Legume Research

  • Chief EditorJ. S. Sandhu

  • Print ISSN 0250-5371

  • Online ISSN 0976-0571

  • NAAS Rating 6.80

  • SJR 0.391

  • Impact Factor 0.8 (2023)

Frequency :
Monthly (January, February, March, April, May, June, July, August, September, October, November and December)
Indexing Services :
BIOSIS Preview, ISI Citation Index, Biological Abstracts, Elsevier (Scopus and Embase), AGRICOLA, Google Scholar, CrossRef, CAB Abstracting Journals, Chemical Abstracts, Indian Science Abstracts, EBSCO Indexing Services, Index Copernicus
Submit

Research Article

Legume Research, volume 42 issue 6 (december 2019) : 812-817

Productivity and Profitability of Cereal-Legume Forages Vis-a-Vis Their Effect on Soil Nutrient Status in Indo-Gangetic Plains

P.S. Hindoriya, R.K. Meena, Rakesh Kumar, Magan Singh, Hardev Ram, V.K. Meena, D. Ginwal, S. Dutta
1ICAR- National Dairy Research Institute, Karnal-132 001, Haryana, India.

  • Submitted02-04-2019|

  • Accepted26-06-2019|

  • First Online 09-11-2019|

  • doi 10.18805/LR-4147

Cite article:- Hindoriya P.S., Meena R.K., Kumar Rakesh, Singh Magan, Ram Hardev, Meena V.K., Ginwal D., Dutta S. (2019). Productivity and Profitability of Cereal-Legume Forages Vis-a-Vis Their Effect on Soil Nutrient Status in Indo-Gangetic Plains. Legume Research. 42(6): 812-817. doi: 10.18805/LR-4147.

ABSTRACT

The present study was conducted to evaluation of production potential of different forage crops commonly gown by farmers. The experiment was carried out in randomized complete block design with eight treatments and three replications at research farm of Agronomy Section, ICAR-NDRI, Karnal (Haryana). Among eight treatments, two perennial forage crops napier bajra hybrid(NBH), guinea grass cultivated sole as well as intercropping with cowpea and four seasonal fodder crops (cowpea, sorghum, baby corn and maize) were tested for their physio-morphological, biomass yield responses and economic efficiency. Experimental results showed that among the different forage crops significantly highest green as well as dry fodder yield were revealed from NBH intercropped with cowpea 63.79 and 11.95 t/ha green biomass fodder yield (GBY) and dry fodder yield respectively;which were found at par with sole NBH treatment (60.69&11.68 t/ha GBY and DFY). Amongs the different forage crops lowest GBY and DFY 33.1and 5.68 t/ha was produced by baby corn and cowpea respectively. The magnitude of the yield advantage was observed maximum and in the tune of 20.69% with guinea intercropped with cowpea against sole guinea. Highest net return was obtained from dual purpose baby corn (¹ 1.60 lakh/ha) with B: C ratio (5.26) and economic efficiency (¹ 2471/ha/day), followed by in NBH intercropped with cowpea. Based on the study, it is clearly indicated that dual purpose baby corn followed by NBH + cowpea intercropping could be feasible option for increasing the overall productivity of dairy farmers in Indo-Gangetic plains and elsewhere similar conditions prevails.

REFERENCES

  1. Adhikari, S., Chakraborty, T. and Bagchi, D.K. (2005). Bio-economic evaluation of maize (Zea mays) and groundnut (Arachis hypogaea) intercropping in drought-prone areas of Chotonagpur plateau region of Jharkhand. Indian Journal of Agronomy. 50(2): 113-115.
  2. Anita, M.R., Lakshmi, S. and Rani, T.S. (2015). Effects of row ratios of grass fodder cowpea mixtures on the yield and quality of forages. International Journal of Forestry and Crop Improvement. 6(2): 85-89.
  3. Annual Report, (2016-17). ICAR-Indian Grassland and Fodder Research Institute, Jhansi, India. 1-137.
  4. Aulakh, C.S., Gill, M. S., Mahey, R. K., Walia, S.S. and Singh, G. (2012). Effect of nutrient sources on productivity of fodder cropping systems in Punjab. Indian Journal of Agronomy. 57(2): 200-205.
  5. Baghdadi, A., Ridzwan, A.H., Ghasemzadeh, A., Ebrahimi, M., Othman, R. and Yusof, M.M. (2016). Effect of intercropping of corn and soybean on dry matter yield and nutritive value of forage corn. Legume Research. 39 (6): 976-981.
  6. Biradar, S.A., Shreedhar, J. N. and Ubhale, P. (2014). Economics and varietal performance of Hybrid Napier and guinea grass under irrigated conditions of northern Karnataka. Forage Research. 40 (2):95-97.
  7. Dar, E.A., Harika, A.S., Tomar, S.K.,Tyagi, A.K. and Datta, A. (2014). Effect of crop geometry and nitrogen levels on quality of baby corn (Zea mays L.) as fodder. Indian Journal of Animal Nutrition. 31(1): 60-64.
  8. Gomez, K.A. and Gomez, A.A. (1984). Statistical Procedure for Agricultural Research. Willey-Int. Sci. Pub., New York, USA.
  9. Halli, H.M., Rathore, S.S., Manjunatha, N. and Wasnik, V.K. (2018). Advances in agronomic management for ensuring fodder security in semi-arid zones of India- A International Journal of Current Microbiology and Applied Sciences. 7(2): 1912-1921.
  10. Hindoriya, P.S., Meena, R.K., Singh, M., Kumar, R., Ram, H., Meena, V.K. and Kushwaha, M. (2019). Evaluation of kharif forage crops for biomass production and nutritional parameters in Indo-Gangetic Plains of India. Indian Journal of Animal Nutrition. 36 (1): 25-29.
  11. Hofer, J.M., Gourlay, C.W. and Ellis, T.N. (2001). Genetic control of leaf morphology: a partial view. Annals of Botany. 88(6): 1129-    1139.
  12. Johnson, K. and Lenhard, M. (2011). Genetic control of plant organ growth. New Phytologist. 191(2): 319-333.
  13. Makkar, H.P.S. (2016). Animal nutrition in a 360-degree view and a framework for future R&D work: towards sustainable livestock production. Animal Production Science. 56(10): 1561–1568
  14. Meena, A.K., Singh, P. and Kanwar, P. (2012). Effect of nitrogen levels on yield and quality of [Sorghum bicolor (L.) Moench] sorghum genotypes. Forage Research. 37(4): 238-240.
  15. Rana, D.S., Singh, B., Gupta, K., Dhaka, A.K. and Pahuja, S.K. (2013). Effect of fertility levels on growth, yield and quality of multicut forage sorghum [Sorghum bicolor (L.) Moench] genotypes. Forage Research. 39: 36-38.
  16. Sarjerao, D.A. (2014). Intercropping of Maize (Zea mays L.)+Cowpea (Vigna unguiculata) for higher production of green fodder (Doctoral dissertation, MPKV, University Library Rahuri).
  17. Strydhorst, S.M., King, J.R., Lopetinsky, K.J. and Harker, K.N. (2008). Forage potential of intercropping barley with fababean, lupin, or field pea. Agronomy Journal. 100(1): 182-190.
  18. Surve, V.H., Patil, P.R. and Arvadia, M.K. (2011). Performance of fodder based intercropping of sorghum, maize and cowpea under different row ratio. Agricultural Science Digest. 32(4): 336-339.
  19. Tamta, A., Kumar, R., Ram, H., Meena, R.K., Meena, V.K., Yadav, M.R. and Subrahmanya, D.J., (2019). Productivity and profitability of legume-cereal forages under different planting ratio and nitrogen fertilization. Legume Research-An International Journal. 42(1): 102-107.
  20. Verma, A.K. and Dadheech, R.C. (2005). Yield and economics of fodder oat as influenced by balanced fertilization and legume mixture. Forage Research. 31: 73-74.
  21. Zhang, G.G., Yang, Z.B., Dong, S.T. (2011). Interspecific competitiveness affects the total biomass yield in an alfalfa and corn intercropping system. Field Crop Research. 124: 66-73. 
Reviewed By

Download Article
In this Article
    Contact us
    Follow us

    Editorial Board

    View all (0)