Banner
Current IssueEditorial BoardOnline First Articles
Current IssueEditorial BoardOnline First Articles
Legume Research
Print ISSN: 0250-5371
Online ISSN: 0976-0571
NASS Rating
6.80
SJR
0.32
CiteScore
0.906

Chief Editor:
J. S. Sandhu
Vice Chancellor, SKN Agriculture, University, Jobner, VC, NDUAT, Faizabad, Deputy Director General (Crop Science), Indian Council of Agricultural Research (ICAR), New Delhi
Frequency:Monthly
Indexing:
BIOSIS Preview, ISI Citation Index, Biological Abstracts, Elsevier (Scopus and Embase), AGRICOLA, Go...

Research Article

Legume Research, volume 41 issue 1 (february 2018) : 12-19

Drought tolerance in some populations of grass pea (Lathyrus sativus L.)

Dalila Boukecha, Meriem Laouar, leila Mekliche-Hanifi, Derradji Harek
1Laboratoire AIPV, Ecole Nationale Supérieure d’Agronomie (ENSA), Rue Hassen Badi, Belfort El Harrach, Alger-16000, Algerie.

  • Submitted21-01-2017|

  • Accepted28-08-2017|

  • First Online 05-12-2017|

  • doi 10.18805/LR-346

Cite article:- Boukecha Dalila, Laouar Meriem, Mekliche-Hanifi leila, Harek Derradji (2017). Drought tolerance in some populations of grass pea (Lathyrus sativus L.). Legume Research. 41(1): 12-19. doi: 10.18805/LR-346.

ABSTRACT

In Algeria, the genus Lathyrus is cultivated mainly for grain production (food) and also used as fodder (animal feed). Lathyrus sativus L. or grass pea has a good resistance to drought, salinity and flooding. However, its place is still very limited compared to that of other pulse crops. The objective of this study was the evaluation of 05 Algerian populations and 2 varieties of Lathyrus sativus under drought stress applied during the flowering stage. ANOVA analysis showed that water stress at flowering stage had a significant genotype effect for most traits and significant genotype x stress interaction for flowering date, number of pods, pods weight, number of seeds per pod and seed yield per plant. 21 Lat, 4Lat4-2 and 1Lat-1 genotypes having high performance for pod length, weight pod per plant, seed yield per plant, biological yield and 1000-seed weight are more tolerant to drought.

REFERENCES

  1. Ahmadi, G. Akbarabadi., A. Kahrizi., D. Rezaizad. A. and Gheytouli. M. (2012). Study of drought tolerance of bread wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) genotypes in seedling stage. Biharean Biologist 6 (2) 77-80. 
  2. Boyer, JS. (1982). Plant productivity and environment. Science., 218: 443–448.
  3. Benkova, M. and Zakova. M (2001). Evaluation of selected traits in grasspea (Lathyrus sativus L.) genetic resources. Lathyrus Lathyrism Newsletter., 2: 27–30. 
  4. Campbell, C.G., (1997). Grass pea. Lathyrus sativus L. Promoting the conservation and use of underutilized and neglected crops.8. Institute of Plant Genetics and Crop Plant Research. Gatersleben/International Plant Genetic Resources Institute, Rome,Italy.
  5. Campbell, C.G., Mehra., R. B., Agrawal., S.K., Chen., Y.Z., Abdel-Moneim, A.M., Khawaja., H.I.T., Yadov., C.R., Tay. J.U. and Araya. W.A. (1994). Current status and future strategy in breeding grass pea (Lathyrus sativus L.). Euphytica., 73: 167–175.
  6. Choudhary, A.K. and.Suri, V.K. (2014). Scaling up of pulses production under frontline demonstrations technology programme in Himachal Himalayas, India. Communication in Soil Science and Plant Analysis, 45 (14):1934–48
  7. Choudhary, AK. and. Suri V.K. (2014a). Integrated nutrient management technology for direct-seeded upland rice (Oryza sativa) in north–western Himalayas. Commun Soil Sci Plant Anal., 45(6):777–784
  8. Choudhary, AK. and Suri VK. (2014b). ‘On farm’ participatory technology development on forage cutting and nitrogen management in dual-purpose wheat (Triticum aestivum) in north–western Himalayas. Commun Soil Sci Plant Anal., 45(6):741–750.
  9. Choudhary; A., ,Pandey. P. and Senthil-Kumar. M. (2016). ”Tailored responses to simultaneous drought stress and pathogen infection in plants,” in Drought Stress Tolerance in Plants Vol. 1 eds Hossain M. A., Wani S. H., Bhattacharjee S., Burritt D. J., Tran L.-S. P., editors. (Cham: Springer International Publishing;). 427–438. 10.
  10. Deloche, J.C. (1980): Environmental effect on seed development and seed polarity. Hort Science., 15:775-78.
  11. Gallais, A.1990. Théorie de la sélection en amélioration des plantes (Theory of selection in the improvement of plantes).Collection sciences agronomiques, Masson, Paris.
  12. Granati, E., Bisignano, Chiaretti. D, Polignano. G.and Crino. P. (2001). Seed quality in accessions of Lathyrus spp. Lathyrus Lathyrism Newsletter., 2: 69-71.
  13. Garavandi, M., Farshadfar. E. and Kahrizi. D. (2011). Evaluation of some physiological traits as indicators of drought tolerance in bread wheat genotypes. Russian Journal of Plant Physiology 58(1): 69-75. 
  14. Gunasekara, C.P.,.Martin, L.D, French., RJ., Siddique. K.H. and Walton, M.G. (2006). Genotype by environmental interactions of Indian mustard (Brasicajuncea L.) and canola (Brassica napus L.) in Mediterranean type environments:I. Crop growth and seed yield. European Journal of Agronomy 25: 1-12.
  15. Hanbury, Cd., White., Cl., Mullan. Bp. and Siddique. Khm. (2000). A review of the potential of Lathyrus sativus L. and L. cicera L. seed for use as animal feed. Animal Feed Science and Technology., 87: 1-27.
  16. Henry, J.L. and Mcdonald. K.B. (1978). The effects of soil and fertilizer nitrogen and moisture stress on yield, oil and protein content of rape. Can. J. Plant Sci., 58: 303-310.
  17. Jiao, C.J.,. Jiang. J. L, M. Ke L., W. Cheng., M. Li., X. Li Z. and Wang. C.Y. (2011). Factors affecting beta-ODAP content in Lathyrus sativus and their possible physiological mechanisms. Food Chem. Toxicol., 49: 543–549.
  18. Kahrizi, D. and Allahvarand. T. (2012). Estimation and Interrelationships of Genetic Variability Parameters of Some Morpho-    phenological Traits in SpringRapeseed (Brassica napus L.). Asian Journal of Biological Sciences., 57: 358-364
  19. Kakaei, M., Kahrizi. D. and Ebadi. A.G. (2010). Study of drought response extremes wheat varieties via seed storage constitutive proteins. American Journal of Scientific Research., 12: 32-35.
  20. Karadag, Y. and Yavuz. M. (2010). Seed yields and biochemical compounds of grass pea (Lathyrus sativus L.) lines grown in semi-arid regions of Turkey. African Journal of Biotechnology Vol. 9(49): 8343-8348.
  21. Keati, J.D.H. and Cooper. P.J.M. (1998). Kabuli chickpea as winter –sown crop in northern Syria: moisture relations and crop productivity. Journal of Agricultural Science., 100: 667-680.
  22. Khalid, Kh.A. (2006). Influence of water stress on growth, essential oil and chemical composition of herbs (Ocimum sp), International Agrophysics., 20: 289-296.
  23. Korte, L.L., Williams., J.H., Specht. J.E. and. Sorenson. R.C (1983). Irrigation of soybean genotypes during reproductive ontogeny: II. Yield component responses. Crop Science., 23: 528-533.
  24. Korus, J., Wituak., M., Juszczak. L. and Ziobro. R. (2008). Grass pea (Lathyrus sativus L.) starch as an alternative for cereal starches. Rheological properties and retrogradation susceptibility., J. Food Eng., 88: 528–534.
  25. Lopez, FB., Johansen C. and Chauhan. YS. (1996). Effect of timing of drought stress on phenology, yield and yield components of a short-duration pigeon pea. J Agron & Crop Sci. 177: 311-320.
  26. Mafakheri, A., Siosemardeh., B. Bahramnejad., A., Struik. P.C. and Sohrabi. E. (2010). Effect of drought stress on yield, proline and chlorophyll contents in three chickpea cultivars. Australian Journal of Crop Science., 4(8):580-585
  27. Milczak, M., Pedzinski., M., Mnichowska., H., Szwedurbas K. and Rybinski. W. (2001). Creative breeding of grass pea (Lathyrus sativus L.) in Poland. Lathyrus Lathyrism Newsletter., 2: 85-88.
  28. Mirzaei, A., Naseri., R., Vafa. P. and Moradi. M. (2014). Effects of Drought Stress on qualitative and quantitative traits of mungbean. Biomolecular Agricultural, Food and Biotechnological Engineering., 8: 148-152.
  29. Mouhouche, B., Ruget. F. and Delecolle. R. (1998). Effect of water-stress applied at different phonological phase on yield components of dwarf bean. Agronomie.,18: 197-207.
  30. Nasri, M., Zahedi., H., Tohidi Moghadam., H.R., Ghooshchi. F. and Paknejad. F. (2008). Investigation of water stress on macroelements in Canola genotypes leaf (Brassica napus). American Journal of Agricultural and Biological Sciences., 3(4): 669-672.
  31. Osuagwu, G.G.E. and Edeoga. H. O. (2013). The effect of water stress (drought) on the proximate composition of the leaves of Ocimum gratissimum and Gongronema latifolium. International Journal of Medicinal and Aromatic Plants., 3 (2): 293-299. 
  32. Pandy, P.K., Maranville J.W..and Admou. A. (2001): Tropical wheat response to irrigation and nitrogen in a Sahelian environment. I. Grain yield, yield components and water use efficiency. European Journal of Agronomy., 15: 93-105.
  33. Pilbeam, CJ., Akatse., JK, Hebblethwaite. PD. and Wright. CD. (1992). Yield production in two contrasting forms of spring-sown faba beans in relation to water supply. Field Crops Res. 29: 73-287.
  34. Sadaqat, H.A., Nadeem Thahir M.H. and. Hussain. M. T (2003). Physiogenetics aspects of drought tolerance in canola (Brassica napus L.). J. Agric. Biol. 5: 611-614.
  35. VazPatto, M.C., Skiba., B., Pang., E.C.K., Ochatt., S.J., Lambein. F .and Rubiales. D. (2006). Lathyrus improvement for resistance against biotic and abiotic stresses: From classical reeding to marker assisted selection. Euphytica., 147: 133–147.
  36. Vidyadha, B., Chand., P.D., Swanalatha., I., Vijaya Sai Reddy M. and Ramachandraiah. D. (2007). Genetic variability and character association in pearl millet (Pennisetum glucum L.) R. BR.) and implication in selection. Indian J. Agric. Res., 41: 150 – 153.
  37. Zebarjadi A., Mirany., T., Kahrizi., D., Ghobadi. M. and .Nikoseresht. R . (2012). Assessment of drought tolerance in some bread wheat genotypes using drought resistance indices. Biharean Biologist., 6: 94-98.
  38. Zirgoli, Mh. and Kahrizi D. (2015). Effects of end-season drought stress on yield and yield components of rapeseed (Brassica napus L.) in warm regions of Kermanshah Province. Bihraen biologist., 9: 133-140.
Reviewed By

Download Article
In this Article
    Contact us
    Follow us

    Editorial Board

    View all (0)