Banner
Current IssueEditorial BoardOnline First ArticlesArchive
Current IssueEditorial BoardOnline First ArticlesArchive

volume 36 issue 5 (october 2013) : 373-379

HETEROSIS AND COMBINING ABILITY ANALYSIS FOR YIELD AND YIELD CONTRIBUTING TRAITS IN CHICKPEA (CICER ARIETINUM L.)

M
M.S. Gadekar
N
N.S. Dodiya
1Department of Plant Breeding and Genetics, Rajasthan College of Agriculture, Maharan Pratap University of Agriculture and Technology, Udaipur-313 004, India

  • Submitted|

  • First Online |

  • doi

Cite article:- Gadekar M.S., Dodiya N.S. (2025). HETEROSIS AND COMBINING ABILITY ANALYSIS FOR YIELD AND YIELD CONTRIBUTING TRAITS IN CHICKPEA (CICER ARIETINUM L.). Legume Research. 36(5): 373-379. doi: .

ABSTRACT

Analysis of crosses involving six chickpea parents viz., KWR-108, IPC-94-19, DCP-92-3, IPC-97-72, IPC-94-94 and MPJG-2000-108 in diallel mating scheme was carried out to study heterosis and combing ability. Observations were recorded on eleven agronomical characters and seed protein content. Analysis of variance for experimental design revealed significant differences for all the traits except for number of branches per plant. Among the parents, IPC-94-19, IPC-97-72 and MPJG-2000-108 were found to be the best general combiners for yield and most of its contributing characters. Cross IPC-94-19 x IPC-94-94 showed the highest significant positive economic heterosis for grain yield per plant, biological yield per plant and number of pods per plant. Two crosses namely KWR-108 X DCP-92-3 and IPC-94-19 X DCP-92-3 found heterotic for grain yield and other component characters involved one parent as good combiner and these crosses will be useful for the production of superior transgressive segregants in advance generations.

REFERENCES

  1. Bhaduoria and Chaturvedi, S.K. (2003). Heterosis and inbreeding depression for yield and its attributes in chickpea. Annals of Agricultural Research, 24: 804-808.
  2. Deshmukh, R.B., Rodge, R.G., Patil, J.V. and Sahane, D.V. (2001). Heterosis for yield and yield components in relation to cropping systems in pigeonpea. Legume Research, 24: 101-104.
  3. Gautam I., and Gupta D. (2007). Combining ability in chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.). Progressive Agriculture, 7: 143-144.
  4. Griffing, B. (1956). Concept of general and specific combining ability in relation to diallel crossing system. Aust. J. Biol. Sci., 9: 463-493.
  5. Gupta, S.K., Kaur A.S. and Sandhu, J.S. (2007). Combining ability for yield and its components in kabuli chickpea. Crop Improvement, 34: 52-55.
  6. Gupta, S.K., Sandhu, J.S. and Garg T. (2007). Combining ability in desi chickpea. Journal of Food Legumes, 20: 22-24.
  7. Gupta, S.K., Singh S. and Kaur A. (2003). Heterosis for seed yield and its component traits in desi x desi and desi x kabuli crosses of chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.). Crop Improvement, 30: 203-207.
  8. Hegde, V.S., Yadav, S.S. and Kumar, J. (2007). Heterosis and combining ability for biomass and harvest index in chickpea under a drought-prone, short-duration environment. Euphytica, 157: 223-230.
  9. Jahagirdar, J.E. (2003). Line x tester analysis for combining ability in pigeonpea. Indian Journal of Pulses Research, 16: 17-19.
  10. Kulkarni, S.S., Patil, J.V. and Gawande, V.L. (2004). Heterosis studies in chickpea [Cicer arietinum L.]. Journal of Maharashtra Agricultural Universities, 29: 272-276.
  11. Linder, R.C. (1944). Rapid analytical methods for some of the more common inorganic constituents of plant tissues. Plant Physiol, 19: 76-89.
  12. Pandey N., Singh N.B. and Ojha C.B. (1998). Combining ability analysis of parents and hybrids in long-duration pigeonpea. International Chickpea and Pigeonpea Newsletter, 5: 36-38.
  13. Patil, A.B., Salimath, P.M., Patil, S.A., Patil, S.S. and Kulkarni, J.H. (1998). Heterosis for characters related to plant type in chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.). Legume Research, 21: 101-104.
  14. Patil, J. V., Kulkarni, S S. and Gawande, V. L. (2004). Genetics of quantitative characters in chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.). National Journal of Plant Improvement, 6: 96-99.
  15. Sharif A., Bakhsh, A., Arshad M., Haqqani, A.M. and Najma S. (2001). Identification of genetically superior hybrids in chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.). Pakistan Journal of Botany, 33: 403-409.
  16. Sidhu, P.S., Sandhu D., Sekhon, R.S., Sarlach, R.S. and Sandhu, D. (2000). Combining ability studies involving male sterile lines in pigeonpea. Journal of Research Punjab Agricultural University, 37: 1-8.
  17. Singh, O. and Paroda, R.S. (1989). A comparative analysis of combining ability and heterosis in irradiated and non- irradiated diallel populations of chickpea. Indian Journal Pulses Research, 2: 1-9.
Published In
Legume Research
Article Metrics
Metrics Icon
0
Views
0
Citations
Reviewed By
Share Article
Download Article
In this Article
    Contact us
    Follow us

    volume 36 issue 5 (october 2013) : 373-379

    HETEROSIS AND COMBINING ABILITY ANALYSIS FOR YIELD AND YIELD CONTRIBUTING TRAITS IN CHICKPEA (CICER ARIETINUM L.)

    M
    M.S. Gadekar
    N
    N.S. Dodiya
    1Department of Plant Breeding and Genetics, Rajasthan College of Agriculture, Maharan Pratap University of Agriculture and Technology, Udaipur-313 004, India

    • Submitted|

    • First Online |

    • doi

    Cite article:- Gadekar M.S., Dodiya N.S. (2025). HETEROSIS AND COMBINING ABILITY ANALYSIS FOR YIELD AND YIELD CONTRIBUTING TRAITS IN CHICKPEA (CICER ARIETINUM L.). Legume Research. 36(5): 373-379. doi: .

    ABSTRACT

    Analysis of crosses involving six chickpea parents viz., KWR-108, IPC-94-19, DCP-92-3, IPC-97-72, IPC-94-94 and MPJG-2000-108 in diallel mating scheme was carried out to study heterosis and combing ability. Observations were recorded on eleven agronomical characters and seed protein content. Analysis of variance for experimental design revealed significant differences for all the traits except for number of branches per plant. Among the parents, IPC-94-19, IPC-97-72 and MPJG-2000-108 were found to be the best general combiners for yield and most of its contributing characters. Cross IPC-94-19 x IPC-94-94 showed the highest significant positive economic heterosis for grain yield per plant, biological yield per plant and number of pods per plant. Two crosses namely KWR-108 X DCP-92-3 and IPC-94-19 X DCP-92-3 found heterotic for grain yield and other component characters involved one parent as good combiner and these crosses will be useful for the production of superior transgressive segregants in advance generations.

    REFERENCES

    1. Bhaduoria and Chaturvedi, S.K. (2003). Heterosis and inbreeding depression for yield and its attributes in chickpea. Annals of Agricultural Research, 24: 804-808.
    2. Deshmukh, R.B., Rodge, R.G., Patil, J.V. and Sahane, D.V. (2001). Heterosis for yield and yield components in relation to cropping systems in pigeonpea. Legume Research, 24: 101-104.
    3. Gautam I., and Gupta D. (2007). Combining ability in chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.). Progressive Agriculture, 7: 143-144.
    4. Griffing, B. (1956). Concept of general and specific combining ability in relation to diallel crossing system. Aust. J. Biol. Sci., 9: 463-493.
    5. Gupta, S.K., Kaur A.S. and Sandhu, J.S. (2007). Combining ability for yield and its components in kabuli chickpea. Crop Improvement, 34: 52-55.
    6. Gupta, S.K., Sandhu, J.S. and Garg T. (2007). Combining ability in desi chickpea. Journal of Food Legumes, 20: 22-24.
    7. Gupta, S.K., Singh S. and Kaur A. (2003). Heterosis for seed yield and its component traits in desi x desi and desi x kabuli crosses of chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.). Crop Improvement, 30: 203-207.
    8. Hegde, V.S., Yadav, S.S. and Kumar, J. (2007). Heterosis and combining ability for biomass and harvest index in chickpea under a drought-prone, short-duration environment. Euphytica, 157: 223-230.
    9. Jahagirdar, J.E. (2003). Line x tester analysis for combining ability in pigeonpea. Indian Journal of Pulses Research, 16: 17-19.
    10. Kulkarni, S.S., Patil, J.V. and Gawande, V.L. (2004). Heterosis studies in chickpea [Cicer arietinum L.]. Journal of Maharashtra Agricultural Universities, 29: 272-276.
    11. Linder, R.C. (1944). Rapid analytical methods for some of the more common inorganic constituents of plant tissues. Plant Physiol, 19: 76-89.
    12. Pandey N., Singh N.B. and Ojha C.B. (1998). Combining ability analysis of parents and hybrids in long-duration pigeonpea. International Chickpea and Pigeonpea Newsletter, 5: 36-38.
    13. Patil, A.B., Salimath, P.M., Patil, S.A., Patil, S.S. and Kulkarni, J.H. (1998). Heterosis for characters related to plant type in chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.). Legume Research, 21: 101-104.
    14. Patil, J. V., Kulkarni, S S. and Gawande, V. L. (2004). Genetics of quantitative characters in chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.). National Journal of Plant Improvement, 6: 96-99.
    15. Sharif A., Bakhsh, A., Arshad M., Haqqani, A.M. and Najma S. (2001). Identification of genetically superior hybrids in chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.). Pakistan Journal of Botany, 33: 403-409.
    16. Sidhu, P.S., Sandhu D., Sekhon, R.S., Sarlach, R.S. and Sandhu, D. (2000). Combining ability studies involving male sterile lines in pigeonpea. Journal of Research Punjab Agricultural University, 37: 1-8.
    17. Singh, O. and Paroda, R.S. (1989). A comparative analysis of combining ability and heterosis in irradiated and non- irradiated diallel populations of chickpea. Indian Journal Pulses Research, 2: 1-9.
    In this Article
      Contact us
      Follow us
      Published In
      Legume Research

      Editorial Board

      View all (0)