Legume Research

  • Chief EditorJ. S. Sandhu

  • Print ISSN 0250-5371

  • Online ISSN 0976-0571

  • NAAS Rating 6.80

  • SJR 0.391

  • Impact Factor 0.8 (2023)

Frequency :
Monthly (January, February, March, April, May, June, July, August, September, October, November and December)
Indexing Services :
BIOSIS Preview, ISI Citation Index, Biological Abstracts, Elsevier (Scopus and Embase), AGRICOLA, Google Scholar, CrossRef, CAB Abstracting Journals, Chemical Abstracts, Indian Science Abstracts, EBSCO Indexing Services, Index Copernicus
Legume Research, volume 40 issue 5 (october 2017) : 955-958

Screening for host plant resistance to Helicoverpa armigera (Hubner) in chickpea using novel techniques

Jagdish Jaba, Meena Agnihotri, Snehel Chakravarty
1<p>College of Agriculture,&nbsp;G.B. Pant University of Agriculture and Technology, Pantangar-263 145, Uttarakhand, India.</p>
Cite article:- Jaba Jagdish, Agnihotri Meena, Chakravarty Snehel (2016). Screening for host plant resistance to Helicoverpa armigera(Hubner) in chickpea using novel techniques . Legume Research. 40(5): 955-958. doi: 10.18805/lr.v0iOF.4478.

Insights of antibiosis resistance in various chickpea cultivars against pod borer Helicoverpa armigera (Hubner) under laboratory condtions. The  present study was carried out in order to investigate the level of resistance against H. armigera on different cultivars by adopting detach leaf and pod assay. In leaf detach assay, pooled mean of 2012 and 2013, significantly lower and maximum weight gain and percent gain recorded was 101.9 mg (88.5%); 382.3mg (317.4%), respectively for ICCV 097105 and ICCV 07306. During podding stage, lowest pod damage (%) was recorded 55 % (ICCV 92944) and highest pod damage recorded by ICC 3137, LL 550 and ICCV07306 (95 %).Highest pupal weight of one day old pupae was recorded on LL 550 (405.2 mg) and lower pupal weight in ICCV 097105 (202.4 mg). The present result  gave clue  for future in depth studies on weeds for developing either specific pheromone compound or repellant compound for the eco- friendly management of H. armigera.

  1. Anonymous, (2014). Commodity profile: Pulses. Source: DES, DAC. As per 3rdAdvance Estimates.

  2. Brar, H.S and Singh, R. (2015). Host plant resistance in chickpea against gram pod borer, Helicoverpa armigera (Hübner) under field and laboratory conditions Journal of Food Legumes 28: 69-72

  3. Narayanamma VL, Sharma HC, Gowda CLL, Sriramulu, M (2013). Mechanisms of resistance to helicoverpa armigera and introgression of resistance genes into F1 hybrids in chickpea, Arthropod Plant Interactions, 1: 263-270 

  4. Sharma, H.C., Gowda, C.L.L., Sharma, K.K., Gaur, P.M., Mallikarjuna, N., Bouhariwalla, H.K. and Crouch, J.K. (2003). Host plant resistance to pod borer, Helicoverpa armigera in chickpea. In: Sharma R.N., Shrivastava, A.L., Rathore, A.L., Sharma, M.L. and Khan, M.A. (Eds.), Chickpea research for the millennium: Proceedings of the International Chickpea Conference, 20-22 January, Indira Gandhi Agricultural University, Raipur. Chattisgarh, India, pp.118-137.

  5. Sharma, H.C., Green, P.W.C., Stevenson, P.C. and Simmonds, M.S.J. (2001). What makes it tasty for the pest? Identification of Helicoverpa armigera (Hubner) feeding stimulants and location of their production on the pod surface of pigeonpea (Cajanus cajan (L.) Millsp).Competitive Research Facility Project R7029 C, Final Technical Report, Department for International Development, UK.

  6. Sharma, H.C., Singh, F. and Nwanze, K.F. (1997). Plant resistance to insects in sorghum. ICRISA’T (International Crops Research Institute for the Semi-Arid Tropics). Patancheru, Andhra Pradesh 502 324. lndia pp. 216.

  7. Sharma, H.C., Stevenson, P.C. and Gowda, C.L.L. (2005). Helicoverpa armigera Management: Emerging trends and prospects for future research. In Helicoverpa armigera management: Emerging trends and strategies for future research (Sharma, H. C. Ed). New Delhi, India: Oxford and IBH Publishers. pp.453-454

Editorial Board

View all (0)