Loading...

STANDARDIZATION OF SOYBEAN ROW SPACING BASED ON MORPHO-PHYSIOLOGICAL CHARACTERS

Article Id: ARCC521 | Page : 138 - 143
Citation :- STANDARDIZATION OF SOYBEAN ROW SPACING BASED ON MORPHO-PHYSIOLOGICAL CHARACTERS.Legume Research.2012.(35): 138 - 143
M.A. Malek, M. Shafiquzzaman2, M.S. Rahman2, M. Razi Ismail1, M.M.A. Mondal3
Address : Bangladesh Institute of Nuclear Agriculture, Mymensingh-2202, Bangladesh

Abstract

A field experiment was conducted during December 2008 to April 2009 to investigate the effect of genotypes and row spacing on morpho-physiological characters, yield attributes and yield of soybean with three row spacing of 25, 30 and 35 cm. The experiment was laid out in two factor randomized complete block design with four replications. Branch number plant–1, leaf area plant–1, total dry mass plant–1, absolute growth rate, relative growth rate, pod number
plant–1, seed yield plant–1 and harvest index were increased with increasing row spacing while reverse trend was observed in plant height and leaf area index. Results revealed that narrow spacing performed better in seed yield than wider spacing in soybean. The genotype having lower leaf
area requires narrows row spacing and vice versa. On an average over the genotypes, the
row spacing of 30 cm showed the highest seed yield in soybean under Bangladesh conditions.
The optimum row spacing for higher seed yield of genotype BAU-21 and Shohag was 25 cm
while optimum row spacing for genotype BAU-70 was 30 cm. Among the different
genotypes, BAU-70 produced the highest seed yield both plant–1 and ha–1 due to its larger photosynthetic area.

Keywords

Soybean Row spacing Yield.

References

  1. Acko, D.K. and Tradan, S. (2008). Influence of row spacing on the yield of ten cultivars of soybean. Acta Agric. Slovenica, 93:43-50.
  2. Babalal, H.B., Lingaraju, B.S. and Radder, G.D. (2005). Response of soybean genotypes to varying degrees of plant densisty. J. Oil Seeds Res., 22:228-231.
  3. Ball, R.A., Purcell, L.C. and Vories, E.D. (2000). Optimizing soybean plant population for short season production system in the Southern USA. Crop Sci., 40:757-764.
  4. BARC. (2005). Fertilizer Recommendation Guide. Bangladesh Agricultural Research Council (BARC). Farm gate, Dhaka-1215. p. 107.
  5. El-Douby, K.A., Mansour, S.H. and Zohry, A.A. (2002). Effect of plant density on some soybean cultivars under two planting dates. Egyptian J. Agric. Res., 80:275-281.
  6. FAO. (2004). FAOSTAT: FAO statistical databases. FAO, UN, Rome. Available via DIALOG. http://faostat.fao.org/
  7. Gratero, Y. and and Montilla, D. (2003). Effects of row spacing and plant population on performance of two indeterminate soybean cultivars. Bioagro, 15:193-199.
  8. Holshouser, D.L. and Whittaker, J.P. (2002). Plant population and row spacing effects on early soybean production system in the mid-atlantic USA. Agron. J., 94:603-611.
  9. Hunt, R. (1978). Plant growth analysis studies in biology. Edward Arnold Ltd., London. p. 67.
  10. McKevith, B. (2005). Nutritional aspects of oilseeds. Nutr. Bull. 30:p. 1326.
  11. Russell, D.F. (1986). MSTAT-C Pakage Programme. Crop and Soil Sci. Dept., Michigan Univ., USA.
  12. Sattar, M.A. (2001). Biofertilizers in Bangladesh: Problem and prospect. In: Proc. third national workshop on pulses, 11-12 June, 2001. BARC, Farmgate, Dhaka-1207. pp. 95-102.
  13. Smith, J., Woodworth, J.B. and Dashiell, K.E. (1995). Government policy and farm-level technologies: the expansion of soybean in Nigeria. IITA Res. 11:14-18.
  14. Tukamuhabwa, P., Dashiell, K.E. and Assafo-Adjei, B. (2001). Determination of yield loss caused by soybean rust (Phakopsora pachyrhizi Syd.) in four genotypes of soybeans. Afr. Crop Sci. Conf. Proc. 5:423-426.
  15. Yoshida, S., Forno, D.A., Cock, J.A. and Gomes, K.A. (1976). Laboratory Manual for Physiological Studies of Rice. Third ed., IRRI, Los Banos, Philippines.

Global Footprints