Legume Research

  • Chief EditorJ. S. Sandhu

  • Print ISSN 0250-5371

  • Online ISSN 0976-0571

  • NAAS Rating 6.80

  • SJR 0.391

  • Impact Factor 0.8 (2023)

Frequency :
Monthly (January, February, March, April, May, June, July, August, September, October, November and December)
Indexing Services :
BIOSIS Preview, ISI Citation Index, Biological Abstracts, Elsevier (Scopus and Embase), AGRICOLA, Google Scholar, CrossRef, CAB Abstracting Journals, Chemical Abstracts, Indian Science Abstracts, EBSCO Indexing Services, Index Copernicus
Legume Research, volume 43 issue 5 (october 2020) : 683-687

Planting pattern and phosphorus management in pigeonpea and mungbean intercropping system

G.K. Math, M. Udikeri, L.G. Jaggal, Yamanura
1AICRP on MULLaRP, University of Agricultural Sciences, Dharwad, Karnataka-580 005, India.
  • Submitted16-03-2018|

  • Accepted27-10-2018|

  • First Online 13-02-2019|

  • doi 10.18805/LR-4018

Cite article:- Math G.K., Udikeri M., Jaggal L.G., Yamanura (2019). Planting pattern and phosphorus management in pigeonpea and mungbean intercropping system. Legume Research. 43(5): 683-687. doi: 10.18805/LR-4018.
A field experiment was conducted at Main Agricultural Research Station, Dharwad during rainy season of 2015 and 2016 to study the effect of planting pattern and phosphorus management on production and profitability of intercropping system of mungbean and pigeonpea. The experiment was laid out in split plot design with three replications and eight treatments. Among them, four planting patterns [sole pigeonpea, mungbean + pigeonpea 1:3 (120 cm x 20 cm), mungbean + pigeonpea 1:2 (90 cm x 20 cm) and mungbean + pigeonpea 2:2 (90 cm x 20 cm)] were main plot treatments and two phosphorus levels (P2O5 @ 50 kg ha-1 and P2O5 @ 75 kg ha-1) were sub plot treatments. Based on pooled data the results revealed that, the significantly higher mungbean seed yield (424 kg ha-1) was recorded with application of 75 kg P2O5 as compared to 50 kg P2O5 ha-1. Whereas, in planting pattern, sole mungbean recorded significantly higher seed yield (757 kg ha-1) as compared to all other intercropping systems. Yield advantage indices and net returns were significantly higher in pigeonpea + mungbean (1:3) with 75 kg P2O5 ha-1 as compared to other treatments. This study indicated the need of fifty per cent higher dose of P2O5 for the pigeonpea and mungbean intercropping system (1:3) in northern transition zone of Karnataka.
  1. Barod, N.K., Kumar, S., Dhaka, A.K. and Kathwal, R. (2017). Evaluation of intercropping systems involving pearlmillet (Pennisetum typhoides) and mungbean (Vigna radiate) as intercrop in pigeonpea (Cajanus cajan). Indian Journal of Agronomy. 62(2): 170- 173.
  2. Hiebsch, C.K. (1980). Principles of intercropping: effect of nitrogen fertilization, plant population and crop duration of equivalency ratios in intercrop versus monoculture comparisons. Disc. Abstract.,41: 4337.
  3. Kantwa, S.R., Ahlawat, I.P.S. and Gangaiah, B. (2005). Effect of land configuration, post mansoon irrigatioin and phosphorus performance of sole and intercropped pigeonpea (Cajanus cajan). Indian Journal of Agronomy. 50(4): 278-280.
  4. Malik, J.K., Singh, R. Thenua, O. V. S. and Kumar, A. (2013). Response of pigeonpea (Cajanus cajan) + mungbean (Phaseolus radiatus) intercropping system to phosphorus and biofertilizers Legume Research, 36(4): 324-330.
  5. Rani, B.P., and Reddy, D.R. (2010). Performance of pigeonpea in sole and intercropping system in Vertisols of Krishna-Godavari zone in Andhra Pradesh. Indian Journal Agriculture Research, 44(3): 225-28. 
  6. Udikeri, M. and Koppalkar, B.G. (2017). Response of nutrient management practices in pigeonpea [Cajanus cajan (L.) Millsp.] and clusterbean [Cymopsis tetragonoloba (L.) Taub.] intercropping system. Indian Journal of Ecology, 44(3): 539-542. 
  7. Willey, R.W. (1979). Intercropping – its importance and research needs. Field Crop Abstract, 32(1): 1-10 and 73-85. 

Editorial Board

View all (0)