Impact of irrigation on pulses production in India: A time-series study

DOI: 10.18805/LR-4038    | Article Id: LR-4038 | Page : 806-811
Citation :- Impact of irrigation on pulses production in India: A time-series study.Legume Research.2019.(42):806-811
Gourav Kumar Vani and Pradeep Mishra kumaragri.vani1@gmail.com
Address : Jawaharlal Nehru Krishi Vishwa Vidyalaya, Jabalpur-482 001, Madhya pradesh, India.
Submitted Date : 11-05-2018
Accepted Date : 11-10-2018


Pulses are source of protein for Indians, production of which has not kept with increasing demand of the nation. Among efforts to enhance pulses production, role of irrigation as a critical input has not been given due importance. In present investigation attempt is to find out importance and contribution of irrigation in growth of pulses production in India. The time series data on area, production, productivity and area irrigated of pulses was obtained from DES Official website. The  regression analysis and linear decomposition analysis were used as tools to carry out analysis. It was found that yield and area not-irrigated effect accounts for 52 per cent of growth of pulses which is not suitable for sustainability of pulses production system. Area not-irrigated effect contribution was 13.69 percent on pulses production. This also shows that irrigation has not been able to influence the production of pulses to desired level. The area irrigated accounted for 69 percent of variation in pulses yield. The result of present investigation is helpful to researcher as well as policymaker in attaining sustainable increases in pulses production in India.


Decomposition analysis Growth decomposition Irrigation Pulses production Regression analysis.


  1. Directorate of Pulses Development, Government of India. Development Programmes on Pulses: Government Efforts, Accessed from http://dpd.dacnet.nic.in/Article%20on%20Pulses%20programmes.pdf
  2. Bhatia, V.S., Singh, P., Wani, S.P., Rao, A.K., and Srinivas, K. (2006). Yield Gap Analysis of Soybean, Groundnut, Pigeonpea and Chickpea in India Using Simulation Modeling: Global Theme on Agroecosystems Report no. 31.
  3. Chand, Ramesh. (2009). Policy Brief: Demand for foodgrains during 11th Plan and towards 2020, NCAP-ICAR, New Delhi.
  4. Dashora, S.K., Dhaka, J.M., Agarwal, N.L. (2000). Growth in Production of Important Pulses Crops in Rajasthan. Agricultural Situation in India, 57(8), 453-458.
  5. Koohafkan, P. (2012). Chapter III Enhancing Cereals Production in Drylands in Water and Cereals in Drylands, Routledge. Food and Agriculture Organization of The United Nations (FAO), Rome.
  6. Kumar, R. (2014). Assessment of technology gap and productivity gain through Crop technology demonstration in chickpea. Indian J. Agric. Res, 48(2), 162-164.
  7. Mythili, G. (2006). Supply response of Indian farmers: Pre-and-Post reforms. Working Paper 2006-009, Mumbai: Indira Gandhi Institute ofDevelopment Research.
  8. Negi, A., and Roy, D. (2015). The cooling effect of pulse imports on price: The case of the pigeon pea in India.
  9. Narayan, P., and Kumar, S. (2015). Constraints of growth in area production and productivity of pulses in India: An analytical approach to major pulses. Indian Journal of Agricultural Research, 49(2), 114-124.
  10. Praduman Kumar, Surabhi Mittal and Mahabub Hossain. (2008). Agricultural Growth Accounting and Total Factor Productivity in South Asia: A review and Policy Implications, Agricultural Economics Research Review, 21 (2) : 145-172
  11. Praduman Kumar, P Shinoj, S.S.Raju, Anjani Kumar, M.Rich and SiwaMsang. (2010). Factor demand, output supply elasticities and supply projections for major crops of India, Agricultural Economics Research Review, 23 (1):1-14
  12. Reddy, A. Amarender. (2009). Pulse Production Technology: Status and Way Forward, Economics and Political Weekly, 64 (52):73-80
  13. Sundaram, I. S. (2010). India needs a pulses revolution. Facts For You (New Delhi), 31(3), 10-12. 

Global Footprints