Banner
Current IssueEditorial BoardOnline First ArticlesArchive
Current IssueEditorial BoardOnline First ArticlesArchive

volume 30 issue 4 (december 2007) : 261 - 265

SUMMER GROUNDNUT CROP PERFORMANCE AND ECONOMICS UNDER MICRO SPRINKLER IRRIGATION AT VARIOUS WATER APPLICATION LEVELS

H
H. D. Rank
1College of Agricultural Engineering & Technology, Junagadh Agricultural University, Junagadh-362001, Gujarat, India.

  • Submitted|

  • First Online |

  • doi

Cite article:- Rank D. H. (2025). SUMMER GROUNDNUT CROP PERFORMANCE AND ECONOMICS UNDER MICRO SPRINKLER IRRIGATION AT VARIOUS WATER APPLICATION LEVELS. Legume Research. 30(4): 261 - 265. doi: .

ABSTRACT

The field experiments were conducted for consecutive three years to assess the crop performance and economics of micro sprinkler system for groundnut (GG-2) during summer season (Feb. to May). Total six treatments having different water application levels based on IW/CPE like 0.6, 0.7, 0.8, 0.9, 1.0 and 1.2 were selected. The lowest pod yield of 1471 kg/ha and highest pod yield of 2550 kg/ha could be obtained at the IW/CPE of 0.6 and 0.9 respectively requiring 523 and 789 ha.mm/ha of irrigation water respectively. The treatment of IW/CPE of 0.8 wasfound statistically better one having the highest water use efficiency of 3.406 kg/ha.mm. The IW/CPE of 0.8 was found most economical water application level. Also, in case of excess water supply (IW/CPE=1.2) and deficit water conditions (0.6), the micro sprinkler wasnot that profitable.

KEYWORDS

    REFERENCES

    1. Anonymous (2003). Final Report of ICAR Adhoc Project on Studies on Techno-Economic Feasibilities of Drip Irrigation for Summer Groundnut Crop and its Comparison with Micro Sprinkler and Border Irrigation, Junagadh
    2. English, M.J. et al.(1990). ASAE Monograph, St. Joseph, Michigan. pp.631-666.
    3. Fabeiro, C. et al. (2003). Agric. Water Mgmt. 59: 155-167.
    4. HeWitt, T.D. et al. (1980). Proc. Soil and Crop Sci. Soc., Fla, 39: 135 – 140.
    5. Hexem, R.W. and Heady, E.O. (1978). Water Production Functions for Irrigated Agriculture. IOWA State University Press, Ames, IOWA, USA.
    6. Kirda, C., P. et al.(1999). Crop Yield Response to Deficit Irrigation. Kluwer Academic Publishers. London.
    7. Rank, H. D.et al. (2003). Proc. Int. sem. for downsizing tech. for rural devpt., RRL Bhubneshwar, 1: 254-257.
    8. Stegman, E.C. et al. (1980). Design and Operation of Farm Irrig. Systems, ASAE, Washigton.
    9. USDA (1959). SCS National Engg. Handbook, Washigton, D.C., pp. 8-1 to 8-15.
    10. Wanjura, F. D., et al. (2002). Agic. Water Manage., 55:217:237.
    Published In
    Legume Research
    Article Metrics
    Metrics Icon
    0
    Views
    0
    Citations
    Reviewed By
    Share Article
    Download Article
    In this Article
      Contact us
      Follow us

      volume 30 issue 4 (december 2007) : 261 - 265

      SUMMER GROUNDNUT CROP PERFORMANCE AND ECONOMICS UNDER MICRO SPRINKLER IRRIGATION AT VARIOUS WATER APPLICATION LEVELS

      H
      H. D. Rank
      1College of Agricultural Engineering & Technology, Junagadh Agricultural University, Junagadh-362001, Gujarat, India.

      • Submitted|

      • First Online |

      • doi

      Cite article:- Rank D. H. (2025). SUMMER GROUNDNUT CROP PERFORMANCE AND ECONOMICS UNDER MICRO SPRINKLER IRRIGATION AT VARIOUS WATER APPLICATION LEVELS. Legume Research. 30(4): 261 - 265. doi: .

      ABSTRACT

      The field experiments were conducted for consecutive three years to assess the crop performance and economics of micro sprinkler system for groundnut (GG-2) during summer season (Feb. to May). Total six treatments having different water application levels based on IW/CPE like 0.6, 0.7, 0.8, 0.9, 1.0 and 1.2 were selected. The lowest pod yield of 1471 kg/ha and highest pod yield of 2550 kg/ha could be obtained at the IW/CPE of 0.6 and 0.9 respectively requiring 523 and 789 ha.mm/ha of irrigation water respectively. The treatment of IW/CPE of 0.8 wasfound statistically better one having the highest water use efficiency of 3.406 kg/ha.mm. The IW/CPE of 0.8 was found most economical water application level. Also, in case of excess water supply (IW/CPE=1.2) and deficit water conditions (0.6), the micro sprinkler wasnot that profitable.

      KEYWORDS

        REFERENCES

        1. Anonymous (2003). Final Report of ICAR Adhoc Project on Studies on Techno-Economic Feasibilities of Drip Irrigation for Summer Groundnut Crop and its Comparison with Micro Sprinkler and Border Irrigation, Junagadh
        2. English, M.J. et al.(1990). ASAE Monograph, St. Joseph, Michigan. pp.631-666.
        3. Fabeiro, C. et al. (2003). Agric. Water Mgmt. 59: 155-167.
        4. HeWitt, T.D. et al. (1980). Proc. Soil and Crop Sci. Soc., Fla, 39: 135 – 140.
        5. Hexem, R.W. and Heady, E.O. (1978). Water Production Functions for Irrigated Agriculture. IOWA State University Press, Ames, IOWA, USA.
        6. Kirda, C., P. et al.(1999). Crop Yield Response to Deficit Irrigation. Kluwer Academic Publishers. London.
        7. Rank, H. D.et al. (2003). Proc. Int. sem. for downsizing tech. for rural devpt., RRL Bhubneshwar, 1: 254-257.
        8. Stegman, E.C. et al. (1980). Design and Operation of Farm Irrig. Systems, ASAE, Washigton.
        9. USDA (1959). SCS National Engg. Handbook, Washigton, D.C., pp. 8-1 to 8-15.
        10. Wanjura, F. D., et al. (2002). Agic. Water Manage., 55:217:237.
        In this Article
          Contact us
          Follow us
          Published In
          Legume Research

          Editorial Board

          View all (0)