Legume Research

  • Chief EditorJ. S. Sandhu

  • Print ISSN 0250-5371

  • Online ISSN 0976-0571

  • NAAS Rating 6.67

  • SJR 0.391

  • Impact Factor 0.8 (2023)

Frequency :
Monthly (January, February, March, April, May, June, July, August, September, October, November and December)
Indexing Services :
BIOSIS Preview, ISI Citation Index, Biological Abstracts, Elsevier (Scopus and Embase), AGRICOLA, Google Scholar, CrossRef, CAB Abstracting Journals, Chemical Abstracts, Indian Science Abstracts, EBSCO Indexing Services, Index Copernicus
Submit

Research Article

Legume Research, volume 45 issue 10 (october 2022) : 1223-1228

Evaluation of Bush Type Common Bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.) Genotypes for Morphological Characters and Anthracnose under Cold Arid Ladakh Conditions

S.A. Ganie, B.A. Wani
1High Mountain Arid Agriculture Research Institute, Leh-194 104, Sher-e-Kashmir University of Agricultural Sciences and Technology, Kashmir, Jammu and Kashmir, India.

  • Submitted15-11-2019|

  • Accepted05-05-2020|

  • First Online 28-07-2020|

  • doi 10.18805/LR-4283

Cite article:- Ganie S.A., Wani B.A. (2022). Evaluation of Bush Type Common Bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.) Genotypes for Morphological Characters and Anthracnose under Cold Arid Ladakh Conditions. Legume Research. 45(10): 1223-1228. doi: 10.18805/LR-4283.

ABSTRACT

In the present study 25 bush type common bean genotypes were evaluated for their adaptability, performance of yield, maturity and anthracnose disease. Among 25 genotypes, ten were red in colour, five were brown in colour, four genotypes were white, two purple and one each was black, pink, yellow and chocolate in colour. For seed shape, 16 genotypes were kidney shaped, 3 were oval, cylindrical and cuboidal. For seed coat pattern, 19 genotypes were plain and 6 were mottled. Seed size revealed that out of 25 genotypes, 6 were large, 17 were medium and two were small. Out of 25 genotypes, 14 were having green colour pods, 10 were yellow and one light green in colour. The pod curvature revealed that 15 genotypes were having medium pod curvature, 7 were curved and 3 genotypes were having straight pod curvature. WB-185 was earliest to flower, whereas WB-956 was earliest to maturity. Highest pod length was recorded in WB-185where as lowest was recorded in local Ladakh and WB-257. Maximum seeds per pod were recorded in genotype WB-185 whereas minimum seeds per pods were recorded in WB-956. Highest plant height was recorded in genotype WB-1690. Highest value for 100 seed weight was recorded in WB-966 and lowest value was recorded in WB-6. Highest yield per plant was recorded in WB-185 and lowest yield per plant was recorded in WB-1129. Analysis of variance revealed that the genotypes exhibited significant variability for all the traits. Screening of genotypes against anthracnose revealed that maximum disease incidence was shown by WB-1690 followed by WB-257, WB-1643, WB-956 and WB-1129. Maximum disease intensity was shown by WB-1690 while lowest disease intensity was recorded in WB-719.

REFERENCES


  1. Akibode, S. and Maredia, M. (2011). Trends in the production, trade and consumption of food-legume crops in Sub-Saharan Africa. Report submitted to SPIA. Department of Agricultural, Food and Resource Economics. Michigan State University. USA.

  2. Broughton, W.J., Hern´andez, G., Blair, M., Beebe, S., Gepts, P. and Vanderleyden, J. (2003). Beans (Phaseolus spp.) model food legumes. Plant and Soil. 252: 55-128.

  3. CIAT (1987). Standard evaluation system for the bean germplasm. Cali, Colombia.

  4. CRIDA (2012). District wise Contingence plans. http://www.crida.in/CP-2012/index.html.

  5. Gonzalez, M., Rodriguez, R., Zavala, M., Jacobo, J., Hernandez, F., Acosta, J., Martinez and Simpson, J. (1998). Characterization of Mexican isolates of Colletotrichum lindemuthianum by using differential cultivars and molecular markers. Phytopathology. 88: 292-299. 

  6. Iram Saba, Parvaze A. Sofi, Zeerak, N.A., Mir, R.R. and Musharib Gull. (2017). Using augmented design for evaluation of common bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.) germplasm. International Journal Current Microbiology Applied Sciences. 6 (7): 246-254.

  7. James, W.C. (1974). Assessment of plant diseases and looses. Annual Review of Phytopathology. 12: 27-48.

  8. Kelly, J.D. and Vallejo, V.A. (2004). A comprehensive review of the major genes conditioning resistance to anthracnose in common bean. Horticulture Science. 39: 1196-207. 

  9. Kelly, J. D. (2010). The Story of Bean Breeding. Michigan University. USA. pp 1-3.

  10. Kour, B., Kour, G., Kaul, S. and Dhar, M.K. (2012). Screening of Phaseolus vulgaris cultivars growing in various areas of Jammu and Kashmir for anthracnose. International Journal of Science and Research. Pub 2: 1-8 

  11. Mahuku, G.S. and Riascos, J.J. (2004). Virulence and molecular diversity within Colletotrichum lindemuthianum isolates from Andean and Messoamerican bean varieties and regions. Europian Journal of Plant Pathology. 110: 253-263. 

  12. Miklas, P.N., Kelly, J.D., Beebe, S.E., Blair, M. (2006). Common bean breeding for the resistance against biotic and abiotic stresses: From classical to marker assisted selection breeding. Euphytica. 147:105-131.

  13. Munda, A., Radisek, S., Šuštar-Vozli, J. and Javornik, B. (2009). Genetic variability of Colletotrichum lindemuthianum isolates from Slovenia and resistance of local Phaseolus vulgaris germplasm. Journal of Plant Disease Protection. 116: 23–29.

  14. Nirmala Maibam, Satish Chandra, Pankaj Baiswar, Majumder, D., Kanchan Saikia. (2015). Host Plant Resistance and Yield Loss due to Anthracnose caused by Colletotrichum lindemuthianum in French bean (Phaseolus vulgaris). Indian Journal of Hill Farming. 28(1): 14-18.

  15. Parlevliet JE 2002. Durability of resistance against fungal, bacterial and viral pathogens; present situation. Euphytica. 124: 147- 156.

  16. Pathania Anju, Sharma, P.N., Sharma, O.P., Chahota, R.K., Bilal Ahmad and Sharma, P. (2006). Evaluation of resistance sources and inheritance of resistance in kidney bean to Indian virulences of Colletotrichum lindemuthianum: Evaluation of resistance in bean to anthracnose. Euphytica. 149: 97-103.

  17. Razvi, S.M., Khan,M.N., Ashraf Bhat, M., Mushtaq Ahmad, Ganaie, S.A., Sheikh,F.A., Najeeb S. and Parry, F.A. (2018). Morphological variability and phylogenetic analysis in common bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.). Legume Research. 41(2): 208-212.

  18. Sharma, P.N., Sugha, S.K., Panwar, K.S. and Sagwal, J.C. (1994). Reaction of land races and exotic collection of kidney bean (Phaseolus vulgaris) to anthracnose (Colletotrichum lindemuthianum). Indian Journal of Agricultural Sciences. 63: 456-457.

  19. Singh, A.K., Singh, A.P., Singh, S.B. and Singh, V. (2009). Relationship and path analysis for green pod yield and its contributing characters over environments in French bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.). Legume Research. 32: 270-273.

  20. Sofi, P.A., Rana, J.C. and Bhat, N.A. (2014). Pattern of variation in common bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L) genetic resources of Jammu and Kashmir. Journal of Food Legumes. 27: 197-201.

  21. Wortmann, C.S., Kirkby, R.A., Elude, C.A., Allen, D.J. (1998). Atlas of common bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.) production in Africa. CIAT, Cali, Colombia.
In this Article
    Contact us
    Follow us

    Editorial Board

    View all (0)