Silage production with intercropped pueraria lobata and zea may L.

DOI: 10.18805/lr.v0i0.7591    | Article Id: LR-268 | Page : 319-324
Citation :- Silage production with intercropped pueraria lobata and zea may L. .Legume Research-An International Journal.2017.(40):319-324

X. Zhang, Y. Zhang, B. Li, C. Xu, and W. Cao and J. Wang*

jianhong1203@sina.com
Address :

Institute of Environment, Resource, soil and fertilizer, Zhejiang Academy of Agricultural Science, Hangzhou 310021, China.

Submitted Date : 7-01-2016
Accepted Date : 7-11-2016

Abstract

In this study, kudzu vine-corn intercropping model and their mixed silage were estimated. Two factor split plot experiment design was used. The main factor was intercropping density (A), with four levels: A0, A1, A2, A3. In which A0 referred to control with only corn. A1 was two lines corn with one line kudzu, which means corn: kudzu =2:1. A2 referred to two lines corn with two lines kudzu, which was kudzu: corn= 2:2. A3 was two lines corn with three lines of kudzu, which meant the ratio between kudzu and corn was 2:3. The vice factor was nitrogen utilization level (B), also with four levels: B0, B1, B2, B3. B0 meant no nitrogen utilization (0 kg/hm2). B1 referred to the nitrogen level at 50 kg/hm2; B2 was 100 kg/hm2 and B3 was 200 kg/hm2. Corn was sowed in April and July separately in kudzu vine field. Two forages were harvested together when the corn was at the milk stage. After that, we measured the yield of the forages and then mixed the samples uniformly in each treatment. The mixed samples were chopped up and made into silage using the bag storage method for 60 days and then the silage quality was estimated by nutrition analysis including crude protein, crude fiber, ashes, fat and pH value. The results showed that, intercropping ratio of kudzu vine and corn was the main factor that influenced the system yield and nutrient content. The influence of nitrogen fertilizer declined as the kudzu vine grew. Intercropping density A1, nitrogen application level B1 or B2 can get the highest nutrient yield, at the same time decrease nitrogen input. Meanwhile, the pH value of the silage was low, which indicated a good silage quality. 

Keywords

Intercrop Pueraria lobata (Willd.) Ohwi Silage Zea may L.

References

  1. Abdul, J. and Riaz, A. (2010). Evaluating the Performance of Direct Seeded Rice in Different Intercropping Systems under Strip Plantation. International Jourbal of Agriculture and Biology. 12: 501-508
  2. Association of Official Analytical Chemists. (1990). Official Methods of Analysis. (15th ed). Arlington Virgninia: AOAC
  3. Chen, M.J. and Jia, S.X. (2002). Forage plants in China. China Agricultural Press, Beijing: 624-626.
  4. Chen, Y.X., Zhou W.D. and Zhang, Y.F. (2004). Optimization production model of agricultural ecosystem in the ecotone between agriculture and animal husbandry in Northeast China. Transactions of the Chinese Society of Agricultural Engineering. 20: 250-254
  5. Du, X.H., Chen, J.F. and Jie, Y.C. (2013). Yield and quality of aerial parts of Pueraria lobata as forage. Hunan Forestry Science & Technology. 5: 24-27 
  6. Ghosh, P.K., Manna, M.C. and Bandyopadhyay. (2006). Interspecific interaction and nutrient use in soybean/sorghum intercropping system. Agronomy Journal. 98: 1097-1108
  7. Karanja, S.M., Kibe, A.M. and Karogo P.N. (2014). Effects of intercrop population density and row orientation on growth and yields of sorghum - cowpea cropping systems in semi arid rongai, Kenya. Journal of Agricultural Science. 6: 1916-9760
  8. Knudsen, M.T., Hauggaard-Nielsen, H. and Joernsgaard, B. (2004). Comparison of interspecific competition and N use in pea–barley, faba bean-barley and lupin-barley intercrops grown at two temperate locations. The Journal of Agricultural Science. 142: 617-627
  9. Li, F.C. and Li, Z.J. (1990). A theoretical pattern of vertical culture in Shandong province. Journal of Shandong Agricultural University. 2: 9-15 
  10. Li, L., Sun, J. and Zhang, F. (2001). Wheat/maize or wheat/soybean strip intercropping: II. Recovery or compensation of maize and soybean after wheat harvesting. Field Crops Research. 71: 173-181
  11. Liu, Z.K., Cao, W.D. and Qin, W.L. (2009). A study on the pattern and effect of Zea mays intercropping with Medicago sativa. Acta Prataculturae Sinica. 18: 158-163
  12. Misra, A.K., Acharya, C.L. and Rao, A.S. (2006). Interspecific Interaction and Nutrient Use in Soybean/Sorghum Intercropping System. Agronomy Journal. 98: 1097-1108
  13. Skelton, L.E. and Barrett, G.W. (2005). A comparison of conventional and alternative agroecosystems using alfalfa (Medicago sativa) and winter wheat (Triticum aestivum). Renewable Agriculture and Food Systems. 20: 38-47
  14. Sleugh, B., Moore, K.J. and George, J.R. (2000) Binary legume-grass mixtures improve forage yield, quality, and seasonal distribution. Agronomy Journal. 92: 24-29
  15. Song, C.M. and Gwan, S.M. (2015). Dynamics of phytoestrogen, isoflavonoids, and its isolation from stems of Pueraria lobata (Willd.) Ohwi growing in Democratic People’s Republic of Korea. Journal of food and drug analysis. 23: 538-544
  16. Strydhorst, S.M., King, J.R. and Lopetinsky, K.J. (2008). Forage potential of intercropping barley with faba bean, lupin, or field pea. Agronomy journal. 100: 182-190
  17. Tang, J.C., Ismael, A.M, and She, L.N. (2005). Nutritional Effects of Soybean Root Architecture in a Maize/Soybean Intercropping System. Scientia Agricultura Sinica. 38:1196-1203
  18. Zhang, D.W., Dai, S.J. and Li, G.H. (2011). Chemical constituents in cane of Pueraria lobata. Chinese Traditional and Herbal Drugs. 42: 649-651

Global Footprints