Physicochemical properties of ingredients and developed strained yoghurt
The physicochemical attributes are important to determine nutritive value, flavour and overall texture of strained yoghurt. Physico-chemical properties of ingredients (Chakka, pink guava pulp and stevia) used in developing strained yoghurt are presented in Table 2. The data depicted in Table 3 outline the impact of incorporating guava pulp and stevia on the acidity, pH, TSS, total solids, fat and sugar content of strained yoghurt.
Acidity
The control sample containing sugar had the lowest acidity (0.99%), while the strained yoghurt made with stevia but no guava pulp had the highest acidity (1.27%). The acidity of strained yoghurt made with stevia and guava pulp was recorded as 1.21% (10% guava pulp), 1.18% (15% guava pulp) and 1.10% (20% guava pulp). The acidity is influenced by presence of lactic acid in the product
(Melia et al., 2021). Guava pulp had lower acidity (0.51%) as compared to chakka (0.84%) hence, increase in pink guava pulp level (0 to 20%) resulted in decreased acidity of strained yoghurt (1.27% to 1.10%). The higher acidity in strained yoghurt made with stevia but no guava pulp is due to the absence of guava pulp. These findings align with the results reported by
Thakur et al., (2014), who observed a decrease in acidity with an increase in mango pulp content.
pH
The control sample with sugar had the highest pH level (4.23), while the strained yoghurt with stevia without guava pulp had the lowest pH level (3.79). The samples with both stevia and pink guava pulp (10, 15 and 20%) had 4.03, 4.13 and 4.16 pH, respectively. The increased pH (3.09 to 4.16) of stevia strained yoghurt could be due to decrease in acidity as the amount of fruit pulp increases. These findings align with the results reported by
Shambharkar (2011), where increase in pH of strained yoghurt was observed with an increase in sapota pulp concentration.
TSS
TSS of strained yoghurt containing sugar stands at 37.00 oBx, the highest among all the samples, due to the inclusion of sucrose. On the other hand, strained yoghurt with only stevia had the lowest TSS, measuring at 13.33 ºBx. The substantial TSS (37.00 oBx) in strained yoghurt made with sugar is attributed to the presence of sucrose in the strained yoghurt mixture. Conversely, the reduced TSS in strained yoghurt with stevia (without guava- 13.33 oBx, 10% guava pulp- 13.66 oBx, 15% guava pulp- 14.00 oBx and 20% guava pulp- 14.33 oBx) can be attributed to the absence of sucrose in the formulation. Parallel findings were observed by
Mane et al., (2019) when various artificial sweeteners were utilised as substitutes for sucrose.
Total solids
Strained yoghurt with sugar had the highest total solids content, with a percentage of 78.46%. Strained yoghurt with stevia without pulp follows behind with 75.57%, while strained yoghurt with stevia and 10% guava pulp and strained yoghurt with stevia and 15% guava pulp have percentages of 74.83% and 73.94%, respectively. The lowest percentage of total solids (72.64%) was found in strained yoghurt with stevia and 20% pulp. The reduced percentage of total solids in stevia and pink guava pulp as compared to chakka could be the reason for lower total solids content in strained yoghurt containing stevia and guava pulp.
Reducing sugar
The range of reducing sugar content varied from 3.84% to 5.91% in all strained yoghurt samples. The strained yoghurt with stevia without fruit pulp had the lowest reducing sugar content (3.84%) whereas, the strained yoghurt with stevia and 20 % pink guava pulp had the highest reducing sugar (5.91%). The findings (Table 3) revealed that with increase in proportion of pink guava pulp (10% to 20%), the reducing sugar content of strained yoghurt samples continued to rise (3.84% to 5.15%). This increase in reducing sugar content of strained yoghurt can be linked to higher fructose content found in fruits including guava
(Ying et al., 2020).
Non reducing sugar
Non-reducing sugar content in strained yoghurt with sugar was the highest (33.92%). The lowest content of non-reducing sugar was found in strained yoghurt with stevia only (1.80%). The strained yoghurt sample with stevia and 10% pink guava pulp had the lowest non-reducing sugar (1.81%), among all the fruit pulp samples. Comparatively higher non-reducing sugar was observed in strained yoghurt with 15% guava pulp (2.47%) and 20% guava pulp (2.56%). The strained yoghurt containing stevia showed an increasing trend in the non-reducing sugar with increased percentage of guava pulp. However, the sugar percentage of all the treatments was significantly lower (1.80% to 2.56%) as compared to control (33.92%).
Total sugar
The strained yoghurt containing added sugar had the highest (37.77%) total sugar content. The lowest sugar content was found in strained yoghurt with stevia only (5.63%). The strained yoghurt sample with stevia and 10% pink guava pulp had the lowest sugar content (6.36%), among all the fruit pulp samples. Relatively higher total sugar content was observed in strained yoghurt with 15% guava pulp (7.73%) and 20 % guava pulp (8.43%). The strained yoghurt containing stevia showed an increasing trend in the total sugars with increased percentage of guava pulp. However, the total sugar percentage of all the stevia samples was significantly lower (5.63 to 8.43%) as compared to control (37.77%).
Fat content
The fat content (3.52 to 3.66%) in all the strained yoghurt samples was observed to be in the range of FSSAI standards to label a product as low-fat product (3-4%) that rightly justifies the use of ingredient formulation (double toned milk chakka, stevia, pink guava pulp) to make low-fat strained yoghurt. Strained yoghurt with sugar had a fat content of 3.53%, while strained yoghurt with stevia had slightly higher fat content (3.66%). Addition of guava pulp (10-20%) to strained yoghurt containing stevia in it, resulted in reduction in fat content (3.52-3.64%).
Sameem et al., (2018) found similar trend in which the increased percentage of dragon fruit pulp caused a reduction in fat content of strained yoghurt.
Kolape et al., (2010) also observed similar results.
Sensory profile of low-fat and low-sugar strained yoghurt
The results from the sensory evaluation of strained yoghurt samples are presented in Fig 2.
Colour
The control sample using sugar had the highest colour score (8.70). The colour score of strained yoghurt with stevia (8.18) and strained yoghurt with stevia and 10% pulp (8.00) reported higher acceptability (≥8) indicating the level of satisfaction experienced by the panellists in terms of the colour of these samples. The strained yoghurt with stevia without pulp, received the higher colour score (8.18) after control,
i.
e. strained yoghurt with sugar (8.70). This implies that the panellists found the colour of sample containing stevia be the most appealing among all the stevia strained yoghurt samples. Furthermore, strained yoghurt containing 10 % pulp recorded highest colour score (8.00) among guava pulp samples, that justifies its acceptability.
Appearance
The scores on appearance indicated that the visual appeal of strained yoghurt went on decreasing with rise in the quantity of pink guava pulp. Stevia strained yoghurt made without pulp received the highest sensory score (7.86) for appearance after the control (8.61). This suggests that the panelists found the appearance of strained yoghurt with stevia without pulp to be the most appealing among all the strained yoghurt samples with stevia. Addition of pink guava pulp resulted in change of colour of the strained yoghurt thus the sensory scores of the treatments decreased as the level of pulp increased.
Taste
The average sensory rating of strained yoghurt sample with sugar was the highest (8.82) for taste. Remarkably, strained yoghurt with stevia and 10% pink guava pulp scored higher (8.16) after strained yoghurt with sugar (8.82), suggesting that adding pink guava pulp to the product improved its taste. Conversely, strained yoghurt which had 20 % pink guava pulp, obtained the lowest taste score (7.07). This indicates that 10 % pulp incorporation improved the taste of stevia strained yoghurt whereas further addition impaired it.
Flavour
The flavour score of strained yoghurt containing sugar was the highest (8.53). Among stevia samples, strained yoghurt containing 10% pulp had the highest flavour score (7.91) followed by 20% pulp sample (7.45). The lowermost score (7.28) for flavour was observed for strained yoghurt with stevia but without fruit pulp. The results revealed a pleasing effect of incorporating 10% pink guava pulp in stevia strained yoghurt.
Texture
The stevia strained yoghurt with 10% guava pulp received the highest score (8.19) for texture after strained yoghurt with sugar (8.70). On the other hand, strained yoghurt with 15% pink guava pulp received the lowest sensory score (7.43). It is a possibility that 10% fruit pulp in combination with 0.6% stevia and 89.4% chakka presented perfect balance in strained yoghurt formulation resulting in improved texture.
Overall acceptability
The strained yoghurt containing stevia and 10% guava pulp has recorded highest overall acceptability (8.09) after control (8.60). The strained yoghurt with stevia and 15% pink guava pulp had the lowest overall acceptability (7.28) followed by strained yoghurt with 20% guava pulp (7.30). The overall acceptability of strained yoghurt with stevia without fruit pulp was 7.66. Among all samples containing stevia in their formulation, the sample with 10% guava pulp comes out on top with the highest overall acceptability (8.09).
Shelf-life estimation of developed strained yoghurt
The effect of storage and packaging on total plate count, yeast and mould, viable lactic acid bacteria and coliform count were assessed and presented graphically in Fig 3 to Fig 7.
Total plate count
The significant increase in total plate count of strained yoghurt was recorded throughout the storage tenure of 18 days (Fig 3). After 18 days, TPC of low-fat and low-sugar strained yoghurt was increased from 76.00x10
7 cfu/ml to 97.33x10
7 cfu/ml when stored in PP containers, whereas more increase in TPC was recorded in strained yoghurt stored in PET containers (101.00x10
7 cfu/ml). This could be because of the poor gas barrier properties of PET as compared to polypropylene (Packaging Gateway, 2004). Total plate count was found to be within acceptable limit (100x10
7 cfu/ml) for 18 days in strained yoghurt packed in PP container (97.33x10
7 cfu/ml) and 15 days in a PET container (93.00x10
7 cfu/ml). The similar results were reported by
Kolape et al., (2010).
Yeast and mould
The yeast and mould (YM) count recorded increasing trend from day 3 (PP- 18.67 cfu/ml and PET- 23.00 cfu/ml) in both the packaging materials (Fig 4). The substantial increase was observed for PET (60.33 cfu/ml) as compared to PP (47.33 cfu/ml) at day 18. The YM remained within the permissible limit laid down by the FSSAI (50 cfu/ml) in strained yoghurt packed in PP and PET up to 18 days (47.33 cfu/ml) and 12 days (49.00 cfu/ml), respectively. Poor moisture barrier properties of PET have played a critical role in the growth of yeast and moulds which resulted in spoilage after 9 days. The similar observations were reported by
Rai et al., (2018) where yeast and mould did not exceed the maximum limit set by FSSAI till day 15.
Viable lactic acid bacteria (LAB)
Viable LAB count was decreased significantly from 37.80x10
7 cfu/ml to 8.00x10
7 cfu/ml in PP containers and to 2.53´107 cfu/ml in PET containers on 18
th day of storage (Fig 5). It was found to be within the normal range (PP- 22.00
×107 cfu/ml and PET- 10.33´107 cfu/ml) for 12 days as per FSSAI guidelines (viable count > 108 cfu/ml). The similar results are reported by
Jadhav et al., (2019).
Coliforms
Coliforms were not traced in the strained yoghurt of samples packed in both PP as well as PET containers throughout the storage tenure.
Acidity
The significant increase in acidity (from 1.07% to 1.14% in PP containers and 1.20% in PET containers on 18
th day) was recorded during entire storage period of strained yoghurt (Fig 6). The increased acidity of strained yoghurt throughout the storage could be attributed to fermentation of lactose sugar by probiotic micro-organisms present in strained yoghurt matrix causing increase in the percentage of lactic acid
(Sivasankari et al., 2017). Strained yoghurt packed in both PP and PET containers remained within acceptable limits of acidity (<1.4%) throughout the storage tenure as per FSSAI guidelines.
pH
The decrease in pH (from 3.97 to 3.72 in PP containers and 3.12 in PET containers) of strained yoghurt can be correlated with rise in acidity of strained yoghurt (Fig 7). The pH of strained yoghurt packed in PP containers remained in acceptable limit throughout the storage tenure (FSSAI limits- 3.50).