Banner
Current IssueEditorial BoardOnline First ArticlesArchive
Current IssueEditorial BoardOnline First ArticlesArchive

volume 37 issue 5 (october 2014) : 542-546,   Doi: 10.5958/0976-0571.2014.00673.0

INFLUENCE OF PLANTING TIME, PLANTING GEOMETRY, INTERCROPPING AND ROW DIRECTION ON RUST (UROMYCES VICIAE FABAE) PERS. DE BARY OF FIELD PEA (PISUM SATIVUM L.)

D
Deepak Singh*1
A
Ashish Kumar2
A
Anil K. Singh3
1Centre of Advanced Studies in Plant Pathology G.B. Pant University of Agriculture and Technology, Pantnagar-263 145, India
Cite article:- Singh*1 Deepak, Kumar2 Ashish, Singh3 K. Anil (2025). INFLUENCE OF PLANTING TIME, PLANTING GEOMETRY, INTERCROPPING AND ROW DIRECTION ON RUST (UROMYCES VICIAE FABAE) PERS. DE BARY OF FIELD PEA (PISUM SATIVUM L.). Legume Research. 37(5): 542-546. doi: 10.5958/0976-0571.2014.00673.0.

ABSTRACT

A field experiment was conducted during 1999-2000, 2000-2001 and 2001-2002 to study the effects of cultural practices viz., planting time, planting geometry, intercropping and row direction on disease severity of field pea rust caused by Uromyces viciae fabae and grain yield. Among different time of plantings tested, 13th December planting has recorded the highest disease severity and   minimum grain yield. It was also noticed that planting geometry i.e. row spacing has significant influence on disease severity. The minimum disease severity was recorded in plots having wider row spacing (45 cm) followed by 37.5 and 30 cm. Similarly, minimum rust severity was recorded when field pea was intercropped with mustard.  However, planting direction has not significantly influenced rust severity under Pantnagar (Uttarakhand) condition.

REFERENCES

  1. Anonymous. (2009). ‘Project Coordinator’s Report’. All India Coordinated Research Project on MULLARP. Published by IIPR Kanpur, pp. 2.
  2. Bhardwaj, M.L. and Sharma, J.M. (1996). Performance of early pea genotypes under different sowing times in the hills of Himachal Pradesh. J. Hill Res., 9(1): 62-64.
  3. Chung, W.H., Tsukiboshi, T.O.Y. and Kakishma, M. (2004). Phylogenic analyses of Uromyces viciae-fabae and its varieties on Vicia, Lathyrus and Pisum in Japan. Mycoscience., 45:1-8.
  4. Emeran, A.A., Roma, N.B., Sillero, J.C., Satovi, Z. and Rubiales , D. (2008). Genetic variation among and within Uromyces species infecting legumes. J. Phytopathol., 156: 419-424.
  5. Emeran, A.A., Sillero, J.C., Niks, R.E. and Rubiales, D. (2005). Infection structure of host-specialized isolates of Uromyces viciae-fabae and of other species of Uromyces infecting leguminous crops. Plant Dis., 89:17-22.
  6. Gaumann, E. A. (1998). Comparative Morphology of Fungi, Translated by Caroll William Dodge, Biotech Book, Delhi, 563 pp.
  7. Gomez, K. A. and Gomez, A. A.(1984). Statistical Procedures for Agricultural Research. John Wiley & Sons Inc., Singapore, 2nd Ed.
  8. Hebblethwaite, P.D. (1983). The Faba bean. Butterworths London, U.K., 573pp.
  9. Kushwaha, C., Chand, R. and Srivastava, C.P. (2006). Role of aeciospores in outbreak of pea (Pisvum sativum) rust (Uromyces fabae). Eur. J. Plant Path., 115: 323-330.
  10. Mihailovic, V., Mikic, A.,Cupina,B. and Eric,P. ( 2005). Field pea and vetches in serbia and montenegro Grain Legumes. 44: 25-26.
  11. Mohamed, HAR. (1981). Major disease problems of faba beans in Egypt. In: Faba Bean Improvement (Hawtin, G.C. and Webb, C., Eds.). Martinus Nijhoff Publishers, The Hague, The Netherlands, pp.213-225.
  12. Rashid, K.Y. and Bernier, C.C. (1991) .The effect of rust on yield of faba bean cultivars and slow rusting populations. Can. J. Plant Sci., 71: 967-972.
  13. Sangar, R.B. and Singh, V.K. (1994). Effect of sowing dates and pea varieties on the, severity of rust, powdery mildew and yield. Indian J. Pul. Res., 7(1): 88-89.
  14. Sharma, A.K. (1998). Epidemiology and management of ruts disease of frenchbean. Veg. Sci., 25: 85-88.
  15. Singh , A. K., Singh, Lal., Kumar, C., Kumar, P. and Dimree, S.K. (2010). Para grass hybrid (Brachiaria sp.)- A potential forage for India. Envi. & Ecol. 28 (3): 1715-1721.
  16. Singh, A.K. and Bhatt B.P. (2012). Faba Bean (Vicia faba L.): Potential Leguminous crop of India. ICAR, E. R, Patna, 522pp.
  17. Singh, R.S. (2005). Plant Diseases. Oxford and IBH, New Delhi, 396pp.
  18. Singh, V.K.; Sangar, R.B.S. and Singh, R.N. (1996). Effect of varieties and sowing dates on disease incidence and productivity of fieldpea (Pisum sativum). Indian J. Agron., 41(3): 451-453.
Published In
Legume Research
Article Metrics
Metrics Icon
0
Views
0
Citations
Reviewed By
Share Article
Download Article
In this Article
    Contact us
    Follow us

    volume 37 issue 5 (october 2014) : 542-546,   Doi: 10.5958/0976-0571.2014.00673.0

    INFLUENCE OF PLANTING TIME, PLANTING GEOMETRY, INTERCROPPING AND ROW DIRECTION ON RUST (UROMYCES VICIAE FABAE) PERS. DE BARY OF FIELD PEA (PISUM SATIVUM L.)

    D
    Deepak Singh*1
    A
    Ashish Kumar2
    A
    Anil K. Singh3
    1Centre of Advanced Studies in Plant Pathology G.B. Pant University of Agriculture and Technology, Pantnagar-263 145, India
    Cite article:- Singh*1 Deepak, Kumar2 Ashish, Singh3 K. Anil (2025). INFLUENCE OF PLANTING TIME, PLANTING GEOMETRY, INTERCROPPING AND ROW DIRECTION ON RUST (UROMYCES VICIAE FABAE) PERS. DE BARY OF FIELD PEA (PISUM SATIVUM L.). Legume Research. 37(5): 542-546. doi: 10.5958/0976-0571.2014.00673.0.

    ABSTRACT

    A field experiment was conducted during 1999-2000, 2000-2001 and 2001-2002 to study the effects of cultural practices viz., planting time, planting geometry, intercropping and row direction on disease severity of field pea rust caused by Uromyces viciae fabae and grain yield. Among different time of plantings tested, 13th December planting has recorded the highest disease severity and   minimum grain yield. It was also noticed that planting geometry i.e. row spacing has significant influence on disease severity. The minimum disease severity was recorded in plots having wider row spacing (45 cm) followed by 37.5 and 30 cm. Similarly, minimum rust severity was recorded when field pea was intercropped with mustard.  However, planting direction has not significantly influenced rust severity under Pantnagar (Uttarakhand) condition.

    REFERENCES

    1. Anonymous. (2009). ‘Project Coordinator’s Report’. All India Coordinated Research Project on MULLARP. Published by IIPR Kanpur, pp. 2.
    2. Bhardwaj, M.L. and Sharma, J.M. (1996). Performance of early pea genotypes under different sowing times in the hills of Himachal Pradesh. J. Hill Res., 9(1): 62-64.
    3. Chung, W.H., Tsukiboshi, T.O.Y. and Kakishma, M. (2004). Phylogenic analyses of Uromyces viciae-fabae and its varieties on Vicia, Lathyrus and Pisum in Japan. Mycoscience., 45:1-8.
    4. Emeran, A.A., Roma, N.B., Sillero, J.C., Satovi, Z. and Rubiales , D. (2008). Genetic variation among and within Uromyces species infecting legumes. J. Phytopathol., 156: 419-424.
    5. Emeran, A.A., Sillero, J.C., Niks, R.E. and Rubiales, D. (2005). Infection structure of host-specialized isolates of Uromyces viciae-fabae and of other species of Uromyces infecting leguminous crops. Plant Dis., 89:17-22.
    6. Gaumann, E. A. (1998). Comparative Morphology of Fungi, Translated by Caroll William Dodge, Biotech Book, Delhi, 563 pp.
    7. Gomez, K. A. and Gomez, A. A.(1984). Statistical Procedures for Agricultural Research. John Wiley & Sons Inc., Singapore, 2nd Ed.
    8. Hebblethwaite, P.D. (1983). The Faba bean. Butterworths London, U.K., 573pp.
    9. Kushwaha, C., Chand, R. and Srivastava, C.P. (2006). Role of aeciospores in outbreak of pea (Pisvum sativum) rust (Uromyces fabae). Eur. J. Plant Path., 115: 323-330.
    10. Mihailovic, V., Mikic, A.,Cupina,B. and Eric,P. ( 2005). Field pea and vetches in serbia and montenegro Grain Legumes. 44: 25-26.
    11. Mohamed, HAR. (1981). Major disease problems of faba beans in Egypt. In: Faba Bean Improvement (Hawtin, G.C. and Webb, C., Eds.). Martinus Nijhoff Publishers, The Hague, The Netherlands, pp.213-225.
    12. Rashid, K.Y. and Bernier, C.C. (1991) .The effect of rust on yield of faba bean cultivars and slow rusting populations. Can. J. Plant Sci., 71: 967-972.
    13. Sangar, R.B. and Singh, V.K. (1994). Effect of sowing dates and pea varieties on the, severity of rust, powdery mildew and yield. Indian J. Pul. Res., 7(1): 88-89.
    14. Sharma, A.K. (1998). Epidemiology and management of ruts disease of frenchbean. Veg. Sci., 25: 85-88.
    15. Singh , A. K., Singh, Lal., Kumar, C., Kumar, P. and Dimree, S.K. (2010). Para grass hybrid (Brachiaria sp.)- A potential forage for India. Envi. & Ecol. 28 (3): 1715-1721.
    16. Singh, A.K. and Bhatt B.P. (2012). Faba Bean (Vicia faba L.): Potential Leguminous crop of India. ICAR, E. R, Patna, 522pp.
    17. Singh, R.S. (2005). Plant Diseases. Oxford and IBH, New Delhi, 396pp.
    18. Singh, V.K.; Sangar, R.B.S. and Singh, R.N. (1996). Effect of varieties and sowing dates on disease incidence and productivity of fieldpea (Pisum sativum). Indian J. Agron., 41(3): 451-453.
    In this Article
      Contact us
      Follow us
      Published In
      Legume Research

      Editorial Board

      View all (0)