Response of alfalfa germination to low temperature stress at different fall dormancy ratings
Correlation analysis of cold hardiness indices during the germination period
The correlation analysis of low temperature tolerance indices between fall dormancy ratings and germination stage was carried out (Fig 1). FDR exhibited strong negative correlations with RGI and RVI
(P<0.01) and significant negative correlated with RGP and GC (
P<0.05). Strong positive correlations between RGP and RGI, RVI and GC (
P<0.01), contrasted by a negative correlation with MGT (
P<0.05) were noted. RGI has shown highly significant positive correlation with RVI and GC (
P<0.01), while significantly negative correlation with MGT (
P<0.05). RVI was highly significantly positively correlated with GC (
P<0.01) and significantly negatively correlated with MGT (
P<0.05). MGT has recorded highly significant negative correlation with GC (
P<0.01). The results of correlation analysis showed that most of the individual indicators were highly significantly correlated with each other.
Optimal germination typically requires adequate moisture, sufficient oxygen availability and appropriate temperature regimes
(Li et al., 2023). Low temperature greatly reduces the rate of seed uptake and swelling and the germination ability of seeds from different alfalfa accessions varies significantly at low temperatures
(Butler et al., 2014). In this study, we used alfalfa seeds with full seeds, good seed embryo and high seed vigor as materials and low temperature was the main factor affecting seed germination. RGP, RGI, RVI and RRL of alfalfa seeds were significantly reduced at 4
oC, mainly due to the fact that low temperature reduces enzyme activity in the seeds, so that the enzymatic reactions within the seeds could not be carried out adequately, thus reducing the vigor (
Ozkan, 2025). Correlation analysis showed that FDR was significantly negatively correlated with low temperature germination indexes (RGP, RGI, RVI, GC). This suggests that the ability of seeds to germinate at low temperatures and fall dormancy ratings are significantly correlated. Alfalfa accessions with low fall dormancy ratings are not only more susceptible to short sunshine and low temperatures in the fall, but they also halt growth before it enters dormancy. Additionally, they have a strong ability to germinate at low temperatures, as evidenced by higher GP, GI, VI, RL and GC, as well as a shorter germination period. This study revealed that alfalfa seeds with a high fall dormancy ratings had a lower ability to germinate at low temperatures, indicating that these materials were less tolerant and adaptable to low temperatures.
Principal component analysis of cold tolerance indicators at germination stage
Principal component analysis (PCA) reduces multiple highly correlated single indicators to a few independent comprehensive indicators
(Cicevan et al., 2016). Two orthogonal principal components were obtained by PCA and the cumulative explained variance was 96.94% (Table 1). PC1 explained 83.732% of the variance (λ=5.024) and the main loads were RGP, RGI, RVI and GC. PC2 explained 13.208% of the variation (λ=0.792), which was mainly affected by RRL.
Comprehensive evaluation of cold hardiness during germination
The membership function method was used to analyze the cold resistance of FDR at germination stage. The comprehensive evaluation of cold hardiness of materials in fall dormancy ratings 1~5 matched with fall dormancy ratings to a high degree and there was no obvious pattern in ratings 6~10. The cold hardiness of emergence was negatively correlated with the fall dormancy ratings in general (R2=0.659) (Table 2).
The linear regression method was used to comprehensively evaluate the membership function and fall dormancy level of alfalfa with different fall dormancy levels at the germination stage (Fig 2). It is possible that the relatively more cold-tolerant alfalfa accessions of low fall dormancy ratings showed adaptive responses to low temperatures in seed germination due to the existence of long-term acclimatization to low-temperature environments. In contrast, the seed germination ability of alfalfa with high fall dormancy ratings, which has been cultivated in warm environment for a long time, is a kind of inherent potential performance.
Zhao et al. (2012) found that there was also no significant correlation between alfalfa germination heat tolerance and fall dormancy ratings, which also side by side confirmed that alfalfa germination response to temperature was not completely consistent with the response to low temperature and short sunshine in fall.
Response of alfalfa seedlings of different fall dormancy ratings to low temperature stress
Cold tolerance coefficients of physiological indicators of seedlings under low temperature stress
Physiological cold tolerance coefficients, calculated as stress-to-control ratios, exhibited distinct ranges across biomarkers: MDA (1.096-1.823), REC (4.295-7.681), SOD (1.290-3.453), POD (1.235-3.358), CAT (1.233-1.755), Pro (1.036-1.877) and SS (1.314-2.462) (Table 3). The stress-to-control ratios of each index were greater than 1, indicating that the contents of the physiological biomarkers measured under low temperature stress increased to different degrees.
Correlation analysis between fall dormancy ratings and cold hardiness coefficients
Multivariate correlation analysis revealed complex interrelationships between cold hardiness biomarkers and fall dormancy ratings (Fig 3), FDR exhibited strong negative correlations with SOD and CAT (
P<0.01) and significant negative correlation with Pro (
P<0.05), while showing positive correlation with MDA (
P<0.01). MDA exhibited strong negative correlations with SOD (
P<0.01), while significant negative correlation with POD, CAT and Pro (
P<0.05). SOD exhibited strong significant positive correlation with CAT (
P<0.01) and significant positive correlation with POD, Pro and SS (
P<0.05). POD exhibited significant positive correlation with CAT and SS (
P<0.05). CAT exhibited significant positive correlation with Pro (
P<0.05). Pro exhibited strong significant positive correlation with SS (
P<0.01).
Fall dormancy reflects alfalfa’s hardiness response to low winter temperatures. Under low temperatures, plants employ various strategies to maintain the metabolic balance of intracellular reactive oxygen species. Low temperatures lead to increased cytoplasmic peroxidation and severe oxidative damage to the membrane system, resulting in the formation of MDA
(Mansoor et al., 2022). Antioxidant enzymes help eliminate reactive oxygen species generated during metabolism, thereby preserving cell membrane stability (
Latha et al., 2024). To counteract low-temperature stress, plants accumulate SP and Pro, which increase intracellular osmotic concentration and reduce damage caused by cold temperatures
(Yang et al., 2021). Correlation analyses demonstrated strong negative associations between FDR and cold hardiness indices for SOD and CAT, significantly negatively correlated with the cold hardiness coefficient of Pro, contrasted with positive correlation to MDA; this indicates that the accession with a high index of the fall dormancy ratings has a significant increase in the concentration of MDA and a high degree of peroxidation of the cell membrane under low-temperature stress and the greater the damage suffered by the leaf blade (
Hanson et al., 2015). The heightened activity of SOD, POD and CAT enzymes under low-temperature stress demonstrated their protective effects on protoplasts. A negative correlation with the alfalfa’s fall dormancy ratings suggested that lower fall dormancy ratings corresponded to stronger cellular antioxidant and repair capabilities under low temperatures. Similarly, the negative correlation between the concentrations of osmoregulators Pro and SS, converted into cold tolerance coefficients and fall dormancy ratings indicated that alfalfa with lower fall dormancy ratings could accumulate more osmoregulators to withstand low-temperature stress. REC mainly reflected the integrity of the intracellular membrane system at low temperatures and the correlation with the fall dormancy ratings did not reach a significant level, which might be related to the fact that the stress temperature did not reach below 0
oC. The REC of alfalfa at the fall dormancy ratings did not reach a significant level.
Principal component analysis of cold tolerance coefficients of physiological indicators
PCA was performed on seven seedling-stage cold tolerance biomarkers (Table 4). The eigenvalues (λ) and variance explained revealed: PC1 (λ=5.082) accounted for 72.599% variance with primary loadings on POD, CAT, Pro. PC2 (λ=1.01) explained 14.429% variance, dominated by MDA, REC, SOD and POD. The cumulative explained variance reached 87.028%, effectively capturing the multivariate physiological responses.
Comprehensive evaluation of physiological indicators of cold tolerance
For the comprehensive evaluation of cold hardiness of alfalfa seedlings of different fall dormancy ratings (Table 5). The comprehensive evaluation value was used as the dependent variable and seven single indicators with stronger correlations were employed as independent variables for stepwise regression analysis to establish the optimal regression equation D=-0.017-0.061REC +0.124SOD+0.129POD+0.248SS, R
2=0.998,
P<0.001, the four independent variables can determine almost all the variances of seedling cold hardiness, the regression equation was used to predict the seedling cold hardiness of different fall dormancy ratings and the predicted values were basically consistent with the order of the comprehensive evaluation value. The regression equation was used to predict the seedling cold hardiness of different fall dormancy ratings. In this study, we found that, alfalfa seedling cold hardiness and fall dormancy ratings showed a strong linear relationship and a negative correlation in general (Fig 4). This clearly indicates that the genetic mechanism regulating fall dormancy ratings not only plays a role in the overwintering process, but also regulates seedling cold hardiness. The lower the fall dormancy ratings of alfalfa, the stronger will be the seedling cold hardiness; and the higher the fall dormancy ratings, the weaker will be the cold hardiness.
Tong et al. (2020) exposed 16 low-fall-dormancy alfalfa varieties to stress for 24 hours and found a negative correlation between fall dormancy ratings and cold hardiness.
Zhu et al. (2018) discovered that alfalfa varieties with strong fall dormancy ratings and cold hardiness store more nutrients in their roots, aiding safe overwintering, whereas varieties with weak fall dormancy ratings and poor cold hardiness store fewer nutrients, hindering overwintering. Consequently, in practical applications, fall dormancy ratings can be used to preliminarily assess alfalfa germplasm seedling cold hardiness, helping to select appropriate fall dormancy ratings for planting.