Chief EditorJ. S. Sandhu
Print ISSN 0250-5371
Online ISSN 0976-0571
NAAS Rating 6.80
SJR 0.32, CiteScore: 0.906
Impact Factor 0.8 (2024)

Frequency :

Monthly (January, February, March, April, May, June, July, August, September, October, November and December)

Indexing Services :

BIOSIS Preview, ISI Citation Index, Biological Abstracts, Elsevier (Scopus and Embase), AGRICOLA, Google Scholar, CrossRef, CAB Abstracting Journals, Chemical Abstracts, Indian Science Abstracts, EBSCO Indexing Services, Index Copernicus

Submit

Legume Research, volume 29 issue 2 (june 2006) : 110 - 113

BIOMASS PARTITIONING AND GROWTH OF CHICKPEA (CICER ARIETINUM L.) AS INFLUENCED BY SOWING DATES AND GENOTYPES

Satish Kumar, Manish Kumar, V.S. Kadian

Affiliations

¹Department of Agronomy, Chaudhary Charan Singh Haryana Agricultural University, Hisar - 125 004, India

Submitted|
First Online |
doi

Cite article:- Kumar Satish, Kumar Manish, Kadian V.S. (2025). BIOMASS PARTITIONING AND GROWTH OF CHICKPEA (CICER ARIETINUM L.) AS INFLUENCED BY SOWING DATES AND GENOTYPES. Legume Research. 29(2): 110 - 113. doi: .

ABSTRACT

A field study comprising five sowing dates and four genotypes of chickpea was carried out during winter seasons of 1999 to 2000 to study the effect of sowing dates on partitioning of biomass, dry matter accumulation and crop growth rate of chickpea genotypes. Dry matter accumulation in leaf, stem and pods decreased significantly in December 5 and December 20 sowings as compared to November 5 sowing. Chickpea planted on or before November 5 produced higher crop growth rate as compared to delayed sowings. Among genotypes at maturity HC 3 and C 235 accumulated the highest and lowest total above ground bio-mass, respectively. Crop growth rate of chickpea genotype HC 3 was found higher except between 60 – 89 DAS where it was found higher in H 92–67.

KEYWORDS

REFERENCES

Bahadur, M.M. et al. (2002). Crop Res., 23: 293-299.
Radford, P.J. (1967). Crop Sci., 7: 171-175.
Saini, S.S. et al. (1996). Haryana J. Agron., 12: 119-124.
Sestak, Z. et al. (1971). Plant Photosynthetic Production : Manual of Methods. Dr. W. Junk, N.V. Puble., The Haque.
Watson, D.J. (1952). Adv. Agron., 4: 101-144.
Yadav, V.S. et al. (1999). Ann. Agric. Res., 20: 227-230.

Disclaimer :

All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.

Copyright :

This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Reviewed By

Share options

Editorial Board

View all (0)

BIOMASS PARTITIONING AND GROWTH OF CHICKPEA (CICER ARIETINUM L.) AS INFLUENCED BY SOWING DATES AND GENOTYPES

ABSTRACT

KEYWORDS

REFERENCES

Reviewed By

In this Article

APC

Publish With US

Become a Reviewer/Member

Open Access

Products and Services

Support and Policies

Editorial Board