The quality of yoghurt is greatly dependent on the type and quality of raw material used for its manufacturing. The compositional parameters, like fat content mainly control the body and texture characteristics and flavour of the product. The research investigation is described separately in physical and chemical parameters. Results obtained during the course of this study have been summarized in the following tables after subjecting to statistical analysis wherever necessary. The findings have been also illustrated diagrammatically. A brief description of finding is also discussed with each table.
Physical qualities of milk
The five cow milk samples (S
1, S
2, S
3, S
4 and S
5) were taken and the observations were taken just after the collection of the samples with regard to physical properties of milk on the basis of colour, flavour and taste by panel of testers using nine point’s hedonic rating scale (Table 1).
Colour: The cow milk samples showed light yellowish colour which was same for remaining all samples of milk.
Flavour: It indicates that all milk samples were obtained from dairy farm and local market were normal flavour and they were free from any off flavour.
Taste: The cow milk taste was to be found slightly sweet.
Chemical qualities of milk
In Table 2, some important nutritional constituents were analyzed separately for five different milk samples (S
1, S
2, S
3, S
4 and S
5) of cow to identify their chemical qualities, acidity, fat, protein and lactose. The data indicate that the acidity percentage of cow milk samples varied between 0.15 to 0.17 with an average of 0.158. The fat and protein content of milk samples lies between 3.91 to 4.54 and 3.33 to 4.93 with an average of 4.306 and 3.866 whereas the lactose content of milk samples lies between 3.23 to 5.05 with an average of 4.302.
The null hypothesis (H
0) is rejected and the alternative hypothesis is taken because 78.881>3.239, (FC>FT).This means that the statistically analysis (Table 3) shows that there is a significant difference between the acidity, fat, protein and lactose content in milk samples.
Physical quality of yoghurt
The physical qualities,
viz., colour, flavour, body and texture of yoghurt samples were studied and the relevant data are presented in Table 4, the yoghurt obtained from the five different samples of cow milk with treatments (T
0, T
1, T
2, T
3 and T
4) they were different colours, flavour, body and texture due to addition of strawberry juice/pulp at different (0%, 5%, 10%, 15% and 20%) levels.
i) Colour
Colour is an important sensory parameter besides taste, aroma and texture. Colour is one of the factors that influence consumer acceptance of food products. Control yoghurt (T
0) is yoghurt without addition of any ingredients including sweeteners or other flavours. In this study, the control yoghurt produced was white whereas the yoghurt with addition of strawberry juice/pulp has a light pink colour that comes from the anthocyanin content in strawberries. The higher the concentration of strawberry juice/pulp added resulted in the lighter colour of the yoghurt
(Jaster et al., 2018).
ii) Body and texture
Yoghurt texture determines the quality of the resulting yoghurt. Generally, good yoghurt has a soft texture like porridge, not too runny and not too thick
(Faisal et al., 2019). The texture of the yoghurt produced in this study was soft and smooth at various levels. The addition of strawberry juice/pulp causes yoghurt texture becomes thicker.
iii) Flavour and taste
The taste of the strawberry yoghurt and the control yoghurt were sour in taste due to the fermentation takes place, by lactic acid bacteria that converts fructose, sucrose and galactose into lactic acid.
Chemical quality of yoghurt
The yoghurt samples were analyse on the basis of organoleptic and chemical tests. The physical qualities,
viz., colour, flavour, body and texture of yoghurt samples were studied. The result found that the yoghurt obtained from the five different samples of cow milk with treatments (T
0, T
1, T
2, T
3 and T
4) they were different colours, flavour, body and texture due to addition of strawberry juice/pulp at different (0%, 5%, 10%,15% and 20%) levels .In this study, the control yoghurt produced was white whereas the yoghurt with addition of strawberry juice /pulp has a light pink colour that comes from the anthocyanin content in strawberries. The higher the concentration of strawberry juice/pulp added resulted in the lighter colour of the yoghurt. The texture of the yoghurt produced was soft and smooth at various levels and the addition of strawberry juice/pulp causes yoghurt texture becomes thicker. The taste of the strawberry yoghurt and the control yoghurt were sour in taste.
In comparing chemical analysis, it was observed that moisture content and acidity were increased in prepared yoghurt with strawberry juice incorporation because strawberry juice contains higher moisture content (71.96%) and acidity (1.02) which decreases the shelf life of the yoghurt. It was observed that P(0% or plain yoghurt) contains lower moisture content (71.80%) and other samples of 5%, 10%, 15% and 20% contains 71.84%, 71.86%, 71.94% and 71.96% respectively. It was also observed that P (0% or plain yoghurt) contains lower acidity content (0.8%) and the other samples of 5%, 10%, 15% and 20% contains 0.9%, 0.9% 1.00% and 1.02%. On the other hand , ash and fat content were decreased with the addition of strawberry juice because strawberry juice contains low ash (0.69%) and fat (4.01%) content. It was observed that P (0% or plain yoghurt) contains higher fat content (4.73%) and other samples of 5%, 10%, 15% and 20% contains 4.36%, 4.12%, 4.08% and 4.01% respectively. It was also observed by chemical composition analysis that P (0% or plain yoghurt) contains higher ash content (0.79%) and other samples of 5%, 10%, 15% and 20% contains 0.76%, 0.73%, 0.70% and 0.69% respectively. The protein content of P (0% or plain yoghurt) were decreased about (3.87%) and other samples of 5%, 10%, 15% and 20% contains higher protein content such as 4.15%, 4.24%, 4.34% and 4.41% respectively. Thus, total solids content increases as P (0% or plain yoghurt) contains (28.22%) and other samples of 5%, 10%, 15% and 20% contains 28.18%, 28.16%, 28.08% and 28.00% respectively.
Average of different physicochemical properties of the control and strawberry fruit juice/pulp yoghurt
The highest mean value for moisture percentage was found in T
4 (71.96) followed by T
3 (71.94), T
2 (71.86), T
1 (71.84) and T
0 (71.80). There were no significant differences found among the treatments. Thus, it showed that different levels of milk and strawberry juice have a great impact on the quality of fruit yoghurt. The highest mean value for total solids percentage was found in T0 (28.22) followed by T
1 (28.18), T
2 (28.16), T
3 (28.08) and T
4 (28.00). There were no significant differences found among the treatments. F value was 0.0, indicating no significant effect of treatment on total solid. The highest mean value for fat percentage was found in T
0 (4.73) followed by T
1 (4.36), T
2 (4.12), T
3 (4.08) and T
4 (4.01). There were no significant differences found among the treatments. and the highest mean value for protein percentage was found in T
4 (4.41) followed by T
3 (4.34), T
2 (4.24), T
1 (4.15) and T
0 (3.87). There were no significant differences found among the treatments. The highest mean value for fat percentage was found in T
0 (0.79) followed by T
1 (0.76), T
2 (0.73), T
3 (0.70) and T
4 (0.69). There were no significant differences found among the treatments and the highest mean value for acidity percentage was found in T
4 (1.02) followed by T
3 (1.00), T
2 (0.9), T
1 (0.9) and T
0 (0.8). There were no significant differences found among the treatments.
Analysis of Variance (ANOVA) for the moisture, total solids, fat, protein, ash and acidity content in five different samples of cow milk (S
1, S
2, S
3, S
4 and S
5) with treatments (T
0, T
1, T
2, T
3 and T
4) using different levels 0% (control yoghurt), 5%, 10%, 15% and 20% (with addition of strawberry juice) as shown in Table 5.
The null hypothesis (H
0) is accepted, since 2.759>0.0, (FT>FC). This means that, there is no significant difference between the mean of moisture, total solids, fat, protein, ash and acidity content in milk samples (Table 6).