Legume Research

  • Chief EditorJ. S. Sandhu

  • Print ISSN 0250-5371

  • Online ISSN 0976-0571

  • NAAS Rating 6.80

  • SJR 0.391

  • Impact Factor 0.8 (2024)

Frequency :
Monthly (January, February, March, April, May, June, July, August, September, October, November and December)
Indexing Services :
BIOSIS Preview, ISI Citation Index, Biological Abstracts, Elsevier (Scopus and Embase), AGRICOLA, Google Scholar, CrossRef, CAB Abstracting Journals, Chemical Abstracts, Indian Science Abstracts, EBSCO Indexing Services, Index Copernicus
Submit

Research Article

Legume Research, volume 41 issue 1 (february 2018) : 108-113

Optimizing mungbean productivity and irrigation water use efficiency through the use of low water- consumption during plant growth stages
 

Fathy S. El-Nakhlawy, Saleh M. Ismail andJalal M. Basahi
1Arid Land Agriculture Department, Faculty of Meteorology, Environment and Arid Land Agriculture, King Abdulaziz University, Jeddah, Saudi Arabia.
Cite article:- El-Nakhlawy S. Fathy, Basahi M. andJalal Ismail M. Saleh (2017). Optimizing mungbean productivity and irrigation water use efficiency through the use of low water- consumption during plant growth stages. Legume Research. 41(1): 108-113. doi: 10.18805/lr.v40i04.9014.

ABSTRACT

This research was conducted during 2014/2015 and 2015/2016 seasonsin the Agricultural Research Station, King Abdulaziz University at Hada Al-Sham region,  Saudi Arabia to produce mungbean as a new legume crop in Saudi Arabia using low water consumption through maximizing crop yield with optimizing irrigation water use efficiency under drought stress during vegetative and flowering growth stages.No significant differences were found between the yield and yield components when practicing water stress during vegetative stage compared with full irrigation treatment in the two seasons. MN96 cv. was significantly dominated over NMf cv. in all studied traits except flowering date.The highest IWUE and seed yield/ha were obtained from the MN96 cv. under full irrigation and water stress during vegetative stage without significantly differences between them in the two seasons. 

REFERENCES

  1. AbdEl-SalamMS,El-MetwallyIM, Abd El-GhanyHM,Hozayn M. (2013). Potentiality of using mungbean as a summer legume forage crop under Egyptian condition.Journal of Applied Sciences Research.9: 1238-1243.
  2. Allen RG, Pereira LS, Raes D, Smith D. (1998). Crop Evapotranspiration Guide liens forcomputing crop water requirements- FAO Irrigation and drainge paper No. 56. 
  3. Assefa Y, Staggenborg AS, Prasad VP. (2010). Grain Sorghum Water equirement and Responses to Drought Stress: A Review. Crop Management. 9(10): 1109- 1111.
  4. Azab MA.(1997). Salt tolerance of two varieties of Mungbean (VignaradiataL. Wilczek). Zagazig. J. Agri. Res. 24: 11-21.
  5. Begg JE.(1980). Morphological adaptation of leaves to water stress. In: Turner NC, Kramer PJ (eds) Adaptation of plants to water and high temperature stress, John Wiley and Sons, New York.
  6. El-NakhlawyFS. (2010). Experimental Design and Analysis in Scientific Research. Sci. Pub. Center, King Abdulaziz University, Jeddah, Saudi Arabia.
  7. El-Nakhlawy FS and Ghandorah MO. (2009). Applied practices of field crops production. Sci. Pub. Center, King Abdulaziz University, Jeddah, Saudi Arabia.
  8. Fuertes-Mendizabal T, Gonzalez-Murua C, Gonzalez-Moro MB, Estavillo JM. (2012).Late nitrogen fertilization affects nitrogen remobilization in wheat. Journal of Plant Nutrition and Soil Science. 175(1): 115-124. 
  9. Hammad HM, Khaliq A, Ahmad A, Aslam M, MalikAH, Farhad W, Laghari, KQ.(2011). Influence of different organic manures on wheat productivity. International Journal of Agriculture and Biology. 13(1): 137-140.
  10. Haqqani AM and Pandey RK. (1994). Response of Mungbean to aterstress and irrigation at various growth stages and plant densities: II.Yield and yield components. Tropical Agriculture71 (4): 289-294
  11. Ismail SM. (2016). Maximizing production and irrigation water productivity of canola crop (Brassica napus L) under arid land conditions: Irrigation and Drainage.65: 254–263.
  12. Ismail SM and Almarshadi MH. (2013). Effect of water distribution patterns on productivity, fruit quality and water use efficiency of Ziziphus jujube in arid regions under drip irrigation system. Journal of Food, Agriculture and Environment.11: 373-378.
  13. Jaiwal PK, KumariRI, IgnacimuthsS, Potrykus I,SautterC.(2001). Agrobacterium tumefacients-mediated genetic transformation of mungbean- a recalcitrant grain legume. Plant Sci 61: 239-247.
  14. Jordan WR, Ritichie JT. (2002). Influence of soil water stress on evaporation, root absorption and internal water status of cotton. Plant Physiol. 48:783-788.
  15. Khadraji A., Ghoulam C. 2017. Effect of drought on growth, physiological and biochemical processes of chickpea- rhizobia symbiosis. Journal - Legume Research An International Journal. 40 (1) : 94-99.
  16. Kusvuran S., DasganH. (2017).Effects of drought stress on physiological and biochemicalchanges in Phaseolus vulgaris L. Journal - Legume Research An International Journal.40(1) : 55-62.
  17. Madani A,Makarem AH,Vazin F, Joudi M. (2012). The impact of post-anthesis nitrogen and water availability on yield formation of winter wheat. Plant Soil and Environment58(1): 9-14. 
  18. Masomi A, Kafi M, Nezami A, Hoseini H. (2006). Effects drought stress on morphological characteristics of Cheek pea genotypes in greenhouse conditions. Iranian Journal of Agricultural Research. 3 (2): 277-289.
  19. Moradi A, Ahmadi A, Hoseinzadeh A.(2009). Agronomic and Physiological interaction of Mung bean (Partov) to sever and light stress in different stages. Journal of agricultural research. 12 (45): 659-671.
  20. Nielson DC, Nelson NO. (1998). Black Bean Sensitivity to Water Stress at Various Growth Stages. Crop Sci. 38: 422-427.
  21. Pandey RK, Herrera WA, Pendleton JW. (1984). Drought response of grain legume under irrigation gradient. I. Yield and yield components. Agron. J.76: 549- 553.
  22. Pansu M,GautherouJ. (2006). Handbook of Soil Analysis. Mineralogical, Organic and Inorganic Methods. Springer.com. 
  23. Rehman A, Ahmad R,Safdar M. (2011). Effect of hydrogel on the performance of aerobic rice sown under different techniques. Plant Soil and Environment.57: 321-325.
  24. Sadasivan R, Natrajaratnam N, Dabu R, Muralidharan V, Rangasmay SR.(1988). Response of mungbean cultivars to soil moisture stress at different growth phases. Mungbean Proceeding of the Second International Symposium. AVRCD. Pp.260-262.
  25. SAS. (2006). SAS Institute Inc., Cary Nc., USA (Soft Ware Statistical Program). SrivalliB,Chinnusamy V, Chopra RK.(2003). Antioxidant defense in response to abiotic stresses in plants. J. Plant Biol. 30:121-139.
  26. Tahir MM,KhurshidM, KhanMZ,Abbasi MK,Kazmi MH. (2011). Lignite-derived humic acid effect on growth of wheat plants in different soils. Pedosphere 21(1): 24-131.
  27. Thomas M, Robertson J,Fukai S, Peoples MB. 2004. The effect of timing and severity of water deficit on growth development, yield accumulation and nitrogen fixation of mung bean. Field Crops Res.86 : 67-8. 
Reviewed By

Download Article
In this Article
    Contact us
    Follow us

    Editorial Board

    View all (0)