Banner
Current IssueEditorial BoardOnline First Articles
Current IssueEditorial BoardOnline First Articles
Legume Research
Print ISSN: 0250-5371
Online ISSN: 0976-0571
NASS Rating
6.80
SJR
0.32
CiteScore
0.906

Chief Editor:
J. S. Sandhu
Vice Chancellor, SKN Agriculture, University, Jobner, VC, NDUAT, Faizabad, Deputy Director General (Crop Science), Indian Council of Agricultural Research (ICAR), New Delhi
Frequency:Monthly
Indexing:
BIOSIS Preview, ISI Citation Index, Biological Abstracts, Elsevier (Scopus and Embase), AGRICOLA, Go...

Research Article

Legume Research, volume 42 issue 3 (june 2019) : 416-420

Bio-Efficacy of different tank mix herbicides for weed control in soybean [Glycine max (L.) Merrill]

Jai Prakash Bhimwal, Arvind Verma, Virendra Nepalia, Versha Gupta
1Department of Agronomy, Rajasthan College of Agriculture Maharana Pratap University of Agriculture and Technology, Udaipur-313 001, Rajasthan, India.

  • Submitted23-02-2018|

  • Accepted07-08-2018|

  • First Online 20-09-2018|

  • doi 10.18805/LR-4009

Cite article:- Bhimwal Prakash Jai, Verma Arvind, Nepalia Virendra, Gupta Versha (2018). Bio-Efficacy of different tank mix herbicides for weed control in soybean [Glycine max (L.) Merrill]. Legume Research. 42(3): 416-420. doi: 10.18805/LR-4009.

ABSTRACT

A field experiment was conducted at the Rajasthan College of Agriculture, MPUAT, Udaipur during Kharif season 2015 and 2016 to adjudge the efficacy of different herbicide and herbicide mixtures against weeds in soybean. Monocot weeds were predominant (55.15%) in the experimental field compared with dicot weeds (44.85%). However, Echinochloa colona (41.56%) and Trianthema portulacastrum (33.16%) were predominant in soybean but, other weeds (Cyperus rotundus, Cynodon dactylon, Commelina benghalensis, Digera arvensis, Amaranthus viridis, Physalis minima, Corchorus spp.) were also present at 60 DAS. Among different weed control treatments, post-emergence and tank mix combination of propaquizafop + imazethapyr (75+75 g ha-1) and imazethapyr + quizalofop-ethyl (75+60 g ha-1) at 21 DAS were most effective in respect of reducing weed density, weed biomass, nutrient removal by weed and promote yield attributes and yield and quality of soybean as compared to rest of  weed control treatment. 

REFERENCES

  1. Arregui, M.C., Scotta, R. and Sanchez, D. (2005). Improved weed control with broadleaved herbicides inglyphosate-tolerant soybean (Glycine max). Crop Protection. 25: 653-656.
  2. Devi, K. N., Singh, L. N. K., Singh, M. S., Singh, S. B. and Singh, K. K. (2012). Influence of sulphur and boron fertilization on yield, quality, nutrient uptake and economics of soybean (Glycine max) under upland conditions. Journal of Agricultural Science 4(4): 1-10.
  3. Dhaker, S. C., Mundra, S. L., Dhaker, R. C. and Sumeriya, H. K. (2015). Effect of weed management and sulphur on nutrient content and uptake by weeds and soybean. Legume Research 38(3): 411-414. 
  4. Hazra, D., Das, T. K. and Yaduraju, N. T. (2009). Competition of Trianthema portulacastrum L. with and without other weeds in soybean. Indian Journal of Weed Science 41(3 & 4): 176-182. 
  5. Jackson, M.L. (1967). Soil Chemical Analysis. Prentice Hall of India Pvt. Ltd., New Delhi, pp. 183- 347 and 387-408.
  6. Jaybhay, S. A., Taware, S. P., Varghese, P. and Nikam, V. R. (2018). Soybean cultivation by farmers of Maharashtra: Identification and analysis of problems Legume Research.41: 474-479.
  7. Kushwah, S.S. and Vyas, M.D. (2006). Efficacy of herbicides against weeds in rainfed soybean [Glycine max (L.) Merrill] under Vindhyan Plateau of Madhya Pradesh. Indian Journal of Weed Science. 38: 62-64.
  8. Mosjidis, J.A. and Wehtje, G. (2011). Weed control in sunhemp and its ability to suppress weed growth. Crop Protection. 30: 70-73.
  9. Nagre, B. S., Kumble, A. B., Danawale, N. J. and Dhonde, M. B. (2017). Crop geometry and weed management effect on weed dynamics in soybean. Indian Journal of Weed Science 49(1): 95–97.
  10. Panda, S., Lal, S., Kewat, M. L., Sharma J. K. and Saini, M. K. (2015). Weed control in soybean with propaquizafop alone and in mixture with imazethapyr. Indian Journal of Weed Science 47(1): 31–33. 
  11. Parmar, P. S., Jain, N., Kumar, D. and Solanki, R. (2016). Efficacy of different herbicides for weed control in soybean. Indian Journal of Weed Science 48(4): 453–454.
  12. Patel, S., Kokni, R., Dhonde, M. B. and Kamble, A. B. (2016). Integrated weed management for improved yield of soybean. Indian Journal of Weed Science 48(1): 83–85.
  13. Peer, F. A., Hassan, B., Lone, B. A., Qayoom, S., Ahmad, L., Khanday, B. A., Singh P. and Singh, G. (2014). Effect of weed control methods on yield and yield attributes of soybean. African Journal of Agricultural Research 8(48): 6135-6141. 
  14. Ramprakash, T., Madhavi, M. and Yakadri, M. (2016). Dissipation and persistence of propaquizafop in soil, plant and rhizomes in turmeric and its effect on soil properties. Nature Environment and Pollution Technology 15(4): 1217-1220.
  15. Renjith, P. S. and Sharma, R. (2014). Effect of Propaquizafop on growth, yield and yield attributes of soybean [Glycine max (L.) Merril.]. BIOINFOLET 11 (2A): 289-291.
  16. Saharan, B., Jha, G., Jha, A. K. and Sanodiya, P. (2016). Efficacy of chlorimuron for controlling weeds in soybean. Indian Journal of Weed Science 48(1): 86–89.
  17. Singh, M., Kewat, M. L., Dixit, A., Kumar, K. and Pal, V. (2013). Effect of post-emergence herbicides on growth and yield of soybean. Indian Journal of Weed Science 45(3): 219–222.
  18. Tiwari, D. K., Kewat M. L., Khan, J. A. and Khamparia, N. K. (2007). Evaluation of efficacy of post-emergence herbicides in soybean (Glycine max L.). Indian Journal of Agronomy 52(1): 74-76.
  19. Tiwari, D.K., Kewat, M.L., Khan, J.A. and Khamparia, N.K. (2007). Evaluation of Efficacy of Post emergence herbicides in soybean (Glycine max). Indian Journal of Agronomy. 52: 74-76.
  20. Tuti, M. D., Das, T. K., Sairam, R. K., Annapurna, K. and Singh, S. B. (2015). Effect of sequential application of metribuzin on selectivity and weed control in soybean. International Journal of Pest Management 61(1): 17-25.
Reviewed By

Download Article
In this Article
    Contact us
    Follow us

    Editorial Board

    View all (0)