Loading...

Evaluation of chickpea varieties under compartmental bunding in rainfed situation

DOI: 10.18805/lr.v0iOF.9379    | Article Id: LR-3496 | Page : 890-895
Citation :- Evaluation of chickpea varieties under compartmental bundingin rainfed situation .Legume Research.2016.(39):890-895

S.L. Patil*, N. Loganandhan1 and M.N. Ramesha

slpatil64@gmail.com
Address :

ICAR-Indian Institute of Soil and Water Conservation, Research  Centre, Bellary-583 104, India.

Submitted Date : 30-03-2015
Accepted Date : 19-12-2015

Abstract

Compartmental bunding (CB) and improved chickpea varieties were evaluated in ten farmers’ fields during rainy-winter (kharif-rabi) seasons of 2012-13 in Vertisols at Bellary, India. Adopting improved chickpea varieties of BGD103 and JG11 during winter season increased the grain yields from 12.5 to 15.9%, respectively over locally cultivated A1 variety. The CB that was laid out during July (rainy season) conserved rainwater in-situ and further increased the grain yield of chickpea up to 36.7% in BGD103 and 43.9% in JG11. The increase in grain yield from 24.2% (JG11) to 27.8% (BGD103) indicates that CB is effective for in-situ rainwater conservation and improving profile soil moisture in Vertisols. However technology gap during study period was higher compared to extension gap and it was attributed to drought situation with only 81.2% of mean annual rainfall. Technology index was higher in this study and varied from 48.3% (Cultivation of BGD103 variety with CB) to 60.6% (Cultivation of JG11 variety without CB) indicating that technology index can be reduced and chickpea yields can be increased and sustained with adoption of improved chickpea production technologies including in-situ rainwater conservation practices at farmers fields. Correlation studies also indicate that grain weight, stover weight and total dry matter production per plant ultimately determine the chickpea grain and stover yields in the Vertisols of Bellary region during winter season. Higher gross and net returns with greater B:C ratio was observed with layout of farmers fields with CB and cultivation of JG11 variety.

Keywords

Chickpea Compartmental bunding Varieties Vertisols Winter season.

References

  1. Allolli, T.B., Hulihalli. U.K. and Athani. S.I. (2008). Influence of in-situ moisture conservation practices on the performance of dryland chilli. Karnataka J. Agric. Sci., 21: 253–255. 
  2. Anonymous. (2011). Vision 2030, Indian Institute of Pulses Research, Kanpur. pp iii-vii.
  3. Black, C.A. (1965). Methods of Analysis, Part II. Chemical and microbial properties. American Society of Agronomy, Incorporation, Madison Wisconsin, United States of America, No. 9, pp. 1569.
  4. Chandrasekhara, U.M. (2009). Perceptions and adaptations to climate change and variability by coffee growers in the hill district of Chickmaglur, Karnataka India. Paper presented in the International Workshop on Sustainable Land Management in Marginal Mountain Areas: Vulnerability and Adaptation to Global changes, organized by United Nations University, Tokyo and Jawaharlal Nehru University, Delhi at North-Eastern Hill University, Shillong, India on November 9–11, 2009.
  5. Chaturvedi, S.K., Nadarajan., N., Singh, S.K. and Mishra, J.P. (2010). Strategies for enhancing pulses production in Bundelkhand tracts of U.P. and M.P. In: Extension strategy for Bundelkhand region, ZPD, Zone-IV, ICAR, Kanpur.
  6. Gomez, K.A. and Gomez, A.A. (1984). Statistical Procedures for Agricultural Research. 2nd Edition. A Wiley–Interscience Publication., New York, 657p.
  7. Jackson, U.L. (1967). Soil Chemical Analysis. Prentice–Hall of India Private Ltd, New Delhi, pp. 498.
  8. Kumar S., Arora, P.P. and Jeena, A.S. (2002). Correlation analysis in chickpea. Agric. Sci. Digest, 22: 134–135.
  9. Lutfor Rahman S.M. and Mesbah Uddin. A.S.M. (2000). Ecological Adaptation of Chickpea (Cicer Arietinum L) to water stress-2. Grain yield, harvest index, flowering and maturity studies. Legume Res., 23: 1–8.
  10. Meerasab, H.J. and Guled. M.B. (2013). Effect of sara method of in situ moisture conservation practices and intercropping system on yield of rabi sorghum and chickpea. Karnataka J. Agric. Sci., 26: 356–359. 
  11. Muhr, G.R., Datta. N.P., Shankaranbramoney. H., Lely, V.P. and Donahaue, R.L. (1965). Soil testing in India. USAID, New Delhi, India. pp. 39–41.
  12. Nadarajan, N. (2013). Prospects and strategies for increasing pulses production in the potential states. In Training Manual ‘Model Training Course on Management of Pest and Diseases in Pulse Crops’ organized at IIPR, Kanpur, pp. 1–18.
  13. Patil, S.L. (2013). Winter sorghum (Sorghum bicolor) productivity as influenced by tillage practices and nitrogen management in Vertisols of SAT, India. Soil & Tillage Res. 126: 183–192.
  14. Patil, S.L., Mishra., P.K., Loganandhan., N. Math., S.K.N., Manikatti, S.M. and Seshadri. B.N. (2015). Suitable chickpea cultivars for rainfed situations in black soils of South India. Legume Res., 38(2): 229–234.
  15. Patil, S.L., Mishra, P.K., Loganandhan., N., Ramesha, M.N. and Math, S.K.N. (2014). Energy, economics, and water use efficiency of chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.) cultivars in Vertisols of semi-arid tropics, India. Current Sci., 107: 656–664.
  16. Patil S.L. and Sheelavantar. M.N. (2004). Effect of cultural practices on soil properties, moisture conservation and grain yield of winter sorghum (Sorghum bicolar L. Moench) in Semi–Arid Tropics of India. Agric. Water Manage. 64: 49–67.
  17. Piper, C.S. (1966). Soil and Plant Analysis. Academic Press, New York, USA. pp. 47–77.
  18. Rao S.K. and Kumar, K.S. (2000). Analysis of yield factors in short duration chickpeas (Cicer arietinum). Agric. Sci. Digest. 20: 66–67.
  19. Rao, C.S., Steiner, J.L. and Mayeux, H.S. (2007). The Role of World’s Agricultural Lands for Future Food Security in India, In Book on Challenges and Strategies for Dryland Agriculture (Ed. Barbarick, K.A. and Co-Ed. Rao, C.S. and John Ryan), pp. 1–10.
  20. Samra, J.S. (2009). A report on drought mitigation strategies for Bundelkhand region of U.P. and M.P. Rainfed Authority of India, New Delhi. pp.12. 
  21. Selvaraju, R., Subbian. P., Balasubramanian. A. and Lal. R. (1999). Land configuration and soil nutrient management options for sustainable crop production on Alfisols and Vertisols of southern peninsular India. Soil & Till Res., 52: 203–216.
  22. Shah, N.A., Aujla., K.M. Abbas. M. and Mahmood. K. (2007). The Economics of Chickpea Production in the Thal Desert of Pakistan. Pakistan J Life and Social Sci., 5(1–2): 6–10.
  23. Sharma, S. and Rai, L.K. (2012). Climate change and sustainability of agrodiversity in traditional farming of the Sikkim Himalaya. pp. 191–201.
  24. Singh, R.K. (2012). Soil Water Conservation in Context of Climate Change. Use of Simulation Modelling in Climate Change Research: Special References to natural Resource Management. ICAR Sponsored Short Course Training. 3-12 October, 2012. pp. 185-195.
  25. Singh, H.P., Sharma., K.D., Subba Reddy, G. and Sharma. K.L. (2007). Dryland Agriculture in India, In Book on Challenges and Strategies for Dryland Agriculture (Ed. Barbarick, K.A. and Co-Ed. Rao, C.S. and John Ryan), pp. 67–92.
  26. Singh, L. and A.K. Singh. 2013. Performance of chickpea in varied conditions of Uttar Pradesh. J. Food Legumes 26: 120–123.
  27. Somasundaram, E., A. Jauhar Ali., M.L. Manoharan. and A. Arokiaraj. (2000). Response of crops to different land management practices under sodic soil conditions. Indian J. Agron., 45: 92–96.
  28. Somasundaram, J., B.L. Lakaria., R. Saha., N.K. Sinha., P. Jha., R.S. Chaudhary., R.K. Singh., D. Manadal., K.M. Hati., K. Ramesh., C. Vassanda., A.K. Biswas., P. Dey., K. Sammi Reddy. and A. Subba Rao. (2014). Management of stressed soils of dryland agriculture in semi-arid tropics-A review. Indian J. Soil Conserv., 42: 178–187.
  29. Subbaiah, B.V. and G.L. Asija. (1956). A rapid procedure for the estimation of available nitrogen in soils. Current Sci., 25: 259–260.
  30. Venkateswarlu B. and A.K. Shanker. (2009). Climate change and agriculture: Adaptation and mitigation strategies. Indian J. Agron., 54: 226–230.

Global Footprints