Loading...

Influence of rhizobium inoculation, split nitrogen application and plant geometry on productivity of garden pea (Pisum sativum L.) in an acid alfisol
 

DOI: 10.18805/lr.v39i6.6642    | Article Id: LR-3418 | Page : 955-961
Citation :- Influence of rhizobium inoculation, split nitrogen application and plantgeometry on productivity of garden pea (Pisum sativum L.) in an acid alfisol .Legume Research.2016.(39):955-961

Akhilesh Sharma*1, Raj Paul Sharma2 and Saurabh Singh3

assharmaakhil1@gmail.com
Address :

Department of Vegetable Science & Floriculture, CSK Himachal Pradesh Agricultural University, Palampur, 176 062, India.

Submitted Date : 19-01-2015
Accepted Date : 3-02-2016

Abstract

A field experiment comprising of twelve treatment combinations was conducted for two years at Himachal Pradesh Agricultural University, Palampur, India. Crop geometry treatment comprising of two row spacings (60 cm × 10 cm and 45 cm × 10 cm) were allocated to the main plots and six nitrogen management practices namely, Rhizobium inoculation in conjunction with 75 and 50 per cent of recommended N either as basal or split application and  recommended N (100 %) were assigned in sub-plots. Wider spacing resulted in significant higher seed yield (7.3%) over close spacing along with superior performance of component traits and nutrient uptake. The split applied nitrogen resulted in better performance of different parameters which together enhanced seed yield by 13.8 per cent  over recommended N as basal application. Augmentation of nitrogen with Rhizobium culture positively improved growth and yield parameters leading to net saving of  25 per cent  N fertilizers as evident from higher seed yield in treatment comprising 75 per cent split applied N + Rhizobium over recommended N. Interaction effects of split applied N at both row spacings resulted in better performance for seed yield, other related traits and uptake of NPK. Split applied 100 per cent N at wide spacing resulted in 15.5 and 23.6 per cent higher seed yield over recommended N at wider and close spacing, respectively. It could be concluded that Rhizobium inoculation could save 25per cent  synthetic fertilizer N. Wider spacing (60 cm × 10 cm) and split applied nitrogen was a better preposition for enhancing productivity of pea in an acid alfisol under north western Himalayas.
 

Keywords

Nutrient uptake Pisum sativum L. Productivity Rhizobium Row spacing Split applied N Soil fertility.

References

  1. Adesemoye, A.O., Torbert, H.A. and Kloepper, J. W. (2009). Plant growth promoting rhizobacteria allow reduced application rates of chemical fertilizers. Microb. Ecol., 58: 921–929.
  2. Ahmad, A., Abrol, Y.P. and Abdin, M.Z. (1999). Effect of split application of sulphur and nitrogen on growth and yield attributes of Brassica genotypes differing in time of flowering. Canadian J. Plant Sci., 79: 175-180.
  3. Bahadur, A. and Singh, K.P. (2005). Optimization of spacing and drip irrigation scheduling in indeterminate tomato. Indian J. Agric. Sci., 75: 563-565.
  4. Feinerman, E., Choi, E.K. and Johnson, S.R. (1990). Uncertainty and Split Nitrogen Application in Corn Production. American J. Agri. Eco., 72: 975–984.
  5. Gaud, V.V. and Kale, H. B. (2010). Productivity and profitability of pigeonpea under different source of nutrients in rainfed condition of central India. J. Food Legumes, 23: 212–217.
  6. Gautam, A.K., Kumar, D., Shivay, Y.S. and Mishra, B.N. (2008). Influence of nitrogen levels and plant spacing on growth, productivity and quality of two inbred varieties and a hybrid of aromatic rice. Archives of Agron. and Soil Sci., 54: 515-532. 
  7. Gomez, K.A. and Gomez, A.A. (1984). Statistical Procedures for Agricultural Research, 2nd ed. John Willey and Sons, New York.
  8. Jackson, M.L. (1973). In: Soil Chemical Analysis. Prentice Hall of India, New Delhi.
  9. Khanna, V. and Sharma, P. (2011). Potential for enhancing lentil (Lens culinaris) productivity by co-inoculation with PSB, plant growth-promoting rhizobacteria and Rhizobium. Indian J. Agric. Sci., 81: 932–934.
  10. Kumar, A. and Dhar, S. (2010). Evaluation of organic and inorganic sources of nutrients in maize (Zea mays) and their residual effect on wheat (Triticum aestivum) under different fertility levels. Indian J. Agric. Sci., 80: 364–371.
  11. Malik, B.S., Paul, S., Sharma, R.K., Sethi, A.P. and Verma, O.P. (2005). Effect of Azotobacter chroococcum on wheat (Triticum aestivum) yield and its attributing components. Indian J. Agric. Sci., 75: 600-602. 
  12. Qureshi, M.A., Ahmad, M.J., Naveed, M., Iqbal, A., Akhtar, N. and Niazi, K.H. (2009). Co-inoculation with Mesorhizobium ciceri and Azotobacter chroococcum for improving growth, nodulation and yield of chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.). Soil and Environ., 28: 124–129.
  13. Sharma, A., Kapur, P., Katoch, V., Singh, Y. and Sharma, J.D. (2013). Development of powdery mildew resistant genotypes in garden pea (Pisum sativum L.) through generation mean analysis approach. Indian J. Genet., 73: 371-377. 
  14. Sharma, A., Sharma, R.P., Sharma, G.D., Sankhyan, N.K. and Sharma, M. (2014). Integrated nutrient supply system for cauliflower-frenchbean-okra cropping sequence in humid temperate zone of north-western Himalayas. Indian J. Hort., 71: 211-216.
  15. Shrikanth, A.S., Channaveerswami, S., Tirakannanavar, C.P. and Hosamani, R.M. (2008). Effect of spacings and fertilizer levels on crop growth and seed yield in lablab bean (Lablab purpureus L.). Karnataka J. Agric. Sci., 21:440-443.
  16. Sutaria, G.S., Kabari, K.N., Vora, V.D., Hirpara, D.S. and Padmani, D.R. (2010). Response of legume crops to enriched compost and vermicompost on Ustochrept under rainfed Agriculture. Legume Res., 33: 128–130.
  17. Tamhane, R.V., Motiramani, D.P., Bali, V.D. and Roy, L.D. (1964). In: Soil- Their chemistry and fertility in Tropical Asia. Prentice Hall of India. Pvt. Ltd., New Delhi.
  18. Taran, B., Zhang, C., Warkentin, T., Tullu, A. and Vandenberg, A. (2005). Genetic diversity among varieties and wild species accessions of pea (Pisum sativum L.) based on molecular markers, morphological and physiological characters. Genome, 48: 257-272.
     

Global Footprints