Banner
Current IssueEditorial BoardOnline First ArticlesArchive
Current IssueEditorial BoardOnline First ArticlesArchive

volume 29 issue 1 (march 2006) : 18 - 24

INFLUENCE OF PLANT GROWTH PROMOTERS ON ASSIMILATE PARTITIONING AND SEED YIELD OF GREEN GRAM (VIGNA RADIATA L.)

N
N. Thavaprakash
K
K. Velayudham
M
M. Djanaguiraman*
P
P. Subramanian
S
S. Panneerselvam
C
C. Prabakaran**
1Department of Agronomy, Tamil Nadu Agricultural University, Coimbatore- 641 003, India

  • Submitted|

  • First Online |

  • doi

Cite article:- Thavaprakash N., Velayudham K., Djanaguiraman* M., Subramanian P., Panneerselvam S., Prabakaran** C. (2025). INFLUENCE OF PLANT GROWTH PROMOTERS ON ASSIMILATE PARTITIONING AND SEED YIELD OF GREEN GRAM (VIGNA RADIATA L.). Legume Research. 29(1): 18 - 24. doi: .

ABSTRACT

A field experiment was conducted to study the effect of plant growth promoters on assimilate partitioning and seed yield of green gram during summer 2002. The results revealed that foliar application of putrescine and spermine @ 20 ppm registered higher growth characters (plant height, number of trifoliate leaves plant−1, leaf area index and dry matter production). Yield attributing characters such as number of flowers plant−1, number of pods plant−1, fertility coefficient, number of filled seeds pod−1 and per cent filled seeds were also increased. Application of putrescine and spermine had increased per cent seed weight and reduced the seed coat dry matter accumulation. It also registered significantly increased partitioning of assimilates in economic parts from leaf, stem and root. Putrescine and spermine recorded an additional yield of 42 and 39 per cent respectively over control by maintaining better partitioning assimilates.

KEYWORDS

    REFERENCES

    1. Anonymous (1998). Pulses Development Programme in Tamil Nadu, State Planning Commission, Chennai, India.
    2. Bagni, N. (1986). Acta. Hort., 176: 95-103.
    3. Bagni, N. et al. (1981). Pl. Physiol., 68: 727-730
    4. Cohen, E. et al. (1982).Pl. Physiol., 70: 540-543.
    5. Estelle, M.A. and Somerville, C. (1987). Mol. Gen. Genet., 206: 200-206.
    6. Galston, A.W. (1983). Bioscience, 33: 382-388.
    7. Gardner, F.P. et al. (1985). In: Physiology of Crop giants. Iowa State University Press, Amen, Iowa, pp: 187-208.
    8. Gifford, R.M. and Evans, L.T. (1981). Ann. Rev. Plant Physiol., 32: 485-509.
    9. Gomez, K.A. and Gomez, A.A. (1984). Statistical Procedure for Agricultural Research. John- Wiley and Sons Inc New York USA.
    10. Kabir. J. et al. (1992). Sci. Cult., 58: 159.
    11. Keithly, J.H. et al. (1990). Plant Sci., 68: 57-64.
    12. Kobayashi, H. et al. (1990). Japn. Soc. Hort. Sci., 59: 115-119.
    13. Loomis, R.S. et al. (1979). Ann. Rev. Plant Physiol., 30: 339-352.
    14. Masse, J. et al. (1989). Plant Physiol. Biochem., 27: 489-493.
    15. Mirza, J.I. and Bagni, N. (1991). Plant Growth Regul., 10: 163-168.
    16. Mulkey, T.J. et al. (1982). Plant Physiol., 70: 186-188.
    17. Patrick, J.W. (1988). Hort. Sci., 23: 33-40.
    18. Pyke, K.A. and Leech, R.M. (1987). J. Exp. Bot., 38: 1949-1956.
    19. Reid, M.S. (1987). Plant Hormones and Their Role in Plant Growth and Development (Davies, P.J. ed.) Martinus
    20. Nijhoff Publishers, Dordrecht. p. 257-279.
    21. Singh, S. (1998). Agric. Situation India, 18: 391
    22. Sivakumar, R. (2000). M.Sc.(Agri) Thesis, Tamil Nadu Agric.Univ., Coimbatore, India.
    23. Slocum, R.D. et al. (1984). Arch. Biochem. Biophys., 235: 283-303.
    24. Smith, T.A. (1985). Ann. Rev. Plant Physiol, 36: 117-143.
    25. Sujatha, S. (2001). M.Sc.(Agri) Thesis, Tamil Nadu Agric. Univ., Coimbatore, India.
    26. Szczotka, Z. and Lewandowska, U. (1988). Acta. Physiol. Plant, 3: 171-179
    27. Szczotka, Z. and Lewandowska, U. (1989). Forest Tree Physiology-Polyamines in Dormancy Breaking of Tree Seeds. (Dreyer, E. et al. eds.), 95-97. INRA.
    28. Taiz, L. and Zeiger, E. (1991). Plant Physiology. Benjamin/Cummings Publ. Company Inc. California.
    29. Williams, R.M. (1946). Ann. Bot., 10: 41-71.
    Published In
    Legume Research
    Article Metrics
    Metrics Icon
    0
    Views
    0
    Citations
    Reviewed By
    Share Article
    Download Article
    In this Article
      Contact us
      Follow us

      volume 29 issue 1 (march 2006) : 18 - 24

      INFLUENCE OF PLANT GROWTH PROMOTERS ON ASSIMILATE PARTITIONING AND SEED YIELD OF GREEN GRAM (VIGNA RADIATA L.)

      N
      N. Thavaprakash
      K
      K. Velayudham
      M
      M. Djanaguiraman*
      P
      P. Subramanian
      S
      S. Panneerselvam
      C
      C. Prabakaran**
      1Department of Agronomy, Tamil Nadu Agricultural University, Coimbatore- 641 003, India

      • Submitted|

      • First Online |

      • doi

      Cite article:- Thavaprakash N., Velayudham K., Djanaguiraman* M., Subramanian P., Panneerselvam S., Prabakaran** C. (2025). INFLUENCE OF PLANT GROWTH PROMOTERS ON ASSIMILATE PARTITIONING AND SEED YIELD OF GREEN GRAM (VIGNA RADIATA L.). Legume Research. 29(1): 18 - 24. doi: .

      ABSTRACT

      A field experiment was conducted to study the effect of plant growth promoters on assimilate partitioning and seed yield of green gram during summer 2002. The results revealed that foliar application of putrescine and spermine @ 20 ppm registered higher growth characters (plant height, number of trifoliate leaves plant−1, leaf area index and dry matter production). Yield attributing characters such as number of flowers plant−1, number of pods plant−1, fertility coefficient, number of filled seeds pod−1 and per cent filled seeds were also increased. Application of putrescine and spermine had increased per cent seed weight and reduced the seed coat dry matter accumulation. It also registered significantly increased partitioning of assimilates in economic parts from leaf, stem and root. Putrescine and spermine recorded an additional yield of 42 and 39 per cent respectively over control by maintaining better partitioning assimilates.

      KEYWORDS

        REFERENCES

        1. Anonymous (1998). Pulses Development Programme in Tamil Nadu, State Planning Commission, Chennai, India.
        2. Bagni, N. (1986). Acta. Hort., 176: 95-103.
        3. Bagni, N. et al. (1981). Pl. Physiol., 68: 727-730
        4. Cohen, E. et al. (1982).Pl. Physiol., 70: 540-543.
        5. Estelle, M.A. and Somerville, C. (1987). Mol. Gen. Genet., 206: 200-206.
        6. Galston, A.W. (1983). Bioscience, 33: 382-388.
        7. Gardner, F.P. et al. (1985). In: Physiology of Crop giants. Iowa State University Press, Amen, Iowa, pp: 187-208.
        8. Gifford, R.M. and Evans, L.T. (1981). Ann. Rev. Plant Physiol., 32: 485-509.
        9. Gomez, K.A. and Gomez, A.A. (1984). Statistical Procedure for Agricultural Research. John- Wiley and Sons Inc New York USA.
        10. Kabir. J. et al. (1992). Sci. Cult., 58: 159.
        11. Keithly, J.H. et al. (1990). Plant Sci., 68: 57-64.
        12. Kobayashi, H. et al. (1990). Japn. Soc. Hort. Sci., 59: 115-119.
        13. Loomis, R.S. et al. (1979). Ann. Rev. Plant Physiol., 30: 339-352.
        14. Masse, J. et al. (1989). Plant Physiol. Biochem., 27: 489-493.
        15. Mirza, J.I. and Bagni, N. (1991). Plant Growth Regul., 10: 163-168.
        16. Mulkey, T.J. et al. (1982). Plant Physiol., 70: 186-188.
        17. Patrick, J.W. (1988). Hort. Sci., 23: 33-40.
        18. Pyke, K.A. and Leech, R.M. (1987). J. Exp. Bot., 38: 1949-1956.
        19. Reid, M.S. (1987). Plant Hormones and Their Role in Plant Growth and Development (Davies, P.J. ed.) Martinus
        20. Nijhoff Publishers, Dordrecht. p. 257-279.
        21. Singh, S. (1998). Agric. Situation India, 18: 391
        22. Sivakumar, R. (2000). M.Sc.(Agri) Thesis, Tamil Nadu Agric.Univ., Coimbatore, India.
        23. Slocum, R.D. et al. (1984). Arch. Biochem. Biophys., 235: 283-303.
        24. Smith, T.A. (1985). Ann. Rev. Plant Physiol, 36: 117-143.
        25. Sujatha, S. (2001). M.Sc.(Agri) Thesis, Tamil Nadu Agric. Univ., Coimbatore, India.
        26. Szczotka, Z. and Lewandowska, U. (1988). Acta. Physiol. Plant, 3: 171-179
        27. Szczotka, Z. and Lewandowska, U. (1989). Forest Tree Physiology-Polyamines in Dormancy Breaking of Tree Seeds. (Dreyer, E. et al. eds.), 95-97. INRA.
        28. Taiz, L. and Zeiger, E. (1991). Plant Physiology. Benjamin/Cummings Publ. Company Inc. California.
        29. Williams, R.M. (1946). Ann. Bot., 10: 41-71.
        In this Article
          Contact us
          Follow us
          Published In
          Legume Research

          Editorial Board

          View all (0)