Genetic divergence and stability (AMMI) study in chickpea (Cicer aeritinum L.) under north western Himalayas of Jammu and Kashmir, India

DOI: 10.18805/lr.v0iOF.8410    | Article Id: A-4473 | Page : 842-845
Citation :- Genetic divergence and stability (AMMI) study in chickpea (Cicer aeritinum L.)under north western Himalayas of Jammu and Kashmir, India.Legume Research.2017.(40):842-845
Sanjeev Kumar, Praveen Singh and Magdeshwar Sharma ssalgotra@gmail.com
Address :

Krishi Vigyan Kendra, Poonch, Sher-e-Kashmir University of Agricultural Sciences and Technology of Jammu, Jammu-180 009, Jammu and Kashmir, India.

Submitted Date : 18-07-2015
Accepted Date : 2-01-2016


Genetic diversity of seventeen chickpea genotypes was studied through Mahalanobis D2, Tocher’s Method. The genotypes under study fall into five clusters. The cluster- IInd contained the highest number of genotypes (08) and Cluster IV and V contained the lowest (01). Cluster- II produced the highest mean value for days to maturity. The inter-cluster distances were much higher than the intra-cluster distances. Cluster-V exhibited the highest intra-cluster distance while the lowest distance was observed in cluster-IV and V. The highest inter-cluster distance was observed between cluster-III and V while the lowest was between cluster-I and IV. Considering all the characters, it is suggested that the genotypes 81-0-800, C-306, 96907, C-235 and SCS-3 could be used as parents for future breeding programmes to develop high yielding varieties of chickpea. As per AMMI model, two genotypes i.e. C-81 and 96911 were identified as having wider adaptability along with
higher seed yield per plant. 


Chickpea D2 statistics Genetic divergence Intra and inter-cluster distance


  1. Chowdhary, M.A., Vanderberg V. and Warkentin, T. (2002). Cultivar identification and genetic relationship among selected breeding lines and cultivars in chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.). Euphytica 172: 317-325.
  2. Devi, L.S., Das, A., Pandey, M.K. and Kole, C.R. (2004). Studies on genetic variability and divergence in rice: Extended Summery, Int. Symp. on rice: From Green Revolution to Gene Revolution. Oct. 04-06, DRR, Hyderabad, India.94 p.
  3. Fentie, M., Assefa, A. and Belete, K. (2013). AMMI analysis of yield performance and stability of finger millet genotypes across different environments. World J. Agric. Sci., 9: 231-237.
  4. Jodha, N.S. and Subba Rao, K.V.(1987). The Chickpea. In: Chickpea: World Importance and Distribution (Eds: M. C. Saxena and K. B. Singh), CAB International, Wallingford, Oxon, UK. pp 1-10.
  5. Lal, D., Ram Krishna and Gurpreet, S. (2001). Genetic divergence in chickpea. Ind. J. Pulses Res., 14: 63-64.
  6. Mahalanobis, P.C. (1928). A statistical study at Chinese head measurement. Man in India 8: 32-64.
  7. Mahalanobis, P.C. (1936). On the generalized distance in statistics. Proc. Nat. Inst. Sci. India. 2: 49-55.
  8. Murty, B.R. and Arunachalam, V. (1996). The nature of divergence in relation to breeding system in some crop plants. Indian J. Genet. Plant Breed., 26: 188-198.
  9. Osiru, M.O., Olayana, O.M., Adipala, E., Kapinga, R. and Lemaga, B. (2009). Yield stability of Ipomoea batatus L. cultivars in diverse environments. Australian J. Crop Sci., 3: 213-220.
  10. Rao, C.R. (1952). Advanced Statistical Methods in Biometrical Research. John Wiley and Sons, New York. pp 45-110.
  11. Saxena, M.P., Goldworthy, R. and Righer, N.M. (2001). Chickpea. The Physiology of Tropical Field Crops. John Willey and Sons. 419-452 pp.
  12. Singh, R.K. and Chaudhary, B.P. (1985). Biometrical methods of quantitative genetic analysis. Haryana J. Hort. Sci. 12: 151-156.
  13. Syed, M.A., Islam, M.R., Hossain, M.S., Alam, M.M. and Amin, M.N. (2012). Genetic divergence in chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.). Bangladesh J. Agric. Res., 37: 129-136.
  14. Vavilov, N.I. (1926). Studies on the Origin of Cultivated plants. Leningrad: Inst. Appl . Bot. Plant. Breed, 1926. 

Global Footprints