Loading...

Response of groundnut (Arachis hypogaea L.) cultivars to late leaf spot disease (Passalora personata) under different sowing dates 

DOI: 10.18805/lr.v39i6.6648    | Article Id: LR-3392 | Page : 1028-1033
Citation :- Response of groundnut (Arachis hypogaea L.) cultivars to late leaf spot disease (Passalora personata) under different sowing dates .Legume Research.2016.(39):1028-1033

Utpal Dey1, D.N. Dhutraj1, A.P. Suryawanshi1, Ritika Bhattacharjee1 and Diganggana Talukdar2

utpaldey86@gmail.com
Address :

Department of Plant Pathology, Vasantrao Naik Marathwada Krishi Vidyapeeth, Parbhani-431 402, Maharashtra, India.

Submitted Date : 12-12-2014
Accepted Date : 22-10-2016

Abstract

Experiments were conducted to investigate the effect of date of sowing on groundnut cultivars against late leaf spot disease severity, defoliation, frequency and size of the leaf spot which revealed that all these aspects were significantly influenced by the date of sowing and crop varieties which directly affect the pod yield and test weight. The crop sown early on 25th June exhibited maximum mean late leaf spot disease severity (range 43.63 to 54.05%), defoliation (range, 17.22 to 22.30%), frequency (range, 1.32 to 1.78 / mm2) and size (range, 1.49 to 1.56 / mm2) and thereby gave reduced pod yield (range, 1225 to 1720 kg/ha) and test weight (28.66 to 32.97 g) followed by 10th July and 25th July. Among the groundnut cultivars, susceptible cv. JL 24 exhibited maximum mean disease severity (range, 35.94 to 54.05 %), defoliation (range, 11.61 to 22.30 %), frequency (range, 1.23 to 1.78 / mm2) and size (range, 1.26 to 1.56 / mm2), followed by TAG 24 and TG 26. However, LGN 1 exhibited least mean disease severity, defoliation, frequency and size with the highest pod yield (ranges, 1720 to 2332 kg/ha) and test weight (ranges, 32.97 to 38.59 g).  

Keywords

Arachis hypogaea Cultivar Defoliation Frequency Leaf spot Size Passalora  personata Severity Sowing dates.

References

  1. Biere, A. and Antonovics, J. (1996). Sex-specific costs of resistance to the fungal pathogen Ustilago violacea (Microbotryum violaceum) in Silene alba. Evolution, 50:1098-1110. 
  2. Chandra, S., Paliwal, S.P. and Sarma, B.K. (2004). Components of resistance is some selected groundnut genotypes to Cercospora arachidicola. J. Mycol. Pl. Pathol. 34: 900-902. 
  3. Dandnaik, B.P., Wadikar, V.B. and Mujawar, D.Y. (1996). Varietal response to various diseases of groundnut and different sowing dates in the post rainy seasons. IAN, 16:29-33.
  4. Gadhave, R.N., Mogle, T.R. and Nikam, P.S. (2011). Influence of dates of sowing on incidence of Alternaria blight of sunflower. J. Pl. Dis. Sci. 6: 124-127.
  5. Galgunde, L.P. and Kurundkar, B.P. (2002). Foliar diseases of groundnut genotypes grown in post rainy season. J. Soils and Crops. 12:78-84.
  6. Grichar, W.J., Besler, B.A. and Jaks, A.J. (1998). Peanut (Arachis hypogaea L.) cultivar response to leaf spot disease development under four disease management programs. Peanut Sci. 25: 35-39.
  7. Hazarika, D.K., Dubey, L.N. and Das, K.K. (2000). Effect of sowing dates and weather factors on development of leaf spots and rust of groundnut. J. Mycol. Pl. Path. 30:27-30.
  8. Hegde, V. M., Subramanyam, K., Gowda, M. V. C., and Prabhu, T. G. (1995). Estimation of yield loss due to late leaf spot disease in spanish groundnut in Karnataka. Karolinska. J. Agric. Sci. 8:355-359.
  9. Maloy, O.C. and Baudoin, A.(2001). Disease Control Principles. in: Enclyclopedia of Plant Pathology, [O.C. Maloy and T.D. Murray, eds]. Wiley, New York, Pp: 330-332.
  10. Mayee, C.D. and Suryawanshi, A.P. (1995). Structural defence mechanisms in groundnut to late leaf spot pathogen. Indian Phytopath., 48:160-165.
  11. Mc Kinney (1923). A new system of grading plant diseases. J. Agril. Res. 26: 195-218. 
  12. McDonald, D., Subrahmanyam, P., Gibbons, R.W., and Smith, D.H. (1985). Early and late leaf spots of groundnut. Information Bulletin no. 21. Patancheru, A.P. 502 324, India: International Crops Research Institute for the Semi-    Arid Tropics.
  13. Middleton, K.J., Pande, S., Sharma, S.B., Smith, D.H., (1994). Diseases. In: The Groundnut Crop: A Scientific Basis for Improvement, Smart, J. (Ed.). Chapman & Hall Ltd. Scientific, London, pp. 336–394
  14. Mittal, R. K. (1999). Cultural management of foliar diseases of blackgram in hills of Uttar Pradesh. Journal of Mycology and Plant Pathology, 29: 128-130.
  15. Naab, J.B., Tsigbey, F.K., Prasad, P.V.V., Boote, K.J., Bailey, J.E., Brandenburg, R.L., (2005). Effects of sowing date and fungicide application on yield of early and late maturing groundnut cultivars grown under rainfed conditions in Ghana, Crop Protection. 24:325-332.
  16. Nutsugah, S.K., Oti-Boateng, C., Tsigbey, F.K., Brandenburg, R.L. (2007). Assessment of yield losses due to early and late leaf spots of groundnut (Arachis hypogaea L.). Ghana Journal of Agricultural Science. 40: 21-27. 
  17. Prasad, R., Singh, H.C., and Singh, S.K. (2001). Effect of sowing date, temperature and relative humidity on the incidence of net blotch of barley. Indian Phytopath. 54: 304-306.
  18. Rashid, M.H., Aktar, M. S., Hossain, I., Rahmam, M. M., Hasnat, M. R., and Nair, R.M. (2013). Effect of dates of sowing on incidence and severity of Mungbean Yellow Mosaic Virus and Cercospora Leaf spot of mungbean. Int. J. Advancements in Res. & Tech., 2:96-105.
  19. Singh, M. and Chand, J.N. (1985). Epidemiology of net blotch of barley caused by Helminthosporium teres. Indian Phytopath. 38: 653-658.
  20. Singh, N.K., Kumar, K.R.R., Kumar, D., Shukla, P. and Kirti, P.B. (2013). Characterization of a Pathogen Induced Thaumatin-    Like Protein Gene AdTLP from Arachis diogoi, a Wild Peanut. PLoS ONE, 8: e83963. doi:10.1371/journal. pone.0083963.
  21. Stockle,C. O., Donatelli, M. and Nelson, R.(2003). CropSyst, a cropping system simulation model. Europ. J. Agronomy. 18: 289-307.
  22. Subasinghe Ananda H.M.P., Bains G.S. and Mohan C. (2009). Effect of sowing dates and meterological parameters on development of white rust disease in Indian mustard. Pl. Dis. Res. 24: 166-169.
  23. Subha Rao; Subrahmanyam, P.V. and Reddy, P.M. (1990). A modified nine point disease scale for assessment of rust and late leaf spot of groundnut. In : Second International Congress of the French Phytopathological Society, Montpellier, France.
  24. Subrahmanyam, P., McDonald, D., Gibbons, R. W., Nigam, S. N. and Nevill, D. L. (1982). “Resistance to Rust and Late Leaf Spot Diseases in Some Genotypes of Arachis hypogaea,” Peanut Science, 9: 6-10. doi:10.3146/i0095-    3679-9-1-2.
  25. Suriharn, B., Patanothai, A., Boote, K.J.K.J and Hoogenboom, G. (2011). Designing a peanut ideotype for target environment using the CSM-CROPGRO- Peanut model. Crop Sci., 51: 1887-1902. 
  26. Tiwari, R.K.S., Tiwari, R.B., Singh, A., Rajput, M.L. (2005). Influence of time of sowing on the incidence of leaf spot caused by Cercospora arachidicola Hori and Cercosporidium personatum (Berk. & Curt.) (Deighton) and economics of spray schedules in groundnut (Arachis hypogea L.). Advances in Plant Sciences. 18: 591-595.
  27. Tshilenge, L. (2010). “Pathosystem Groundnut (Arachis hypo-gaea L.), Cercospora spp. and Environment in DR-Congo: Overtime Interrelations,” In: K. K. C. Nkongolo, Ed., Contribution to Food Security and Malnutrition in DR- Congo, Laurentian Press, 2010, pp. 195-221. 

Global Footprints