Legume Research

  • Chief EditorJ. S. Sandhu

  • Print ISSN 0250-5371

  • Online ISSN 0976-0571

  • NAAS Rating 6.80

  • SJR 0.391

  • Impact Factor 0.8 (2024)

Frequency :
Monthly (January, February, March, April, May, June, July, August, September, October, November and December)
Indexing Services :
BIOSIS Preview, ISI Citation Index, Biological Abstracts, Elsevier (Scopus and Embase), AGRICOLA, Google Scholar, CrossRef, CAB Abstracting Journals, Chemical Abstracts, Indian Science Abstracts, EBSCO Indexing Services, Index Copernicus
Submit

Full Research Article

Legume Research, volume 46 issue 8 (august 2023) : 973-980

Influence of Moisture Content on Germination and Physico-Mechanical Properties of Pulses

K. Gupta1, T.K. Khura1,*, H.L. Kushwaha1, R.A. Parray1, S.K. Sarkar2
1ICAR-Indian Agricultural Research Institute, New Delhi-110 012, India.
2ICAR-Indian Agricultural Statistics Research Institute, New Delhi-110 012, India.

  • Submitted01-03-2023|

  • Accepted07-06-2023|

  • First Online 28-07-2023|

  • doi 10.18805/LR-5125

Cite article:- Gupta K., Khura T.K., Kushwaha H.L., Parray R.A., Sarkar S.K. (2023). Influence of Moisture Content on Germination and Physico-Mechanical Properties of Pulses . Legume Research. 46(8): 973-980. doi: 10.18805/LR-5125.

ABSTRACT

Background: Pulses are a kind of legume crops which can be utilised for both food and animal feed. Pulses are also termed a “poor man’s meat” because of high protein content. The physical properties of pulses are useful to design the processing equipment. The moisture content of agricultural materials greatly affects various physical properties. Nitty-gritty data on germination and physico-mechanical properties of pulses are provided in this paper at different moisture contents, which is extremely helpful in the design of equipment used in harvesting operations and food processing operations. 

Methods: The experiment was conducted at Department of Agricultural Engineering, Indian Agricultural Research Institute, New Delhi. All the experiments were replicated thrice and mean±SD (standard deviation) values were taken using R software to check the level of significance (p≤0.05). 

Result: Physical properties, mechanical properties and germination of pulses were evaluated as functions of moisture content. It was observed that average length, breadth, thickness and geometric mean diameter, sphericity, porosity, angle of repose and static coefficient of friction of pulses increased linearly and bulk density, true density, hardness and germination decreased density with increase in moisture content from 9.98 to 20.4% (db).

INTRODUCTION

Pulses are considered to be a healthy vegetarian cuisine with excellent source of protein for millions of people who cannot afford animal protein for a balanced diet. Chickpea (Cicer arietinum), lentil (Lens culinaris) and pigeonpea (Cajanus cajan) are an economically important pulses produced by millions of small Indian farmers. The estimated production of pulses in 2021-22 as per the Department of Agriculture and Farmers’ Welfare (DA and FW) is 26.96 million tonnes, while chickpea 9.94, pigeonpea 3.32 and lentil 1.23 million tonnes (Anonymous, 2020). Pusa-547 (chickpea) and Pusa Arhar 16 (pigeonpea) were released by the ICAR in the year 2006 and 2016, respectively. Pusa-547 has attractive bold seeds, high yield performance, thin testa, good cooking quality and average yield 17 q/ha (Kharkwal et al., 2008). Similarly, Pusa Arhar 16 has a maturity time of 120 days and yield around 20 q/ha. Lentil 4717 was released in 2017 by ICAR-IARI and is suitable for rainfed conditions of Central Zone and average yield is 12-13 q/ha.
       
Comprehension of physical properties of pulses is required for the design of equipment for handling, harvesting, processing and storing (Prasad et al., 2010). Dimensions of pulses are crucial in the design of separating, harvesting, grinding sizing, cleaning and grading machines. Bulk density, true density, porosity and angle of repose play a crucial role in different applications such as design of hopper, silos, storage bins and conveyor belt (Tavakoli et al., 2009). The coefficient of friction between seed and wall is a critical parameter in the prediction of seed pressure on walls.
       
Several studies were reported on physical properties of different pulses viz., lentil seeds (Konak et al., 2002; Amin et al., 2004; E. Isik 2007; Isik and Izli, 2016; Bagherpour et al., 2010; Gharibzahedi et al., 2011). Nikoobin et al., (2009) for chickpea. Singh and Kotwaliwale (2010), Sangani and Davara (2013); Khanbarad et al., 2014; Baryeh and Mangope (2002) for pigeonpea and Senthilkumar et al., (2018) for beans. However, still, detailed measurements of the physical attributes of new variety of chickpea (Pusa 547), pigeonpea (Pusa Arhar 16) and lentil (Pusa 4717) at various levels of moisture content have not been investigated.
               
The objective of this study was to investigate influence of moisture content on germination and physico-mechanical properties namely linear dimensions, sphericity, density, porosity, angle of repose, hardness and coefficient of static friction against three structural surfaces of the chickpea, pigeonpea and lentil seed.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Sample preparation             
 
Ten kilograms of different types of pulses, namely chickpea (Pusa547), pigeonpea (Pusa Arhar 16) and lentil (Pusa 4717) were procured from Seed Processing Unit (SPU), ICAR-New Delhi. All experimental analysis was conducted in Division of Agricultural Engineering (IARI, New Delhi) in 2021. The seed moisture content investigated range was selected as 9.98-20.40% (db), since harvesting, transportation, storage, handling and processing operations of crops are performed in this moisture range. Moisture content of pulses seed was determined by AOAC (2012). The samples at the desired moisture levels were prepared by adding calculated amounts of distilled water (Eq. 1), mixed thoroughly and then sealed in separate polyethylene bags (Dursun and Dursun, 2005). Samples were kept at 278K for seven days to distribute moisture.
 
 
 
Where;
Q= Mass of water to be added (gram).
wi= Initial mass of the sample (gram).
Mi and Mf = Initial moisture content and final (desired) moisture content of the sample, % (db).
 
Determination of principal dimensions of pulses
 
The principal dimensions of pulses seed namely, length (L), breadth(W) and thickness(T), were measured by using a digital vernier calliper (Mitutoyo Digital Calipers 500-196) with 0.01 mm sensitivity. The mean value of length, breadth, thickness and geometric mean diameter of 500 seeds (chickpea, pigeonpea and lentil) were determined. The geometric mean diameter, (Dg) of chickpea, pigeonpea and lentil seeds were calculated (Eqs. 2-3) as relationship described by (Raigar and Mishra, 2015).
 


 
          
Where
Dg=   Geometric mean diameter (mm).
L=     Major dimension along the longest axis (mm).
W=    Minor dimension along the longest axis perpendicular to L (mm).
T=     Intermediate thickness dimension along the lowest axis perpendicular to both L and W.
 
Sphericity of pulses seed
 
The sphericity of chickpea and pigeonpea were calculated (Eq. 4) and sphericity of was determined for lentil as (Eq. 5) described by (Singh et al., 2004 and Bhattacharya et al., 2005).
                                


 
 
Bulk density, true density and porosity
 
The bulk density of pulses was determined by filling a 500ml beaker with seeds and dropping them from a height of 150 mm, then weighing them. No separate manual compaction of seeds was done to ensure that the seeds were evenly distributed in the beaker (Vashishth et al., 2020). The toluene displacement technique was used to determine the true density of pulses, which was determined as the proportion of seed mass to true volume. (Bajpai et al., 2020). Porosity of pulse seed at various moisture contents was computed using bulk and true densities using relationship (Eq.6),
   
 
 
Thousand seed mass
 
The thousand-seed weight of the seed of each variety was analysed using the method described by ISTA (2019).
 
Angle of repose
 
The angle of repose of pulses seed was determined by using an open-ended cylinder. The cylinder was raised slowly until the seeds formed a cone on the circular plate. The diameter and height of the cone were recorded and the angle of repose (Eq.7) was determined (Mishra et al., 2019) :
                                                      
 
 
Static coefficient of friction
 
The static coefficient of friction of seeds was determined against galvanised iron (GI), mild steel(MS) and stainless steel(SS) surfaces at different moisture contents. An aluminium box of (150×100×40) mm3 was filled with the sample and placed on an adjustable tilting plate, facing the test surface. The sample container was raised slightly so as not to contact the surface. The slope of the test surface was gradually increased until the box started to slide down, at which point the tilt angle was measured using a graduated scale. For each repetition, the sample in the container was emptied and refilled with a new sample. The co-efficient of static friction (Eq. 8) was calculated as given below (Aviara, Power and Abbas, 2013):
  
 
 
Hardness of pulses
 
The hardness of pulses seeds were determined using Stable micro system texture analyser (Model: TA+HDi, Stable Micro Systems, UK) equipped with a stainless steel probe (P75) and load cell of 500 kg having accuracy of ±0.001 mm in deformation and ±0.001N in force. The pre-test, test and post-test speeds during the analysis were 2, 1 and 3 mm/s respectively with 60% strain. The compression of individual seed along its thickness resulted in to a force-deformation diagram (Tavakoli et al., 2009). The average of 25 replications is reported (Altuntas and Yildiz, 2007).
 
Germination of pulses
 
The germination of seed was carried out as per procedure described by (ISTA 2021) using equation as follows:
 
 

Statistical analysis
 
All the experiments were replicated thrice and mean ± SD (standard deviation) values were taken. The values were subjected to single factor analysis of variance by using R software to check the level of significance (p≤0.05). The post hoc Duncan test was used to separate the means. Linear regression analysis was also performed in Microsoft Excel (2019) to obtain the regression equation and coefficient of determination (R2).

RESULTS AND DISCUSSION

Principal dimensions of pulses seed
 
The effect of moisture content on the principal dimensions of pulses seed is shown in Table 1. The average values for chickpea’s length, breadth, thickness and geometric mean diameter were ranged from 8.893±0.569 to 11.063±0.495 mm, 7.021±0.506 to 7.387±0.430 mm, 6.767±0.459 to 7.125 ±0.462 mm and 7.482±0.386 to 7.847±0.388 mm, respectively;  for pigeon pea, the mean values varied from 5.882±0.424 to 6.108±0.408 mm, 4.646±0.391 to 4.867±0.321 mm, 3.873±0.226 to 4.135±0.321 mm and 4.278±0.201 to 4.955±0.232 mm, respectively. However, the average length, thickness sand GMD of lentils ranged from 4.114±0.394 to 4.465±0.33 mm, 2.31±0.154 to 2.56±0.153 and 3.387±0.257 to 3.739±0.202 mm, respectively. All the mean principal dimensions were significantly (p≤0.05) increased for chickpea, pigeon pea and lentil an increase in moisture content from 9.98% to 20.40% (db) (Table 1). The linear regression equations between moisture content and principal dimensions of pulses were developed (Table 2). As moisture content increased the moisture migration take place in the intercellular space of seed and resulted expansion and swelling. Similar results have been reported by (Singh and Kotwaliwale, 2010) for Pigeon pea, (Konak et al., 2002) for chickpea and (Kiani Deh Kiani et al., 2008) for red bean grain all showed similar trends. The linear relationship between different pulses and moisture content (Mc) are presented as follows:

Table 1: Variation of principal dimensions and geometric mean diameter of pulses with moisture content.



Table 2: Relationships between principal dimensions and moisture content (Mc) of pulses seeds with coefficient of determination (R2).


 
Shape of pulses seed
 
The shape of the seed, in terms of sphericity, was studied. It was espied that the average values of sphericity for chickpea, pigeonpea and lentil seeds were not significant (p≤0.05) and increased from 84.359±5.416 to 84.905±3.175%, 80.42±4.572 to 81.406±4.614% and 75.115±3.384 to 75.828 ± 3.387, respectively [Fig 1(ii)] while moisture level increased 9.98 to 20.40% (db). The sphericity increased with moisture content might due to higher rate of expansion in breadth and thickness compared to length due to moisture absorption. Similar findings were reported for yellow lentil and soybean by Isika and Izlia (2016) and Kakade et al., (2019), respectively. The variation in sphericity (ö) with moisture content (Mc) of pulses can be represented by the following equation:
 
    
                        
 
 
         
  
1000 Seed weight
 
The experimental value obtained for thousand seed weight for chickpea, pigeonpea and lentil seeds M1000 increased linearly from 180.95±0.11 to 232.37±0.07 g, 62.52±0.55 to 77.42±0.39 g and 21.09±0.042 to 23.66±0.146 g, respectively [Fig 1 (i)] for chickpea, pigeonpea and lentil (p<0.05) when the moisture content was increased from 9.98 to 20.40% d.b. These values were smaller than results reported for lentil (Bagherpour, 2010) and pigeonpea (Sangani and Davara, 2013). A linear equation was fitted between thousand grain mass (M1000) and moisture content can be represented as.
 

 
 
 
    
Bulk density
 
The bulk density of pulses at various moisture levels were found to be statistically significant at the 5% level. The mean values of bulk density was varied from 793.19±1.92 to 752.46 ± 4.16 kgm-3,828.10±2.02 to 772.61±3.86 kg m-3 and 882.58±2.01 to 797.28±3.86 kg m-3, respectively [Fig 1(iii)] for chickpea, pigeonpea and lentil, respectively, at 9.98 to 20.40% (db) moisture levels. It was observed that increasing the moisture content resulted in decreased bulk density for all three pulses. The decline in bulk density of pulses probably due to increase in volumetric expansion in the seed is greater than seed mass. Similar trend was reported for rice bean and pigeonpea by Bhusan and Raigar (2020) and Singh and Kotwaliwale, (2010). Negative linear equations were obtained for the bulk density (rb) of chickpea, pigeonpea and lentils are represented in Equations (16) and (18):
 
    
 
  
 
       

Fig 1: Effect of moisture content on.


 
True density.
 
Fig 1(iv) depicted the affects moisture levels on true density of chickpea, pigeonpea and lentil, which increased linearly from 1281.17±10.05 to 1248.37±12.43 kg m-3, 1363.15±3.05 to 1315.53±7.66 kg m-3 and 1304.14±3.95 to 1242.05±5.01 kg m-3, respectively as a result of increasing the moisture content from 9.98 to 20.40% db. The decreasing trend of true density may be attributed to the possible higher weight increase of seeds in comparison to their volume expansion with moisture gain and discrepancies could be due to the cell structure and the volume and mass increase characteristics of seeds as moisture content increases. Similar trends of results have also been reported by Chowdhury et al., (2001) for gram and Sahoo and Srivastava (2002) for okra seed. The relationship between the moisture content and true density presented in eqs (19)-(21).
 
  
 
     
 
   
Porosity
 
The porosity of chickpea, pigeonpea and lentil as a function of moisture content was observed from given Fig 1(v), significantly increased from 38.08 to 39.72%, 39.25 to 41.26% and 32.32 to 35.80% respectively with an increase in moisture level. A similar trend for the porosity was also obtained by Vashishth et al., (2020) for horse gram seeds and Kakade et al., (2019) for soyabean. The linear relationships for porosity of pulses are presented below :
 
      
 
          
 
           
Angle of repose
 
It was observed from Fig 1(vi), angle of repose for chickpea, pigeonpea and lentil increased with increasing the moisture content. The mean value angle of repose for chickpea, pigeonpea and lentil seeds were 23.87, 24.78 and 25.31°C at 9.98% (db). The percentage increase observed in the angle of repose was 22.99, 11.10 and 8.67% for chickpea, lentil and pigeonpea. The increasing rate of the angle of repose was not significant for chickpea and pigeonpea seeds. The increase in the angle of repose on moisture absorption was due to the moisture which surrounds the surface of seed cause increase in stickiness of the kernel surface of pulses, which in turn increases stability and reduces flowing ability. The variation is somewhat similar to feba bean (Haciseferogullari et al., 2003) and Konak et al., (2002) for chickpea. A linear equation was fitted between the angle of repose (q) of pulses seed and moisture content (Mc) is given as follows.
 
    
 
 
 
        
Static coefficient of friction
 
It was espied that the coefficient of friction of pulses increased with an increasing moisture content for all structural surfaces (Table 3). The static coefficient of friction between a seed and a surface is lower for all three pulses on stainless steel compared to galvanized iron and mild steel due to the smooth and hard nature of stainless-steel surface. The rough and soft nature of galvanized iron and mild steel results in a higher static coefficient of friction. The experimental data of coefficient of friction of chickpea at various moisture levels were resulted significantly (p≤0.05) increased for stainless steel sheet while in GS and MS showed statically insignificant. Similar trend observed by Pandiselvam et al., (2014) for onion seed and Gharibzahedi et al., (2011) for red lentil. The changes in coefficient of friction with changes in moisture content of pulses seeds on different surfaces followed linear relationships represented in Table 4.

Table 3: Static coefficient of friction of chickpea, pigeonpea and lentil seeds and their relationship at different moisture content.



Table 4: Relationships between static coefficient of friction (µ) and moisture content (Mc) of pulses seeds with coefficient of determination (R2).


 
Germination
 
The germination of seeds decreased linearly from 98.6±1 to 79.23±1.1, 99.24±0.8 to 88.53±1.07 and 97.38±0.6 to 76.82±1.11 for chickpea, pigeonpea and lentil with increased moisture content [Fig 2(ii)]. The decline rate of germination for all three pulses were more at higher moisture content (20.40%) which may be due to ageing occurred or seed may not receive enough oxygen, leading to seed rot and reduced germination. Maintaining optimal moisture content is crucial to ensure seed viability, maximize germination and minimize seed decay. The linear relationships for germination of pulses are presented below:
 
    
 
  
 
    

Fig 2: Effect of moisture content on (i) hardness and (ii) germination of chickpea, pigeonpea and lentil.


 
Mechanical properties
 
Hardness of pulses
 
The estimated mean values of hardness for chickpea, pigeonpea and lentil seeds were found significantly decrease with the increase in moisture content (Fig 2(i)). This may be due to the decreased surface roughness at higher moisture values. The seed may have become more susceptible to rupturing at high moisture levels, which may have caused the lower forces at increasing moisture content. The calculated results are higher to those reported by Konak et al., (2002); Unal et al., (2008) for mung bean and Bagherpour et al., (2010) for lentil. The variation in hardness in N with moisture content of pulses can be represented by the following equation:
 
          
 
     
          
 

CONCLUSION

The following conclusions were drawn from the investigation on germination and physico-mechanical properties of pulses for moisture content range of 9.98% to 20.40% d.b. The mean value of principal dimensions of the pulses increased linearly with an increase in seed moisture content with high correlation. The length, breadth, thickness and geometric mean diameter for chickpea and pigeonpea increased by 22.15%, 8.53%, 5.29%, 4.87% and 3.84%, 4.75%, 6.76%, 10.39%, respectively. The average value of length, thickness and geometric mean diameter for lentil seed increased by 8.41%, 10.77% and 10.39%. The sphericity, thousand seed weight, porosity, angle of repose, static coefficient of friction, hardness increased whereas bulk density, true density and germination linearly decreased with increase in moisture content.

CONFLICT OF INTEREST

None.

REFERENCES


  1. Altuntas, E. and Yildiz, M. (2007). Effect of moisture content on some physical and mechanical properties of feba bean grains. Journal of Food Engineering. 78: 174-183.

  2. Amin, M.N., Hossain, M.A. and Roy, K.C., (2004). Effects of moisture content on some physical properties of lentil grains. J. Food Eng. 65: 83-87.

  3. Anonymous, (2020). Agricultural Statistics at a Glan ce. Directorate of Economics and Statistics, Department of Agriculture and Cooperation, New Delhi.

  4. AOAC, (2012). Official Method of Analysis (19th ed.). Washington, DC: Association of Analytical Chemists.

  5. Aviara, N.A., Power, P.P. and Abbas, T. (2013). Moisture-dependent physical properties of Moringa oleifera seed relevant in bulk handling and mechanical processing. Industrial Crops and Products. 42(1): 96-104.

  6. Bagherpour H., Minaei, S.  and Khoshtaghaza M.H. (2010). Selected physico-mechanical properties of lentil seed. Int. Agrophysics. 24: 81-84.

  7. Bajpai, A., Kumar, Y., Singh, H., Prabhakar, P.K. andMeghwal, M. (2020). Effect of moisture content on the engineering properties of Jamun seed. Journal of Food Process Engineering. 43(2): 1-8.

  8. Baryeh, E.A., Mangope, B.K. (2002). Some physical properties of QP-38 variety pigeon pea. Journal of Food Engineering. 56: 59-65.

  9. Bhattacharya, S., Narasimha, H.V. and Bhattacharya, S. (2005). The moisture dependent physical and mechanical properties of whole lentil pulse and split cotyledon. International Journal of Food Science and Technology. 40: 213-221.

  10. Bhushan, B. and Raigar, R.K. (2020). Influence of moisture content on engineering properties of two varieties of rice bean. Journal of Food Process Engineering. 3-10.

  11. Chowdhury, M.M.I., Sarker, R.I., Bala, B.K. and Hossain, M.A. (2001). physical properties of gram as a function of moisture content. International Journal of Food Properties. 4(2): 297-310.

  12. Dursun, E. and Dursun, I. (2005). Some physical properties of caper seed. Biosystems Eng. 92: 237-245.

  13. Gharibzahedi, S.M.T., Ghasemlou, M., Razavi, S.H., Jafarii, S.M. and Faraji, K. (2011). Moisture-dependent physical properties and biochemical composition of red lentil seeds. Int. Agrophys. 25: 343-347.

  14. Haciseferogullari, H., Gezer, I., Bahtiyarca, Y., Menges, H.O. (2003). Determination of some chemical and physical properties of Sakiz-faba bean [Vicia faba (L). var. major]. Journal of Food Engineering. 60: 475-479.

  15. Isik, E. and Izli, N. (2016) Effects of moisture content on some physical properties of the yellow lentil. Journal of Agricultural Sciences. 22: 307-316.

  16. Isik, E. (2007). Some physical and mechanical properties of round red lentil grains. American Society of Agricultural and Biological Engineers. 23(4): 503-508.

  17. ISTA, (2019). Thousand-seed weight (TSW) determination. In International rules for seed testing, Chap 10. Bassersdorf, Switzerland: International Seed Testing Association (ISTA). 10: 10-12.

  18. ISTA, (2021). The germination tests. In International rules for seed testing, Chap 05. Bassersdorf, Switzerland: International Seed Testing Association (ISTA). 14: 1-16.

  19. Kakade, A., Khodke, S., Jadhav, S., Gajabe, M. and Othzes, N. (2019). Effect of moisture content on physical properties of soybean. International Journal of Current Microbiology and Applied Sciences. 8(04): 1770-1782.

  20. Khanbarad, S.C., Joshi N.D., Mohapatra D., Sutar R.F. and Joshi D.C. (2014). Effect of Moisture Content on Some Selected Physical Properties of Pigeon Pea (Cajanus cajan). Journal of Grain Processing and Storage. 1: 06-12.

  21. Kharkwal, M.C., Gopalakrishna, T., Pawar, S.E. (2008). Mutation breeding for improvement of food legumes. Food Legumes for Nutritional Security and Sustainable Agriculture. 1: 194-221.

  22. Kiani Deh Kiani M., Minaei S., Maghsoudi H. and Ghasemi Varnamkhasti M. (2008). Moisture dependent physical properties of red bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.) grains. Int. Agrophysics. 22: 231-237.

  23. Konak, M.M., Carman, K., Aydin, C. (2002). Physical Properties of Chick Pea Seeds. Biosystems Engineering. 82(1): 73-78.

  24. Mishra, A., Sinha, J.P., Kaukab, S. and Tomar, B.S. (2019). Study of engineering properties of selected vegetable seeds. Indian Journal of Agricultural Sciences. 89(10): 1693-169.

  25. Nikoobin M., Mirdavardoost F., Kashaninejad M. and Soltani A. (2009). Moisture-dependent physical properties of chickpea seeds. Journal of Food Process Engineering. 32: 5440-564.

  26. Pandiselvam, R., Pragalyaashree, M.M., Kailappan, R., Thirupathi, V. and Krishnakumar, P. (2014). Moisture dependent engineering properties of onion seeds. Journal of Agricultural Engineering. 51(2): 36-43.

  27. Prasad, K., Vairagar, P.R., Bera, M.B., (2010). Temperature dependent hydration kinetics of Cicer arietinum splits. Food Res. Int. 43: 483-488.

  28. Raigar, R.K. and Mishra, H.N. (2015). Effect of moisture content and particle sizes on physical and thermal properties of roasted Bengal gram flour. Journal of Food Processing and Preservation. 39(6): 1839-1844.

  29. Sahoo, P.K. and Srivastava, A.P. (2002). Physical properties of okra seeds. Biosyst. Eng. 83: 441-448.

  30. Sangani, V.P. and Davara, P.R. (2013). Moisture dependent physical properties of pigeon pea grains. Int. J. Postharvest Technology and Innovation. 3(1): 51-62.

  31. Senthilkumar, T., Jian, F., Jayas, D.S. and Narendran, R.B. (2018). Physical properties of white and black beans (Phaseolus vulgaris). Applied Engineering in Agriculture. 34(4): 749-754.

  32. Singh, K.K. and Kotwaliwale, N. (2010). Effect of moisture content on physico-thermal properties of pigeonpea. Journal of Food Processing and Preservation. 34: 845-857.

  33. Singh, K.K., Reddy, B.S., Varshney, A.C. and Mangraj, S. (2004). Physical and frictional properties of orange and sweet lemon. Appl. Eng. Agric. 20: 821-825.

  34. Tavakoli, H., Mohtasebi, S.S., Jafari, A. (2009). Physical and mechanical properties of wheat straw as influenced by moisture content. Int. Agrophys. 23: 175-181.

  35. Unal, H., Isik, E, Izli, N and  Tekin, Y. (2008). Geometric and mechanical properties of mung bean (Vigna radiata L.) grain: Effect of moisture. International Journal of Food Properties. 11: 572-586.

  36. Vashishth, R., Semwal, A.D., Pal Murugan, M., Govind Raj, T. and Sharma, G.K. (2020). Engineering properties of horse gram varieties as a function of moisture content and structure of grain. Journal of Food Science and Technology.  57(4): 1477-1485.
Reviewed By

Download Article
In this Article
    Contact us
    Follow us

    Editorial Board

    View all (0)