Banner
Current IssueEditorial BoardOnline First ArticlesArchive
Current IssueEditorial BoardOnline First ArticlesArchive

Research Article

volume 40 issue 6 (december 2017) : 1097-1099,   Doi: 10.18805/lr.v0iOF.9106

Productive  potential of pigeonpea [Cajanus cajan (L.) Millsp.] genotypes in  different planting geometry under protective irrigation

A
A.S. Channabasavanna
H
H. Rajakumar
M
M.S. Kitturmath
A
A.M. Talwar
1Agricultural Research Station, Malnoor, University of Agricultural Sciences, Raichur-584 104, Karnataka, India
Cite article:- Channabasavanna A.S., Rajakumar H., Kitturmath M.S., Talwar A.M. (2017). Productive potential of pigeonpea [Cajanus cajan (L.) Millsp.] genotypes in different planting geometry under protective irrigation. Legume Research. 40(6): 1097-1099. doi: 10.18805/lr.v0iOF.9106.

ABSTRACT

A field experiment was conducted at Agricultural Research Station, Malnoor,  University of  Agricultural Sciences,  Raichur on vertisols during kharif seasons of 2010-11 and 2011-12 to study the productive potential of pigeonpea genotypes in different planting geometry under protective irrigation. The experiment consisted of three genotypes (BSMR-736, TS-3R and Laksmi) and seven planting geometry ( 90 x 20 cm, 120 x20 cm, 120 x 60 cm, 120 x 90 cm, 150 x 20 cm, 150 x 60 cm and 150 x 90 cm).  The experiment was conducted in split plot design with three replications.  Results revealed that among three genotypes tested,  BSMR-736 (1667 kg/ha) recorded significantly higher grain yield  over Laksmi (1369 kg/ha)  and  TS-3R (823 kg/ha).  With respect to  planting geometry, 90 x 20 cm, 120x20 cm and  150x20 cm recorded the highest grain yield, net returns and B:C  irrespective of the genotypes.  The interaction between genotypes and planting geometry showed that  the genotype BSMR-736 planted at 150X20 cm recorded the highest grain yield (2322 kg/ha),  net returns (Rs. 64421/ha) and B:C (4.37).

REFERENCES

  1. Ali Masood, Kumar Narendra and Ghost P.K. (2012). Milestones on agronomic research in pulses in India. Indian Journal of Agronomy 57(3): 52-57
  2. Anonymous. (2011). Low productivity problems of pulses. Surv. Indian Agric., Hindu Publ., pp. 65-67.
  3. Anonymous. (2012). All India area, production and yield of total pulses 2011-12. Ministry of Agriculture, Govt. of India.
  4. Giramallappa B, Tuppad B G, Koppalkar A S, Halepyati and Desai B.K. (2012). Yield and economics of pigeonpea genotypes as influenced by planting geometry under rainfed condition. Kanataka journal of Agricultural Sciences 25(2): 179-182
  5. Parameshwarappa S G. (2002). Performance of pigeonpea cultivation medium black soils of North Transitional Zones of Karnataka under rain fed conditions. Karnataka Journal of Agricultural Sciences 15(3): 502-503.
  6. Potdar M P, Chittapur B M, Salakinkoppa S R, Arjun sharma and Dharmraj P S. (2010). Response of transplanted pigeonpea (Cajanus cajana L.) to planting geometry under rainfed conditions of north eastern dry zone of Karnataka, Proc. Nation. Symp. on Resource Management Approaches towards Livelihood Security, 2-4 December, 2010, Bengaluru, Karnataka (India). 
  7. Salakinkoppa S R and Patil H Y. (2010). Enhancing the productivity of pigeonpea by transplanting technique in command area. Proc. Nation. Symp. on Food Security in Context of Changing Climate held at Kanpur during October 30 to November 01 2010. pp. 133.
  8. Kashyap, Shivastava G K, Lakpal R and Ghoubey N K. (2003). Productive potential of pegeonpea genotypes in response to growth regulators under vertisols of chattisgarh plains. Annals of Agricultural Reseach New series 24(2): 449-452
  9. Thanki H P, Sawargaonkar S L. and Hudge B V. (2010). Genotype x environment interaction for biometrical traits in pigeonpea (Cajanus cajan L. Millsp.) under varying spacings. Electronic Journal of Plant Breeding 1(4): 925-928 
Published In
Legume Research
Article Metrics
Metrics Icon
0
Views
0
Citations
Reviewed By
Share Article
Download Article
In this Article
    Contact us
    Follow us

    Research Article

    volume 40 issue 6 (december 2017) : 1097-1099,   Doi: 10.18805/lr.v0iOF.9106

    Productive  potential of pigeonpea [Cajanus cajan (L.) Millsp.] genotypes in  different planting geometry under protective irrigation

    A
    A.S. Channabasavanna
    H
    H. Rajakumar
    M
    M.S. Kitturmath
    A
    A.M. Talwar
    1Agricultural Research Station, Malnoor, University of Agricultural Sciences, Raichur-584 104, Karnataka, India
    Cite article:- Channabasavanna A.S., Rajakumar H., Kitturmath M.S., Talwar A.M. (2017). Productive potential of pigeonpea [Cajanus cajan (L.) Millsp.] genotypes in different planting geometry under protective irrigation. Legume Research. 40(6): 1097-1099. doi: 10.18805/lr.v0iOF.9106.

    ABSTRACT

    A field experiment was conducted at Agricultural Research Station, Malnoor,  University of  Agricultural Sciences,  Raichur on vertisols during kharif seasons of 2010-11 and 2011-12 to study the productive potential of pigeonpea genotypes in different planting geometry under protective irrigation. The experiment consisted of three genotypes (BSMR-736, TS-3R and Laksmi) and seven planting geometry ( 90 x 20 cm, 120 x20 cm, 120 x 60 cm, 120 x 90 cm, 150 x 20 cm, 150 x 60 cm and 150 x 90 cm).  The experiment was conducted in split plot design with three replications.  Results revealed that among three genotypes tested,  BSMR-736 (1667 kg/ha) recorded significantly higher grain yield  over Laksmi (1369 kg/ha)  and  TS-3R (823 kg/ha).  With respect to  planting geometry, 90 x 20 cm, 120x20 cm and  150x20 cm recorded the highest grain yield, net returns and B:C  irrespective of the genotypes.  The interaction between genotypes and planting geometry showed that  the genotype BSMR-736 planted at 150X20 cm recorded the highest grain yield (2322 kg/ha),  net returns (Rs. 64421/ha) and B:C (4.37).

    REFERENCES

    1. Ali Masood, Kumar Narendra and Ghost P.K. (2012). Milestones on agronomic research in pulses in India. Indian Journal of Agronomy 57(3): 52-57
    2. Anonymous. (2011). Low productivity problems of pulses. Surv. Indian Agric., Hindu Publ., pp. 65-67.
    3. Anonymous. (2012). All India area, production and yield of total pulses 2011-12. Ministry of Agriculture, Govt. of India.
    4. Giramallappa B, Tuppad B G, Koppalkar A S, Halepyati and Desai B.K. (2012). Yield and economics of pigeonpea genotypes as influenced by planting geometry under rainfed condition. Kanataka journal of Agricultural Sciences 25(2): 179-182
    5. Parameshwarappa S G. (2002). Performance of pigeonpea cultivation medium black soils of North Transitional Zones of Karnataka under rain fed conditions. Karnataka Journal of Agricultural Sciences 15(3): 502-503.
    6. Potdar M P, Chittapur B M, Salakinkoppa S R, Arjun sharma and Dharmraj P S. (2010). Response of transplanted pigeonpea (Cajanus cajana L.) to planting geometry under rainfed conditions of north eastern dry zone of Karnataka, Proc. Nation. Symp. on Resource Management Approaches towards Livelihood Security, 2-4 December, 2010, Bengaluru, Karnataka (India). 
    7. Salakinkoppa S R and Patil H Y. (2010). Enhancing the productivity of pigeonpea by transplanting technique in command area. Proc. Nation. Symp. on Food Security in Context of Changing Climate held at Kanpur during October 30 to November 01 2010. pp. 133.
    8. Kashyap, Shivastava G K, Lakpal R and Ghoubey N K. (2003). Productive potential of pegeonpea genotypes in response to growth regulators under vertisols of chattisgarh plains. Annals of Agricultural Reseach New series 24(2): 449-452
    9. Thanki H P, Sawargaonkar S L. and Hudge B V. (2010). Genotype x environment interaction for biometrical traits in pigeonpea (Cajanus cajan L. Millsp.) under varying spacings. Electronic Journal of Plant Breeding 1(4): 925-928 
    In this Article
      Contact us
      Follow us
      Published In
      Legume Research

      Editorial Board

      View all (0)