Banner
Current IssueEditorial BoardOnline First ArticlesArchive
Current IssueEditorial BoardOnline First ArticlesArchive

volume 29 issue 3 (september 2006) : 169 - 174

MUNGBEAN SEED YIELD IV. EFFECT OF VARIOUS PHYSIOLOGICAL PARAMETERS DURING PRE AND POST FLOWERING PERIODS

V
Vijaylaxmi
A
A. Bhattacharya
1Indian Institute of Pulses Research, Kanpur - 208 024, India

  • Submitted|

  • First Online |

  • doi

Cite article:- Vijaylaxmi, Bhattacharya A. (2025). MUNGBEAN SEED YIELD IV. EFFECT OF VARIOUS PHYSIOLOGICAL PARAMETERS DURING PRE AND POST FLOWERING PERIODS. Legume Research. 29(3): 169 - 174. doi: .

ABSTRACT

Twenty-five phenologically and physiologically different mungbean genotypes were involved in field experiments during kharif seasons of 2000 and 2001 to elucidate the relative efficacies of pnenological as well as physiological parameters during pre and post flowering periods on seed yield. Through estimations of correlations, further partitioning of the correlations into direct and indirect effects, regression, and per cent association of the traits during pre and post flowering periods with seed yield it was concluded that yield structure of mungbean was related differentially with physiological traits during pre and post flowering periods. During pre flowering period, leaf area duration and relative growth rates of leaf and total plant and days to flowering had major influence on yield. During post flowering period, dry matter allocation in pods and total plant, days to podding and leaf area duration had their definite roles in influencing the seed yield mungbean genotypes.

KEYWORDS

    REFERENCES

    1. Bhattacharya, A. (1996). Legume Res., 19: 185-187.
    2. Bhattacharya, A. et al. (2005). ln: Advances in Plant Physiology (Hemantranjan, A. ed.), 8: 329-352.
    3. Davies, S.L. et al. (2000). Aust. J. Agric. Res., 51: 855-866.
    4. Dewey, D.R. and Lu, K.H. (1959). Agron. J., 51: 511-519.
    5. Egli, D.B. and Legget, J.E. (1973). Crop Sci., 12: 220-222.
    6. Ganguly, S.B. and Bhattacharya, A. (2000). Legume Res., 23: 222-226.
    7. Hays, H.K. et al. (1955). Methods of Plant Breeding. International Student Eddition, McGraw Hill Book Company Inc., Tokyo, pp. 442-443.
    8. Khanna-Chopra, R. (1987). In “Proc. National Sci. Acad. (Biological Science)”, 53: 289-304.
    9. Lal, S. (1978). Trop. Grain Legume Bull., 6: 29-31.
    10. Mehra, R.B. et al. (1987). Indian J. Plant Physiol., 30: 78-86.
    11. Nanda, R. and Saini, A.D. (1989). Indian J. Agric. Sci., 59: 514-516.
    12. Naresh, R.K. (1985). Indian J. Plant Physiol., 28: 323-330.
    13. Natarajan, M. and Palanisamy, S. (1988). Indian J. Pulses Res., 1: 23-26.
    14. Prasad, V.V.S. et al. (1979). Indian J. Plant Physiol., 21: 228-234.
    15. Reddy, P.R. et al. (1980). In “Progress Report, Part I, 1978-80”, Department of Plant Physiology, APAU, Hyderabad, pp. 31-32.
    16. Saxena, N.P. and Sheldrake, A.R. (1979). In “Proc. Intern. Workshop on Chickpea Improvement”, 1979, ICRISAT, pp. 108-120.
    17. Sheldrake, A.R. and Saxena, N.P. (1979). In “Stress Physiology in Crop Plants” (Mussel, H. and Staples, R.C. eds.)
    18. J. Wiley, New York, pp. 465-483.
    19. Singh, D.N. and Bhattacharya, A. (1995). In “Consolidated Report on Rabi Pulses 1994-1995 of All India Coordinated
    20. Pulses Improvement Programme”, P.A.U., Ludhiana.
    21. Sinha, S.K. and Khanna, R. (1975). Advances in Agronomy, 27: 123-174.
    22. Snedecor, G.W. and Cochran, W.G. (1974). Statistical Methods Applied to Experiments in Agriculture and Biology. Iowa State College, USA.
    23. Summerfield, R.J.S. et al. (1980). Proc. Intern. Workshop on Chickpea Improvement, 1979, ICRISAT, pp. 121-149
    Published In
    Legume Research
    Article Metrics
    Metrics Icon
    0
    Views
    0
    Citations
    Reviewed By
    Share Article
    Download Article
    In this Article
      Contact us
      Follow us

      volume 29 issue 3 (september 2006) : 169 - 174

      MUNGBEAN SEED YIELD IV. EFFECT OF VARIOUS PHYSIOLOGICAL PARAMETERS DURING PRE AND POST FLOWERING PERIODS

      V
      Vijaylaxmi
      A
      A. Bhattacharya
      1Indian Institute of Pulses Research, Kanpur - 208 024, India

      • Submitted|

      • First Online |

      • doi

      Cite article:- Vijaylaxmi, Bhattacharya A. (2025). MUNGBEAN SEED YIELD IV. EFFECT OF VARIOUS PHYSIOLOGICAL PARAMETERS DURING PRE AND POST FLOWERING PERIODS. Legume Research. 29(3): 169 - 174. doi: .

      ABSTRACT

      Twenty-five phenologically and physiologically different mungbean genotypes were involved in field experiments during kharif seasons of 2000 and 2001 to elucidate the relative efficacies of pnenological as well as physiological parameters during pre and post flowering periods on seed yield. Through estimations of correlations, further partitioning of the correlations into direct and indirect effects, regression, and per cent association of the traits during pre and post flowering periods with seed yield it was concluded that yield structure of mungbean was related differentially with physiological traits during pre and post flowering periods. During pre flowering period, leaf area duration and relative growth rates of leaf and total plant and days to flowering had major influence on yield. During post flowering period, dry matter allocation in pods and total plant, days to podding and leaf area duration had their definite roles in influencing the seed yield mungbean genotypes.

      KEYWORDS

        REFERENCES

        1. Bhattacharya, A. (1996). Legume Res., 19: 185-187.
        2. Bhattacharya, A. et al. (2005). ln: Advances in Plant Physiology (Hemantranjan, A. ed.), 8: 329-352.
        3. Davies, S.L. et al. (2000). Aust. J. Agric. Res., 51: 855-866.
        4. Dewey, D.R. and Lu, K.H. (1959). Agron. J., 51: 511-519.
        5. Egli, D.B. and Legget, J.E. (1973). Crop Sci., 12: 220-222.
        6. Ganguly, S.B. and Bhattacharya, A. (2000). Legume Res., 23: 222-226.
        7. Hays, H.K. et al. (1955). Methods of Plant Breeding. International Student Eddition, McGraw Hill Book Company Inc., Tokyo, pp. 442-443.
        8. Khanna-Chopra, R. (1987). In “Proc. National Sci. Acad. (Biological Science)”, 53: 289-304.
        9. Lal, S. (1978). Trop. Grain Legume Bull., 6: 29-31.
        10. Mehra, R.B. et al. (1987). Indian J. Plant Physiol., 30: 78-86.
        11. Nanda, R. and Saini, A.D. (1989). Indian J. Agric. Sci., 59: 514-516.
        12. Naresh, R.K. (1985). Indian J. Plant Physiol., 28: 323-330.
        13. Natarajan, M. and Palanisamy, S. (1988). Indian J. Pulses Res., 1: 23-26.
        14. Prasad, V.V.S. et al. (1979). Indian J. Plant Physiol., 21: 228-234.
        15. Reddy, P.R. et al. (1980). In “Progress Report, Part I, 1978-80”, Department of Plant Physiology, APAU, Hyderabad, pp. 31-32.
        16. Saxena, N.P. and Sheldrake, A.R. (1979). In “Proc. Intern. Workshop on Chickpea Improvement”, 1979, ICRISAT, pp. 108-120.
        17. Sheldrake, A.R. and Saxena, N.P. (1979). In “Stress Physiology in Crop Plants” (Mussel, H. and Staples, R.C. eds.)
        18. J. Wiley, New York, pp. 465-483.
        19. Singh, D.N. and Bhattacharya, A. (1995). In “Consolidated Report on Rabi Pulses 1994-1995 of All India Coordinated
        20. Pulses Improvement Programme”, P.A.U., Ludhiana.
        21. Sinha, S.K. and Khanna, R. (1975). Advances in Agronomy, 27: 123-174.
        22. Snedecor, G.W. and Cochran, W.G. (1974). Statistical Methods Applied to Experiments in Agriculture and Biology. Iowa State College, USA.
        23. Summerfield, R.J.S. et al. (1980). Proc. Intern. Workshop on Chickpea Improvement, 1979, ICRISAT, pp. 121-149
        In this Article
          Contact us
          Follow us
          Published In
          Legume Research

          Editorial Board

          View all (0)