Optimizing crop geometry and nutrient management for yield, water productivity and economics of kharif groundnut (Arachis hypogaea L.)

DOI: 10.18805/LR-4053    | Article Id: LR-4053 | Page : 676-679
Citation :- Optimizing crop geometry and nutrient management for yield, water productivity and economics of kharif groundnut (Arachis hypogaea L.).Legume Research-An International Journal.2019.(42):676-679
Ekta Joshi, D.S. Sasode, R.S. Sikarwar, Varsha Gupta and B.S. Kasana joshi.ekta86@gmail.com
Address : Department of Agronomy, RVSKVV, College of Agriculture, Gwalior-474 002, Madhya Pradesh, India.
Submitted Date : 15-06-2018
Accepted Date : 23-08-2018

Abstract

An experiment was conducted during kharif season of 2016 and 2017 at College of Agriculture, Gwalior. To optimise plant population and fertility levels an experiment was laid out in split plot design, replicated thrice in fixed plots and the test variety of the crop groundnut (Mallika) was used. The plant geometry of 30 × 10 cm, 25 × 10 cm and 20 × 10 cm was adopted with three fertility levels as 75, 100 and 125% recommended dose of fertilizers. The yield and economics were increased by optimization of plant geometry and nutrient management under kharif groundnut. Sowing of crop at 30×10 cm spacing resulted in 7.3 and 4.3 % higher pod yield over 25×10 cm and 20×10 cm spacing, respectively and 3.0 % higher haulm yield over 25×10 cm. Similarly, application of 125% RDF resulted in 3.0 and 9.3 % higher pod yield over 100% RDF and 75% RDF, respectively but application of 100% RDF resulted in  18.6% higher haulm yield over 75% RDF and was at par with 125 % RDF application. The highest gross, net returns and B:C ratio was obtained at the spacing of 30×10 cm with 125% RDF.

Keywords

Crop geometry Groundnut Nutrient management Profitability Water productivity Yield.

References

  1. Buah, S.S.J. and Mwinkaara, S. (2009). Response of sorghum to nitrogen fertilizer and plant density in the Guinea savanna zone. J. Agron., 8: 124-130.
  2. Chaniyara, N.J., Solanki, R.M. and Bhalu, V.B. (2002). Effect of inter and intra row spacings on yield of mustard. Agric. Sci. Digest., 22 (1): 48-50.
  3. Desire, T.V., Liliane, M.T., Le prince, N.M., Jonas, P.I. and Akoa, A. (2010). Mineral nutrient status, some quality and morphological characteristic changes in peanut (Arachis hypogaea L.) cultivars under salt stress. African J. Environ. Sci. Technol., 4: 471-479.
  4. Gobarah, M.E., Mohammad, M.H. and Tawfik, M.M. (2006). Effect of phosphorus fertilizer and foliar spraying with zinc on growth, yield and quality of groundnut under reclaimed sandy soils. Journal of Applied Science Research. 2: 491-496.
  5. Gomez, K.A. and Gomez, A.A. (1984). Statistical Procedure for Agricultural Research. Second Edition John Willy and Sons Inc., New York.
  6. Joshi, Ekta, Sasode, D.S., Gupta, Varsha and Tiwari, Sushma. (2017). Productivity and profitability of groundnut as influenced by crop geometry and plant nutrition. Annals of Agricultural Research New Series. 38 (4): 1-6.
  7. Rajeshkumar, S., S. Durairaj, Nalliah and Kannan, V. (2017). Effect of crop geometry and foliar nutrition on growth and yield of irrigated blackgram (Vigna mungo L.). Int.J.Curr.Microbiol.App.Sci. 6(11): 4084-4094. 
  8. Salve, Y.V. and Gunjal, B.S. (2011). Effect of different levels of phosphorus and potassium on summer groundnut (Arachis hypogaea L.). International Journal of Agricultural Sciences. 7(2): 352-355.
  9. Sarkar, A.R., Kabir, M. H., Begum, M. and Salam, A. (2004). Yield performance of mungbean as affected by planting date, variety and plant density. J. Agron., 3 (1): 18-24.
  10. Sathyamoorthi, K., Amanullah, M.M., Vaiyapuri, K. and Somasundaram. E. (2008). Physiological parameters and yield of greengram (Vigna radiata L.) as influenced by increased plant density and fertilizer levels. Indian J. Crop. Sci., 3 (1): 115-122.
  11. Siddaraju, R., Narayanaswamy, S., Ramegowda, V.A. and Prasad. S. R. (2010). Studies on growth, seed yield and yield attributes as influenced by varieties and row spacing in cluster bean (Cyamopsis tetragonoloba L.). Mysore J. Agric. Sci., 44 (1): 16-21.
  12. Singh, A.L. (1999a). Mineral nutrition of groundnut. Advances in Plant Physiology 2: 161-200. (Ed. A. Hemantranjan), Scientific Publishers (India), Jodhpur, India. 
  13. Singh, P., Elamathi, S. and Ananthi, P. (2009). Effect of row spacing and dates of sowing on growth and yield of lentil (Lens culinaris) under north eastern region of Uttar Pradesh. Legume Res., 32 (4): 307-308.
  14. Singh, R.A., Singh, P.V., Singh, Jitendra, Singh, D.P. and Khan, Khalil. (2012). Integrated nutrient management in groundnut (Arachis hypogaea L.) for higher production during rainy season. International Journal of Agricultural Sciences. 8(1): 37-40. 

Global Footprints