Submitted06-11-2020|
Accepted16-03-2021|
First Online 22-04-2021|
ABSTRACT
Methods: The trial was conducted with dairy cows 3 - 4 months of lactation. The experimental treatments included: Fedamin (Chelated minerals, given 50 gm. /day/ cow) and control. The study lasted from 0 to 30 days. Milk yield and milk composition of cows were measured individually on days 1, 8, 15, 22 and 30.
Result: The Fedamin treated group (Chelated minerals) improved the milk yield and fat percentage in milk during this study as compared to control and specific gravity, solid-not fat, protein, lactose and total solids of milk differ non-significantly.
INTRODUCTION
The objective of the study was to determine the effects of supplementation of chelated minerals Fedamin of Guybro Animal Health Private Limited, Mumbai, feeding on milk production and milk composition in dairy cows. Fedamin is an elite group of chelated minerals. Nutritional composition of chelated minerals is furnished in Table 2. It contains a combination of 12 minerals (Co, Cu, I, Fe, Mg, K, Na, Mn, S, Zn, Ca and P) with 4 vitamins (Vitamin A, B3, D3, E,) which helps to overcome deficiency in ration and helps in increase of milk production.
MATERIALS AND METHODS
Fedamin was administered orally to the cows at the rate of 0 and 50 gm/day/animal for 30 days for group I & II respectively. The milk samples and yield of individual cows was noted before the commencement of the treatment as well as on 1th, 8th, 15th, 22th and 30th day of the commencement of the treatment. On each of the milk-recording day the milk sample was subjected for the analysis of specific gravity, fat %, SNF %, total solids %, Protein % and lactose %, to find out the economic traits of the milk. Milk samples for chemical analysis were prepared as per the method described in BIS Handbook (SP 18: 1981).
In this experiment, concentrate feed mixture was used, consisting of 33% maize, 21% groundnut cake (oiled), 12% mustered cake (oiled) 20% wheat bran, 11% de-oiled rice bran, 2% mineral mixture and 1% common salt.
Milk Composition Analysis
Specific gravity
Specific gravity is measured by Lactometer. The specific gravity was calculated by the following formula:
Where,
CLR= Lactometer reading (LR) ± Correction factor (CF)
CF = 0.1 × Difference between temperature of milk and calibration temperature of Lactometer
Determination of fat
The fat content of milk was determined by Gerber method. Fat content (colourless column) was measure directly from the butyrometer stem by deducting lowest figure from highest as described in IS: 1224 (Part-Ι), 1977.
Determination of SNF (solids-not-fat)
The specific gravity of milk will, therefore, vary with the duration and temperature of storage. This variation may be overcome by ensuring that the fat is completely in the liquid state before the specific gravity reading is taken. This is achieved by pre-warming the milk.
The % of SNF in milk is calculated using the following formula:
Where,
F = Fat content of milk.
SNF = Solids-not-fat in milk;
CLR = Corrected lactometer reading at 27°C,
Determination of milk protein
The milk protein content of all the milk samples of milk were determined using micro-Kjeldahl method of nitrogen estimation as described in BIS Handbook (SP 18: part XI, 1981). The percent total protein was obtained multiplying the percent nitrogen by a factor of 6.38.
Calculation:
Calculate the total nitrogen content of the test sample by the following equation:
Where,
Vs = Volume of standard acid used for titration of test sample (ml).
Vb = Volume of standard acid used for titration of blank sample (ml).
Mr = Exact concentration of standard acid used in titration (N).
W = Weight of sample used (g).
Determination of milk lactose
The lactose content of all the milk samples were determined using Lane Eynon Method described in BIS Handbook (SP 18: part XI, 1981).
Where,
X = ml of 0.5% standard lactose solution used for titration.
Y = ml of lactose milk filtrate used for titration.
Total solids
The total solids content was determined by Gravimetric method. The total solid was calculated by the following formula as described in IS: 1479 (Part-II), 1961.
Statistical analysis
The data obtained during investigation were subjected to statistical analysis using one-way ANOVA to compare differences among group’s means for different parameters by using SPSS 16.0 software.
RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
Effect of supplementation of chelated minerals on milk yield is presented in Table 1. It is clearly indicated by the presented data that milk yield differed significantly by using supplementation of chelated minerals. The average milk yield was recorded higher in the treated group (8.24 kg/ d) as compared to the control group (7.50 kg/d). The average increase in milk yield was recorded 0.74 kg in a group fed with chelated minerals. This increase was recorded consistently throughout the whole experiment. Somkuwar et al., (2011) found that the Metho-chelated organic minerals treated group improved the milk yield of animals across the various stages of lactation as compared to in control and inorganic mineral treated groups of animals.
Specific gravity
The observation recorded for specific gravity of milk samples collected from different sources are furnished in Table 1. Non- significant variation was seen in the treated group for specific gravity. The average specific gravity in both groups was almost similar.
Milk fat (%)
Data pertaining to milk fat % is presented in Table 1. It is obvious from the data that average higher milk fat (4.51%) was recorded with the treatment group, whereas minimum milk fat (3.68%) was observed in the control group. The average significant increase in milk fat was recorded 0.83% in the treated group. Similar results have been reported when dairy cows were supplemented with chelated minerals (Formigoni et al., 1993).
SNF (%)
The effect of supplementation of chelated minerals on SNF content of milk is shown in Table 1. It was seen from the findings of the experiment that higher average SNF content was recorded with the control group (9.58%) as compared to the treated group (8.39%). It is clearly indicated by the present findings that there is no effect of chelated minerals on the SNF content of milk. The same was significantly reduced as compared to control when chelated minerals were used in the diet at either level. However, the difference between the groups receiving chelated minerals was non-significant.
Protein (%)
The week wise average milk protein percentage from different groups are presented in Table 1. The average milk protein percentage was 3.50 and 3.53 respectively for the treatment and control group. Thus, the protein contents of milk from cows receiving chelated minerals was almost similar. The statistical analysis indicated non-significant effect of treatments on the protein content of milk. Kincaid et al., (1984) reported that the milk protein percentage was not affected by supplementing Zn-methionine to the lactating cows. Similar trend was also noticed in the present trial.
Lactose (%)
Data concerning lactose content of milk as affected by chelated minerals are presented in Table 1. It is apparent from data that the control group contained higher lactose content (4.85%) as compared to the group supplemented with chelated mineral (4.80%). It is clearly indicated by the present findings no effect of supplementation of chelated minerals on lactose content in milk.
Total solids (%)
The week wise average total solids percentage of milk from different groups are presented in Table 1. It is evident from the table that the average total solids percent of milk was 13.43 and 13.47% for treated and control group respectively. Thus, the total solids percent in different groups was almost same. It is noticed that the treatments had non-significant effect on the total solids percent of milk from both groups.
CONCLUSION
Keeping in view the research outcomes summarized above, it can be concluded that the chelated mineral supplement improves milk quality and quantity in terms of increased milk yield and milk fat. Whereas, there was no effect on solid-not-fat (SNF), protein, lactose and total solid content in milk. The above results are thus in agreement to the researchers that feeding of chelated minerals improves milk yield and fat percentage of the dairy cows.
REFERENCES
- Bailey, J.D., Ansotegui, R.P., Paterson, J.A., Swenson, C.K. and Johnson, A.B. (2001). Effects of supplementing combinations of inorganic and complexed copper on performance and liver mineral status of beef heifers consuming antagonists. Journal of Animal Science. 79(11): 2926-2934.
- Boland, M.P., Lonergan, P. and O’callaghan, D. (2001). Effect of nutrition on endocrine parameters, ovarian physiology and oocyte and embryo development. Theriogenology. 55(6): 1323-1340.
- Chester-Jones, H., Vermeire, D., Brommelsiek, W., Brokken, K., Marx, G. and Linn, J.G. (2013). Effect of trace mineral source on reproduction and milk production in Holstein cows. The Professional Animal Scientist. 29(3): 289-297.
- Formigoni, A., Parisini, P. and Corradi, F. (1993). The use of amino acid chelates in high production milk cows. The Roles of Amino Acid Chelates in Animal Nutrition. Ashmead HD, ed. Noyes Publ., Park Ridge, NJ, 170-186.
- Grace, N.D. and Knowles, S.O. (2012). Trace element supplementation of livestock in New Zealand: meeting the challenges of free-range grazing systems. Veterinary Medicine International, 2012.
- Handbook, B.I.S. (1981). SP: 18 (Part. I). ISI Handbook of Food Analysis. Part. XI. Dairy Products. Indian Standards Institution, New Delhi.
- Indian Standard, I.S. 1224 (Part I) (1977). Determination of Fat by Gerber Method. Part I. Milk (First Revision). Indian Standard Institution, Manak Bhavan, New Delhi.
- IS: 10083. (1982). (Reaffirmed 1997). Indian Standard Method of test for determination of SNF (Solids-not-fat) in milk by use of Lactometer. Bureau of Indian Standards, New Delhi.
- Kincaid, R.L., Hodson, A.S., Riley, R.E. and Cronrath, J.D. (1984). Supplementation of diets for lactating cows with zinc as zinc oxide and zinc methionine. J. Dairy Sci. 67(103): 18.
- Kumar, S., Pandey, A.K., Abdul Razzaque, W.A. and Dwivedi, D.K. (2011). Importance of micro minerals in reproductive performance of livestock. Veterinary World. 4(5): 230.
- Lee, S.C., Prosky, L. and Vries, J. W. D. (1992). Determination of total, soluble and insoluble dietary fiber in foods-Enzymatic-gravimetric method, MES-TRIS buffer: Collaborative study. Journal of AOAC International. 75(3): 395-416.
- Norusis, M. (2008). SPSS 16.0 advanced statistical procedures companion. Prentice Hall Press.
- NRC (2001). Nutrient requirements of Dairy cattle: 7th edn. National Acedemic press. pp: 105-1146.
- Rabiee, A.R., Lean, I.J., Stevenson, M.A. and Socha, M.T. (2010). Effects of feeding organic trace minerals on milk production and reproductive performance in lactating dairy cows: A meta-analysis. Journal of Dairy Science. 93(9): 4239-4251.
- Redfearn, E.C. (1903). U.S. Patent No. 745,521. Washington, DC: U.S. Patent and Trademark Office.
- Somkuwar, A.P., Kadam, A.S., Kumar, S. and Radhakrishna, P.M. (2011). Efficacy Study of Metho-Chelated Organic Minerals preparation feeding on Milk Production and Fat Percentage in dairy cows. Veterinary World. 4(1).
- Sudhir, K., Pandey, A.K., Razzaque, W.A.A., and Dwivedi, D.K. (2011). Importance of micro minerals in reproductive performance of livestock. Veterinary World. 4(5): 230-233.
- Ward, J.D., Spears, J.W. and Kegley, E.B. (1996). Bioavailability of copper proteinate and copper carbonate relative to copper sulfate in cattle. Journal of Dairy Science. 79(1): 127-132.
The Asian Journal of Dairy and Food Research (AJDFR) follows a disclaimer policy that outlines the responsibilities of the journal, authors, reviewers, and readers. The policy is designed to ensure that all published content is accurate and meets ethical standards, and to protect the journal from any legal liability.
The AJDFR does not guarantee the accuracy, completeness, or reliability of the content published in the journal. The opinions expressed in published articles are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of the journal or its editorial board. The journal does not accept any responsibility for any errors or omissions in the content published in the journal.
Authors are responsible for ensuring that their work is original, accurate, and meets ethical standards. They are also responsible for obtaining permission to use copyrighted material and for providing appropriate attribution.
Reviewers are responsible for ensuring that the content of articles is accurate, original, and meets ethical standards. They are also responsible for maintaining confidentiality and disclosing any conflicts of interest.
Readers are responsible for evaluating the content of articles and for making their own judgments about the accuracy and reliability of the information presented. They are also responsible for complying with copyright laws and ethical standards when using the content of articles.
AJDFR is committed to ensuring that all published content meets ethical standards and that all parties involved in the publishing process understand their responsibilities. The disclaimer policy is designed to protect the journal from any legal liability and to ensure that readers can rely on the accuracy and reliability of the content published in the journal.
This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.