Banner
Current IssueEditorial BoardOnline First ArticlesArchive
Current IssueEditorial BoardOnline First ArticlesArchive

volume 32 issue 2 (june 2009) : 129-132

EVALUATION OF INTER AND INTRASPECIFIC HYBRID DERIVATIVES OF GROUNDNUT (ARACHIS HYPOGAEA L.) FOR YIELD AND ITS COMPONENTS

J
J.J. Savaliya
A
A.G. Pansuriya
P
P.R. Sodavadiya
R
R.L. Leva.
1Department of Agricultural Botany, Junagadh Agricultural University, Junagadh 362 001, India

  • Submitted|

  • First Online |

  • doi

Cite article:- Savaliya J.J., Pansuriya A.G., Sodavadiya P.R., Leva. R.L. (2025). EVALUATION OF INTER AND INTRASPECIFIC HYBRID DERIVATIVES OF GROUNDNUT (ARACHIS HYPOGAEA L.) FOR YIELD AND ITS COMPONENTS. Legume Research. 32(2): 129-132. doi: .

ABSTRACT

The range of variation as well as analysis of variation for different characters indicated wide difference in three independent populations of groundnut. The genotypic and phenotypic coefficients of variation (PCV and GCV) were higher for pod yield in interspecific, intra specific hybrid derivatives and its parents. The 100-seed weight , pod yield, number of pods and shelling percentage showed high heritability combined with high genetic advance (GAm) as percent of mean indicating the presence of additive genetic variance for these characters and possibility of improvement in these economic characters of direct relevance to groundnut cultivation.

REFERENCES

  1. Allard R. W. (1960). Principles of Plant Breeding. John Willey and Sons. Inc. New York pp 85-95
  2. Burton, G. W. (1952). In: Proc.6th Int. Grass land. Cong. 1:227-283
  3. Dholaria. S. J. (1971). M. Sc. (Agri) Thesis, Saurastra Univ., Rajkot.
  4. John, K. et al. (2006). Legume Res., 29: 225-227.
  5. Johnson, H.W. et al. (1955). Agron. J., 47: 314-318.
  6. Mahalaxmi, P. et al. (2005). Legume Res., 28: 197
  7. Mothilala, et al. (2005). In: Paper presented in the National Symposium on « Enhancing Productivity of Groundnut for
  8. Sutaining Food and Nutritional Security, NRCG Junagadh October 11-12, 2004.
  9. Sakai, K. (1951). Jap. J. Breed., 1: 1-9.
  10. Suresh Babu, V. et al. (1996). J. Trop. Agric., 34: 10-13.
  11. Wani, S.C. et al. (2005). In: Paper presented in the National Symposium on « Enhancing Productivity of Groundnut for
  12. Sutaining Food and nutritional Security, NRCG Junagadh October 11-12, 2004.
Published In
Legume Research
Article Metrics
Metrics Icon
0
Views
0
Citations
Reviewed By
Share Article
Download Article
In this Article
    Contact us
    Follow us

    volume 32 issue 2 (june 2009) : 129-132

    EVALUATION OF INTER AND INTRASPECIFIC HYBRID DERIVATIVES OF GROUNDNUT (ARACHIS HYPOGAEA L.) FOR YIELD AND ITS COMPONENTS

    J
    J.J. Savaliya
    A
    A.G. Pansuriya
    P
    P.R. Sodavadiya
    R
    R.L. Leva.
    1Department of Agricultural Botany, Junagadh Agricultural University, Junagadh 362 001, India

    • Submitted|

    • First Online |

    • doi

    Cite article:- Savaliya J.J., Pansuriya A.G., Sodavadiya P.R., Leva. R.L. (2025). EVALUATION OF INTER AND INTRASPECIFIC HYBRID DERIVATIVES OF GROUNDNUT (ARACHIS HYPOGAEA L.) FOR YIELD AND ITS COMPONENTS. Legume Research. 32(2): 129-132. doi: .

    ABSTRACT

    The range of variation as well as analysis of variation for different characters indicated wide difference in three independent populations of groundnut. The genotypic and phenotypic coefficients of variation (PCV and GCV) were higher for pod yield in interspecific, intra specific hybrid derivatives and its parents. The 100-seed weight , pod yield, number of pods and shelling percentage showed high heritability combined with high genetic advance (GAm) as percent of mean indicating the presence of additive genetic variance for these characters and possibility of improvement in these economic characters of direct relevance to groundnut cultivation.

    REFERENCES

    1. Allard R. W. (1960). Principles of Plant Breeding. John Willey and Sons. Inc. New York pp 85-95
    2. Burton, G. W. (1952). In: Proc.6th Int. Grass land. Cong. 1:227-283
    3. Dholaria. S. J. (1971). M. Sc. (Agri) Thesis, Saurastra Univ., Rajkot.
    4. John, K. et al. (2006). Legume Res., 29: 225-227.
    5. Johnson, H.W. et al. (1955). Agron. J., 47: 314-318.
    6. Mahalaxmi, P. et al. (2005). Legume Res., 28: 197
    7. Mothilala, et al. (2005). In: Paper presented in the National Symposium on « Enhancing Productivity of Groundnut for
    8. Sutaining Food and Nutritional Security, NRCG Junagadh October 11-12, 2004.
    9. Sakai, K. (1951). Jap. J. Breed., 1: 1-9.
    10. Suresh Babu, V. et al. (1996). J. Trop. Agric., 34: 10-13.
    11. Wani, S.C. et al. (2005). In: Paper presented in the National Symposium on « Enhancing Productivity of Groundnut for
    12. Sutaining Food and nutritional Security, NRCG Junagadh October 11-12, 2004.
    In this Article
      Contact us
      Follow us
      Published In
      Legume Research

      Editorial Board

      View all (0)