Productivity of mungbean (Vigna radiata) with elevated carbon dioxide at various phosphorus levels and cyanobacteria inoculation
 

DOI: 10.18805/lr.v0iOF.3765    | Article Id: LR-3640 | Page : 497-505
Citation :- Productivity of mungbean (Vigna radiata) with elevated carbon dioxideat various phosphorus levels and cyanobacteria inoculation .Legume Research-An International Journal.2017.(40):497-505

Sumit Kumar Dey*, B. Chakrabarti, R. Prasanna, S.D. Singh, T.J. Purakayastha, A. Datta and H. Pathak              
 

sumitdeyiari@gmail.com
Address :

Centre for Environment Science and Climate Resilient Agriculture, Indian Agricultural Research Institute, New Delhi-110 012, India.

Submitted Date : 21-10-2015
Accepted Date : 29-07-2016

Abstract

Increase in the concentration of atmospheric carbon dioxide (CO2) has significant impact on crop growth and productivity. A study was undertaken during the kharif season to study the impacts of elevated CO2 and cyanobacterial inoculation on growth and yield of mungbean crop under different doses of P using Free Air Carbon dioxide Enrichment (FACE) facility. The crop was grown under two CO2 levels i.e., ambient (400 µmol mol-1) and elevated (550 ± 20 µmol mol-1), with five levels of P (0, 8, 12, 16 and 20 mg P kg-1 soil) and 2 levels of calothrix sp. (with and without cyanobacteria) inoculation. Elevated CO2 level increased seed yield by 35.0% and biomass yield by 31.3%. Leaf area, photosynthesis rate and leaf chlorophyll content significantly increased at high CO2 level. Yield attributes such as number of pods plant-1, number of seeds pod-1 and test weight also increased at high CO2 level. Application of P and cyanobacterial inoculation further increased growth and yield of the crop. The study showed that application of P as well as cyanobacteria could help in improving productivity of legumes under elevated CO2 condition. 

Keywords

Cyanobacteria Elevated CO2 Mungbean Phosphorus Yield.

References

  1. Ainsworth, E.A and Long, S.P. (2005).What have we learned from 15 years of free air CO2 enrichment (FACE)? A meta-    analytic review of the responses of photosynthesis, canopy properties and plant production to rising CO2. New Phytologist. 165: 351-372.
  2. Ainsworth, E.A., Rogers, A., Blum, H., Nosberger, J and Long, S.P. (2003).Variation in acclimation of photosynthesis in Trifoliumrepens after eight years of exposure to Free Air CO2 Enrichment (FACE). Journal of Experimental Botany. 54: 2769-2774.
  3. Arnon, D.I. (1949). Copper enzymes in isolated chloroplasts, polyphenoxidase in beta vulgaris. Plant physiology. 24: 1-15.
  4. Canadell, J.G., Quéré, C.L., Raupach, M.R., Fielde, C.B., Buitenhuis, E.T., Ciaisf, P., Conwayg, T.J., Gillettc, N.P., Houghtonh, R.A and Marland, G. (2007). Contributions to accelerating atmospheric CO‚ growth from economic activity, carbon intensity, and efficiency of natural sinks. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America. 104: 18866-18870.
  5. Chakrabarti, B., Singh, S.D., Kumar, S.N., Aggarwal, P.K., Pathak, H and Nagarajan, S. (2012). Low-cost facility for assessing impact of carbon dioxide on crops. Current Science. 102: 1035-1040.
  6. Dawes, M.A., Hättenschwiler, S., Bebi, P., Hagedorn, F., Handa, I. T., Körner, C and Rixen, C. (2011). Species-specific tree growth responses to 9 years of CO2 enrichment at the alpine treeline. Journal of Ecology. 99: 383-394.
  7. Dlugokencky, Ed and Pieter, T. (2015). Trends in atmospheric carbon dioxide, Global. National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration/Earth System Research Laboratory. http://www.esrl.noaa.gov/gmd/ccgg/trends/global.html
  8. Hiscox, J.D. and Israelstam, G.F. (1979).A method for the extraction of chlorophyll from leaf tissue without maceration. Canadian Journal of Botany. 57: 1332-1334.
  9. Israel, D.W. (1987). Investigation of the role of phosphorus in symbiotic dinitrogen fixation. Plant Physiology. 84: 835–840.
  10. Karthikeyan, N., Prasanna, R., Lata, N and Kaushik, B.D. (2007). Evaluating the potential of plant growth promoting cyanobacteria as inoculants for wheat. European Journal of Soil Biology. 43: 23-30.
  11. Kaushik, B.D and Venkataraman, G.S. (1979). Effect of algal inoculation on yield and vitamin C content of two varieties of tomato. Plant and Soil. 52: 135-136.
  12. Luo, Y., Hui, D and Zhang, D. (2006). Elevated carbon dioxide stimulates net accumulations of carbon and nitrogen in terrestrial ecosystems: A meta-analysis. Ecology. 87: 53-63.
  13. McCarthy, H.R., Oren, R., Johnsen, K.H., Gallet-Budynek, A., Pritchard, S.G., Cook, C.W., LaDeau, S.L., Jackson, R.B and Finzi, A.C. (2010). Re-assessment of plant carbon dynamics at the Duke free-air CO2 enrichment site: Interactions of atmospheric CO2 with nitrogen and water availability over stand development. New Phytologist. 185: 514-528.
  14. Mishra U and Pabbi S. (2004): Cyanobacteria: a potential biofertilizer for rice. Resonance. 9: 6–10.
  15. Nowak, R.S., Ellsworth, D.S and Smith, S.D. (2004). Functional responses of plants to elevated atmospheric CO2do photosynthetic and productivity data from FACE experiments support early predictions? New Phytologist. 162: 253-280.
  16. Prasanna, R., Babu, S., Rana, A., Kabi, S.R., Chaudhary, V., Gupta, V., Kumar, A., Shivay, Y.S., Nain, L and Pal, R.K. (2013). Evaluating the establishment and agronomic proficiency of cyanobacterial consortia as organic options in wheat-rice cropping sequence. Experimental Agriculture. 49: 416-434.
  17. Rogers, A., Gibon, Y., Stitt, M., Morgan, P.B., Bernacchi, C.J., Ort, D.R and Long, S.P. (2006). Increased C availability at elevated carbon dioxide concentration improves N assimilation in a legume. Plant, Cell & Environment. 29: 1651-1658.
  18. Ross, D.J., Newton, P.C.D and Tate, K.R. (2004). Elevated (CO2) effects on herbage production and soil carbon and nitrogen pools and mineralization in a species-rich, grazed pasture on a seasonally dry sand. Plant and Soil. 260: 183-196.
  19. Saha, S., Sehgal, V.K., Chakraborty, D and Pal, M. (2013). Growth behavior of kabuli chickpea under elevated atmospheric CO2. Journal of Agricultural Physics. 13: 55-61.
  20. Saha, S., Sehgal, V.K., Nagarajan, S and Pal. M. (2012). Impact of elevated atmospheric CO2 on radiation utilization and related plant biophysical properties in pigeon pea (Cajanus cajan L.). Agricultural and Forest Meteorology. 158–    159: 63–70.
  21. Soussana, J.F and Hartwig, U.A. (1996). The effects of elevated CO2 on symbiotic N2 fixation: a link between the carbon and nitrogen cycles in grassland ecosystems. Plant and Soil. 187: 321-332.
  22. Sun, J., Yang, L., Wang, Y and Ort, R. D. (2009). FACE-ing the global change: Opportunities for improvement in photosynthetic radiation use efficiency and crop yield. Plant Science 177: 511–522.
  23. Wang, D., Heckathorn, S.A., Wang, X and Philpott, S.M. (2012). A meta-analysis of plant physiological and growth responses to temperature and elevated CO2. Oecologia. 169: 1-13.
  24. Wu, D.X. and Wang, G.X. (2000) Interaction of CO2 Enrichment and drought on growth, water use, and yield of broad bean (Vicia faba). Environmental and Experimental Botany. 43: 131-139.

Global Footprints