Banner
Current IssueEditorial BoardOnline First ArticlesArchive
Current IssueEditorial BoardOnline First ArticlesArchive

Research Article

volume 42 issue 3 (june 2019) : 348-353,   Doi: 10.18805/LR-3958

Effect of plant densities and different environments on productivity and profitability of Yardlong bean (Vigna unguiculata sub sp. sesquipedalis)

M
M. Manjesh
N
Nagarajappa Adivappar
V
V. Srinivasa
G
G.K. Girijesh
S
Sharanabasappa
1Zonal Agricultural and Horticultural Research Station, Shivamogga-577 204 Karnataka, India.

  • Submitted03-11-2017|

  • Accepted15-03-2018|

  • First Online 20-06-2018|

  • doi 10.18805/LR-3958

Cite article:- Manjesh M., Adivappar Nagarajappa, Srinivasa V., Girijesh G.K., Sharanabasappa (2018). Effect of plant densities and different environments on productivity and profitability of Yardlong bean (Vigna unguiculata sub sp. sesquipedalis). Legume Research. 42(3): 348-353. doi: 10.18805/LR-3958.

ABSTRACT

The present investigation was carried out during Kharif  2016 at ZAHRS, Navile, Shivamogga. The experiment was laid out in split plot design with three replications. There were 24 treatment combinations comprised of three different environments (polyhouse, shadenet and open field) and eight spacing treatments (45 cm x 30 cm, 45 cm x 45 cm, 45 cm x 60 cm, 45 cm x 75 cm, 60 cm x 30 cm, 60 cm x 45 cm, 60 cm x 60 cm, 60 cm x 75 cm). The obtained results showed that all the characters were markedly affected by different environments and spacing. Among different environments significantly higher plant height (325.17cm), number of primary branches (12.46), number of pods per plant (21.66), pod length (70.67 cm), pod girth (3.73 cm), pod weight per plant (31.13 g), yield per plant (458.21 g) and higher pod yield per 1000 m2 (1605.99 kg) were recorded in polyhouse. Among spacing treatments significantly higher number of primary branches (12.91), pods per plant (22.30), pod length (71.73 cm), pod girth (3.94 cm), pod weight per plant (33.11g) and pod yield per plant (547.86 g) were recorded with wider spacing of 60 cm x 75 cm. Highest plant height (294.29 cm) and yield per 1000 m2 (1791.68 kg) were recorded with the closer spacing of 45 cm x 30 cm. The interaction of different environments and spacing were found to be statistically non-significant for all the traits. The evaluation of production economics revealed that growing of Yardlong bean in open condition with 45 cm x 30 cm spacing was most remunerative option with a highest benefit: cost of 3.14.

REFERENCES

  1. Alam, M. S., Saha, S. R., Salam, M. A., Alam, M. K., (2011). Effect of sowing time and plant spacing on the yield and yield attributes of sweet pepper (Capsicum annuum). Bangladesh J. Agric. Res., 36: 271-278.
  2. Almaz, M. Gezahegn, Tesfaye, J. J., Sharma, Belel, M. D., (2016). Determination of optimum plant density for faba bean (Vicia faba L.) on vertisols at Haramaya, Eastern Ethiopia. Cogent Food & Agriculture., 2:122-128.
  3. Bakry, B. A., Elewa, T. A., El-karamany, M. F., Zeidan, M. S.,Tawfik, M. M., (2011). Effect of row spacing on yield and its components of some faba bean varieties under newly reclaimed sandy soil condition. World J. Agric. Sci.,7(1): 68-72.
  4. Basavaraja, N., Nandi, V. R., Jholgikar, P., (2003). Protected cultivation of capsicum and bhendi. Proc. of all India on Sem. Potential and Prospects for Protective Cultivation, Organized by the Institute of Engineers, Ahmednagar, 12-13, December, 2003, pp. 197-199.    Darwesh, Fayza, M. A., (2012). Cowpea (Vigna unguiculata) productivity as affected by combination effect between sowing dates and plant population. J. Plant Production, Mansoura Univ., 3(11): 2711-2722.
  5. Deka, K.K., Milu R. D., Bora P.., Mazumder. N., (2015). Effect of sowing dates and spacing on growth and yield of cluster bean (Cyamopsis tetragonoloba) in subtropical climate of Assam, India. Indian J. Agric. Res., 49 (3): 250-254.
  6. Ganesan, M., Subbiah, V. R., (2005). A case study on increasing tomato productivity in a low cost naturally ventilated greenhouse with different spacing. Scientist, JRD Tata Eco-technology Centre. P. 423-426.
  7. Ghosh, D. C., Patra, A. K., (1994). Effect of plant density and fertility levels on productivity and economics of summer sesame (Sesamum indicum). Indian J. Agron., 39(1): 71-75.
  8. Gomez, K. A., Gomez, A. A., (1984).Statistical Procedures for Agricultural Research with Emphasis on Rice. John wiley and Sors, New York. pp. 680.
  9. Harish, S., (2011). Investigations on growing condition, spacing and calcium sprays on seed yield, quality and storability of tomato. M.Sc. (Agri) Thesis, Univ. Agric. Sci., Dharwad (Karnataka).
  10. Hatam, M. K. M., Khattak., Manullah, A. M., (2000). Effect of sowing date and sowing geometry on growth and yield of faba bean (Vicia faba L.). FABIS News Letter. 24:26-28.
  11. Jakusko, B. B., Anasunda, U. I., Mustapha, (2009). Effect of inter-row spacing on some selected cow pea (Vigna unguiculata L. Walp) varieties in Yola, Adamawa State, Nigeria. IOSR-JAVS., 2(3): 30-35.
  12. Kumar, S., (2001). Response of hybrid tomato (Lycopersicon esculentum Mill.) to plant geometry and training on growth, yield and quality. M.Sc, Thesis, RAU, Bihar.
  13. Lacob, F. C., Campeanu, G., Atanasiu, N., (2009). Effect of culture technique upon pickling cucumber hybrids in solarium tunnels in the Tartasesti- racan. Horti., 53: 133- 136.
  14. Mamnoie, E., Dolatkhahi, A., Esfandiyari, B., (2014). Effects of different levels of density on yield and quantitative characteristics of two greenhouse cucumber (Cucumis sativus) cultivars. J. Sci. Tech. Greenhouse Culture., 5: 18-20.
  15. Megharaja, K. M., (2000). Studies on the effect of growing conditions and growth regulators on growth and productivity of hybrid capsicum Cv. Indira. M.Sc. (Agri.) Thesis, Univ. Agric. Sci., Bangalore (Karnataka).
  16. Nagalakshmi, S., Nandakumar, N., Paliniswamy, D., Sreenarayan, V.V., (2001). Naturally ventilated polyhouse for vegetable cultivation. South Indian Hort., 49: 345-346.
  17. Parvej, M. R., Khan, M. A. H., Awal, M. A., (2010). Phenological development and production potentials of tomato under polyhouse climate. J. Agric. Sci., 5(1):9-31.
  18. Pawar, S.U., Kharwade, M. L., Awari, H. W., (2007). Effect of plant density on vegetative growth and yield performance of different varieties of French bean under irrigated condition. Karnataka J. Agric. Sci., 20(3): 684-685.
  19. Reddy, M. A., Reddy, S. B., (2011). Effect of planting geometry and fertility level on growth and seed yield of cluster bean under scarce rainfall zone of Andhra Pradesh. Legume Res., 34(2): 143-145.
  20. Satodiya, B. N., Patel, H. C., Soni, N. V., (2015) Effect of planting density and integrated nutrient management on flowering, growth and yield of vegetable cowpea (Vigna unguiculata walp). The Asian J. Hort., 10(2): 232-23.
  21. Sharma, D. K., Chaudary, D. R., Verma, T. S., (2001). Growth and seed yield of tomato (Lycopersicon esculentum Mill.) cv. Roma as influenced by levels of nitrogen and plant spacing. Harayana J. Hort. Sci., 30(2): 95-96.
  22. Sharma, V. K., Pathania, P., Sharma, G. D., (2008). Response of French bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.) varieties to sowing dates and plant density in cold desert region. Legume Res., 31(3): 230-231.
  23. Shrikanth, M. N. Merwade, A. S., Tirakannanavar, C. S., Mallapur, C. P., Hosamani, R.M., (2007). Effect of spacings and fertilizer levels on crop growth and seed yield in lablab bean (Lablab purpureus). Karnataka J. Agric. Sci., 21(3): 440-443.
  24. Singh, J. V., Punia, A., Chader, S., Gupta, V., (2002). Characterization and evaluation of cluster bean [Cyamopsis tetragonoloba(L.)
  25. Taub] germplasm. Forage Res., 28(3):130-133.
  26. Singh, R. V., (2000). Response of French bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.) to plant spacing and nitrogen, phosphorus fertilization. Indian J. Horti., 57(4): 338-341.
  27. Singh, R. V., (2003). Response of rainy season tomato to N, P fertilization and plant spacing in the eastern plateau region. Indian J. Horti., 60: 79-83. 
Published In
Legume Research
Article Metrics
Metrics Icon
0
Views
0
Citations
Reviewed By
Share Article
Download Article
In this Article
    Contact us
    Follow us

    Research Article

    volume 42 issue 3 (june 2019) : 348-353,   Doi: 10.18805/LR-3958

    Effect of plant densities and different environments on productivity and profitability of Yardlong bean (Vigna unguiculata sub sp. sesquipedalis)

    M
    M. Manjesh
    N
    Nagarajappa Adivappar
    V
    V. Srinivasa
    G
    G.K. Girijesh
    S
    Sharanabasappa
    1Zonal Agricultural and Horticultural Research Station, Shivamogga-577 204 Karnataka, India.

    • Submitted03-11-2017|

    • Accepted15-03-2018|

    • First Online 20-06-2018|

    • doi 10.18805/LR-3958

    Cite article:- Manjesh M., Adivappar Nagarajappa, Srinivasa V., Girijesh G.K., Sharanabasappa (2018). Effect of plant densities and different environments on productivity and profitability of Yardlong bean (Vigna unguiculata sub sp. sesquipedalis). Legume Research. 42(3): 348-353. doi: 10.18805/LR-3958.

    ABSTRACT

    The present investigation was carried out during Kharif  2016 at ZAHRS, Navile, Shivamogga. The experiment was laid out in split plot design with three replications. There were 24 treatment combinations comprised of three different environments (polyhouse, shadenet and open field) and eight spacing treatments (45 cm x 30 cm, 45 cm x 45 cm, 45 cm x 60 cm, 45 cm x 75 cm, 60 cm x 30 cm, 60 cm x 45 cm, 60 cm x 60 cm, 60 cm x 75 cm). The obtained results showed that all the characters were markedly affected by different environments and spacing. Among different environments significantly higher plant height (325.17cm), number of primary branches (12.46), number of pods per plant (21.66), pod length (70.67 cm), pod girth (3.73 cm), pod weight per plant (31.13 g), yield per plant (458.21 g) and higher pod yield per 1000 m2 (1605.99 kg) were recorded in polyhouse. Among spacing treatments significantly higher number of primary branches (12.91), pods per plant (22.30), pod length (71.73 cm), pod girth (3.94 cm), pod weight per plant (33.11g) and pod yield per plant (547.86 g) were recorded with wider spacing of 60 cm x 75 cm. Highest plant height (294.29 cm) and yield per 1000 m2 (1791.68 kg) were recorded with the closer spacing of 45 cm x 30 cm. The interaction of different environments and spacing were found to be statistically non-significant for all the traits. The evaluation of production economics revealed that growing of Yardlong bean in open condition with 45 cm x 30 cm spacing was most remunerative option with a highest benefit: cost of 3.14.

    REFERENCES

    1. Alam, M. S., Saha, S. R., Salam, M. A., Alam, M. K., (2011). Effect of sowing time and plant spacing on the yield and yield attributes of sweet pepper (Capsicum annuum). Bangladesh J. Agric. Res., 36: 271-278.
    2. Almaz, M. Gezahegn, Tesfaye, J. J., Sharma, Belel, M. D., (2016). Determination of optimum plant density for faba bean (Vicia faba L.) on vertisols at Haramaya, Eastern Ethiopia. Cogent Food & Agriculture., 2:122-128.
    3. Bakry, B. A., Elewa, T. A., El-karamany, M. F., Zeidan, M. S.,Tawfik, M. M., (2011). Effect of row spacing on yield and its components of some faba bean varieties under newly reclaimed sandy soil condition. World J. Agric. Sci.,7(1): 68-72.
    4. Basavaraja, N., Nandi, V. R., Jholgikar, P., (2003). Protected cultivation of capsicum and bhendi. Proc. of all India on Sem. Potential and Prospects for Protective Cultivation, Organized by the Institute of Engineers, Ahmednagar, 12-13, December, 2003, pp. 197-199.    Darwesh, Fayza, M. A., (2012). Cowpea (Vigna unguiculata) productivity as affected by combination effect between sowing dates and plant population. J. Plant Production, Mansoura Univ., 3(11): 2711-2722.
    5. Deka, K.K., Milu R. D., Bora P.., Mazumder. N., (2015). Effect of sowing dates and spacing on growth and yield of cluster bean (Cyamopsis tetragonoloba) in subtropical climate of Assam, India. Indian J. Agric. Res., 49 (3): 250-254.
    6. Ganesan, M., Subbiah, V. R., (2005). A case study on increasing tomato productivity in a low cost naturally ventilated greenhouse with different spacing. Scientist, JRD Tata Eco-technology Centre. P. 423-426.
    7. Ghosh, D. C., Patra, A. K., (1994). Effect of plant density and fertility levels on productivity and economics of summer sesame (Sesamum indicum). Indian J. Agron., 39(1): 71-75.
    8. Gomez, K. A., Gomez, A. A., (1984).Statistical Procedures for Agricultural Research with Emphasis on Rice. John wiley and Sors, New York. pp. 680.
    9. Harish, S., (2011). Investigations on growing condition, spacing and calcium sprays on seed yield, quality and storability of tomato. M.Sc. (Agri) Thesis, Univ. Agric. Sci., Dharwad (Karnataka).
    10. Hatam, M. K. M., Khattak., Manullah, A. M., (2000). Effect of sowing date and sowing geometry on growth and yield of faba bean (Vicia faba L.). FABIS News Letter. 24:26-28.
    11. Jakusko, B. B., Anasunda, U. I., Mustapha, (2009). Effect of inter-row spacing on some selected cow pea (Vigna unguiculata L. Walp) varieties in Yola, Adamawa State, Nigeria. IOSR-JAVS., 2(3): 30-35.
    12. Kumar, S., (2001). Response of hybrid tomato (Lycopersicon esculentum Mill.) to plant geometry and training on growth, yield and quality. M.Sc, Thesis, RAU, Bihar.
    13. Lacob, F. C., Campeanu, G., Atanasiu, N., (2009). Effect of culture technique upon pickling cucumber hybrids in solarium tunnels in the Tartasesti- racan. Horti., 53: 133- 136.
    14. Mamnoie, E., Dolatkhahi, A., Esfandiyari, B., (2014). Effects of different levels of density on yield and quantitative characteristics of two greenhouse cucumber (Cucumis sativus) cultivars. J. Sci. Tech. Greenhouse Culture., 5: 18-20.
    15. Megharaja, K. M., (2000). Studies on the effect of growing conditions and growth regulators on growth and productivity of hybrid capsicum Cv. Indira. M.Sc. (Agri.) Thesis, Univ. Agric. Sci., Bangalore (Karnataka).
    16. Nagalakshmi, S., Nandakumar, N., Paliniswamy, D., Sreenarayan, V.V., (2001). Naturally ventilated polyhouse for vegetable cultivation. South Indian Hort., 49: 345-346.
    17. Parvej, M. R., Khan, M. A. H., Awal, M. A., (2010). Phenological development and production potentials of tomato under polyhouse climate. J. Agric. Sci., 5(1):9-31.
    18. Pawar, S.U., Kharwade, M. L., Awari, H. W., (2007). Effect of plant density on vegetative growth and yield performance of different varieties of French bean under irrigated condition. Karnataka J. Agric. Sci., 20(3): 684-685.
    19. Reddy, M. A., Reddy, S. B., (2011). Effect of planting geometry and fertility level on growth and seed yield of cluster bean under scarce rainfall zone of Andhra Pradesh. Legume Res., 34(2): 143-145.
    20. Satodiya, B. N., Patel, H. C., Soni, N. V., (2015) Effect of planting density and integrated nutrient management on flowering, growth and yield of vegetable cowpea (Vigna unguiculata walp). The Asian J. Hort., 10(2): 232-23.
    21. Sharma, D. K., Chaudary, D. R., Verma, T. S., (2001). Growth and seed yield of tomato (Lycopersicon esculentum Mill.) cv. Roma as influenced by levels of nitrogen and plant spacing. Harayana J. Hort. Sci., 30(2): 95-96.
    22. Sharma, V. K., Pathania, P., Sharma, G. D., (2008). Response of French bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.) varieties to sowing dates and plant density in cold desert region. Legume Res., 31(3): 230-231.
    23. Shrikanth, M. N. Merwade, A. S., Tirakannanavar, C. S., Mallapur, C. P., Hosamani, R.M., (2007). Effect of spacings and fertilizer levels on crop growth and seed yield in lablab bean (Lablab purpureus). Karnataka J. Agric. Sci., 21(3): 440-443.
    24. Singh, J. V., Punia, A., Chader, S., Gupta, V., (2002). Characterization and evaluation of cluster bean [Cyamopsis tetragonoloba(L.)
    25. Taub] germplasm. Forage Res., 28(3):130-133.
    26. Singh, R. V., (2000). Response of French bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.) to plant spacing and nitrogen, phosphorus fertilization. Indian J. Horti., 57(4): 338-341.
    27. Singh, R. V., (2003). Response of rainy season tomato to N, P fertilization and plant spacing in the eastern plateau region. Indian J. Horti., 60: 79-83. 
    In this Article
      Contact us
      Follow us
      Published In
      Legume Research

      Editorial Board

      View all (0)