Background: Beetroot greens (Beta vulgaris L.), a lesser-known leafy vegetable from the Chenopodiaceae family, are often overlooked despite their high nutritional value. This study aimed to enhance traditional Gujarati recipes by incorporating beetroot greens and evaluating their sensory and nutritional properties.

Methods: The sensory acceptability and nutritive score of dried beetroot leaves powder (DBLP) incorporated Khaakra and Murukku at different per centages (0, 5,10,15) of added dried beetroot leaves powder (DBLP) were evaluated.

Result: There was a direct correlation between increasing levels of DBLP and improved nutrient content. DBLP-enriched products had mostly enhanced parameters, such as moisture content, protein, fiber, iron and calcium, while carbohydrate content was decreased. Among all products, the highest sensory acceptability was that of the product containing 10% DBLP.

Agricultural and industrial food by-products like peels, leaves and seeds constitute significant waste. Despite being reaped for its benefits, they are disposed leading to environmental pollution. With the surge in awareness, there has been an expansion in the utilization of the same in food products (Anal, 2017). Mango peel is incorporated into bakery products and is served as a functional ingredient (Jahurul et al., 2015). However, strategies have not been formulated to partially or fully utilize most by-products (Lai et al., 2017).
       
Beetroot (Beta vulgaris L.), a commonly consumed vegetable worldwide, belongs to the Chenopodiaceae family. Its leafy greens, known as beetroot greens, are often discarded due to limited dietary awareness (Amnah, 2013; Biondo et al., 2014). These leaves contain anti-nutrients like oxalate, tannins and phytate at levels comparable to or lower than those found in spinach (Spinacia oleracea L.). Both the leaves and the root of beetroot are nutrient-dense, offering minerals, protein, fiber and essential vitamins such as cyanocobalamin, pyridoxine, calcium and folic acid (Fernandez et al., 2017). Furthermore, beetroot leaves are abundant in plant pigments like carotenoids, chlorophylls and betalains, as well as bioactive compounds such as kaempferol, quercetin and rutin, which contribute to their antioxidant properties. Additionally, they serve as a good source of omega-3 fatty acids, particularly linolenic acid (Elaby and Ali, 2018).
       
Incorporation of underutilized low-cost traditional ingredients in value-added products can spur interest in the market, especially among the malnourished population (Ebert, 2014). The current consumer demand is convenient but nutritious ready-to-eat foods (Ali et al., 2015). Consumers are approaching food to fulfill nutritional requirements, not just satiate hunger. There is an increased understanding of its role in preventing nutritional deficiency disorders (Betoret et al., 2011; O’Shea et al., 2012). This has created a demand for nutritious snacks (Yangilar, 2013).
       
Murukku is a widely consumed ready-to-eat snack, particularly in Gujarat and among Indian communities in Fiji and Sri Lanka. Crunchy Murukku, shaped like tiny coils, is the most popular in southern India. It is typically savored for its flavor and crisp texture. It is a mixture of black gram, rice flour, salt, spices and flavorings like cumin, carom seed, chili and asafoetida. When combined into a batter, shaped into a coil or spiral shape, it is mechanically extruded before being deep-fried until crisp (Ramasamy et al., 2011).
       
Khakhra, a widely enjoyed Gujarati snack, is a thin, crispy flatbread commonly paired with tea, coffee, butter, yogurt, cheese, chutney, or pickles. Available in flavors such as cumin, fenugreek, mint leaves and various spice blends, it is traditionally made from wheat flour and oil. This homemade, roasted snack is a convenient and flavorful option for breakfast or light meals. Its minimal packaging requirements, lack of additional processing and extended shelf life contribute to its popularity (Vijayarani et al., 2021). There are some studies done on Khakhra fortified with whole unripe pumpkin (Patel et al., 2023), millets (Vijayarani et al., 2021), Multiple grains, spirulina powder, flax seeds (Bansal et al., 2023), red rice, buckwheat and flaxseed (Bartwal et al., 2020), apricots (Hirdyani and Mundeja, 2015) have been done. Similarly, limited studies replaced refined flour with rajma flour in the preparation of Murukku (Vijayarani et al., 2021) or preparation of low-fat Multigrain Murukku (Sarangam et al., 2015). Although reports of Dried Beetroot Leaf Powder (DBLP) incorporated Khaakra and Murukku are unprecedented.
               
When cooking oils are heated to standard frying temperatures, they produce high levels of certain toxins that can get into the food. Regular consumption of these toxins, especially the α,β-unsaturated types, can be very harmful to human health in the long term. It’s crucial to develop strategies to address this serious issue (Grootveld et al., 2020). From this perspective, our study aims to prepare and standardise DBLP-incorporated value-added products, namely, Khaakra and Murukku, by baking.
Fresh beetroot (Beta vulgaris L.) leaves were sourced from local vegetable markets, while other ingredients for product development were procured from nearby grocery stores. The experiment was conducted at the Food Processing Laboratory and Food analysis Laboratory of Department of Food and Nutrition, Era University, Lucknow, UP in 2022.
 
Preparation of DBLP
 
First, the fresh beetroot leaves were cleaned. Asadi and Khan’s (2019) specifications were followed in the preparation of the DBLP. A tray dryer (Biogen Scientific C.A.T. No. BGS-123 Sr. No. 101742, U.P. India) was used to dry the beetroot leaves for seven hours at 60±2oC, followed by blanching in a microwave system (Kenstar KE20CBGJ MGA, India) at 560 W for 50 seconds. The DBLP was ground into powder using an automatic blender (Tandem brand, India) and then sieved through a  sieve (SETHI firm, India, mesh size of 180 μm). The leaves were then placed in low-density polyethylene (LDPE) bags, sealed with a heat sealer (Golden Eagle, India) and kept for later use at -18oC (Fig 1).

Fig 1: Method of preparation of DBLP.


 
Preparation of value-added products
 
Value-added products were prepared using the method recommended by Giridhar (2019). The basic recipe (control M0, K0) had three basic variations namely M1, M2, M3, K1, K2, K3 respectively as seen in Fig 2a and 2b. The 100:0 ratio was the control product. The different products, such as Khakhra and Murukku, were prepared by using different ratios of DBLP on a trial basis as follows:

Fig 2a: Method of preparation of Murukku.



Fig 2b: Method of preparation of Khakhra.


 
Product composition
 
The DBLP was incorporated into the value-added products (Murukku and Khakhra) at 5, 10 and 15 per cent.
M0, K0- Control (No incorporation of DBLP), 100% Bengal gram flour.
M1, K1- Bengal gram flour 95 g and DBLP 5 g.
M2, K2- Bengal gram flour 90 g and DBLP 10 g.
M3, K3- Bengal gram flour 85 g and DBLP 15 g.
 
Nutritional analysis
 
The Association of Official Analytical Chemists (AOAC, 2000) guidelines were followed to determine the per centage of ash, moisture, crude fiber and crude protein in the samples for proximate analysis. Energy was calculated using the energy conversion factor and the carbohydrate content of value-added products was determined using the difference approach. Fat content analysis was conducted using the Soxhlet extraction method (LTSW-4). For ashing, the samples were digested in a muffle (Model No- HT-MF800-2.3S/G) at 600oC for 6 to 8 hours, or until complete organic matter breakdown and then recovered with acid for mineral identification. An atomic absorption spectrophotometer (HV-AAS02-2100) was used to quantify iron in the samples. Calcium was estimated by the titration method.
 
Sensory analysis
 
The Nine Point Hedonic Scale (Srilakshmi, 2011) was used to assess different sensory parameters viz. color, appearance, body and texture, taste and flavor and overall acceptability of the prepared value-added products. A panel of fifteen trained judges evaluated the prepared value-added products for their various sensory attributes and the analysis was replicated three times. The panelists underwent semi-training to get acquainted themselves with the product’s sensory attributes and the previously indicated nine-score ranges for the sensory analysis (Baljeet et al., 2014; Ranganna, 1986).

Statistical analysis
 
The results were presented as triplicates ± standard deviation for each sensory attribute. The significant differences between the properties of Murukku and Khakhra were statistically tested for significant differences using the ANOVA (Analysis of Variance). The nutritional content of the control recipe and the best acceptable product were statistically analyzed by t-test.
This study was carried out in the Food Processing Laboratory at the Department of Food and Nutrition, Era University, Lucknow. Good raw materials were procured from Lucknow’s local market to prepare value-added products. The per centage of DBLP in treatments of Murukku and Khakhra was 0% in M0, K0, 5% in M1, K1, 10% in M2, K2 and 15% in M3, K3. The mean sensory scores for evaluating value-added products are presented in Table 1. The final products underwent 9- point Hedonic scale assessment as shown in Fig 3 and 4.

Table 1: Sensory evaluation of Murukku and Khakhra.



Fig 3: Sensory scores of Murukku.



Fig 4: Sensory scores of Khakhra.


       
M0 was the most acceptable color and appearance as the Murukku turned dark green from cream as the level of DBLP incorporation increased. Being dense and crunchy, Murukku showed the highest acceptability of M1 regarding Body and Texture. While the taste, flavor and overall acceptability of M2 were most liked, with the increase in DBLP beyond 10%, the product turned dark, bitter and hard, hence reducing the overall acceptability of M3. DBLP incorporated Murukku had a significant effect on color, appearance, body and texture, taste and flavour and overall acceptability (p≤0.05). Khaakra showed a slight tinge of green color and hardness in value-added products, making the Color and Appearance, Body and texture of K0 most acceptable. Value-added K1 Khakhra had an enhanced Taste and Flavour and Overall acceptability, but the acceptability decreased beyond 5% incorporation of DBLP. The inclusion of DBLP in Khakhra significantly influenced its color, appearance, texture, taste, flavor and overall acceptability (p≤0.05). According to the Ingle et al., (2017) the incorporation of beetroot powder in cookies lowered the lightness (L*) and yellowness (b*) but increased redness (a*) of cookies. The hardness of the cookies was increased with increasing the level of beetroot powder. Sensory evaluation of cookies concluded that the cookies prepared with addition of 10% beetroot powder were more acceptable as compared to others.
       
Research on DBLP incorporated Khakhra and Murukku is lacking. Although various research reports similar sensory attributes of DBLP incorporated snacks. In a study reported by Giridhar 2019, the color of T1 was more acceptable than the different treatment combinations of GLV-based Khakhra. It has been noted that a small drop in the amount of GLV in khakhra results in a slight drop in the color and appearance score. Similarly, in our study, as DBLP levels increase, the mean score for color and appearance decreases slightly. As per the research findings revealed by Aulia and Sunarharum 2020, there was a notable effect on the cookies’ colour and crispiness’ when the amount of beetroot powder was increased along with the oven’s temperature. Similar to our study, was reported by Evstigneeva et al., 2020, where a higher per centage of beetroot powder was characterized by a more pronounced color, taste and aroma. Kakade et al., 2015 reported an increase in the hardness of extruded snacks with an increase in beetroot leaves powder per centage, whereas the lateral expansion was decreased. Another study by Singh and Sharma in 2021 reported that up to 15% of incorporation was accepted, contrary to our study. This may be attributed to the powder mixing cauliflower and DBLP. Incorporating this mix resulted in dark color and appearance, both in cooked and raw form. The sensory scores of the treatments decreased as the incorporation level of DBLP increased. The taste scores across the treatments showed remarkably similar results. Upon the escalation of DBLP powder, an atypical mouthfeel was noted. However, the overall flavor and acceptability of the product were not significantly affected, as demonstrated by the nearly identical ratings for different treatments (Singh and Sharma, 2021). According to study reported by Tangariya et al., (2023) BRP incorporated snack bars were evaluated for various sensory parameters viz; taste, after taste, color and appearance, texture and overall acceptability using nine- point Hedonic scale. In case of BRP incorporated snack bars sensory quality declined with increase in the level of BRP. Mean sensory scores for taste and after taste decreased significantly (p<0.05). In contrast to our study, Rachana et al., (2025) reported the lowest organoleptic parameters for bar with highest amount of pineapple and equal amounts of beetroot and dates followed by highest amount of pineapple than beetroot and dates.
               
Values of ash, moisture and fiber were determined to understand the composition of developed value-added products as shown in Table 2 and 3. Results show that K3 and M3 had the highest per centage of proximate composition. This can be attributed to the fact that DBLP is rich in mineral content, which leads to high ash value. DBLP is also naturally high in fibre content. It has been proven that DBLP has a high moisture absorbing capacity; hence, the product with the highest concentration, i.e., K3 and M3, showed the highest per centage of the proximate composition. Ash and moisture content of dehydrated beetroot leaves are 156.09 g/Kg and 85.08 g/Kg, respectively (Biondo et al., 2014). The nutritional composition of the prepared products was determined using the standard procedure described by AOAC (2000). M0 and K0 provided the highest value for energy and carbohydrate among all treatments, as shown in Table 4. This can be attributed to the decrease of high-energy base ingredients, i.e., Bengal gram in Murukku and Khakhra and the increase in low-energy ingredients, i.e., DBLP, by 5% in each treatment following the previous. Since the quantity of beetroot powder increased by 5% in each treatment of both Murukku and Khakhra following the previous, the protein content was highest in M3 and K3. There was an increase in calcium and iron content with each treatment, as the level of incorporation increased by 5% in each following the previous. In another study, based on nutrient content as per the increasing maturity level of DBLP, Dehydrated beetroot leaves’ energy and carbohydrate levels range from 3,5843.56 to 3350.19 Kcal/kg and 307.21 to 410.19 g/Kg. The protein content ranges from 310.25 to 264.12 g/Kg. The Saturated fatty acid content ranged from 8.56 to 13.90 mg/g. The Calcium content ranged from 1476.35 to 1864.85 mg/kg. The iron content ranged from 187.30 to 342.75 mg/kg (Biondo et al., 2014). DBLP incorporated Khakhra and Murukku, which are rich in iron and can be good for the anaemic community. Sobhy et al., 2020 reported that DBLP contains 13.71 mg/100 g of iron, approximately half of the values reported by Biondo et al., 2014 (25.63 mg/100 g). The variation in iron content may be attributed to the fact that the species or the soil quality may differ in both studies. nonetheless, it is an iron-rich source. The studies show that DBLP contains a good amount of ash, ranging from 145.06 g/kg to 184.33 g/kg (Biondo et al., 2014). DBLP could be considered a viable source of protein for individuals with constrained options for animal protein, as its crude protein levels varied from 264.12 gm/kg to 310.25 gm/kg. The DBLP’s ash and protein contents were greater in 52 varieties of vegetables and 36 hydroponic systems when compared to the findings of Kinupp and Barros (2008).

Table 2: Proximate composition of Khaakhra.



Table 3: Proximate composition of Murukku.



Table 4: Nutritional composition of Murukku and Khaakhra.

Regarding sensory attributes, the DBLP incorporated Murukku at 10% and the DBLP incorporated Khakhra at 5%, with the highest overall acceptability. Based on nutrition composition, it was found that the nutrient content (Protein, Calcium and Iron per 100gm) was highest in M3 and K3. While energy, carbohydrates and fat content were highest in the control treatment of both products. The products formulated by incorporation of DBLP at different per centages were acceptable and at the same time, nutritionally enhanced.
       
Consumption of iron and protein-rich foods has been proven to alleviate various nutritional deficiency disorders. Nutrition education programs that utilize and incorporate underutilized food items like beetroot leaves can be beneficial. Further, intervention with similar value-added products can be done to determine their therapeutic use.
We thank Era University, Lucknow, for providing the research resources. The present study was not financially supported by any of the agency or institute.
 
Disclaimers
 
The views and conclusions expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent the views of their affiliated institutions. The authors are responsible for the accuracy and completeness of the information provided, but do not accept any liability for any direct or indirect losses resulting from the use of this content.
 
Informed consent
 
No animals and human intervention was done.
The authors declare that there are no conflicts of interest regarding the publication of this article. No funding or sponsorship influenced the design of the study, data collection, analysis, decision to publish or preparation of the manuscript.

  1. Ali, T., Alam, A. and Ali, J. (2015). Market structure analysis of health and wellness food products in India. British Food Journal. 117(7): 1859-1871.

  2. Amnah, M.A. (2013). Nutritional, sensory and biological study of biscuits fortified with red beet roots. Life Science Journal. 10: 1579-1584. 

  3. Anal, A.K. (2017). Food Processing by Products and their Utilization: Introduction. In A.K. Anal (Ed.), Food Processing by Products and their Utilization (1st ed.). John Wiley and Sons Ltd. pp: 2-4.

  4. AOAC. (2000). Official Methods of Analysis (17th ed.). Association of Official Analytical Chemists.

  5. Aulia, F. and Sunarharum, W.B. (2020). Beetroot (Beta vulgaris L. var. rubra L.) flour proportion and oven temperature affect the physicochemical characteristics of beetroot cookies. IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science, 475(1): 012040.

  6. Baljeet, S.Y., Ritika, B.Y. and Reena, K. (2014). Effect of incorporation of carrot pomace powder and germinated chickpea flour on the quality characteristics of biscuits. International Food Research Journal. 21(1): 217-222.

  7. Bansal, R., Ojha, N. and Sharma, M. (2023). Formulation and sensory evaluation of multigrain Khakhra by incorporating spirulina powder and flax seeds. The Pharma Innovation. 12(1): 2444-2447.

  8. Bartwal, A., Tyagi, A., Joshi, H. and Bisht, B. (2020). Nutritional gluten- free multigrain Khakhra using red rice, buckwheat and flaxseed: A review. International Journal of Chemical Studies. 8(4): 2541–2545.

  9. Betoret, E., Betoret, N., Vidal, D. and Fito, P. (2011). Functional foods development: Trends and technologies. Trends in Food Science and Technology. 22(9): 498-508. 

  10. Biondo, P.B.F., Boeing, J.S., Barizão, É.O., Souza, N.E.D., Matsushita, M., Oliveira, C.C.D. and Visentainer, J.V. (2014). Evaluation of beetroot (Beta vulgaris L.) leaves during its developmental stages: A chemical composition study. Food Science and Technology. 34(1): 94–101. 

  11. Ebert, A.W. (2014). Potential of underutilized traditional vegetables and legume crops to contribute to food and nutritional security, income and more sustainable production systems. Sustainability. 6(1): 319-335. 

  12. Elaby, S. and Ali, J. (2018). The anti-anemic effect of dried beet green in phenylhydrazine treated rats. Archives of Pharmaceutical Sciences Ain Shams University. 2(2): 54-69. 

  13. Evstigneeva, T., Iakovchenko, N., Kuzmicheva, N. and Skvortsova, N. (2020). Applying beetroot as food ingredient in ice- cream production. Agronomy Research. 18(S3): 1662-1672.

  14. Fernandez, M.V., Jagus, R.J. and Agüero, M.V. (2017). Evaluation and characterisation of nutritional, microbiological and sensory properties of beet greens. Acta Scientific Nutritional Health. 1: 37-45. 

  15. Giridhar, P. (2019). Preparation and sensory evaluation of finger millet Khakhra. Journal of Food Science and Nutrition Research. 2(1): 61-64.

  16. Grootveld, M., Percival, B.C., Leenders, J. and Wilson, P. B. (2020). Potential adverse public health effects afforded by the ingestion of dietary lipid oxidation product toxins: Significance of fried food sources. Nutrients. 12(974). 

  17. Hirdyani, H. and Mundeja, A. (2015). Enhancing the nutritional quality of two commonly consumed Indian snacks Khakhra and Ladoo with potassium rich apricots and their quality evaluation. International Journal of Home Science. 1(3): 28-31.

  18. Ingle, M., Thorat, S.S., Kotecha, M.P. and Nimbalkar, A.C. (2017). Nutritional assessment of beetroot (Beta vulgaris L.) powder cookies. Asian Journal of Dairy and Food Research. 36(3): 222-228. doi: 10.18805/ajdfr.v36i03.8963.

  19. Jahurul, M.H.A., Zaidul, I.S.M., Ghafoor, K., Al-Juhaimi, F.Y., Nyam, K.-L., Norulaini, N.A.N. and Mohd Omar, A.K. (2015). Mango (Mangifera indica L.) by-products and their valuable components: A review. Food Chemistry. 183: 173-180. 

  20. Kakade, B., Hathan, B.S. and Neeha, V.S. (2015) Utilization of beetroot (Beta vulgaris) Leaves powder in cereals based extruded product. International Research Journal of Engineering and Technology. 02(03). 

  21. Kinupp, V.F. and Barros, I.B.I.D. (2008). Protein and mineral contents of native species, potential vegetables and fruits. Food Science and Technology. 28: 846-857.

  22. Lai, W.T., Khong, N.M.H., Lim, S.S., Hee, Y.Y., Sim, B.I., Lau, K.Y.,  and Lai, O.M. (2017). A review: Modified agricultural by- products for the development and fortification of food products and nutraceuticals. Trends in Food Science and Technology. 59: 148-160. 

  23. O’Shea, N., Arendt, E.K. and Gallagher, E. (2012). Dietary fibre and phytochemical characteristics of fruit and vegetable by- products and their recent applications as novel ingredients in food products. Innovative Food Science and Emerging Technologies. 16: 1-10. 

  24. Patel, P. and Singh, S.P. (2023). Formulation and standardization of Gujarati snack (Khakhra) fortified with whole unripe pumpkin (Cucurbita moschata) powder. Current Journal of Applied Science and Technology. 42(29): 38-45.

  25. Rachana, S.S., Jessie, S.W. and Kavitha, K.K.V. (2025). Physico- chemical properties and cost analysis of jaggery based salubrious snack bar. Asian Journal of Dairy and Food Research. 44(3): 385-394. doi: 10.18805/ajdfr.DR-1838.

  26. Ramasamy, R., Vivek Kumar, S. and Maya, P. (2011). Projective mapping and product positioning of deep fat fried snack. Food and Nutrition Sciences. 02(06).

  27. Ranganna, S. (1986). Handbook of Analysis and Quality Control for Fruit and Vegetable Products. Tata McGraw-Hill Education. (2nd ed., pp: 595-597, 623-629).

  28. Ravi, R., Singh, V. and Prakash, M. (2011). Projective mapping and product positioning of deep fat fried snack. Food and Nutrition Sciences. 2(6): 674-683. 

  29. Sarangam, S., Chakraborty, P. and Chandrasheker, G. (2015). Development of low fat multigrain Murukku-a traditional savoury product. International Journal of Research. 15.

  30. Singh, R. and Sharma, L. (2021). Utilization of waste leaves of Beta vulgaris, Brassica oleracea and Oryza sativa flakes for the development of iron-rich vermicelli. International Journal of Current Research and Review. 13(19).

  31. Sobhy, E.S., Abdo, E., Shaltout, O., Abdalla, A. and Zeitoun, A. (2020). Nutritional evaluation of beetroots (Beta vulgaris L.) and its potential application in a functional beverage. Plants (Basel). 9(12): 1752. 

  32. Srilakshmi, B. (2011). Dietetics (6th ed.). New Age International Publisher.

  33. Tangariya, P., Awasthi, P. and Sahoo, A. (2023). Effect of beetroot powder incorporation on the textural, sensory and nutritional quality of legume and oil seeds based snack bar. Asian Journal of Dairy and Food Research. 42(1): 117-122. doi: 10.18805/ajdfr.DR-1721

  34. Vijayarani, D. and Sabarimathi, J. (2021). Development and standard- lization of rajma flour incorporated food products to combat malnutrition. The Indian Journal of Nutrition and Dietetics. 58(S2): 96-103. 

  35. Yangilar, F. (2013). The application of dietary fibre in food industry: Structural features, effects on health and definition, obtaining and analysis of dietary fibre: A review. Journal of Food and Nutrition Research. 1(13): 13-23.

Background: Beetroot greens (Beta vulgaris L.), a lesser-known leafy vegetable from the Chenopodiaceae family, are often overlooked despite their high nutritional value. This study aimed to enhance traditional Gujarati recipes by incorporating beetroot greens and evaluating their sensory and nutritional properties.

Methods: The sensory acceptability and nutritive score of dried beetroot leaves powder (DBLP) incorporated Khaakra and Murukku at different per centages (0, 5,10,15) of added dried beetroot leaves powder (DBLP) were evaluated.

Result: There was a direct correlation between increasing levels of DBLP and improved nutrient content. DBLP-enriched products had mostly enhanced parameters, such as moisture content, protein, fiber, iron and calcium, while carbohydrate content was decreased. Among all products, the highest sensory acceptability was that of the product containing 10% DBLP.

Agricultural and industrial food by-products like peels, leaves and seeds constitute significant waste. Despite being reaped for its benefits, they are disposed leading to environmental pollution. With the surge in awareness, there has been an expansion in the utilization of the same in food products (Anal, 2017). Mango peel is incorporated into bakery products and is served as a functional ingredient (Jahurul et al., 2015). However, strategies have not been formulated to partially or fully utilize most by-products (Lai et al., 2017).
       
Beetroot (Beta vulgaris L.), a commonly consumed vegetable worldwide, belongs to the Chenopodiaceae family. Its leafy greens, known as beetroot greens, are often discarded due to limited dietary awareness (Amnah, 2013; Biondo et al., 2014). These leaves contain anti-nutrients like oxalate, tannins and phytate at levels comparable to or lower than those found in spinach (Spinacia oleracea L.). Both the leaves and the root of beetroot are nutrient-dense, offering minerals, protein, fiber and essential vitamins such as cyanocobalamin, pyridoxine, calcium and folic acid (Fernandez et al., 2017). Furthermore, beetroot leaves are abundant in plant pigments like carotenoids, chlorophylls and betalains, as well as bioactive compounds such as kaempferol, quercetin and rutin, which contribute to their antioxidant properties. Additionally, they serve as a good source of omega-3 fatty acids, particularly linolenic acid (Elaby and Ali, 2018).
       
Incorporation of underutilized low-cost traditional ingredients in value-added products can spur interest in the market, especially among the malnourished population (Ebert, 2014). The current consumer demand is convenient but nutritious ready-to-eat foods (Ali et al., 2015). Consumers are approaching food to fulfill nutritional requirements, not just satiate hunger. There is an increased understanding of its role in preventing nutritional deficiency disorders (Betoret et al., 2011; O’Shea et al., 2012). This has created a demand for nutritious snacks (Yangilar, 2013).
       
Murukku is a widely consumed ready-to-eat snack, particularly in Gujarat and among Indian communities in Fiji and Sri Lanka. Crunchy Murukku, shaped like tiny coils, is the most popular in southern India. It is typically savored for its flavor and crisp texture. It is a mixture of black gram, rice flour, salt, spices and flavorings like cumin, carom seed, chili and asafoetida. When combined into a batter, shaped into a coil or spiral shape, it is mechanically extruded before being deep-fried until crisp (Ramasamy et al., 2011).
       
Khakhra, a widely enjoyed Gujarati snack, is a thin, crispy flatbread commonly paired with tea, coffee, butter, yogurt, cheese, chutney, or pickles. Available in flavors such as cumin, fenugreek, mint leaves and various spice blends, it is traditionally made from wheat flour and oil. This homemade, roasted snack is a convenient and flavorful option for breakfast or light meals. Its minimal packaging requirements, lack of additional processing and extended shelf life contribute to its popularity (Vijayarani et al., 2021). There are some studies done on Khakhra fortified with whole unripe pumpkin (Patel et al., 2023), millets (Vijayarani et al., 2021), Multiple grains, spirulina powder, flax seeds (Bansal et al., 2023), red rice, buckwheat and flaxseed (Bartwal et al., 2020), apricots (Hirdyani and Mundeja, 2015) have been done. Similarly, limited studies replaced refined flour with rajma flour in the preparation of Murukku (Vijayarani et al., 2021) or preparation of low-fat Multigrain Murukku (Sarangam et al., 2015). Although reports of Dried Beetroot Leaf Powder (DBLP) incorporated Khaakra and Murukku are unprecedented.
               
When cooking oils are heated to standard frying temperatures, they produce high levels of certain toxins that can get into the food. Regular consumption of these toxins, especially the α,β-unsaturated types, can be very harmful to human health in the long term. It’s crucial to develop strategies to address this serious issue (Grootveld et al., 2020). From this perspective, our study aims to prepare and standardise DBLP-incorporated value-added products, namely, Khaakra and Murukku, by baking.
Fresh beetroot (Beta vulgaris L.) leaves were sourced from local vegetable markets, while other ingredients for product development were procured from nearby grocery stores. The experiment was conducted at the Food Processing Laboratory and Food analysis Laboratory of Department of Food and Nutrition, Era University, Lucknow, UP in 2022.
 
Preparation of DBLP
 
First, the fresh beetroot leaves were cleaned. Asadi and Khan’s (2019) specifications were followed in the preparation of the DBLP. A tray dryer (Biogen Scientific C.A.T. No. BGS-123 Sr. No. 101742, U.P. India) was used to dry the beetroot leaves for seven hours at 60±2oC, followed by blanching in a microwave system (Kenstar KE20CBGJ MGA, India) at 560 W for 50 seconds. The DBLP was ground into powder using an automatic blender (Tandem brand, India) and then sieved through a  sieve (SETHI firm, India, mesh size of 180 μm). The leaves were then placed in low-density polyethylene (LDPE) bags, sealed with a heat sealer (Golden Eagle, India) and kept for later use at -18oC (Fig 1).

Fig 1: Method of preparation of DBLP.


 
Preparation of value-added products
 
Value-added products were prepared using the method recommended by Giridhar (2019). The basic recipe (control M0, K0) had three basic variations namely M1, M2, M3, K1, K2, K3 respectively as seen in Fig 2a and 2b. The 100:0 ratio was the control product. The different products, such as Khakhra and Murukku, were prepared by using different ratios of DBLP on a trial basis as follows:

Fig 2a: Method of preparation of Murukku.



Fig 2b: Method of preparation of Khakhra.


 
Product composition
 
The DBLP was incorporated into the value-added products (Murukku and Khakhra) at 5, 10 and 15 per cent.
M0, K0- Control (No incorporation of DBLP), 100% Bengal gram flour.
M1, K1- Bengal gram flour 95 g and DBLP 5 g.
M2, K2- Bengal gram flour 90 g and DBLP 10 g.
M3, K3- Bengal gram flour 85 g and DBLP 15 g.
 
Nutritional analysis
 
The Association of Official Analytical Chemists (AOAC, 2000) guidelines were followed to determine the per centage of ash, moisture, crude fiber and crude protein in the samples for proximate analysis. Energy was calculated using the energy conversion factor and the carbohydrate content of value-added products was determined using the difference approach. Fat content analysis was conducted using the Soxhlet extraction method (LTSW-4). For ashing, the samples were digested in a muffle (Model No- HT-MF800-2.3S/G) at 600oC for 6 to 8 hours, or until complete organic matter breakdown and then recovered with acid for mineral identification. An atomic absorption spectrophotometer (HV-AAS02-2100) was used to quantify iron in the samples. Calcium was estimated by the titration method.
 
Sensory analysis
 
The Nine Point Hedonic Scale (Srilakshmi, 2011) was used to assess different sensory parameters viz. color, appearance, body and texture, taste and flavor and overall acceptability of the prepared value-added products. A panel of fifteen trained judges evaluated the prepared value-added products for their various sensory attributes and the analysis was replicated three times. The panelists underwent semi-training to get acquainted themselves with the product’s sensory attributes and the previously indicated nine-score ranges for the sensory analysis (Baljeet et al., 2014; Ranganna, 1986).

Statistical analysis
 
The results were presented as triplicates ± standard deviation for each sensory attribute. The significant differences between the properties of Murukku and Khakhra were statistically tested for significant differences using the ANOVA (Analysis of Variance). The nutritional content of the control recipe and the best acceptable product were statistically analyzed by t-test.
This study was carried out in the Food Processing Laboratory at the Department of Food and Nutrition, Era University, Lucknow. Good raw materials were procured from Lucknow’s local market to prepare value-added products. The per centage of DBLP in treatments of Murukku and Khakhra was 0% in M0, K0, 5% in M1, K1, 10% in M2, K2 and 15% in M3, K3. The mean sensory scores for evaluating value-added products are presented in Table 1. The final products underwent 9- point Hedonic scale assessment as shown in Fig 3 and 4.

Table 1: Sensory evaluation of Murukku and Khakhra.



Fig 3: Sensory scores of Murukku.



Fig 4: Sensory scores of Khakhra.


       
M0 was the most acceptable color and appearance as the Murukku turned dark green from cream as the level of DBLP incorporation increased. Being dense and crunchy, Murukku showed the highest acceptability of M1 regarding Body and Texture. While the taste, flavor and overall acceptability of M2 were most liked, with the increase in DBLP beyond 10%, the product turned dark, bitter and hard, hence reducing the overall acceptability of M3. DBLP incorporated Murukku had a significant effect on color, appearance, body and texture, taste and flavour and overall acceptability (p≤0.05). Khaakra showed a slight tinge of green color and hardness in value-added products, making the Color and Appearance, Body and texture of K0 most acceptable. Value-added K1 Khakhra had an enhanced Taste and Flavour and Overall acceptability, but the acceptability decreased beyond 5% incorporation of DBLP. The inclusion of DBLP in Khakhra significantly influenced its color, appearance, texture, taste, flavor and overall acceptability (p≤0.05). According to the Ingle et al., (2017) the incorporation of beetroot powder in cookies lowered the lightness (L*) and yellowness (b*) but increased redness (a*) of cookies. The hardness of the cookies was increased with increasing the level of beetroot powder. Sensory evaluation of cookies concluded that the cookies prepared with addition of 10% beetroot powder were more acceptable as compared to others.
       
Research on DBLP incorporated Khakhra and Murukku is lacking. Although various research reports similar sensory attributes of DBLP incorporated snacks. In a study reported by Giridhar 2019, the color of T1 was more acceptable than the different treatment combinations of GLV-based Khakhra. It has been noted that a small drop in the amount of GLV in khakhra results in a slight drop in the color and appearance score. Similarly, in our study, as DBLP levels increase, the mean score for color and appearance decreases slightly. As per the research findings revealed by Aulia and Sunarharum 2020, there was a notable effect on the cookies’ colour and crispiness’ when the amount of beetroot powder was increased along with the oven’s temperature. Similar to our study, was reported by Evstigneeva et al., 2020, where a higher per centage of beetroot powder was characterized by a more pronounced color, taste and aroma. Kakade et al., 2015 reported an increase in the hardness of extruded snacks with an increase in beetroot leaves powder per centage, whereas the lateral expansion was decreased. Another study by Singh and Sharma in 2021 reported that up to 15% of incorporation was accepted, contrary to our study. This may be attributed to the powder mixing cauliflower and DBLP. Incorporating this mix resulted in dark color and appearance, both in cooked and raw form. The sensory scores of the treatments decreased as the incorporation level of DBLP increased. The taste scores across the treatments showed remarkably similar results. Upon the escalation of DBLP powder, an atypical mouthfeel was noted. However, the overall flavor and acceptability of the product were not significantly affected, as demonstrated by the nearly identical ratings for different treatments (Singh and Sharma, 2021). According to study reported by Tangariya et al., (2023) BRP incorporated snack bars were evaluated for various sensory parameters viz; taste, after taste, color and appearance, texture and overall acceptability using nine- point Hedonic scale. In case of BRP incorporated snack bars sensory quality declined with increase in the level of BRP. Mean sensory scores for taste and after taste decreased significantly (p<0.05). In contrast to our study, Rachana et al., (2025) reported the lowest organoleptic parameters for bar with highest amount of pineapple and equal amounts of beetroot and dates followed by highest amount of pineapple than beetroot and dates.
               
Values of ash, moisture and fiber were determined to understand the composition of developed value-added products as shown in Table 2 and 3. Results show that K3 and M3 had the highest per centage of proximate composition. This can be attributed to the fact that DBLP is rich in mineral content, which leads to high ash value. DBLP is also naturally high in fibre content. It has been proven that DBLP has a high moisture absorbing capacity; hence, the product with the highest concentration, i.e., K3 and M3, showed the highest per centage of the proximate composition. Ash and moisture content of dehydrated beetroot leaves are 156.09 g/Kg and 85.08 g/Kg, respectively (Biondo et al., 2014). The nutritional composition of the prepared products was determined using the standard procedure described by AOAC (2000). M0 and K0 provided the highest value for energy and carbohydrate among all treatments, as shown in Table 4. This can be attributed to the decrease of high-energy base ingredients, i.e., Bengal gram in Murukku and Khakhra and the increase in low-energy ingredients, i.e., DBLP, by 5% in each treatment following the previous. Since the quantity of beetroot powder increased by 5% in each treatment of both Murukku and Khakhra following the previous, the protein content was highest in M3 and K3. There was an increase in calcium and iron content with each treatment, as the level of incorporation increased by 5% in each following the previous. In another study, based on nutrient content as per the increasing maturity level of DBLP, Dehydrated beetroot leaves’ energy and carbohydrate levels range from 3,5843.56 to 3350.19 Kcal/kg and 307.21 to 410.19 g/Kg. The protein content ranges from 310.25 to 264.12 g/Kg. The Saturated fatty acid content ranged from 8.56 to 13.90 mg/g. The Calcium content ranged from 1476.35 to 1864.85 mg/kg. The iron content ranged from 187.30 to 342.75 mg/kg (Biondo et al., 2014). DBLP incorporated Khakhra and Murukku, which are rich in iron and can be good for the anaemic community. Sobhy et al., 2020 reported that DBLP contains 13.71 mg/100 g of iron, approximately half of the values reported by Biondo et al., 2014 (25.63 mg/100 g). The variation in iron content may be attributed to the fact that the species or the soil quality may differ in both studies. nonetheless, it is an iron-rich source. The studies show that DBLP contains a good amount of ash, ranging from 145.06 g/kg to 184.33 g/kg (Biondo et al., 2014). DBLP could be considered a viable source of protein for individuals with constrained options for animal protein, as its crude protein levels varied from 264.12 gm/kg to 310.25 gm/kg. The DBLP’s ash and protein contents were greater in 52 varieties of vegetables and 36 hydroponic systems when compared to the findings of Kinupp and Barros (2008).

Table 2: Proximate composition of Khaakhra.



Table 3: Proximate composition of Murukku.



Table 4: Nutritional composition of Murukku and Khaakhra.

Regarding sensory attributes, the DBLP incorporated Murukku at 10% and the DBLP incorporated Khakhra at 5%, with the highest overall acceptability. Based on nutrition composition, it was found that the nutrient content (Protein, Calcium and Iron per 100gm) was highest in M3 and K3. While energy, carbohydrates and fat content were highest in the control treatment of both products. The products formulated by incorporation of DBLP at different per centages were acceptable and at the same time, nutritionally enhanced.
       
Consumption of iron and protein-rich foods has been proven to alleviate various nutritional deficiency disorders. Nutrition education programs that utilize and incorporate underutilized food items like beetroot leaves can be beneficial. Further, intervention with similar value-added products can be done to determine their therapeutic use.
We thank Era University, Lucknow, for providing the research resources. The present study was not financially supported by any of the agency or institute.
 
Disclaimers
 
The views and conclusions expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent the views of their affiliated institutions. The authors are responsible for the accuracy and completeness of the information provided, but do not accept any liability for any direct or indirect losses resulting from the use of this content.
 
Informed consent
 
No animals and human intervention was done.
The authors declare that there are no conflicts of interest regarding the publication of this article. No funding or sponsorship influenced the design of the study, data collection, analysis, decision to publish or preparation of the manuscript.

  1. Ali, T., Alam, A. and Ali, J. (2015). Market structure analysis of health and wellness food products in India. British Food Journal. 117(7): 1859-1871.

  2. Amnah, M.A. (2013). Nutritional, sensory and biological study of biscuits fortified with red beet roots. Life Science Journal. 10: 1579-1584. 

  3. Anal, A.K. (2017). Food Processing by Products and their Utilization: Introduction. In A.K. Anal (Ed.), Food Processing by Products and their Utilization (1st ed.). John Wiley and Sons Ltd. pp: 2-4.

  4. AOAC. (2000). Official Methods of Analysis (17th ed.). Association of Official Analytical Chemists.

  5. Aulia, F. and Sunarharum, W.B. (2020). Beetroot (Beta vulgaris L. var. rubra L.) flour proportion and oven temperature affect the physicochemical characteristics of beetroot cookies. IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science, 475(1): 012040.

  6. Baljeet, S.Y., Ritika, B.Y. and Reena, K. (2014). Effect of incorporation of carrot pomace powder and germinated chickpea flour on the quality characteristics of biscuits. International Food Research Journal. 21(1): 217-222.

  7. Bansal, R., Ojha, N. and Sharma, M. (2023). Formulation and sensory evaluation of multigrain Khakhra by incorporating spirulina powder and flax seeds. The Pharma Innovation. 12(1): 2444-2447.

  8. Bartwal, A., Tyagi, A., Joshi, H. and Bisht, B. (2020). Nutritional gluten- free multigrain Khakhra using red rice, buckwheat and flaxseed: A review. International Journal of Chemical Studies. 8(4): 2541–2545.

  9. Betoret, E., Betoret, N., Vidal, D. and Fito, P. (2011). Functional foods development: Trends and technologies. Trends in Food Science and Technology. 22(9): 498-508. 

  10. Biondo, P.B.F., Boeing, J.S., Barizão, É.O., Souza, N.E.D., Matsushita, M., Oliveira, C.C.D. and Visentainer, J.V. (2014). Evaluation of beetroot (Beta vulgaris L.) leaves during its developmental stages: A chemical composition study. Food Science and Technology. 34(1): 94–101. 

  11. Ebert, A.W. (2014). Potential of underutilized traditional vegetables and legume crops to contribute to food and nutritional security, income and more sustainable production systems. Sustainability. 6(1): 319-335. 

  12. Elaby, S. and Ali, J. (2018). The anti-anemic effect of dried beet green in phenylhydrazine treated rats. Archives of Pharmaceutical Sciences Ain Shams University. 2(2): 54-69. 

  13. Evstigneeva, T., Iakovchenko, N., Kuzmicheva, N. and Skvortsova, N. (2020). Applying beetroot as food ingredient in ice- cream production. Agronomy Research. 18(S3): 1662-1672.

  14. Fernandez, M.V., Jagus, R.J. and Agüero, M.V. (2017). Evaluation and characterisation of nutritional, microbiological and sensory properties of beet greens. Acta Scientific Nutritional Health. 1: 37-45. 

  15. Giridhar, P. (2019). Preparation and sensory evaluation of finger millet Khakhra. Journal of Food Science and Nutrition Research. 2(1): 61-64.

  16. Grootveld, M., Percival, B.C., Leenders, J. and Wilson, P. B. (2020). Potential adverse public health effects afforded by the ingestion of dietary lipid oxidation product toxins: Significance of fried food sources. Nutrients. 12(974). 

  17. Hirdyani, H. and Mundeja, A. (2015). Enhancing the nutritional quality of two commonly consumed Indian snacks Khakhra and Ladoo with potassium rich apricots and their quality evaluation. International Journal of Home Science. 1(3): 28-31.

  18. Ingle, M., Thorat, S.S., Kotecha, M.P. and Nimbalkar, A.C. (2017). Nutritional assessment of beetroot (Beta vulgaris L.) powder cookies. Asian Journal of Dairy and Food Research. 36(3): 222-228. doi: 10.18805/ajdfr.v36i03.8963.

  19. Jahurul, M.H.A., Zaidul, I.S.M., Ghafoor, K., Al-Juhaimi, F.Y., Nyam, K.-L., Norulaini, N.A.N. and Mohd Omar, A.K. (2015). Mango (Mangifera indica L.) by-products and their valuable components: A review. Food Chemistry. 183: 173-180. 

  20. Kakade, B., Hathan, B.S. and Neeha, V.S. (2015) Utilization of beetroot (Beta vulgaris) Leaves powder in cereals based extruded product. International Research Journal of Engineering and Technology. 02(03). 

  21. Kinupp, V.F. and Barros, I.B.I.D. (2008). Protein and mineral contents of native species, potential vegetables and fruits. Food Science and Technology. 28: 846-857.

  22. Lai, W.T., Khong, N.M.H., Lim, S.S., Hee, Y.Y., Sim, B.I., Lau, K.Y.,  and Lai, O.M. (2017). A review: Modified agricultural by- products for the development and fortification of food products and nutraceuticals. Trends in Food Science and Technology. 59: 148-160. 

  23. O’Shea, N., Arendt, E.K. and Gallagher, E. (2012). Dietary fibre and phytochemical characteristics of fruit and vegetable by- products and their recent applications as novel ingredients in food products. Innovative Food Science and Emerging Technologies. 16: 1-10. 

  24. Patel, P. and Singh, S.P. (2023). Formulation and standardization of Gujarati snack (Khakhra) fortified with whole unripe pumpkin (Cucurbita moschata) powder. Current Journal of Applied Science and Technology. 42(29): 38-45.

  25. Rachana, S.S., Jessie, S.W. and Kavitha, K.K.V. (2025). Physico- chemical properties and cost analysis of jaggery based salubrious snack bar. Asian Journal of Dairy and Food Research. 44(3): 385-394. doi: 10.18805/ajdfr.DR-1838.

  26. Ramasamy, R., Vivek Kumar, S. and Maya, P. (2011). Projective mapping and product positioning of deep fat fried snack. Food and Nutrition Sciences. 02(06).

  27. Ranganna, S. (1986). Handbook of Analysis and Quality Control for Fruit and Vegetable Products. Tata McGraw-Hill Education. (2nd ed., pp: 595-597, 623-629).

  28. Ravi, R., Singh, V. and Prakash, M. (2011). Projective mapping and product positioning of deep fat fried snack. Food and Nutrition Sciences. 2(6): 674-683. 

  29. Sarangam, S., Chakraborty, P. and Chandrasheker, G. (2015). Development of low fat multigrain Murukku-a traditional savoury product. International Journal of Research. 15.

  30. Singh, R. and Sharma, L. (2021). Utilization of waste leaves of Beta vulgaris, Brassica oleracea and Oryza sativa flakes for the development of iron-rich vermicelli. International Journal of Current Research and Review. 13(19).

  31. Sobhy, E.S., Abdo, E., Shaltout, O., Abdalla, A. and Zeitoun, A. (2020). Nutritional evaluation of beetroots (Beta vulgaris L.) and its potential application in a functional beverage. Plants (Basel). 9(12): 1752. 

  32. Srilakshmi, B. (2011). Dietetics (6th ed.). New Age International Publisher.

  33. Tangariya, P., Awasthi, P. and Sahoo, A. (2023). Effect of beetroot powder incorporation on the textural, sensory and nutritional quality of legume and oil seeds based snack bar. Asian Journal of Dairy and Food Research. 42(1): 117-122. doi: 10.18805/ajdfr.DR-1721

  34. Vijayarani, D. and Sabarimathi, J. (2021). Development and standard- lization of rajma flour incorporated food products to combat malnutrition. The Indian Journal of Nutrition and Dietetics. 58(S2): 96-103. 

  35. Yangilar, F. (2013). The application of dietary fibre in food industry: Structural features, effects on health and definition, obtaining and analysis of dietary fibre: A review. Journal of Food and Nutrition Research. 1(13): 13-23.
In this Article
Published In
Asian Journal of Dairy and Food Research

Editorial Board

View all (0)