Effect of tillage, mulching and weed management practices on the performance and economics of chickpea 

DOI: 10.18805/lr.v0iOF.3552    | Article Id: LR-3460 | Page : 786-791
Citation :- Effect of tillage, mulching and weed management practiceson the performance and economics of chickpea .Legume Research-An International Journal.2016.(39):786-791

B.R. Manjith Kumar* and S.S. Angadi1 

manjeetkumar2007@gmail.com
Address :

Department of Agronomy, College of Agriculture, UAS, Dharwad-580 005, Karnataka, India.

Abstract

A field experiment was conducted to study the effect of tillage, mulching and weed management practices on growth, yield and uptake of nutrients by chickpea during rabi 2010 and 2011 at MARS, UAS Dharwad, Karnataka. Conventional tillage increased various growth, yield parameters and chickpea yield and also nutrient uptake and nitrogen use efficiency over minimum and zero tillage practices. Significantly higher gross return, net return and B:C ratio were recorded in conventional tillage as compared to minimum and zero tillage practices. Mulching practice showed higher growth, yield and yield parameters of chickpea and also nutrient uptake and economics over minimum and zero tillage practices. Significantly higher growth, chickpea yield and yield parameters, nutrient uptake, gross return, net return and B:C ratio were recorded in application of pendimethalin as compared to other weed management practices.

Keywords

Chickpea Mulching Tillage Weed Management Yield.

References

  1. Arya, R. L.; Lalit Kumar; Singh, K. K. and Kushwaha (2005). Effect of fertilizers and tillage management in rice-chickpea cropping system under varying irrigation schemes. Indian J. Agron., 50: 256-259. 
  2. Bhan, V. M.; Singh, S. D. and Tripathi, S. S. (1976). Influence of weeds on onion (Allium cepa L.) yield and their methods of control using herbicides. Indian J. Weed Sci., 8: 140-144. 
  3. Bradford, J. M. and Peterson, G. A. (2000). Conservation tillage. In Handbook of Soil Science Ed. M E Sumner. CRC Press, Boca Raton, FL (USA). pp. 247–269.
  4. Das, T. K. (2008). Weed Science: Book, published by Jain brothers. pp. 407-430. 
  5. Fang, S. Z.; Xie B. D.; Liu D and Liu J. J. (2011). Effects of mulching materials on nitrogen mineralization, nitrogen availability and poplar growth on degraded agricultural soil. New Forests. 41: 147–162.
  6. Govaerts, B.; Sayre K. D.; Lichter, K.; Dendooven, L. and Deckers, J. (2007). Influence of permanent raised bed planting and residue management on physical and chemical soil quality in rain fed maize/wheat systems. Plant and Soil, 291: 39–54. 
  7. Kushwaha, C. P.; Tripathi, S. K. and Singh, K. P. (2000). Variation in soil microbial biomass and N availability due to residue and tillage management in a dry land rice agroecosystem. Soil Till. Res., 56:153-166.
  8. Lal, R. (1981). Spoil conditions and tillage methods in the tropics. Proceedings of the WARSS/WSS Symposium on No Tillage and Crop Production in the Tropics in Liberia.
  9. Lal, R. (1984). Conservation tillage for sustainable agriculture: tropics versus temperate environments. J. Adv. Agro. 42: 86-197.
  10. Mukundam, B.; Venkata Ramana M.; Subha Lakshmi, C. and Raja, V. (2008). Effect of tillage practices and seed priming on growth and yield of upland crops in rice fallows – a review. Agric. Reviews, 29: 74 – 78. 
  11. Raghvani, B. R.; Goyal, S. N.; Patel, J. C. and Malavia, D. P. (1985). Weed competition in mungbean. Indian J. Weed Sci., 17: 18-21. 
  12. Thripathi, R. S.; Manish Kumar; Panday, N.; Sonboir, H. L. and Panday, D. (2004). Establishment, yield and water use efficiency of on farm rainfed chickpea (Cicer arietinium L.) as influenced by tillage practices. Ann. Agric. Res. New Series. 25: 35-37. 
  13. Verma, U. N.; Srivastava, V. C. and Verma, U. K. (1988). Nitrogen management in wheat under conventional and no tillage conditions in rice- wheat sequence. Indian J. Agron. 33: 37- 43.

Global Footprints