Yield performance stability of adapted and improved cowpea in the Equatoria region of South Sudan

DOI: 10.18805/LR-463    | Article Id: LR-463 | Page : 247-252
Citation :- Yield performance stability of adapted and improved cowpea in the Equatoria region of South Sudan.Legume Research.2020.(43):247-252
Tony Ngalamu, Silvestro Meseka, James Odra Galla, Nixon. James Tongun, Newton W. Ochanda and Kwadwo Ofori lingarigwa@yahoo.co.uk
Address : Department of Crop Science, School of Agricultural Sciences, College of Natural Resources and Environmental Studies, University of Juba, P.O. Box 82, Juba, South Sudan.
Submitted Date : 13-11-2018
Accepted Date : 29-03-2019


Cowpea is an important food crop with high nutritional and socio-economical values in South Sudan. However, the lack of improved varieties is one of the main production constraints. This study was undertaken to assess the yield stability performance of improved cowpea genotypes across six environments in South Sudan in 2014 and 2015. Nine genotypes were evaluated in a randomized complete block design with three replications. Genotype and genotype x environment biplot analysis method was used to determine yield stability. Highly significant (p< 0.001) genotype x environment interaction effect was detected for seed yield. IT90K-277-2 had the highest while ACC004 had the lowest grain yield. Palotaka was as highly discriminating and repeatable environment compare to the other testing sites. IT07K-211-1-8 and Mading Bor II were the most responsive genotypes, while IT90K-277-2 was the most stable high yielding genotype across the test environments and can be grown by farmers across the region. 


Adaptability Agro-ecological zones Cowpea Grain yield Stability.


  1. Allard RW (1999). Principles of Plant Breeding. 2nd Edition. Wiley, New York.
  2. Asnake, W., Hennery, M., Temsegen, Z., Girma, T. (2013). Additive main effects and multiplicative interaction model (AMMI) and genotype main effect and genotype by environment interaction (GGE) biplot analysis of multi-environmental wheat variety trials. African Journal of Agricultural Research, 8: 1033-1040.
  3. Aybegun, T., Karaköy, T., Anlarsal, A.E., Türkeri M. (2018). Investigation of grain yield and yield components of some field pea (Pisum sativum L.) genotypes in Mediterranean climate conditions. Legume Research, 41(1) 41-47. 
  4. Cooper, M.S. and Delacy, R.E. (1994). Relationship among analytical methods used to study genotypic variation and genotype by environment interaction in plant breeding multi-environment experiments. Theory Applied Genetics, 88:561-572. 
  5. Cooper, M., Stucker, R.E., DeLacy, I.H., Harch, B.D. (1997). Wheat breeding nurseries, target environments, and indirect selection for grain yield. Crop Science, 37: 1168-1176.
  6. Fan, X.M., Kang, M. S., Chen, H., Zhang, Y., Tan, J., Xu, C. (2007). Yield stability of maize hybrids evaluated in multi-environment trials in Yunnan, China. Agronomy Journal, 99:220-228.
  7. Gabriel, K.R. (1971). The biplot graphic display of matrices with application to principal component analysis. Biometrika, 58:453-467. 
  8. Galla, O.J. and Ngalamu, T. (2013). Crop production in the Sudd wetland and prospect for sustainable development. Proceedings of the project planning workshop on South Sudan’s Sudd region. Publisher, University of Juba, South Sudan. pp. 47-58.
  9. Kang, M.S. (1993). Simultaneous selection for yield and stability in crop performance trials: Consequences for growers. Agronomy Journal, 85: 451-757.
  10. Kang, M.S. and Magari, R. (1996). New developments in selecting for phenotypic stability in crop breeding. In: Kang M.S. and Gauch H.G., editors, Genotype by Environment interaction.’ CRC Press, Boca Raton, FL. 1-14. 
  11. Kaya, Y., Akcura, M. and Tanre, S. (2006). GGE biplot analysis of multi-environment yield trials in bread wheat. Turkish. Journal of Agriculture. Forestry, 30: 325-337.
  12. Meena, H.K., Ram Krishna, K. and Singh, B. (2015). Character associations between seed yield and its components traits in cowpea Vigna unguiculata (L.) Walp. Indian Journal of Agricultural Research. 49: 567-570.
  13. Meseka, S., Menkir, A., Olakojo, S., Jalloh, A., Coulibaly, N., Bossey, O. (2016). Yield stability of yellow maize hybrids in the savannas of West Africa. Agronomy Journal, 108:1-8.
  14. Putto, W., Patanothai, A., Jogloy, S., Hoogenboom, G. (2008). Determination of mega-environment for peanut breeding using the CSM”CROPGRO, Peanut model. Crop Science, 48: 973-982.
  15. Singh, J., Kumar, A., Fiyaz R.A., Singh, K.M (2018). Stability analysis of pigeon pea genotypes by deployment of AMMI model under rainfed environment. Legume Research, 41(2) 182-188. 
  16. Souza .L.C., de Lopes, A.C., de A, Gomes, R.L.F., Rocha, M. de M., Silva, E.M. (2007). Variability and correlations in cowpea populations for green-grain production. Crop Breeding and Applied Biotechnology, 7:262-269.
  17. Sozen, O., Karadavut, U., Ozcelik, H., Bozoglu, H., Akcura. M. (2018). Genotype x environment interaction of some dry bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.) genotypes. Legume Research, 41(2) 189-195. 
  18. Thomason, W.E. and Phillips, S.B. (2006) Methods to evaluate wheat cultivars testing environments and improve cultivar selection protocols. Field Crops Research, 99: 87-95.
  19. Vargas, M., Combs, E. Alvarado, G, Atlin, G, Mathews, K. and Crossa, J. (2013). META: A suite of SAS programs to analyze multi-    environment breeding trials. Agronomy Journal, 105:11-19.
  20. VSN International. (2015). GenStat for Windows 18th Edition. VSN International Hemel Hempstead, UK.
  21. Yan, W., Hunt, L.A., Sheng, Q., Szlavnics, Z. (2000). Cultivar evaluation and mega-environment investigation based on GGE biplot. Crop Science, 40: 597-605. 
  22. Yan, W. and Hunt, L.A. (2001). Interpretation of genotype x environment interaction for winter wheat yield in Ontario. Crop Science, 41: 19 – 25. 
  23. Yan, W. (2002). Singular value partitioning for biplot analysis of multi-environment trial data. Agronomy Journal, 94: 990-996. 
  24. Yan, W. and Rajcan, I. (2002). Biplot analysis of test sites and trait relations of soybean in Ontario. Crop Science, 42: 11-20.
  25. Yan, W. and Tinker, N.A. (2005). An Integrated system of biplot analysis for displaying, interpreting and exploring genotype-    environment integrations. Crop Science, 45: 47-50. 
  26. Yan, W., Kang, M.S., Ma, B.L., Woods, S., Cornelius, P.L. (2007). GGE biplot vs. AMMI analysis of genotype by environment data. Crop Science, 47:643-653. 

Global Footprints