Banner

Legume Research

  • Chief EditorJ. S. Sandhu

  • Print ISSN 0250-5371

  • Online ISSN 0976-0571

  • NAAS Rating 6.80

  • SJR 0.32, CiteScore: 0.906

  • Impact Factor 0.8, Q3

Frequency :
Monthly (January, February, March, April, May, June, July, August, September, October, November and December)
Indexing Services :
BIOSIS Preview, ISI Citation Index, Biological Abstracts, Elsevier (Scopus and Embase), AGRICOLA, Google Scholar, CrossRef, CAB Abstracting Journals, Chemical Abstracts, Indian Science Abstracts, EBSCO Indexing Services, Index Copernicus
Submit

Research Article

Legume Research, volume 41 issue 4 (august 2018) : 490-499

Field characterization of endemic wild Vigna accessions collected from biodiversity hotspots of India to identify promising genotypes for multiple agronomic and adaptive traits

Aditya Pratap, Nupur Malviya, Sanjeev Gupta, Rakhi Tomar, Vankat Raman Pandey, Umashanker Prajapati
1Crop Improvement Division, ICAR-Indian Institute of Pulses Research, Kalyanpur, Kanpur-208 024, Uttar Pradesh, India.

  • Submitted18-02-2017|

  • Accepted28-08-2017|

  • First Online 16-07-2018|

  • doi 10.18805/LR-4723

Cite article:- Pratap Aditya, Malviya Nupur, Gupta Sanjeev, Tomar Rakhi, Pandey Raman Vankat, Prajapati Umashanker (2018). Field characterization of endemic wild Vigna accessions collected from biodiversity hotspots of India to identify promising genotypes for multiple agronomic and adaptive traits. Legume Research. 41(4): 490-499. doi: 10.18805/LR-4723.

ABSTRACT

Wild Vigna species possess a reservoir of useful genes that have potential to be utilized in improvement of cultivated mungbean and urdbean. The level of genetic diversity in representative accessions of cultivated and wild Asiatic Vigna species collected from diversity-rich endemic areas of India was investigated using morphological descriptors. Data were recorded on 27 qualitative and quantitative traits in 44 wild and cultivated accessions belonging to 12 Vigna species grown over 2 years and analyzed to compute mean and variances for each trait. Cluster analysis following unweighted pair group method based on arithmetic mean grouped accessions into five clusters with cluster I accommodating most of the accessions. The different accessions showed variation at species level based on morphological descriptors. 3 accessions viz., IC251424 and IC251425 of V. radiata and IC331436 of V. trilobata were superior for multiple traits viz., number of seeds/pod, seed quality and early maturity. Likewise for seed size, IC 298665 of V. unguiculata and PRR 2008-2 of V. umbellata were identified as promising donors while for earliness, 3 accessions of V. trilobata (IC 331545, IC 349701 and JAP/10-7), 1 of V. radiata (IC 251427) and 1 each of V. mungo (IC 251385) and V. unguiculata (IC 298665) were identified as maturing significantly early and therefore, could be used in hybridization programme for introgression of these traits. This evaluation and characterization study on endemic Vigna species provides useful  information for improving mungbean and urdbean cultivars through recombination breeding.

REFERENCES

  1. Arora, R.K. (1985) Diversity and collection of wild Vigna species in India. FAO/IBPGR Plant Genetic Resources Newsletter, 63: 26–35.
  2. Bisht, I.S., Bhat, K.V., Lakhanpaul, S., Latha, M., Jayan, P.K., Biswas, B.K. and Singh, A.K. (2005a) Diversity and genetic resources of wild Vigna species in India. Genetic Resources and Crop Evolution 52: 53–68.
  3. Bisht, I.S., Bhat, K.V., Latha, M., Abraham, Z., Dikshit, N., Bhalla S and Loknathan TR (2005b) Distribution, diversity and species relationship of wild Vigna species in mungo-radiata complex. Indian Journal of Plant Genetic Resources, 12:169–179.
  4. Dana, S. and Karmakar, P.G. (1990) Species relation in Vigna subgenus Ceratotropis and its implications in breeding. Plant Breeding Reviews, 8: 19–42.
  5. FAOSTAT (2013) http://faostat.fao.org/site/567/default.aspx#ancor (accessed on 15 January, 2017)
  6. Hajjar R and Hodgkin T (2007) The use of wild relatives in crop improvement: A survey of developments over the last 20 years. Euphytica, 156: 1–13.
  7. IBPGR (1980) IBPGR (International Board for Plant Genetic Resources Regional Committee for Southeast Asia). Descriptors for mungbean. IBPGR, Rome.
  8. Jaccard, P. (1908) Nouvelles recherches sur la distribution florale. Bul. Soc. Vaudoise Sci. Nat., 44:223–270.
  9. Knott D.R. and Dvorak J. (1976) Alien germplasm as a source of resistance to disease. Annual Reviews of Phytopathology, 14: 211-    235.
  10. Kumar, S., Gupta, S., Chandra, S. and Singh, B.B., 2003. How wide is the Genetic Base of Pulse Crops? In: Ali, M., Singh, B.B., Kumar, S. and Dhar, V. (eds) Pulses in New Perspective. Indian Society of Pulses Research and Development. pp 211-221.
  11. Kumar, S., Imtiaz, M., Gupta, S. and Pratap, A. (2011). Distant hybridization and alien gene introgression. In. Pratap, A. and Kumar, J. (eds) Biology and breeding of food legumes. CABI, Oxfordshire, pp. 81-110.
  12. Ladizinsky, G., Pickersgill, B., and Yamamoto, K. (1988) Exploitation of wild relatives of the food legumes. In: World crops: Cool season food legumes, Springer, Netherlands, pp 967-978.
  13. Lawn, R., (1995) The Asiatic Vigna species. In: The Evolution of Crop Plants. Smartt J. and Simmonds N.W. (eds), 2nd edn. Longman, Harlow, UK, pp. 321–326.
  14. Mondini, L., Noorani, A. and Pagnotta, M.A. (2009) Assessing plant genetic diversity by molecular tools. Diversity, 1:19-35.
  15. Pratap, A., Basu, P.S., Gupta, S., Malviya, N., Rajan, N., Tomar, R., Nadarajan, N and Singh N.P. (2014) Identification and characterization of sources for photo and thermo insensitivity in Vigna species. Plant Breeding 133:756-764.
  16. Pratap, A., Gupta, D.S., Singh, B.B. and Kumar, S. (2013). Development of Super Early Genotypes in Greengram [Vigna radiata (L.) Wilczek]. Legume Research, 36:105-110.
  17. Pratap, A., Gupta, S., Malviya, N., Rajan, N., Tomar, R., Latha, M., John J.K. and Singh, N.P. (2015). Genome scanning of asiatic vigna species for discerning population genetic structure based on microsatellite variation. Molecular Breeding, 35: 178.
  18. Pratap, A., Gupta, S., Tomar, R., Malviya, N., Pandey, V.R., Mehandi, S. and Singh, N.P. (2016). Cross-genera amplification of informative microsatellite markers from Common bean and Scarlet runner bean for assessment of genetic diversity in Mungbean [Vigna radiata (L.) Wilczek]. Plant Breeding, 135: 499-505.
  19. Prescott-Allen C. and Prescott-Allen R. (1986) The first resource. Wild species in the North American economy. New Haven, Conn.: Yale University Press. 
  20. Rohlf, F.L. (2009) NTSYS-pc: Numerical Taxonomy and Multivariate Analysis System, version 2.2; Applied Biostatistics, NY
  21. Singh, D.P. (1990) Distant hybridization in genus Vigna –a review. Indian Journal of Genetics and Pant Breeding, 50: 268–276.
  22. Singh, K.P., Monika, Sareen, P.K. and Kumar, A. (2003) Interspecific hybridization studies in Vigna radiata (L.) Wilczek and Vigna umbellata L. National Journal of Plant Improvement, 5: 16–18
  23. Singh, M., Bisht, I.S., Sardana, S., Gautam, N.K., Husain, Z., Gupta, S., Singh, B.B. and Dwivedi, N.K. (2006). Asiatic Vigna. Plant genetic resources: food grain crops. Narosa Publishing House Pvt. Ltd., New Delhi, India, pp. 275-301.
  24. Stalker, H.T. (1980) Utilization of wild species for crop improvement. Advance in Agronomy 33: l-147.
  25. Tomooka N., Vaughan D.A., Moss, H. and Maxted, N. (2003) The Asian Vigna: Genus Vigna subgenus Ceratotropis Genetic Resources. Kluwer Academic Publishers, 288 pp
  26. Tomooka, N., Egawa, Y., and Kaga, A. (2000) Biosystematics and genetic resources of the genus Vigna subgenus Ceratotropis. In: The Seventh MAFF International Workshop on Genetic Resources. Part 1. Wild Legumes, [Vaughan D., Tomooka N. and Kaga A. (eds)], Ministry of Agriculture, Forestry and Fisheries and National Institute of Agrobiological Resources, Japan, pp. 37–62.
  27. Yimram, T., Somta, P. and Srinives, P. (2009) Genetic variation in cultivated mungbean germplasm and its implication in breeding for high yield. Field Crops Research, 11:260-266
Reviewed By

Download Article
In this Article
    Contact us
    Follow us

    Editorial Board

    View all (0)