Response of fieldpea (Pisum sativum L. var arvense) to various planting methods, irrigation schedule and weed management practices

DOI: 10.18805/lr.v0iOF.7107    | Article Id: LR-3518 | Page : 132-137
Citation :- Response of fieldpea (Pisum sativum L. var arvense) to various planting methods, irrigation schedule and weed management practices .Legume Research-An International Journal.2017.(40):132-137

Brijbhooshan*1, V.K. Singh and Shalini

brij35537@gmail.com
Address :

Department of Agronomy, G.B. Pant University of Agriculture & Technology, Pantnagar-263 145, India

Submitted Date : 9-05-2015
Accepted Date : 9-06-2015

Abstract

A field experiment was conducted during rabi seasons of 2007-08 and 2008-09 on mollisols at G.B. Pant University of Agriculture & Technology, Pantnagar to study the performance of fieldpea (Pisum sativum L.var arvense) under different planting methods, irrigation levels and weed management practices. Results revealed that growth attributes as plant height, number of branches and dry matter accumulation per plant, number and dry weight of nodules per plant, density and dry matter of weeds/unit area, nutrient uptake and yield attributes as pods/plant, 1000-grain weight, grain yield/plant and grain yield of fieldpea were significantly higher under raised bed planting as compared to flat bed. Planting on raised bed increased grain yield of fieldpea by 17.5% over flat bed. Two irrigations applied at critical stages i.e. pre-flowering and pod formation proved promising in increasing the growth, nutrient uptake, yield attributes and grain yield of pea. One hand weeding done at 25 days after sowing (DAS) reduced the density and dry matter of weeds significantly and one hand weeding done at 25 DAS increased the values of growth attributes, number and dry weight of nodules, nutrient uptake, yield attributes and grain yield as compared to pendimethalin 1.0 kg a.i./ha applied as pre-emergence and weedy check.

Keywords

Fieldpea Irrigation Nodules Planting method Weed management.

References

  1. Anonymous (2009). Pulses and oilseeds policies: the fault to the core. Agriculture Today. 12: 4p
  2. Anonymous (2013). Agricultural Statistics at a Glance, Department of Agriculture and Cooperation, Ministry of Agriculture, Government of India, New Delhi
  3. Aslam, M., Ahmad, H.K., Ahmad, E., Himayatullah Khan, M.A. and Sagoo, A.G. (2007). Effect of sowing methods and weed control techniques on yield and yield components of chick pea. Pak. J. Weed Sci. Res., 13:49-61.
  4. Bakker, D.M., Hamilton, G.J., Houlbrooke, D.J., Spann, D. and Burgel, A.V. (2007). Productivity of crops grown on raised beds on duplex soils prone to water logging in Western Australia. Aust J Exp Agri., 47:1368-1376
  5. Binod Kumar and Singh, G.R. (2014). Response of French bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.) to various sowing methods, irrigation levels and nutrient substitution in relation to its growth, seed yield and nutrient uptake. Journal of food legume. 27: 108-111
  6. Chauhan, D.R., Panwar, K.S., and Balyan, R.S. (1992). Influence of irrigation, phosphorus and weed control methods on weed and fieldpea (Pisum sativum L.). Tropical Pest Management. 38:1-4.
  7. Idnani, L.K. and Gautam, H.K. (2008). Water economization in summer greengram (Vigna radiata var. radiata) as influenced by irrigation regimes and land configurations. Indian J Agr Sci., 78: 214-219
  8. Kantwa, S.R., Ahlawat, I.P.S. and Gangaiah, B. (2005). Effect of land configuration, post monsoon irrigation and phosphorus on performance of sole and intercropped pigeonpea (Cajanus cajan). Indian J Agron., 50:278-280
  9. Kasturikrishna, S. and Ahlawat, I.P.S. (1999). Growth and yield response of pea (Pisum sativum L.) to moisture stress, phosphorus, sulphur and zinc fertilizers. Indian J Agron., 44:588-596 
  10. Lyon, D.J. and Wilson, R.G. (2005). Chemical weed control in dryland and irrigated chickpea. Weed Technol., 19:959-965
  11. Maruthi, V., Chandrasekhara Reddy S. and Yellamanda Reddy, T. (1990). Effect of irrigation level and weed management on growth and yield of post-rainy season redgram (Cajanus cajan L.). J Res APAU., 18:175-177
  12. Masood Ali, Mishra, J. P., Ghosh, P. K. and Naimuddin (2014). Textbook of Field Crop Production volume I. In: Rabi (Winter) Pulses, 2nd edn. ICAR, New Delhi, pp 323-333
  13. Pramanik, S. C., Singh, N.B. and Singh, K.K. (2009). Yield, economics and water use efficiency of chickpea (Cicer arietinum) under various irrigation regimes on raised bed planting system. Indian J Agron., 54: 315-318
  14. Parminder Singh, Kanwar, J.S. and Kulbir Singh (2007). Response of integrated weed management and planting patterns on seed productivity of pea. Seed Research. 35: 164-167
  15. Singh Kanwar, Saini, S.S., Yadav, S.K., Harpal Singh and Kumar, A. (2001). Effect of irrigation and row spacing on growth and yield of fieldpea. Agric Sci Dig., 21:127-128
  16. Singh, M. K. and Tripathi, S.S. (2004). Interaction of herbicides on physiological growth parameters in Rajmash (Phaseolus vulgaris L.). Agric Sci Dig., 24: 224-226
  17. Singh, P.P. and Yadav, R.P. (2005) Effect of manuring and irrigation on plant mortality in fieldpea (Pisum sativum L.) due to stem fly-wilt complex in calcareous soils of Bihar. J Appl Zool Res., 16:7- 8
  18. Singh Vinod Kumar, Dwivedi Brahma S., Shukla Arvind K. and Rajendra Mishra P. (2010). Permanent raised bed planting of the pigeonpea- wheat system on a typic Ustochrept: Effect on the soil fertility, yield and water and nutrient use efficiencies. Field Crops Res., 116:127-139
  19. Sunil Kumar, Raghuvir Singh and Narendra Kumar (2010). Performance of different herbicide in weed growth of chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.). Int J Agr Sci., 6: 202-205
  20. Wagner, G. and Nadasy, E. (2010). Influence of nitrogen and herbicidal treatments on the nitrogen uptake of pea and Chenopodium album L. Acta Agron Hung., 58: 123-132 

Global Footprints