and Bisht, D. (2017). M. tuberculosis hypothetical proteins and proteins of unknown function: Hope for exploring novel resistance mechanisms as well as future target of drug resistance. Frontiers in Microbiology. 8: 465.

  25. Sugandhi, G.P. (2018). Probiotics conventional benefits and cautions in intake-A review. Agricultural Reviews. 39(3): 251-254. doi: 10.18805/ag.R-1749.

  26. Wilson, B. and Whelan, K. (2017). Prebiotic inulin type fructans and galacto oligosaccharides: Definition, specificity, function and application in gastrointestinal disorders. Journal  of Gastroenterology and Hepatology. 32: 64-68.

Development of Vegan Probiotic Chocolate

P
P. Jayamma1,*
A
A.D. Srikanth Tangirala2
R
R. Aruna1
R
R. Kavya1
K
K. Visishta1
K
Kummari Sirisha1
1Department of Food Safety and Quality Assurance, College of Food Science and Technology, Acharya N.G. Ranga Agricultural University, Pulivendula-516 390, Kadapa, Andhra Pradesh, India. 
2Department of Food Process Engineering, College of Food Science and Technology, Acharya N.G. Ranga Agricultural University, Pulivendula-516 390, Kadapa, Andhra Pradesh, India. 

Background: Probiotics are live microorganisms that, when administered in adequate amounts, confer health benefits to the host. However, options for lactose-intolerant individuals are limited due to the predominant use of dairy-based carriers. The present study was undertaken to isolate and identify potential probiotic strains and develop a novel dairy-free probiotic chocolate using microencapsulated Lactobacillus spp. with fruit pulp as a natural prebiotic source.

Methods: Fifteen bacterial isolates were obtained from yogurt samples and subjected to biochemical and sugar fermentation tests, leading to the identification of five Lactobacillus isolates (LC1 to LC5). These were evaluated for probiotic potential under varied pH (2 to 7) and NaCl concentrations (2%, 4%, 6%, and 8%). Antimicrobial activity was assessed via the well diffusion method and antibiotic susceptibility was determined by the disc diffusion assay. The most promising isolate, LC1, was microencapsulated and incorporated into a dairy-free chocolate matrix using coconut pulp as a prebiotic. The encapsulated beads were added before setting the chocolate at 2-3°C and the final product was analyzed for texture properties.

Result: Optimal bacterial growth was observed at pH 6. Isolate LC1 demonstrated the highest salt tolerance and significant antimicrobial activity with a 3 mm inhibition zone. It also showed minimal susceptibility to antibiotics, indicating probiotic robustness. The incorporation of microencapsulated LC1 into chocolate slightly increased hardness compared to the control but retained desirable sensory properties. The developed product offers a functional and palatable probiotic food option for lactose-intolerant individuals.

Probiotics, whether consumed as dietary supplements or through functional food products, have emerged as key components in the realm of health-promoting nutrition. They have long been recognized as vital agents offering a range of potential health benefits and are a focal point in commercial health food development (Sanz et al., 2016; Hamad et al., 2022). The term probiotic was first introduced by Werner Kollath in 1953, derived from the Latin pro and the Greek Bio, meaning “for life.” Kollath described probiotics as active substances with essential roles in supporting various aspects of health (Gasbarrini et al., 2016). Later, the Food and Agriculture Organization (FAO) and the World Health Organization (WHO) defined probiotics as “live microorganisms which, when administered in adequate amounts, confer a health benefit on the host”. Microorganisms from several genera, including Pediococcus, Lactococcus, Enterococcus, Streptococcus, Propionibacterium and Bacillus, have been identified as promising candidates for probiotic application (De Brito Alves  et al., 2016; Hamad  et al., 2022). Probiotics not only aid the gut by increasing the number of beneficial bacteria and inhibiting harmful bacteria but also strengthen the body’s immune response. Prebiotics, act as ‘food’ for these beneficial probiotic bacteria, promoting their activity. The combinations of pre-and probiotics are called symbiotics as both work together in a synergistic manner to enhance the probiotic benefits (Sugandhi et al., 2018; Gehlot et al., 2018).
       
Probiotics can be consumed through various means, including their incorporation into dairy and non-dairy food products or as dietary supplements (Fenster et al., 2019). Many fermented foods naturally contain active microbial strains that are genetically similar to those recognized as probiotics. These fermented products not only contribute beneficial microbes but also improve the functional and nutritional profile of foods by transforming raw substrates into bioactive and bioavailable compounds (Marco et al., 2017). An effective daily dose of probiotics has been identified as approximately 10y  colony-forming units (CFU) (Hill et al., 2014). To meet this effective dosage, the food industry has introduced probiotics into a wide range of products such as beverages, yogurt, ice cream, bread and more. However, a major challenge in probiotic application is their vulnerability to harsh processing conditions and gastrointestinal (GI) stresses, which can compromise their viability. Despite these limitations, consumer interest in probiotic-enriched foods remains strong due to their associated health benefits (Konuray and Erginkaya, 2018).
       
Lactose intolerance (LI) is a condition characterized by the inability to digest lactose due to low levels of lactase enzyme activity. Symptoms of LI include bloating, nausea, abdominal cramping and diarrhoea. Lactase enzyme activity is affected by several factors such as age, race, integrity of the small intestinal membrane and small intestinal transit time. Prevalence of LI in adult populations varies from 5 per cent to 15 per cent in European and North American countries, and 50 per cent to 90 per cent in African, Asian, and South American countries, highest rates of LI are found in the Asian populations (Misselwitz et al., 2013).
       
Prebiotics are non-digestible, selectively fermented dietary fibers that promote the growth and activity of specific bacterial genera in the gastrointestinal tract, thereby offering health benefits to the host. They can feed the intestinal microbiota, and their degradation products are short-chain fatty acids that are released into blood circulation, consequently, affecting not only the gastrointestinal tracts but also other distant organs. Fructo-oligosaccharides and galacto-oligosaccharides are the two important groups of prebiotics with beneficial effects on human health (Davani-Davari  et al., 2019)
       
The most widely studied prebiotics are inulin-type fructans and galacto-oligosaccharides. The selective nature of prebiotics is driven by species-specific gene clusters found in saccharolytic bacteria, which are regulated by substrate-responsive signaling mechanisms. The beneficial effects of prebiotics are largely attributed to immune modulation and the production of bacterial metabolites. In humans, prebiotic supplementation has been shown to increase the abundance of beneficial gut microbiota, such as Bifidobacteria, enhance immune function and, depending on the microbial response, stimulate the production of short-chain fatty acids (SCFAs). Gastrointestinal disorders like irritable bowel syndrome (IBS) and Crohn’s disease are commonly associated with a decline in beneficial gut bacteria and heightened mucosal inflammation (Wilson and Whelan, 2017).
       
Encapsulation is a mechanical or physicochemical process that traps a potentially sensitive material and provide a protective barrier between it and the external conditions (Katke et al., 2022). Vegan chocolate is made of fine solid sugar and cocoa particles suspended in a continuous fat phase. Chocolate solidifies between 20 and 25°C and melts at body temperature (37°C), resulting in a smooth suspension of solid particles and a pleasant sensation in the mouth. The continuous phase affects sensory qualities like melt in the mouth or mouth feel. There are plenty of commercially accessible probiotic-infused dairy-based items on the market, including frozen treats, dairy products, baby food, chocolate and puddings (Abbasiliasi et al., 2019). The development of probiotic chocolate with fruit pulp added for prebiotic benefits is suggested by the current investigation.
       
The main objective of this study is to develop a vegan probiotic chocolate, along with fruit pulp as prebiotic source, using microencapsulated Lactobacillus strains which were isolated, identified and screened for their potential probiotic properties.
Isolation of lactobacillus
 
The lactic acid bacteria were isolated from yoghurt collected from the local market. A loop full of yogurt was inoculated into 20 ml sterile MRS broth under aseptic conditions and incubated at 37°C for 24 h in a rotary orbital shaker. A loop full of the inoculated broth was streak plated on MRS agar and incubated at 37°C up to 18 h. Bacterial colonies grown were purified by repeated streaking. The bacterial isolates were examined for their colony morphology, gram staining character, biochemical tests (Mannan et al., 2017). Identified pure cultures were stored in MRS agar slant for further study.

Screening of bacterial isolates for probiotic properties
 
Acid tolerance test
 
Test tubes containing MRS broth were adjusted to pH 2 to 7 using HCl and NaOH to decrease and increase the pH respectively. After sterilization, each test tube was inoculated with 0.1% fresh overnight grown probiotic culture, incubated at 37°C for 24 h and the growth was determined by Spectrophotometer at 600 nm absorbance (Reda et al., 2018).
 
Salt tolerance test
 
Test tubes containing MRS broth with different concentrations of NaCl (2%, 4%, 6% and 8%) were prepared. After sterilization, each test tube was inoculated with 0.1% fresh overnight culture, incubated at 37°C for 24 h and the growth was determined by Spectrophotometer at 600 nm absorbance (Reda et al., 2018).
 
Antimicrobial activity
 
The Lactobacillus isolates were examined for their antimicrobial activity against the indicator microorganism Staphylococcus aureus by well diffusion method. Antibacterial activity was estimated as the diameter of the inhibitory zone formed around the wells (Forhad et al., 2015).
 
Antibiotic susceptibility test
 
Antibiotic susceptibility test is widely performed using disc diffusion method. MRS agar plate containing 10 μL of bacterial isolate was prepared in this present study. Antibiotic discs containing Meropenem, Ciproflaxin, Tobramycin, Moxiflaxin, Ofloxacin, Sparfloxacin, Levoflaxin, Impenem were placed on MRS agar plates containing bacterial isolate and zone of inhibition were noted after incubation at 37°C for 24 hr (Hoque et al., 2010).
 
Encapsulation of probiotic bacteria
 
Procedure
 
Sodium alginate solution was prepared by dissolving 2 g (w/v) of sodium alginate powder with 100 ml distilled water in 250 ml sterilized beaker. Afterward, it was heated until boiling for proper mixing. Calcium chloride solution was prepared by dissolving 5 g (w/v) calcium chloride granules in 500 ml beaker with simultaneous gentle stirring. Both the reagents were sterilized before use. The cell biomass was added to a 2.0% (w/v) strength sodium alginate solution with gentle stirring. Under aseptic conditions, the bacterial alginate suspension was packed into the sanitized container of spray gun (make pilot spray gun P-5) having nozzle size of 1.6 mm and this was connected to a laboratory air compressor (range: 14-58 psi). The filled alginate cell biomass mix was then sprayed into prepared 1% (w/v) calcium chloride solution. This allowed the formation of microcapsules, and these beads were allowed to harden for 5 min. The probiotic ca-alginate beads were then harvested with the help of sanitized nylon sieve (size <100 µm) and were air-dried at the normal temperature (Mandal et al., 2012).
 
Preparation of probiotic chocolates
 
Preparation of chocolate
 
By double boiler method, over low heat, add 50 gm-coconut oil, 10gm-cocoa powder, 45 gm-icing sugar. Stir constantly until well combined and a pourable consistency is achieved. Add in the vanilla essence and whisk until just combined. The prepared chocolate was allowed to cool to room temperature (Fig 1).

Fig 1: Flowchart for preparation of probiotic chocolate.


 
Preparation of fruit pulp
 
Collect tender coconut flesh and shred into fine pieces. Blend the coconut shreds with equal amount of water. Strain the mixture to separate coconut milk. The coconut pulp is obtained.
 
Texture analysis
 
Chocolate samples in block shape were analysed for their textural properties using Brookfield CT3-texture analyser with TA44 type penetration probe. Hardness and fracturability were determined by penetration analysis with test speed 1mm/s, pre-test speed 1 mm/s in 2 cycle penetration. Analysis was done in ambient temperature at 30°C, where each sample was frozen in first cycle and entered melting phase in second cycle (Limbardo et al., 2017).
This chapter contains the results obtained for isolation, identification of lactobacillus bacteria and results of screening test for potential probiotic bacteria. The obtained results are represented in suitable forms and discussed.
 
Isolation of lactobacillus bacteria
 
A total of 15 lactobacillus isolates were cultured on MRS agar plate by streak plate method and initially subjected to morphological and biochemical tests.
 
Identification of lactobacillus bacteria
 
Based on the morphological characteristics of the bacteria, among 15 isolates five isolates were found to be Gram-positive, non-sporeforming, rod shaped as shown in Table 1.

Table 1: Colony morphological characteristics of lactobacillus isolates obtained from yogurt.


 
Screening of bacterial isolates for probiotic properties
 
Acid tolerance
 
The acid tolerance test helps in studying the survival of the strains under low pH gastric juice conditions.In the present studies, it was observed that as pH increased from 2 to 7, there was a gradual increase in turbidity and reached maximum at pH 6 as shown in the Fig 2. This indicates that the probiotic isolates are tolerant to acidic environment. Table 4 indicates that LC1 isolate showed maximum growth (OD580nm=0.250) at pH 2 followed by LC4 (OD580 nm=0.214) and minimum growth is seen in LC5. Pundir et al., (2013) reported that the lactobacillus isolated from fresh vegetables and curd survived in pH 3.5 to pH 7. Similar study conducted by Hoque et al., (2010) found lactobacillus growth in pH 2.5 to pH 8.5.

Fig 2: Acid tolerance of lactobacillus isolates.


       
The sodium chloride tolerance test was performed to test the organism’s ability to tolerate various osmotic conditions. As sodium chloride concentration increases from 2 to 6 percentthe growth was decreased as shown in Fig 3. Table 2 indicates the growth of bacteria at different NaCl concentrations. The LC1 showed maximum growth at 8 percent concentration (OD580nm=1.026) followed by LC3 (OD580nm=0.649) and LC5 showed minimum growth (OD580 nm=0.198). Mannan et al., (2017) stated that all the isolates were able to grow 2% and 4% of sodium chloride concentration of lactobacillus species from yoghurt and cheese samples in Dhaka Metropolitan area. Absorbance at 580 nm.

Fig 3: NaCl tolerance of lactobacillus isolates.



Table 2: Growth of lactobacillus isolates at different NaCl concentrations.


 
Antimicrobial activity
 
The results of antimicrobial activity of the probiotic culture showed that the probiotic isolate can restrain the growth of pathogenic bacteria. The zone of inhibition produced by the bacteria indicates its antimicrobial activity as shown in Table 3. The antimicrobial effect could be due to the production of acetic acid or lactic acids that lowers the overall pH. The isolate LC1 clearly exhibited the zone of inhibition (3 mm) for antimicrobial activity against S. aureusas as shown in Fig 4. The isolates LC2 and LC3 produced a inhibition zone of 1.6 and 1.2 mm respectively. Whereas LC4 and LC5 isolates did not exhibit zone of inhibition against the pathogenic bacteria.

Table 3: Antimicrobial activity of lactobacillus isolates against pathogenic bacteria.



Fig 4: Zone of inhibition produced by lactobacillus bacteria.


       
Sharma and Bisht (2017) reported the effects of lactobacillus isolates of curd against food borne and human pathogens. It was observed that none of the lactobacilli cellfree supernatant (CFS) exhibited inhibitory activity against four pathogens, namely Staphylococcus aureus, Listeria monocytogenes, Escherichia coli and Klebsiella pneumoniae. Bacillus cereus, Salmonella enterica serovar Typhi and Shigella flexneri were moderately inhibited by majority of CFSs, whereas, weak activity was observed against Pseudomonas aeruginosa and Proteus mirabilis. CFS of some of the curd isolates displayed antagonistic activity against Streptococcus mutans; however, human milk lactobacilli did not displayed any inhibitory activity against them. Kang et al., (2017) also reported that lactobacillus spp. had bactericidal effect against planktonic and biofilm S.aureus. It was observed that Cell-free supernatant that was pH neutralized and heat inactivated or proteinase K treated had significantly reduced killing of L. salivarius than with pH-neutralized supernatant alone.
 
Antibiotic susceptibility
 
The zones of inhibition observed against the eight antibiotics indicated that probiotic culture isolated in the present study is sensitive to Meropenem, Moxifloxacin and Impenem as shown in Fig 5. Among all the isolates it was observed that LC1 showed lesser zone of inhibition to antibiotics and no zone of inhibition to two antibiotics (Ofloxacin, Levoflaxin), whereas LC5 isolate was found to be more susceptible to all the antibioticsas indicated in Table 4.

Fig 5: Effects of different antibiotics on lactobacillus isolates.



Table 4: Effects of different antibiotics on lactobacillus isolates.


       
Sharma and Bisht (2017) reported LAB isolates of curdorigin showed sensitivity towards Ampicillin, Imipenem, Meropenem, Chloramphenicol and Erythromycin while investigating the antibiotic sensitivity pattern of indigenous Lactobacilli isolated from curd and human milk samples.
 
Preparation of probiotic chocolates
 
Several studies in recent years have shown the therapeutic benefits derived from the ingestion of probiotic foods. Chocolate is a more effective delivery system than capsules and tablets for probiotics and could be an attractive alternative for consumers. Chocolate has a distinct taste, flavour and texture and is also a source of biologically active substances, like polyphenols that show substantial antioxidant properties and have a positive impact on human health, principally on the cardiovascular system (Homayouni et al., 2016). An in vitro model of the human digestive tract (Simulator of the Human Intestinal Microbial Ecosystem, SHIME) shows that chocolate can indeed represent an ideal carrier for the intestinal delivery of probiotics.
       
In this context, in the present study steps are taken up to develop a probiotic chocolate with the isolated probiotic culture and test its viability and consumers satisfaction survey. Incorporation of the immobilised LAB in chocolate is an excellent solution to protect them from environmental stress conditions and for optimal delivery. In this work, chocolate has been evaluated as a potential protective carrier for oral delivery of a microencapsulated mixture of Lactobacillus sp. The Lactobacillus strains were encapsulated as micro-beads by using sodium alginate and calcium chloride and these beads were incorporated into chocolate suspension. Polysaccharides in the coconut pulp constitute an effective growth substrate for enhancement of Lactobacillus spp. proliferation. (Abbasiliasi et al., 2019) reported that the polysaccharides show stronger activity such as better resistance to human gastric juice and a-amylase as compared to that of commercial prebiotic-FOS, which ensures their reaching the colon to effectively stimulate the growth of probiotic bacteria. A chocolate with encapsulated probiotic bacteria and coconut pulp was prepared.
 
Texture analysis
 
The hardness and fracturability of probiotic chocolate determined by the texture analyzer at ambient temperature 30°C was found to be 305 g and 207 g respectively as shown in Fig 6. The hardness of the prepared chocolate was found to be slightly greater than a normal dark chocolate made with coconut oil which may be due to the presence of coconut pulp and microencapsulated beads. (Limbardo et al., 2017) reported that the substitution of coconut oil for cocoa butter reduced the hardness of chocolate bar from 152.5 to 74.75 g.

Fig 6: TPA graph for probiotic chocolate.

A total of 15 isolates were isolated from yogurt. Among these 15 isolates five were identified as lactobacillus spp. (LC1, LC2, LC3, LC4, LC5). These were screened for their probiotic properties. In the acid tolerance test, LC1 isolate showed maximum growth (OD580nm=0.250) at pH 2. In the NaCl tolerance test, at 8 per cent NaCl concentration, LC1 isolate showed maximum growth (OD580nm=1.013). Among all the isolates LC1 showeda clear zone of inhibition of 3 mm against pathogen bacteria. In antibiotic susceptibility test, LC1 isolate showed lesser zone of inhibition to antibiotics.
       
Hence, LC1 isolate was found to be efficient and have potential probiotic properties among the five isolates and was used to prepare the encapsulated probiotic beads. The probiotic chocolate was formulated using fruit pulp, probiotic beads and chocolate is a functional food since it has the beneficial effects of fruit, probiotic and dairy free chocolate. From texture analysis, the hardness of the prepared chocolate was found to be slightly greater than a normal dairy free chocolate which may be due to the presence of coconut pulp and microencapsulated beads. The idea of combining all these dairy free ingredients and making a product with the goodness of each of the ingredients gives the combined effect in the functional food and serves as a probiotic source for lactose intolerant people.
Thanks to the College of Food Science and Technology, Pulivendula, Acharya N G Ranga Agricultural University for providing necessary budget to complete the research project.
Authors declare that there is no conflict of interest.

  1. Abbasiliasi, S., Tan, J.S., Bello, B., Ibrahim, T.A.T., Tam, Y.J., Ariff, A. and Mustafa, S. (2019). Prebiotic efficacy of coconut kernel cake’s soluble crude polysaccharides on growth rates and acidifying property of probiotic lactic acid bacteria in vitro. Biotechnology and Biotechnological Equipment. 33(1): 1216-1227.

  2. Davani-Davari, D., Negahdaripour, M., Karimzadeh, I., Seifan, M., Mohkam, M., Masoumi, S.J., Berenjian, A. and Ghasemi, Y. (2019). Prebiotics: Definition, types, sources, mechanisms and clinical applications. Foods. 8(3): 92.

  3. de Brito Alves, J.L., De Sousa, V.P., Cavalcanti Neto, M.P., Magnani, M., Braga, V.D.A., Costa-Silva, J.H.D., Leandro, C.G., Vidal, H. and Pirola, L. (2016). New insights on the use of dietary polyphenols or probiotics for the management of arterial hypertension. Frontiers in Physiology. 7: 448.

  4. Fenster, K., Freeburg, B., Hollard, C., Wong, C., Laursen, R.R. and Ouwehand, A.C. (2019). The production and delivery of probiotics: A review of a practical approach. Microorganisms7(3): 83.

  5. Forhada, M.H., SM, K.R., Rahmana, S., Saikota, F.K. and Ch, K. (2015). Probiotic properties analysis of isolated lactic acid bacteria from buffalo milk. Archives of Clinical Microbiology. 7(1): 5-10.

  6. Gasbarrini, G., Bonvicini, F. and Gramenzi, A. (2016). Probiotics history. Journal of Clinical Gastroenterology. 50: S116- S119.

  7. Gehlot, R. and Arora, S. (2018). Probiotics from food and eubiosis in Gut: A commensalism-A review. Asian Journal of Dairy and Food Research. 37(1): 28-34. doi: 10.18805/ajdfr. DR-1267.

  8. Hamad, G.M., Amer, A., El-Nogoumy, B., Ibrahim, M., Hassan, S., Siddiqui, S.A., El-Gazzar, A.M., Khalifa, E., Omar, S.A., Abd-Elmohsen Abou-Alella, S. and Ibrahim, S.A. (2022). Evaluation of the effectiveness of charcoal, Lactobacillus rhamnosus, and Saccharomyces cerevisiae as aflatoxin adsorbents in chocolate. Toxins. 15: 21.

  9. Hamad, G.M., Omar, S.A., Mostafa, A.G., Cacciotti, I., Saleh, S.M., Allam, M.G., El-Nogoumy, B., Abou-Alella, S.A.E. and Mehany, T. (2022). Binding and removal of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons in cold smoked sausage and beef using probiotic strains. Food Research International. 161: 111793.

  10. Hill, C., Guarner, F., Reid, G., Gibson, G.R., Merenstein, D.J., Pot, B., Morelli, L., Canani, R.B., Flint, H.J., Salminen, S. and Calder, P.C. (2014). Activity of cecropin P1 and FA-LL-37 against urogenital microflora. Nature Reviews Gastroenterology and Hepatology. 11(8): 506.

  11. Homayouni, A. and Norouzi, S. (2016). Evaluation of physicochemical traits, sensory properties and survival of lactobacillus casei in fermented soy based ice cream. Journal of Food Processing and Preservation. 40(4): 681-687.

  12. Hoque, M.Z., Akter, F., Hossian, K.M., Rahman, M.S.M., Billah, M.M., Islam, K.M.D. (2010). Isolation, Identification and Analysis of probiotic properties of Lactobacillus Spp. from selective regional yogurts. World Journal of Dairy Food Science. 5(1): 39-46.

  13. Kang, M.S., Lim, H.S., Oh, J.S., Lim, Y.J., Wuertz-Kozak, K., Harro, J.M. and Achermann, Y. (2017). Antimicrobial activity of Lactobacillus salivarius and Lactobacillus fermentum against Staphylococcus aureus. Pathogens and Disease. 75(2). doi: 10.1093/femspd/ftx009.

  14. Katke, S.D. and Deshpande, H.W. (2022). Studies on development of fibre rich probiotic frozen yogurt. Asian Journal of Dairy and Food Research. 41(2): 142-149. doi: 10.18805/ ajdfr.DR-1753.

  15. Konuray, G. and Erginkaya, Z. (2018). Potential use of Bacillus coagulans in the food industry. Foods. 7(6): 92.

  16. Limbardo, R.P., Santoso, H. and Witono, J.R. (2017). The Effect of Coconut Oil and Palm Oil as Substituted Oils to Cocoa Butter on Chocolate Bar Texture and Melting Point. In: AIP Conference Proceedings. AIP Publishing. 1840(1). doi: 10.1063/1.4982281.

  17. Mandal, J., Acharya, N. S., Buddhapriya, D. and Parija, S.C. (2012).  Antibiotic resistance pattern among common bacterial uropathogens with a special reference to ciprofloxacin resistant Escherichia coli. The Indian Journal of Medical Research. 136(5): 842.

  18. Mannan, S.J., Rezwan, R., Rahman, M.S. and Begum, K. (2017). Isolation and biochemical characterization of Lactobacillus species from yogurt and cheese samples in Dhaka metropolitan area. Bangladesh Pharmaceutical Journal20(1): 27-33.

  19. Marco, M.L., Heeney, D., Binda, S., Cifelli, C.J., Cotter, P.D., Foligné, B., Gänzle, M., Kort, R., Pasin, G., Pihlanto, A. and Smid, E.J. (2017). Health benefits of fermented foods: Microbiota and beyond. Current Opinion in Biotechnology. 44: 94- 102.

  20. Misselwitz, B., Pohl, D., Frühauf, H., Fried, M., Vavricka, S.R. and Fox, M. (2013). Lactose malabsorption and intolerance: Pathogenesis, diagnosis and treatment. United European Gastroenterology Journal. 1(3): 151-159.

  21. Pundir, R.K., Kashyap, S.R.N. and Kaur, A. (2013). Probiotic potential of lactic acid bacteria isolated from food samples: An in vitro study. Journal of Applied Pharmaceutical Science. 3(3): 85-93.

  22. Reda, F.M., Hussein, B.M. and Enan, G. (2018). Selection and Characterization of two probiotic lactic acid bacteria strains to be used as starter and protective cultures for food fermentations. Journal of Pure and Applied Microbiology. 12(3): 1499-1513.

  23. Sanz, Y., Portune, K., Del Pulgar, E.G. and Benítez-Páez, A. (2016). Targeting the Microbiota: Considerations for Developing Probiotics as Functional Foods. In: The Gut-brain Axis. Academic Press. (pp. 17-30).

  24. Sharma, D. and Bisht, D. (2017). M. tuberculosis hypothetical proteins and proteins of unknown function: Hope for exploring novel resistance mechanisms as well as future target of drug resistance. Frontiers in Microbiology. 8: 465.

  25. Sugandhi, G.P. (2018). Probiotics conventional benefits and cautions in intake-A review. Agricultural Reviews. 39(3): 251-254. doi: 10.18805/ag.R-1749.

  26. Wilson, B. and Whelan, K. (2017). Prebiotic inulin type fructans and galacto oligosaccharides: Definition, specificity, function and application in gastrointestinal disorders. Journal  of Gastroenterology and Hepatology. 32: 64-68.
In this Article
Published In
Asian Journal of Dairy and Food Research

Editorial Board

View all (0)