Banner
Current IssueEditorial BoardOnline First ArticlesArchive
Current IssueEditorial BoardOnline First ArticlesArchive

volume 29 issue 2 (june 2006) : 126 - 129

REACTION OF FRENCH BEAN ACCESSIONS AND VARIETIES TO BEAN COMMON MOSAIC POTYVIRUS AND SEED TRANSMISSION OF THE VIRUS

M
M.S. Nalini
H
H.S. Prakash*
H
H.S. Shetty
M
M. Prabhakar**
1Department of Studies in Applied Botany and Seed Pathology, University of Mysore, Manasagangothri, Mysore - 570 006, Karnataka, India

  • Submitted|

  • First Online |

  • doi

Cite article:- Nalini M.S., Prakash* H.S., Shetty H.S., Prabhakar** M. (2025). REACTION OF FRENCH BEAN ACCESSIONS AND VARIETIES TO BEAN COMMON MOSAIC POTYVIRUS AND SEED TRANSMISSION OF THE VIRUS. Legume Research. 29(2): 126 - 129. doi: .

ABSTRACT

Fifteen accessions and varieties of french bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.) obtained from various sources were tested for their reaction to Bean common mosaic potyvirus (BCMV) by mechanical inoculations on the 10-day-old seedlings in the screenhouse. Three accessions among the fifteen viz., Arka Komal, IIHR 909 and MFB-2 were diagnosed as susceptible based on symptoms and were confirmed by ELISA. The remaining twelve, were ELISA-negative. Seeds collected from the infected plants of each accession/variety were analyzed for the seed transmission of BCMV by growing-on test, recording 39% transmission in Arka Komal. The infected seedlings manifested typical mosaic and leaf roll symptoms. Studies highlight the existence of resistant genotypes for breeding programmes.

KEYWORDS

    REFERENCES

    1. Al-Fadhil, F.H. and Al- Ani, R.A. (1987). J. Agric. Water Resou. Res.-Plant Production, 6: 99-114.
    2. Capoor, S.P. et al. (1985). Indian Phytopath., 38: 152-154.
    3. Gupta, Y. and Chowfla, S.C. (1990). Indian Phytopath., 84: 434-436.
    4. Hobbs, H.A. et al. (1987). Plant Dis., 71: 747-749.
    5. Klein, R.E. et al. (1988). Plant Dis., 72: 301-302.
    6. Khetarpal, R.K et al. (1994). Indian J. Virol., 10: 13-16.
    7. Muniyappa, V. (1970). Madras Agric. J., 63: 69-70.
    8. Omunyin, M. et al. (1988). Trop. Agric. (Trinidad), 65: 166-168.
    9. Parthasarathy, V.A. (1993). In: Vegetable Crops: (T.K Bose et al., eds.). Naya Prakash Publishers, Calcutta, India, pp. 581-602.
    Published In
    Legume Research
    Article Metrics
    Metrics Icon
    0
    Views
    0
    Citations
    Reviewed By
    Share Article
    Download Article
    In this Article
      Contact us
      Follow us

      volume 29 issue 2 (june 2006) : 126 - 129

      REACTION OF FRENCH BEAN ACCESSIONS AND VARIETIES TO BEAN COMMON MOSAIC POTYVIRUS AND SEED TRANSMISSION OF THE VIRUS

      M
      M.S. Nalini
      H
      H.S. Prakash*
      H
      H.S. Shetty
      M
      M. Prabhakar**
      1Department of Studies in Applied Botany and Seed Pathology, University of Mysore, Manasagangothri, Mysore - 570 006, Karnataka, India

      • Submitted|

      • First Online |

      • doi

      Cite article:- Nalini M.S., Prakash* H.S., Shetty H.S., Prabhakar** M. (2025). REACTION OF FRENCH BEAN ACCESSIONS AND VARIETIES TO BEAN COMMON MOSAIC POTYVIRUS AND SEED TRANSMISSION OF THE VIRUS. Legume Research. 29(2): 126 - 129. doi: .

      ABSTRACT

      Fifteen accessions and varieties of french bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.) obtained from various sources were tested for their reaction to Bean common mosaic potyvirus (BCMV) by mechanical inoculations on the 10-day-old seedlings in the screenhouse. Three accessions among the fifteen viz., Arka Komal, IIHR 909 and MFB-2 were diagnosed as susceptible based on symptoms and were confirmed by ELISA. The remaining twelve, were ELISA-negative. Seeds collected from the infected plants of each accession/variety were analyzed for the seed transmission of BCMV by growing-on test, recording 39% transmission in Arka Komal. The infected seedlings manifested typical mosaic and leaf roll symptoms. Studies highlight the existence of resistant genotypes for breeding programmes.

      KEYWORDS

        REFERENCES

        1. Al-Fadhil, F.H. and Al- Ani, R.A. (1987). J. Agric. Water Resou. Res.-Plant Production, 6: 99-114.
        2. Capoor, S.P. et al. (1985). Indian Phytopath., 38: 152-154.
        3. Gupta, Y. and Chowfla, S.C. (1990). Indian Phytopath., 84: 434-436.
        4. Hobbs, H.A. et al. (1987). Plant Dis., 71: 747-749.
        5. Klein, R.E. et al. (1988). Plant Dis., 72: 301-302.
        6. Khetarpal, R.K et al. (1994). Indian J. Virol., 10: 13-16.
        7. Muniyappa, V. (1970). Madras Agric. J., 63: 69-70.
        8. Omunyin, M. et al. (1988). Trop. Agric. (Trinidad), 65: 166-168.
        9. Parthasarathy, V.A. (1993). In: Vegetable Crops: (T.K Bose et al., eds.). Naya Prakash Publishers, Calcutta, India, pp. 581-602.
        In this Article
          Contact us
          Follow us
          Published In
          Legume Research

          Editorial Board

          View all (0)