Legume Research

  • Chief EditorJ. S. Sandhu

  • Print ISSN 0250-5371

  • Online ISSN 0976-0571

  • NAAS Rating 6.80

  • SJR 0.391

  • Impact Factor 0.8 (2024)

Frequency :
Monthly (January, February, March, April, May, June, July, August, September, October, November and December)
Indexing Services :
BIOSIS Preview, ISI Citation Index, Biological Abstracts, Elsevier (Scopus and Embase), AGRICOLA, Google Scholar, CrossRef, CAB Abstracting Journals, Chemical Abstracts, Indian Science Abstracts, EBSCO Indexing Services, Index Copernicus
Submit

Research Article

Legume Research, volume 40 issue 3 (june 2017) : 514-519

Potential yield of tidal swamp-adaptive soybean promising lines 

Heru Kuswantoro*, Ratri Tri Hapsari, Apri Sulistyo, Agus Supeno
1<p>Indonesian Legume and Tuber Crops Research Institute,&nbsp;Indonesian Agency for Agricultural Research and Development, Jl. Raya Kendalpayak Km. 8 Malang - Indonesia.<br /> &nbsp;</p>
Cite article:- Kuswantoro* Heru, Hapsari Tri Ratri, Sulistyo Apri, Supeno Agus (2017). Potential yield of tidal swamp-adaptive soybean promising lines . Legume Research. 40(3): 514-519. doi: 10.18805/lr.v0i0.7289.

ABSTRACT

This study was carried out in order to identify suitable soybean lines that were adaptive in tidal swamp land. The research material consisted of 10 soybean promising lines and two varieties (Lawit and Menyapa). The research was carried out in Wanaraya, Barito Kuala, Indonesia, in rainy season  2014. The results showed that among of the 10 soybean lines, Snb/1087-148-2-1 reached the largest grain size (10.04 g/100 grains), followed by Snb/1087-147-2-7 (9.72 g/100 grains) and significantly different to Menyapa (6.86 g/100 grains) and Lawit (9.25 g/100 grains). Although these two lines had larger grain size than Menyapa, but the grain yield per unit area of   these two lines were lower. Menyapa produced 1.67 t/ha, while Snb/1087-148-2-1 and Snb/1087-147-2-7 produced 1.18 and 1.42 t/ha respectively. Lower grain yield of these two lines was due to the smaller number of filled pods when compared to Menyapa variety.

REFERENCES


  1. Aldillah, R. (2015). Proyeksi produksi dan konsumsi kedelai Indonesia. J. Ekonomi Kuantitatif Terapan, 8: 9-23.

  2. Alihamsyah, T., Sarwani, M., Jumberi, A., Ar-Riza, I., Noor, I. and dan Sutikno, H. (2003). Lahan pasang surut: Pendukung ketahanan pangan dan sumber pertumbuhan agribisnis. Balai Penelitian Pertanian Lahan Rawa. Banjarbaru. 54 p

  3. Arsyad, D.M. and Purwantoro. (2010). Kriteria seleksi dan toleransi galur kedelai di lahan kering masam. J. Penelitian Pertanian Tanaman Pangan, 29: 98-104.

  4. Balitkabi [Balai Penelitian Tanaman Aneka Kacang dan Umbi]. (2012). Deskripsi varietas unggul kacang-kacangan dan umbi-umbian. Balitkabi, Malang. 180 p

  5. BPS, 2016. Produksi Padi, Jagung dan Kedelai (2015). Berita Resmi Statistik. No. 62/07/ Th. XIX, 01 Juli 2016. https://    bps.go.id/website/brs_ind/brsInd-20160701100908.pdf 

  6. Harmida. (2010). Respons pertumbuhan galur harapan kedelai (Glicyne max (L.) Merril.) pada lahan masam. J. Penelitian Sains, 13: 41-48.

  7. Jin J, Liu, X., Wang, G., Mi, L., Shen, Z., Chen, X., Herbert, S.J. (2010). Agronomic and physiological contributions to the yield improvement of soybean cultivars released from 1950 to 2006 in Northeast China. Field Crops Research, 115: 116-123.

  8. Jitsuyama, Y. (2015). Morphological root responses of soybean to rhizosphere hypoxia reflect waterlogging tolerance. Can. J. Plant Sci., 95: 999–1005.

  9. Kementerian Pertanian. (2015). Outlook Komoditas Pertanian Tanaman Pangan: Kedelai. Nuryati, L., Waryanto, B., Noviati, and Widaningsih, R. (Eds.). Pusat Data dan Sistem Informasi Pertanian. Kementerian Pertanian. Jakarta.

  10. Kim, Y.H., Hwang, S.J., Waqas, M., Khan, A.L., Lee, J.H., Lee, J.D., Nguyen, H.T. and Lee, I.J. (2015). Comparative analysis of endogenous hormones level in two soybean (Glycine max L.) lines differing in waterlogging tolerance. Front. Plant Sci., 6: 714.

  11. Koesrini and William, E. (2004). Keragaan hasil dan daya toleransi genotipe kedelai di lahan sulfat masam. Bul. Agron., 32 : 33-38.

  12. Kuswantoro, H., Ujianto, L., Sulistyo, A., Hapsari, R.T. (2016). Hasil dan Komponen Hasil Galur-Galur Kedelai di Dua Lokasi. J. Agron. Indonesia, 44: 26-32.

  13. Kuswantoro, H. (2011). Response of soybean genotypes to waterlogging. J. Agron. Indonesia, 39: 19-23.

  14. Kuswantoro, H. (2014). Nutrient uptake of soybean genotypes under aluminum toxicity. Italian J. Agron., 9:136-140.

  15. Kuswantoro, H. (2015). Agronomical characters of some soybean germplasm under waterlogging condition. J. Agron., 14: 93-97.

  16. Kuswantoro, H., Sutrisno., W. Y. Han, P.Y. Lee, Y. H. Cho, and I.Y. Baek. (2014). Performance of Korean Soybean Varieties in Indonesia. Korean J. Int. Agric., 26: 107-113.

  17. Liang, C., Piñeros, M.A., Tian, J., Yao, Z., Sun, L., Liu, J., Shaff, J., Coluccio, A., Kochian, L.V., and Liao, H. (2013). Low pH, aluminum, and phosphorus coordinately regulate malate exudation through GmALMT1 to improve soybean adaptation to acid soils. Plant Physiol., 161: 1347–1361.

  18. Mahbub, M.M., Rahman, M.M., Hossain, M.S., Mahmud, F., and Mir Kabir M.M. (2015). Genetic variability, correlation and path analysis for yield and yield components in soybean. Am.Eurasian J. Agric. Environ. Sci., 15: 231-236.

  19. Nguyen, V.T., Vuong, T.D., VanToai, T., Lee, J.D., Wu, X., Rouf Mian, M.A., Dorrance, A.E., Shannon, J.G., and Nguyen, H.T. (2012). Mapping of quantitative trait loci associated with resistance to Phytophthora sojae and flooding tolerance in soybean. Crop Sci., 52: 2481–2493.

  20. Sabran, M., William, E., and Saleh, M. (2000). Pengujian galur kedelai di lahan pasang surut. Bul. Agron., 28: 41-48.

  21. Sumarno, and Zuraida, N. (2006). Hubungan korelatif dan kausatif antara komponen hasil dengan hasil kedelai. J. Penelitian Pertanian Tanaman Pangan, 25: 38-44.

  22. Taufiq, A.,and Sundari, T. (2012). Respons tanaman kedelai terhadap lingkungan tumbuh. Bul. Palawija, 23: 13-26.

  23. Valencia-Ramirez, R.A., and Ligarreto-Moreno, G.A. (2012). Phenotypic correlation and path analysis for yield in soybean (Glycine max (L.) Merril). Acta Agronomica, 61: 322-332

  24. Vandamme, E., Renkens, M., Pypers, P., Smolders, E., Vanlauwe, B., and Merckx, R.. (2013). Root hairs explain P uptake efficiency of soybean genotypes grown in a P-deficient Ferralsol. Plant and Soil, 369: 269-282.

  25. VanToai, T.T., Hoa, T.T.C., Hue, N.T.N., Nguyen, H., Shannon, J.G., Bishop, B. (2007). Diversity in tolerance of soybean (Glicyne max L. Merr.) germplasm to soil waterlogging. Paper presented at International Annual Meetings, New Orleans, Louisiana, 4"8 November 2007.

  26. Yardha and Adie, M.M. (2009). Keragaan galur harapan kedelai di lahan pasang surut. Agrista, 13: 58-63.

  27. Zhang, J., Song, Q., Cregan, P.B., Nelson, R.L., Wang, X, Wu J., Jiang, G.L. (2015). Genome-wide association study for flowering time, maturity dates and plant height in early maturing soybean (Glycine max) germplasm. BMC Genomics, 16: 217.

     
Reviewed By

Download Article
In this Article
    Contact us
    Follow us

    Editorial Board

    View all (0)